簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 馬維妮
Virginie Marc
論文名稱: A Study of the Effect of National Culture Value and Self-Efficacy on Organizational Commitment in Haiti
指導教授: 蔡錫濤
Tsai, Shir-Tau
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 國際人力資源發展研究所
Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 114
中文關鍵詞: 國際文化價值自我效能組織承諾海地
英文關鍵詞: National Culture Value, Self-Efficacy, Organizational Commitment, Haiti
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:238下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • This thesis would not have been possible without the tremendous encouragement of family and friends, the guidance of professors, and strength from the Lord, to all of whom I am heartily thankful. I am very grateful to the International Cooperation Development Fund (ICDF) who had provided me the opportunity to get my Master’s Degree at the National Taiwan Normal University by their financial support. My thanks go to my University which has provided us a sane environment with facilities for studying, and to the office team who had been always there for me that I’m so grateful for their patience and tolerance. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my academic and thesis advisor, Dr. Ted Shir-Tau Tsai who has been devoted to guide and support me kindly throughout the process. Without his expertise, and willingness to help by his suggestion, encouragement, and other support, this study could not have been completed.
    Besides, I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Steven Chih-Chien Lai and Dr. Chen Farn-Shing, who appreciated my efforts of researcher and gave me healthy comments, and suggestions to improve my Thesis in which they had mentioned as a good source of information about Haiti. Also, I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the other professors who help me with a more understanding about my topic.
    Finally, an honorable mention goes to my families, my people in Haiti, and my friends for their understandings and supports on me in completing this Study. Without helps of the particular that mentioned above, I would face many difficulties while doing this research.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT I TABLES OF CONTENTS III LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VII CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 Background of the Study 1 Research Purposes 6 Research Question 6 Delimitations & Limitations 7 Definitions of Terms 7 CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW 9 Introduction to Haiti 9 National Culture Value 13 Self-Efficacy 23 Organizational Commitment 36 CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY 45 Research Framework 45 Sample 46 Research Hypothesis 46 Data Collection 48 Instrument 48 Reliability and Validity 49 Data Analysis 51 Research Procedure 52 CHAPTER IV. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS 55 Profile of Respondents 55 Descriptive Statistic 57 National Culture Value (5 Dimensions) 61 Hypotheses (testing) 70 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 89 Conclusion 89 Recommendations 91 Implications for Future Research 94 Contributions of the Study 94 REFERENCES 96 APPENDICES 103 APPENDIX A: Questionnaire (Haitian Creole’ Translation) 103 APPENDIX B: Questionnaire (English) 109 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1. Factor Analysis and Reliability Results for the Motivational 51 Table 3.2. Coding System used in SPSS 52 Table 4.1 Descriptive Data for Males and Females Respondents 55 Table 4.2. Descriptive Data for Respondent's Group of Age 56 Table 4.3. Descriptive Analysis for Level of Education 56 Table 4.4. Descriptive Analysis for Type of Job 57 Table 4. 5. Descriptive Analysis for Region 57 Table 4.6. Descriptive Statistics for Questionnaire Items 58 Table 4.7. Score for Five (5) Dimensions of Haitian National Culture System 61 Table 4.8. Score for 5 Dimensions of Haitian National Culture System between Groups of Age 63 Table4.9. Score for 5 Dimension of National Culture Value System between Educational Level 65 Table 4.10. Score for 5 Dimensions of National Culture Value System between Type of Job 66 Table 4.11. Score for Dimensions of National Culture Value System between Regions 68 Table 4.12. Cultural Dimensions - Comparison to Haiti 69 Table 4.13. T-test for Difference between Male and Female 70 Table 4.14. ANOVA for Difference between Group of Age 72 Table 4.15. ANOVA for Difference between Educational Levels 73 Table 4.16. ANOVA for Difference between Type of Job 74 Table 4.17. ANOVA for Difference among Regions 75 Table 4.18. T-test for Difference between Male and Female on Self-efficacy 76 Table 4.19. ANOVA for Difference between Group of Age on Self-efficacy 76 Table 4.20. ANOVA for Difference between Educational Levels 77 Table 4.21. ANOVA for Difference between Type of Job on Self-efficacy 78 Table 4.22. ANOVA for Difference between Regions on Self-efficacy 78 Table 4.23. T-test for Difference between Male and Female on Organizational Commitment 79 Table 4.24. ANOVA for Difference between Group of Age on Organizational Commitment 79 Table4.25. ANOVA for Difference between Educational Level on Organizational Commitment 80 Table 4.26. ANOVA for Difference between Type of Job on Organization Commitment 81 Table 4.27. ANOVA for Difference between Region on Organizational Commitment 82 Table4.28. Correlation between Average of National Value System and Organizational Commitment 82 Table 4.29. Correlation between Average Organizational Commitment and Self-efficacy 83 Table 4.30. Correlation Between Average of National Value System and Self-Efficacy 83 Table 4.31. Correlation between Average of National Value System, Self-efficacy, and Average Organizational Commitment 84 Table 4.32. Model Summary----H7 (Both Self-Efficacy and National Value System would have no Effect on Organizational Commitment) 84 Table 4.33. Correlation between Religion and Organization Commitment 85 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3. 1 Research Framework 46 Figure 3.2 Research Procedures 53 Figure 4.1 Score for Five (5) Dimensions of Haitian National Culture System 61 Figure 4.2 Score for 5 Dimensions of Haitian National Culture System between Groups of Age 64 Figure 4.3 Score for 5 Dimensions of National Culture Value System between Educational Levels 65 Figure 4.4 Score for 5 Dimension of National Culture Value System between Types of Job 67 Figure 4.5 Score for Dimensions of National Culture Value System between Regions 68

    Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252-276.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2),122-147.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2(2), 128-163.
    Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies1-45. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Bandura, A., & Wood, R.E. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805-814.
    Bettina, L.B. (1999). Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Career Development. (clearing house on Adult,Career, and Vocational Educational). Eric Digest. Edoc-ce-99-205
    Bishop, J. W., & Scott, K. D. (2000). An Examination of Organizational and Team Commitment in a Self-Directed Team Environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 439-450.
    Bond, et al. (2004). Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(5), 548-570.
    Bong, M. & Clark (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 139-153.
    Boyer, D. A., Zollo, J. S., Thompson, C. M., Vancouver, J. B., Shewring, K., & Sims, E. (2000,June). A quantitative review of the effects of manipulated self-efficacy on performance.Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society,Miami, FL.
    Chase, M. A., Feltz, D. L., Tully, D. C., & Lirgg, C. D. (1994). Sources of collective and individual efficacy in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16, S18
    Child, J. (1981) ‘Culture, Contingency and Capitalism in the Cross-National Study of Organisations’. Chapter in Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (eds.), Research in Organisational Behaviour. Vol. 3. Greenwich, Connecticut. JAI Press. 303-56.
    David, A. R., David, H. H., Robert, H.T., & Yu, K.C. (1997). The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: study of the United States, Russia, Japan,and China. Journal of International Business Studies 28(1), 8-26
    de Mooij, M. (2004). Consumer behavior and culture: consequences for global marketing and advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.
    Detary, T. J. (2003). The relationship between self-efficacy, optimism, and organizational ncommitment among registered nurses in a long-term milieu. Ann Arbor, Mich: ProQuest Information and Learning.
    Feltz, D. L. (1988). Self-confidence and sports performance. In K. B. Pandolf (Ed.), Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 423-457. New York: Macmillan.
    Feltz, D. L. (1994). Self-confidence and performance. In D. Druckman & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Learning, remembering, believing. 173-206. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Sciences Press.
    Feltz, D. L., & Chase, M. A. (1998). The measurement of self-efficacy and confidence in sport.In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advancements in sport and exercise psychology measurement 63-78. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
    Finegan, J. (2000). The impact of person and organizational values on organizational. Journal of occupation and organizational psychology, 73 (2), 149-169. Retrieve from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-63263888.html. May 12 2009
    Garry, A. G., Paul, D., & Patrick, G. (2006). National differences in organizational commitment:effect of economy, product of personality, or consequence of culture? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37( 5), 542-556.
    Gary, Johns, Alan M.Saks. (6th). (2004). Organizational Behavior: Understanding and Managing Life at Work. Alton, IL, U.S.A: Prentice Hall.
    Gould, D., Greenleaf, C., Lauer, L., & Chung, Y. (1999). Lessons from Nagano. Olympic Coach, 9 (3), 2-5.
    Groeschl, S. & Doherty, L. 2000. ‘Conceptualizing culture’, Cross Cultural Management - An International Journal, 7(4), 12-17.
    Hampden-Turner, C. & Trompenaars, F. (1997) Response to Geert Hofstede. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(1), 149-159.
    Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
    Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
    Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture and organizations: Software of the Mind. Retrieved from http://www.psychicsahar.com/artman/publish/printer_77.shtml Hofstede, G. 1983. ‘National culture in four dimensions’. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(2), 46-74.
    Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture Consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Hofstede, G. (1998). Identifying organizational subcultures: An empirical approach. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1): 1-12.
    Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4-21.
    Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2nd ed.). (2005) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
    Hofstede,G.(2nd ed.) (2001) Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Holden, G. (1991). The relationship of self-efficacy appraisals to subsequent health related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Work in Health Care, 16(1), 53-93.
    Holden, G., Moncher, M. S., Schinke, S. P., & Barker, K. M. (1990). Self-efficacy of children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 66(1), 1044-1046.
    Hoppe, M. H. (1990). A comparative study of country elites: International differences in work related values and learning and their implications for management training and development. A Ph.D. dissertation presented in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
    House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (eds) (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 Societies. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
    Information of self-efficacy. (2008). Retrieved from http://des.emory.edu/mfp/self-efficacy.html. January 20 2009.
    Inkeles, A., & Levinson. (1954). National character: the study of modal personality and socio-cultural systems. In G Lindzey (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology Vol. 2: Special Fields and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Addison – Wesley.
    Institut Haitien de statistique et d’Informatique-IHSI (2007). Retrieved from http://www.ihsi.ht/publication.htm. January 15 2009
    Irandokht, A. S., & Promila V. (2006). Self-Efficacy and Self-esteem: A Comparative Study of Employed and Unemployed Married Women in Iran. The German Journal of Psychiatry,ISSN 1433-1055
    Kluckhohn, C. (1951). The study of culture. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell(Eds.). The policy science. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.
    Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. New York: Harper Collins. London. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Laura, R., & Aaron W. (2007). Measuring self-efficacy in music. International Symposium on Performance Science.
    Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application, 3-33. New York:Plenum.
    Maddux, J.E., & Meier, L.J. (1995). Self-efficacy and depression. In J.E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. 143-172. New York: Plenum.
    Mathieu & Zajac. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates,and consequences organizational commitment, Psychological Bulletin, 108 (2), p.174.
    McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis, Human Relations, 55(1), 89-118, Jan. 2002.
    Merritt, A. (2000). Culture in the cockpit: Do Hofstede’s dimensions replicated? Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 31(3), 283-301, 2000.
    Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch & Topolnytsky (2002). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
    Michael, D. M., & Felix B. T. (2002). Beyond models of national culture in information systems research. Journal of Global Information Management, 10(2).
    Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R., & Mack, D. E. (2000). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(3), 280-294.
    Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Mack, D., & Fahrbach, K. (in press). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.
    Mouritzen, P.E., & Svara, J.H. (2002). Leadership at the apex: Politicians and Administrators in Western local governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: the psychology of commitment absenteeism, and turnover, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30-38.
    Nimwegen, T.V. (2002). Global banking, global values: the in-house reception of the corporate values of ABN AMRO. Ph.D dissertation, Nyenrode University, Delft: Eburon.
    Ooi, K.B., & Veeri, A. (2006). The influence of corporate culture on organization commitment: case study of semiconductor organizations in Malaysia. Sunway Academic Journal, 17(3), 99-115
    Poole, M. (1986). Industrial relations: Origins and patterns of national diversity. London. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Sadri, G., & Robertson, I. T. (1993). Self-efficacy and work-related behavior: A review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42(2), 139-152.
    Schwartz, S.H. (1999). A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48 (1), 23–47
    Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1992). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organizational Science, 4(4), 577-594.
    Shane, S. A. (1995). Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. Journal on International Business Studies, 26(2), 47-68, 1995.
    Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.
    Trompenaars, F. & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business (Second Edition). London: Nicholas Brealey.
    Watson, C. B., & Chemers, M. M. (1998). The rise of shared perceptions: A multilevel analysis of collective efficacy. Paper presented at the Organizational Behavior Division for the Academy of Management Meeting, San Diego, CA.
    Witt, Ulrich (1998), Imagination and leadership - The neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35(2), 161-177.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE