簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黎家睿
Li, Chia-Jui
論文名稱: 利用腦磁圖儀探討專家及生手在物理解題認知差異之研究
The Research of Utilizing Magnetoencephalography to Investigate Different Perspective in Physics Test between Experts and Layman
指導教授: 廖書賢
Liao, Shu-Hsien
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 光電工程研究所
Graduate Institute of Electro-Optical Engineering
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 71
中文關鍵詞: 腦磁圖儀系統物理試題專家及生手QU前後
英文關鍵詞: Magnetoencephalograph, Physical test, Experts and Layman, Before QU and After QU
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900577
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:126下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 為了探討專精者及生手對於作答物理試題的差異性,找了兩類族群進行物理試題實驗,相互比較。
    本研究使用全腦式306 陣列感測器腦磁圖儀系統及搭配眼動儀系統紀錄受試者在進行物理試題實驗時的腦磁訊號反應及眼部觀看題目時的歷程軌跡。由受試者作答物理試題實驗時,觀察專精者及生手觀看題目時及答題時腦區活化差異。本研究將同題型之物理試題實驗進行探討及深入研究,又將題目分割成QU前、QU後,QU前即代表受試者看到題目問題重點前的時間,QU後則代表看到題目問題重點後(包含QU)的時間。在實驗進行時,同時也記錄了受試者的眼動軌跡、作答紀錄、作答時間、眼動訊號、心跳訊號,以及腦磁信號,並在實驗結束後訪問受試者作答歷程。
    實驗發現專家及生手於實驗QU前後在特定活化腦區強度有所不同,而在計算大腦活化源連接性也發現,專家與生手在活化源連通區域也有所不同。

    In order to explore the differences between the experts and the layman in answering the physical questions, two groups of people were asked to conduct physical test experiments and compare them with each other.

    This research, We used a whole head sensor array (306 channels) magnetoencephalograph and the eye tracker system were used to record the brain trajectory response of the subject during the physical test experiment and the trajectory of the eye when reading exams. When the subject answers the physics test, observe the differences in brain activation between the experts and the layman when reading exams and answering the question. This research will discuss and in-depth study of the physical test of the same type of question, and divide the title into before QU and after QU. The QU represents the time before the subject sees the problem, and the QU represents the subjects. The time after the problem is focused (including QU). During the experiment, the subject's eye movement trajectory, answer record, answer time, eye movement signal, heartbeat signal, and brain magnetic signal were also recorded, and the subject was interviewed after the experiment.

    Experiments have found that experts and raw hands have different strengths in specific activated brain regions before and after the experiment QU. However, in calculating the connectivity of brain activation sources, it is also found that experts and raw hands are different in the activation source connectivity region.

    致謝 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目錄 iv 1. 緒論 1 1.1研究動機 1 1.2腦磁圖儀系統研究 2 2. 實驗原理 5 2.1物理試題 5 2.2大腦皮質介紹 6 3. 儀器介紹與實驗設計 10 3.1腦磁圖儀系統 10 3.2受試者 11 3.3頭部座標之標定 12 3.4實驗設計 17 3.5眼動儀系統 19 3.6腦磁訊號之量測 20 4. 數據分析及討論 22 4.1數據分析 22 4.2 專家及生手作答情形 25 4.3眼動儀量測 26 4.4大腦活化源分析 36 4.5大腦活化源連接性分析 45 5. 結果與未來展望 59 參考文獻 61 附錄 63

    1. Rubia, K. (2002). The dynamic approach to neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders: use of fMRI combined with neuropsychology to elucidate the dynamics of psychiatric disorders, exemplified in ADHD and schizophrenia. Behavioural Brain Research, 130(1-2): p. 47-56.
    2. Roy, C. S., Sherrington, C. S. (1980). On the Regulation of the Blood-supply of the Brain. J Physiol., 11(1-2): p. 85-158.
    3. Hämäläinen, M. et al. (1993). Magnetoencephalography theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of modern physics, 65: p. 413-493.
    4. Lee, Y. H. et al. (2009). A whole-head magnetoencephalography system with compact axial gradiometer structure. Superconductor Science and Technology, 22(4).
    5. Chen, K. L. et al. (2011). The stability of source localization in a whole-head magnetoencephalography system demonstrated by auditory evoked field measurements. Journal of Applied Physics, 110(7).
    6. Platzek, D. et al. (1999). Active shielding to reduce low frequency disturbances in direct current near biomagnetic measurements. Review of Scientific Instruments, p. 70.
    7. 郭有遹 (2001). 創造性問題解決法, 10(1): p. 353-384.
    8. Newell, A., Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Ha.
    9. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. ETR&D, 45: p. 65-94.
    10. Eysenck, M. W., Keane, M. T. (2000). Kognitivní psychologie, 4th Ed., p. 596.
    11. Lull, R. S., Ferris, H. B., Parker, G. H., Angell, J. R., Keller, A. G., Conklin, E. G. (1922). The evolution of man: a series of lectures delivered before the Yale chapter of the Sigma xi during the academic year 1921–1922. Location: Yale University Press, p. 50.
    12. Puelles, L. (2001). Thoughts on the development, structure and evolution of the mammalian and avian telencephalic pallium. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 356(1414): p. 1583-1598.
    13. Bogen J. E., Bogen G. M. (1976). Wernicke's region-Where is it?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280: p. 834-843.
    14. Caplan, D. (2006). Why is Broca's area involved in syntax?. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 42(4): p. 469-471.

    15. Brodmann, K., Garey L. J. (2006). Brodmann's Localisation in the Cerebral Cortex. Location: Springer.
    16. Wasserstein, R. L., Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2): p. 129-133.
    17. McGill, R., Tukey, J. W., Larsen, W. A. (1978). Variations of Box Plots. The American Statistician, 32 (1): p. 12-16.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE