本研究參考Skinner、Pitzer和Steele（2013）動機性復原力模式，提出以學業自主性動機為自變項，學業復原力、學業投入與不投入為中介變項，而因應方式為依變項的假設模式，以745位國中生，男生368位（49.4%），女生376位（50.5%）為正式研究對象，探討各變項的關係。測量工具包含：學業自主性動機量表、學業復原力量表、學業投入與不投入量表、多向度（六類）因應方式量表四種。統計方法主要為獨立樣本t考驗、皮爾森績差相關、階層式迴歸分析和路徑分析進行統計考驗。根據研究假設所得之結果如下：
1.性別在學業復原力、學業不投入、自我激勵、混亂、逃避和反芻思考有顯著差異，其中混亂和反芻思考是女生多於男生，而學業復原力、學業不投入、自我激勵和逃避則是男生多於女生。年級在學業不投入總分、行為不投入、情緒不投入－無聊，以及情緒不投入－挫折、憂慮、煩惱上有顯著差異，皆為國二生高於國一生。
2.學業自主性動機、學業復原力與策略化、尋求協助、自我激勵因應方式具有正向關連；學業自主性動機與混亂、逃避因應方式具有負向關連，學業復原力與混亂、反芻思考因應方式具有負向關連。學業復原力、學業投入與策略化、尋求協助、自我激勵因應方式具有正向關連；學業復原力與混亂、反芻思考因應方式具有負向關連，學業不投入與混亂、逃避、反芻思考因應方式具有正向關連。
3.學業自主性動機與學業復原力對不同因應方式具有預測力，同時學業自主性動機與學業投入（或不投入）各變項對不同因應方式具有預測力，只是各因應方式之預測因子有些許差異。
4.學業復原力在學業自主性動機和自我激勵、逃避間具有正向中介效果，又分別負向中介學業自主性動機和尋求協助、混亂和反芻思考之影響。
5.學業投入在學業自主性動機和策略化、尋求協助和自我激勵之間具有中介效果，在學業自主性動機與混亂之間有負向中介效果，並且接近顯著地負向中介逃避。
6.學業不投入在學業自主性動機和尋求協助之間具有負向中介效果，並分別在學業自主性動機與混亂、逃避和反芻思考間有正向中介之影響。
7.雙中介變項之學業復原力、學業投入對學業自主性動機分別和策略化、尋求協助和自我激勵因應方式之間具有正向間接效果，同樣對學業自主性動機和混亂間具有負向間接效果。
　　最後，根據研究結果提出本研究之建議，並提供教育與輔導人員在實務工作之參考。

This study refers to the motivational resilience model of Skinner, Pitzer and Steele (2013), and proposes a hypothesis model, using academic autonomous motivation as the independent variable, academic resilience, and academic engagement and disaffection as mediation variables, and ways of coping as the dependent variable. Taking 745 middle school students, including 368 (49.4%) male students and 376 (50.5%) female students as the research object, to explore the relationship between each variable. The four research tools used were Academic Autonomous Motivation Scale, Academic Engagement and Disaffection Scale, Academic Resilience Scale, and Multidimensional (six ways) Measure of Coping Scale. In order to verify the hypothesis, an independent sample t test, Pearson correlation, hierarchical regression, and path analysis were used for statistical test. The results based on the research hypothesis are as follows:
1.There are significant differences in gender in academic resilience, disaffection, self-encouragement, confusion, escape and rumination. Among them, girls show more confusion and rumination than boys, while boys show more academic resilience, disaffection, self-encouragement and escape than girls. Grade also has significant differences in disaffection total score, behavioral disaffection, emotional disaffection-boring, and emotional disaffection-frustration/worried/troubled, all of which showed that eighth grade students are higher than seventh grade students.
2.Academic autonomous motivation and academic resilience have positive correlations with strategizing, help-seeking, and self-encouragement; academic autonomous motivation is negatively related with confusion and escape, simultaneously, academic resilience relates with confusion and rumination negatively. Moreover, academic resilience and academic engagement are positively related with strategizing, help-seeking, and self-encouragement; academic resilience shows negative correlation with confusion and rumination, and disaffection displays positive correlation with confusion, rumination, and escape.
3.Academic autonomous motivation and academic resilience are predictive of different ways of coping, while academic autonomous motivation and the subvariables of academic engagement (or disaffection) are also predictive of different ways of coping, but the prediction factors of each coping way are slightly different.
4.Academic resilience positively mediates between academic autonomous motivation and self-encouragement, and escape; moreover, negatively mediates between academic autonomous motivation with help-seeking, confusion and rumination.
5.Academic engagement is a positive mediator between academic autonomous motivation and strategizing, help-seeking, and self-encouragement, and is a negative mediator between academic autonomous motivation and confusion, and also to escape, which the effect was close to significant.
6.Disaffection negatively mediates between academic autonomous motivation and help-seeking, and positively mediates the effects of academic autonomous motivation to confusion, escape and rumination.
7.The dual mediation variables, which are academic resilience and academic engagement, have a positive indirect effect on the influence from academic autonomous motivation toward strategizing, help-seeking, and self-encouragement, and also have a negative indirect effect on academic autonomous motivation toward confusion.
　Finally, based on the research results, recommendations are proposed for educators and counselors in practical work.

一、中文參考文獻
王春展（2005）。國中生情緒智慧憂鬱與情緒調整策略之研究。嘉南藥理科技大學專題研究計畫。
王昭琪、蕭文（2007）。國中生之生活壓力、憂鬱經驗與復原力之相關研究。生活科學學報，11，1-31。
王蓁蓁（1999）。台北縣國中生之壓力源、因應方式與生活適應之相關研究。臺灣師範大學碩士論文。
吳永裕（1995）。單親兒童之親子關係、行為困擾與學習適應研究。國立臺北教育大學碩士論文。
吳明隆（2014）。SPSS操作與應用－問卷統計分析實務。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳姿音（2014）。學習動機、學習壓力與學習滿意度的關聯性研究－以觀光與休閒管理系的學生為例。中州管理與人文科學學刊，2（2），54-70。
李宜玫、 孫頌賢（2010）。大學生選課自主性動機與學習投入之關係。教育科學研究期刊，55（1），155-182。
李金治、陳政友（2004）。國立臺灣師範大學四年級學生生活壓力、因應方式、社會支持與其身心健康之相關研究。學校衛生，44，1-31。
李承傑、魏琦芳、董旭芳（2017）。「護理學生學業復原力量表」之發展與信效度檢定。護理雜誌，64（5），30-39。
李建德（2018）。中部三縣市國中八年級學生理化科學業投入與學業復原力關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文。
林啟超（2011）。課室支持與高職學生學業涉入相關因素徑路模式之檢驗。測驗統計年刊，19，33-55。
林啟超、謝智玲（2018）。高職學生知覺教師心理支持、情境興趣、個人興趣與課業投入間關係之探究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，11（1），123-153。
師彥潔（2011）。高中生日常性學業復原力與自尊、社會支持的關係。河南大學碩士論文。
徐畢卿、黎士鳴（1999）。認識創傷後壓力症候群。護理雜誌，46（6），13-19。
教育部統計處（2018）。106學年度國民中小學學生數—依年級別查詢。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=NgA4AA2。
張芳慈、陳淑瑜（2017）。國小高年級學生的學習適應與學習動機關係之試探性研究－以新竹市一所國小為例。清華教育學報，34（1），105-161。
張琋婷（2012）。國中生數學之課業壓力、學業復原力、因應策略與數學學業成就關係之研究－以花東地區為例。國立東華大學碩士論文。
張景媛（1988）。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。教育心理學報，21，113-172。
張筱涵（2011）。國中生自我價值、行動/狀態導向對逃避策略的預測暨課室目標結構的調節效果。成功大學碩士論文。
陳秋儀（1998）。國民中學中輟復學生所知覺的問題、因應方式與學校生活適應之分析研究。彰化師範大學碩士論文。
許崇憲（2010）。他們為什麼比較用功？－檢驗學業動機與復原力的解釋力。中華心理學刊，52（2），155-171。
曾文志（2005）。戰勝逆境的秘訣—兒童發展的保護因子與機制。師友月刊， 459，33-39。
曾文志（2006）。復原力保護因子效果概化之統合分析。諮商輔導學報—高師輔導所刊，14，1-35。
黃弘彰（2007）。國小外籍配偶子女社會支持、自我概念與學習適應之相關研究。國立嘉義大學碩士論文。
黃景立（2011）。國中生課業壓力.自我概念.學業復原力與學業成就之關係。國立屏東科技大學碩士論文。
黃琬玲（2004）。東南亞外籍配偶子女的家庭環境與學習適應情形之研究。國立臺北教育大學碩士論文。
詹雨臻、葉玉珠、彭月茵和葉碧玲（2009）。「青少年復原力量表」之發展。測驗學刊，56（4），491-518。
雷若莉、陳曉玫、林京芬、劉雪娥、 許淑蓮（2000）。Y世代護生實習壓力源、學習幫助與因應行為。長庚護理，11（4），11-23。
趙靜、李林英（2009）。大學生學業韌性量表的初步編制。北京理工大學學報（社會科學版），11（1），94-102。
蔡仁斌（2015）。高年級大學生父母教養態度、基本心理需求、生涯準備動機與生涯定向之關係。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文。
劉育春、陳柏霖、洪兆祥（2017）。以數學學業復原力為調節角色－國中生數學考試焦慮與數學學業成就之關係。課程與教學季刊，20（4），151-176。
劉春榮、吳清山、陳明終（1995）。都會原住民兒童生活適應與學習適應及其關聯研究。初等教育學刊，4，147-180。
簡嘉菱、程炳林（2013）。環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係。教育心理學報，44（3），713-734。

二、英文參考文獻
Alva, S. A. (1991). Academic invulnerability among Mexican-American students: The importance of protective and resources and appraisals. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 13, 18–34.
Anagnostaki, L., & Pavlopoulos, V., & Obradović, J., & Masten, A., & Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2016). Academic resilience of immigrant youth in Greek schools: Personal and family resources. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(3), 377-393.
Anthony, E. J. (1974). Introduction: The syndrome of the psychologically vulnerable child. In E. J. Anthony & C. Koupernik (Eds.), The child in his family: Children at psychiatric risk. (Vol.3, pp.3-10). New York: Wiley.
Bartley M., Schoon I., Mitchell R., & Blane, D. (2010). Resilience as an asset for healthy development. In A. Morgan, M. Davies, E. Ziglio (Eds.) Health Assets in a Global Context.New York, NY: Springer.
Benard, B. (1991). Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community. Portland, OR: Western Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities.
Benard, B. (1995). Fostering resilience in children. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED386327)
Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology. (Vol.13, pp.39-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cassidy, S. (2016). The academic resilience scale (ARS-30): A new multidimensional construct measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:1787.
Campbell, J. (1970). Myths, dreams, and religion. New York: Dutton.
Collie, R. J., Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., & Papworth, B. (2017). Academic buoyancy mediates academic anxiety’s effects on learning strategies: an investigation of English- and Chinese-speaking Australian students. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 947-964.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 39-80.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319-338.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-Determination Theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychological Association, 49(3), 182–185.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Optmizing students’ motivation in the era of testing and pressure: A self-determination theory perspective. In: W. Liu, J. Wang, & R. Ryan (Eds), Building Autonomous Learners. (chap.2, pp.2-29). Singapore: Springer.
Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221-234.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.97–132). New York, NY: Springer.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162.
Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. National Society for the Study of Education, 113(1), 101-123.
Hayamizu, T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 98-108.
Howell, C. L. (2004). Resilience in adult women students: Facilitating academic achievement and persistence. The Researcher, 18(1), 34-43.
Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder Jr., G. H. (2001). Students' attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 318-340.
Julien, E., Senécal, C., & Guay, F. (2009). Longitudinal relations among perceived autonomy support from health care practitioners, motivation, coping strategies and dietary compliance in a sample of adults with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3).
Kareepadath, R. S., Harifa, P. R., & Ruopfuvinuo , P. (2017). Academic resilience, locus of control, academic engagement and self-efficacy among the school children. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(4), 507-511.
Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Vallerand, R. J., & Carducci, D. (1996). Identified and introjected form of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1025-1036.
Koestner, R., & Zuckerman, M. (1994). Causality orientations, failure, and achievement. Personality, 62(3), 321-346.
Kuchinskas, G. (1979). Whose cognitive style makes the difference? Educational Leadership, 36(4), 269-71.
Li, H. (2017). The ‘secrets’ of Chinese students’ academic success: Academic resilience among students from highly competitive academic environments. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 1001-1014.
Liew, J., Cao, Q., Hughes, J. N., & Deutz, M. H. F. (2018). Academic resilience despite early academic adversity: A three-wave longitudinal study on regulation-related resiliency, interpersonal relationships, and achievement in first to third grade. Early Education & Development, 29(5), 762-779.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.
Martin, A. J. (2013). Academic buoyancy and academic resilience: Exploring ‘everyday’ and ‘classic’ resilience in the face of academic adversity. Sch. Psychol. Int., 34, 488–500.
Martin, A. J. & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267-281.
Martin, A. J. & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students' everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53-83.
Martin, A. J., Yu, K., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Young people’s academic buoyancy and adaptability: A cross-cultural comparison of China with North America and the United Kingdom. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 930-946.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238.
Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Dev. Psychopathol, 2, 425–444.
Masten, A. S., Cutuli, J. J., Herbers, J. E., & Reed, MG, J. (2009). Resilience in Development. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed.). (chap.12, pp.117-131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Newmann, F., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp.11-39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Niemiec, C. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Self-determination theory and the relation of autonomy to self-regulatory processes and personality development. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Personality and Self-Regulation. (pp.169-191). UK: Blackwell.
Niemiec, C. P., Lynch, M. F., Vansteenkiste, M., Bernstein, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). The antecedents and consequences of autonomous self-regulation for college: A self-determination theory perspective on socialization. Journal of Adolescence, 29(5), 761-775.
Parker, P. D. & Martin, A. J. (2009). Coping and buoyancy in the workplace: Understanding their effects on teachers' work-related well-being and engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 68-75.
Pitzer, J. R. (2015). Exploring the developmental dynamics of motivational resilience over the transition to middle school. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/2305.
Riley, J. R. & Masten, A. S. (2005). Resilience in context. In R. D. Peters, B. Leadbeater, & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Resilience in Children, Families, and Communities. (chap.13, pp.13-25). Boston, MA: Springer.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Grolnick, W. S. (1992). When achievement is not intrinsically motivated: A theory of internalization and sel-regulation in school. In A. K. Boggiano, & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Acheivement and Motivation: A social-developmental perspective. (pp.167-188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination Research. (chap.1, pp.3-33). NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557-1585.
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531-543.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422-445.
Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216-269.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school. (pp.223-245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Development dynamics of engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. (pp.21-44). New York: Springer Science.
Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J., & Brule, H. (2014). The role of emotion in engagement, coping and the development of motivation resilience. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in educations. (chap.17, pp.331-347). New York: Routledge.
Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J. R., & Steele, J. (2013). Coping as part of motivational resilience in school: A multidimensional measure of families, allocations, and profiles of academic coping. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(5), 803–835.
Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. In D. L. Featherman, R. M. Lerner, & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior. (Vol.12, pp.91-133). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Skinner, E. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2007). The development of coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 119–144.
Struthers, C. W., Perry, R. P., & Menec, V. H. (2000). An examination of the relationship among academic stress, coping, motivation, and performance in college. Research in Higher Education, 41(5), 581–592.
Tusaie, K., & Dyer, J. (2004). Resilience: A historical review of the construct. Holistic Nursing Practice, 18(1), 3-10.
Vallerand, R., J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol.29, pp.271-360). San Diego: Academic.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a reallife setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.
Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42(1), 1-18.
Waxman, H. C., & Huang, SY. L. (1996). Motivation and learning environment differences in inner-city middle school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(2), 93-102.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Little, T. D., & Sergeant, J. (2009). Self-determination. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed.). (chap.33, pp.357-366). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Williams, J. M., Bryan, J., Morrison, S., & Scott, T. R. (2017). Protective factors and processes contributing to the academic success of students living in poverty: Implications for counselors. Journal of Multicultural Counseling & Development, 45(3), 183-200.
Wong, M. M. (2000). The relations among causality orientations, academic experience, academic performance, and academic commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 315-326.
Yamauchi, H., & Tanaka, K. (1998). Relations of autonomy, self-referenced beliefs and self-regulated learning among Japanese children. Psychological Reports, 82, 803-816.
Zea, M. C., Jarama, S. L., & Bianchi, F. T. (1995). Social support and psychosocial competence: Explaining the adaptation to college of ethnically diverse students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(4), 509–531.