簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳盈霖
Ying-Lin Chen
論文名稱: 探究臺灣中小學教師對於天然災害防災知識與態度素養調查
Exploring teachers' knowledge and attitudes on climatic hazard mitigation in Taiwan
指導教授: 張俊彥
Chang, Chun-Yen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 地球科學系
Department of Earth Sciences
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 地球科學調查天然災害天然災害中等教育天然災害淢災
英文關鍵詞: Earth science, survey, climatic hazard, nature hazard, middle education, climatic hazard mitigation
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:198下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,天然災害對於環境的破壞日趨嚴重,為了減低天然災害對民眾的傷害,教育部顧問室研擬中華民國國民對於天然災害減災的再教育,為了落實中小學的天然災害防災教育,本研究的主要目的在調查國內中小學教師對於颱風與水災態度與知識的素養為何?並且依據教師個人資料與教學環境也作進一步的交叉分析,以了解不同背景教師在防災素養差異所在。
    本次研究樣本採用分層隨機抽樣的方法進行取樣,在2004年中全國公私立中小學總共有3,647所,其中小學佔2,623所,國中720所,高中304所。國小取樣比率為5%,國高中各25%取樣,共選出387所學校,先以電話調查,扣除不願意受測學校後,寄出333份問卷,回收183份問卷,回收率為55%。
    由此次調查結果中顯示出,大部分的教師年齡集中在31~40歲;且大部分在國高中教授天然災害課程師資大多數是由地球科學相關科系畢業的,但國小則大部分都是非相關科系的教師。而且大多數的教師,認為學校課程內關於防災知識、技能和態度的部分皆不充足。
    在防災態度方面,雖然國小教師優於國高中教師,雖未達顯著僅有低度的實驗效果量(t(183)=0.77, p=0.45, d=0.12, a small effect size)。但在防災知識部分,國高中教師組皆顯著地優於國小教師組且具有高度的實驗效果量(t(183)=-5.20, p=0.00, d=0.81);在防災基本概念部分(t(183)=-6.05, p=0.00, d=0.92);防災常識部分,國高中教師組顯著地優於國小教師組且具有中度的實驗效果量, t(183)=-2.73, p=0.01, d=0.43)。

    This study reports the results of a survey of knowledge and perceptions of climatic hazard mitigation among primary and secondary climatic hazard mitigation (CHM) teachers in Taiwan. This was accomplished by examining their general CHM knowledge and exploring their attitudes toward CHM. The Climatic Hazard Mitigation Inventory (CHMI) was developed by us and content validated by a panel of experts including three university professors and two high school teachers. The CHMI instrument consists of five subtests (80 items) and was piloted by administering it to a group of 28 pre-service earth science teachers in an institute of teacher education. It was also employed to survey 183 in-service primary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan. The CHMI instrument was found to be an appropriate measure to examine teacher’s knowledge of and attitudes toward CHM. The results of the survey also suggest that both primary school teachers and secondary school teachers hold generally positive attitudes toward CHM and possess a reasonable level of CHM knowledge. It is noted, however, that significant differences existed on teachers’ knowledge between primary and secondary teachers.

    TALBE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I................................................1 INTRODUCTION...........................................1 Statement of the Problem...............................1 Purpose of the Study...................................2 Research Questions.....................................2 Importance of the study................................2 Definition of Terms....................................3 Delimitations and Limitations..........................5 Summary................................................6 CHAPTER II...............................................7 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE...........................7 CHAPTER III.............................................13 METHODOLOGY...........................................13 Overview..............................................13 Pilot Study...........................................13 Main Study............................................15 Population, Sample and Site...........................15 Instrumentation.......................................16 Data Collection Procedure.............................19 Data Analysis.........................................20 Research Procedures...................................21 Summary...............................................23 CHAPTER IV..............................................24 Overview..............................................24 Results...............................................25 Results of Investigation I: The personal information of primary and secondary school CHM teachers.......25 Results of Investigation II: The current instructional setting of primary and secondary schools of CHM.....27 Results of Investigation III: The attitudes toward CHM in primary and secondary school CHM teachers in Taiwan..............................................36 Results of Investigation IV: The CHM knowledge in primary and secondary school CHM teachers in Taiwan.42 Results of Investigation V: The personal information of primary school CHM teachers......................43 Results of Investigation VI: The teachers' current instructional setting of primary schools of CHM.....44 Results of Investigation VII: The CHM attitudes in primary school CHM teachers in Taiwan...............54 Results of Investigation VIII: The CHM knowledge in primary school CHM teachers in Taiwan...............59 Results of Investigation IX: The personal information of secondary school CHM teachers....................60 Results of Investigation X: The teachers’ current of instructional setting of secondary schools of CHM...62 Results of Investigation XI: The CHM attitudes in secondary school CHM teachers in Taiwan.............71 Results of Investigation XII: The CHM knowledge in secondary school CHM teachers in Taiwan.............76 Results of Investigation XIII: Differences in CHM attitudes and CHM knowledge between primary and secondary school CHM teachers in Taiwan.............77 Summary...............................................79 CHAPTER V...............................................80 Overview..............................................80 Conclusions and Discussions...........................80 Investigation I: Background information...............81 Investigation II: Current instructional settings......82 Investigation III: Attitudes toward CHM...............85 Investigation IV: CHM knowledge.......................86 Future Research.......................................87 Summary...............................................87 Reference...............................................89 Appendix A. The panel of experts validated the CHMI.....95 Appendix B: Climatic Hazard Mitigation Inventory........96 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of Mean, Standard deviation of the Attitudes toward CHM and CHM knowledge scores (n=28).........................................15 Table 2. The Characteristics of Sample subjects participated in the study......................16 Table 3. Subtests of Climatic Hazard Mitigation Inventory......................................17 Table 4. Reliability coefficients of Climatic Hazard Mitigation Inventory...........................18 Table 5. Summary of Mean, Standard deviation and reliability coefficients (n=183) of the Attitudes toward CHM and CHM knowledge scores..19 Table 6. Characteristics of the Primary and Secondary school CHM teaching Force (n=183)..............26 Table 7. Characteristics of the Teaching and Current situation of the Course related to Precautions against natural calamities in Primary and Secondary school (n=183).......................28 Table 8. Summary of Teaching and Assessment on Natural calamity precaution of Primary and Secondary school teachers(n=183).........................32 Table 9. Summary of Professional development opportunities of primary and secondary school teachers (n=183)........................35 Table 10. Summary of Attitude toward CHM (n=183)........36 Table 11. Summary of Primary and Secondary school Teachers’ Perceptions of CHM (n=183).........37 Table 12. Summary of Climatic Hazard Mitigation Inventory (CHMI) (n=183)......................42 Table 13. Characteristics of the Primary school CHM teaching Force (n=62).........................43 Table 14. Main teaching subject that Primary school teachers teach................................44 Table 15. Characteristics of the Teaching and current situation of the Course related to Precautions against natural calamities in primary schools (n=62)........................................46 Table 16. Summary of Teaching and Assessment on Natural calamity precaution of Primary school teachers (n=62)...............................50 Table 17. Summary of Professional development opportunities of Primary school teachers (n=62)........................................52 Table 18. Summary of Attitude toward CHM (n=62).........54 Table 19. Summary of Primary school teachers’ Perceptions of CHM (n=62).....................55 Table 20. Summary of Climatic Hazard Mitigation Inventory (CHMI) (n=62).......................60 Table 21. Characteristics of the Secondary school CHM teaching Force. (n=121).......................60 Table 22. Main teaching subject that Secondary school teachers Teach................................61 Table 23. Characteristics of the Teaching and Current situation of the Course related to Precautions against natural calamities in Secondary schools (n=121).......................................63 Table 24. Summary of Teaching and Assessment on Natural calamity precaution of Secondary school teachers (n=121)..............................67 Table 25. Summary of Professional development opportunities of Secondary school teachers (n=121).......................................70 Table 26. Summary of Attitude toward CHM (n=121)........71 Table 27. Summary of Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of CHM (n=121)....................72 Table 28. Summary of Climatic Hazard Mitigation Inventory (CHMI) (n=121)......................77 Table 29. Summary of t-test on teachers’ mean scores of the CHMI between Primary and Secondary school teachers (n=183)..............................79 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Summary of Research Design and Procedures.....22

    Bandy, R., Johnson, A., Peek, L., and Sutton, J., 2004, Public hazards communication annotated bibliography: Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado.
    Chang, C. Y., 2000, Enhancing tenth graders' earth-science learning through computer-assisted instruction: Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 48, p. 636-640.
    -, 2001a, Comparing the impacts of a problem-based computer-assisted instruction and the direct-interactive teaching method on student science achievement: Journal of Science Education and Technology, v. 10, no. 2, p. 147-153.
    -, 2001b, A problem-solving based computer-assisted tutorial for the Earth sciences: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 17, p. 263-274.
    -, 2002, Does computer-assisted instruction + problem solving = improved science outcomes? A pioneer study: The Journal of Educational Research, v. 95, no. 3, p. 143-150.
    Chang, C.Y. & Barufaldi, J. (1999) The use of a problem solving based instructional model in initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 373–388.
    Chang, C.Y. & Mao, S.L. (1999) Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 340–346.
    Clark, R. (1983) Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.
    Clark, R. (1985) Confounding in educational computing research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 137–148.
    Clark, R. (1994) Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21–29.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Dori, Y. J., and Barnea, N., 1997, In-service chemistry teachers' are training: The impact of introducing computer technology on teachers' attitudes and classroom implementation: International Journal of Science Education, v. 19, p. 577-592.
    Ferguson, N.H. & Chapman, S.R. (1993) Computer-assisted instruction for introductory genetics. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 22, 145–152.
    Geban, O., Askar, P. & Ozkan, I. (1992) Effects of computer simulations and problem-solving approaches on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 5–10.
    Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3 ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Hamilton, R., and Gingiss, P. L., 1993, The relationship of teacher attitudes to course implementation and student responses: Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 9, p. 193-204.
    Henkel, E.T. (1968) Undergraduate physics instruction and critical thinking ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 89–95.
    Hughes, W.R. (1974) A study of the use of computer simulated experiments in the physics classroom. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1, 1–6.
    Kulinna, P. H., and Silverman, S., 2000, Teachers' attitudes toward teaching physical activity and fitness: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, v. 71, p. 80-84.
    Lee, T. Y., Yang, F. Y., Hsu, Y. S., Chang, C. Y., Jean, W. Y., and Hsu, M. Y., 2002, In search of a comprehensive natural hazard mitigation curriculum for pre-college student- earthquake for example, in Canada-Taiwan natural hazards mitigation workshop, p. 115-117.
    Levine, T. (1994) A computer-based program can make a difference: The case of the Rediscover Science program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 283–296.
    Mileti, D., Nathe, S., Gori, P., Greene, M., and Lemersal, E., 2004a, Public hazards communication and education: The state of the art: Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado.
    Mileti, D., Sutton, J., Sorensen, J., and Vogt, B., 2004b, Public hazards communication bibliography: Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado.
    Ministry of Education, 2001, The 1-9 grades science and life technology curriculum standards: Taipei, MOE.
    Morrell, D. (1992) The effects of computer assisted instruction on student achievement in high school biology. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 177–181.
    Mulopo, M.M. & Fowler, H.S. (1987) Effects of traditional and discovery instruction approaches on learning outcomes for learners of different intellectual development. A study of chemistry students in Zambia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 217–227.
    Olugbemiro, J. (1991) Computers and the learning of biological concepts, attitudes and achievement of Nigerian students. Science Education, 75, 701–706.
    Probart, C. M., Achterberg, E., and Anger, C., 1997, Evaluation of implementation of an interdisciplinary nutrition curriculum in middle schools: Journal of Nutrition Education, v. 29, p. 203-209.
    Rennie, L. J. (1998). Improving the interpretation and reporting of quantitative research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 237-248.
    Russell, J.M. & Chiappetta, E.L. (1981) The effects of a problem solving strategy on the achievement of earth science students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 295–301.
    Stevens, J. P., 2002, Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 699 p.
    Summerlin, L. & Gardner, M. (1973) A Study of tutorial-type computer assisted instruction in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10, 75–82.
    Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 26-30.
    Whiting, J. (1985) The use of a computer tutorial as a replacement for human tuition in a mastery learning strategy. Computers and Education, 9, 101–109.
    Yalcinalp, S., Geban, O. & Ozkan, I. (1995) Effectiveness of using computer-assisted supplementary instruction for teaching the mole concept. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 1083–1095.
    Wainwright, C.L. (1989) The effectiveness of a computer-assisted instruction package in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 275–290.

    QR CODE