研究生: |
黃義 Huang, Samuel Yee |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
臺灣返鄉與移居青年個人社會支持網絡研究 A Study on Individual Social Support Network of the Returning and Migrant Young Adults in Taiwan |
指導教授: |
郭乃文
Kuo, Nae-Wen |
口試委員: |
遲恒昌
Chi, Heng-Chang 張峻嘉 Chang, Chun-Chia 郭乃文 Kuo, Nae-Wen |
口試日期: | 2023/01/06 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
地理學系 Department of Geography |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 195 |
中文關鍵詞: | 地方創生 、返鄉青年 、移居青年 、社會支持 、個人網絡 |
英文關鍵詞: | placemaking, returned youth, migrant youth, social support, personal network |
研究方法: | 社會網路分析 、 深度訪談法 、 半結構式訪談法 、 田野調查法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300270 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:121 下載:16 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著地方創生政策的推動,臺灣島內遷居漸成風氣,如何讓青年們「不只搬過去,更 要留下來」成為一項急需面對的議題。此議題涉及多重行動者以及地方特性、社會風氣與區 域發展等因素,單純由政府提供的支持恐不足因應,因此有必要建立一個由廣泛社會關係與 行動者構織成的支持系統。
本研究援引個人核心網絡與社會支持等概念,嘗試勾勒出既有返鄉與移居青年的社會 支持網絡樣態。採取深度訪談的研究方法,於臺東關山、屏東竹田、臺南將軍與苗栗南庄等 四個研究樣區,訪談12位返鄉者與12位移居者,共24位青年。
研究結果顯示,受訪青年現有情感性支持網絡具有同質性高、關係強度大、空間臨近 性較低等特性,成員最大占比屬於跨城鄉網絡;工具性核心網絡則具有網絡規模較小、關係 強度弱、空間鄰近性較高等特性,最多成員來自於返鄉移居者網絡。
本研究歸納出在地社會網絡、返鄉與移居者網絡、家庭網絡、公部門資源網絡、跨城 鄉網絡以及虛擬社群媒體網絡等六種青年日常參與的社會網絡。不論是哪一種社會網絡,對 青年留鄉的影響,皆非單純的支持或阻礙。他們在其中時而得利,時而損失,充分體驗關係 如同雙面刃的特質。這六種社會網絡的拓展與運作,又受到地方特性、地理空間、遷居類 型、個人特質、組織參與、遷居時間長短、婚姻狀況與工作類型等八個因素影響,展現出個 人核心網絡在多重社會關係相互作用以及主客觀因素影響下構建與運作的動態過程。
Driven by placemaking policy in Taiwan, in-migrant within the island has gradually become a trend. However, how to let young people "not only move, but also stay" has become an urgent issue. This issue involves multiple actors and factors such as local characteristics, social attitude, and regional development. Support system mainly provided by the government may not be able to deal with it. Therefore, it’s necessary to reconsider a support model composed by multiple social relations and networks.
Through the concept of individual core network and social support, this study tries to outlines the structure of social support networks of returned and migrant youth. Using the method of in- depth interviews, this study has interviewed 24 returned or immigrant youths from four different countryside places around Taiwan, including Guanshan, Taitung; Zhutian, Pingtung; JiangJun Tainan, and Nanzhuang, Miaoli.
The results show that the existing emotional support network of youths has high homogeneity, strong relationship strength, and low spatial proximity, and the largest proportion of members belongs to the network between urban and rural. In contrast, lower network size, weaker strength, and higher spatial proximity are the characteristics of instrumental support network. Most members come from the network of other returner and migrants.
The study summarizes six types of social networks in which young people participate, including local networks, network of returners and immigrants, family network, government resource network, cross-urban and rural network, and virtual social media network. No matter what kind of social networks it is, its effect on youths staying-at-place is not simply support or hindrance. Young people sometimes get support and sometimes face obstacle from the networks, experiencing the characteristics of relationship as a double-edged sword. The expansion and operation of these six social networks are also affected by eight factors, including local characteristics, geographical space, type of migration, personal characteristics, organization participation, length of migration, marriage, and occupations. Revealing the dynamic process of construction and operation of indiidual core network under multiple interaction and the influence of different factors.
(一)中文文獻
制定非都市土地使用分區圖及各種使用地作業須知(民國 64 年 08 月 01 日)。
區域計畫法施行細則(民國 67 年 01 月 23 日)。
區域計畫法(民國 63 年 01 月 31 日)。
國土計畫法(民國 105 年 01 月 06 日)。
王正彬(2007)鄉村教會的社區參與過程-以臺灣基督長老教會南庄教會為例。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院農業推廣學研究所碩士論文。
呂宜華(2012)媒體再現鄉村性──以《台客練習曲》為例。國立臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所碩士論文。
宋郁玲(2019)地方依附與社會網絡支持系統之建構— 彰化縣埔鹽鄉返鄉青農的留農與地方創生。行政院農委會水土保持局委託計畫(編號:SWCB-108-243)。臺北市:農委會。
邱星崴(2013)南庄的鄉民、公民與國家。國立清華大學人類學研究所碩士論文。
內政部營建署(2020)「106年度鄉村地區整體規劃策略及國土功能分區指導原則」成果報告。內政部委託之成果報告(編號:UR-10619)。臺北市:內政部。
陳美芬(2005)鄉村回流從農青年農業養成經驗與轉換歷程之研究-以休閒農業為例。行政院農業委員會九十四年度科技研究計畫研究報告(編號:94農科-3.1.4-輔-#1(4))。臺北市:農委會。
農村發展基金會(2018)返鄉/移居-農村創生交流會-臺東場:移居生活的經驗與課題會議記錄。取自:https://www.rdf.org.tw/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/20181108-臺東鹿野農村創生交流會記錄修.pdf,2021年6月10日。
王毅傑、童星(2004)流動農民社會支援網探析。社會學研究,2(2),42-48。
王光旭(2015)社會網絡分析在公共行政領域研究的應用。調查研究—方法與應用,(34),67–134。
王光旭、黃怡臻(2018)社區人際網絡與社區意識及參與關聯性之研究:不同營造經驗社區的比較。調查研究—方法與應用,(40),63-125。
王仕圖(2000)個人社會支持的網絡結構:以快速成長的郊區社區爲例。臺灣社會學刊, (23),141-178。
王親仁(2004)我國農村青年對農村發展願景與農業前途看法之研究,農業委員會九十三年度科技研究計畫研究報告。臺北:行政院農委會。
王雅各、盧蕙馨、范麗娟、成虹飛、顧瑜君、吳天泰、蔡篤堅、魏惠娟、謝臥龍、駱慧文(2004)質性研究。臺北:心理。
王儀真、陳美芬、方珍玲、王俊豪(2011)青年農民留農選擇之研究。農業推廣學報 ,(28),53-67。
余明仁、張訓譯(2018)從異鄉到新鄉:外地人的地方認同之研究。育達科大學報,(46),55-72。
李柏寬(2019)讓人們回到地方, 發展農產加工可行嗎?妥善的農業公共支援體系,讓移居者得以在農村安身立命。豐年雜誌,69(5),40-48。
李承嘉 (2005)行動者網絡理論應用於鄉村發展之研究。地理學報,(39),1-30。
吳宜娟(2011)創造宜蘭新故鄉:生活風格移居類型研究。國立交通大學人文社會學系族群與文化碩士班學位論文。
吳曉、吳明偉(2003)國內外流動人口聚居區之比較。規劃師,19(12),96-101。
吳寶秀(1990)臺灣製造業員工個人社會網絡分析。東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
林正修(1993)臺灣戰後城鄉關係之政治分析(1945-1992)。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉所碩士論文。
林季平(2005)臺灣的人口遷徙及勞工流動問題回顧:1980-2000。臺灣社會學刊,(34),147-209。
林南、陳志柔、傅仰止(2010) 社會關係的類型和效應:臺灣、美國、中國大陸的三地比較。臺灣社會學刊,(45),117-162。
林承毅、謝其𤀹(2020)二地居:地方創生未來式。臺北市:天下文化。
林育陞(2017)新貧階級就業危機之探討-社會支持網絡觀點。危機管理學刊,14(2),1-10。
林開世(2016)什麼是人類學的田野工作?知識情境與倫理立場的反思。考古人類學刊,(84),77-110。
林淑馨(2010)質性研究 : 理論與實務。高雄市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。
胡幼慧(1996)質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。
紀佩岑(2012)影響臺灣都市退休族進行島內移居之因素探討。中山大學公共事務管理所碩士論文。
侯惠香(2019)社區總體營造、文化創意產業與地方創生發展之研究─以竹田鄉為例。國立屏東大學文化創意產業學系碩士論文。
高迪理(1991)社會支持體系概念之架構探討。社區發展季刊,54,24-32。
孫治本(2004)個人化與生活風格社群。臺北:唐山。
郭正亮(1988)國民黨政權在臺灣的轉化。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
陳介玄(1994)協力網絡與生活結構。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。
陳木青(2013)論鹽分地帶詩人群的地方意識。有鳳初鳴年刊,(9),316-341。
陳文祥(2007)遷移農村動機與永續生活型態之研究-以臺東縣為例。亞洲大學經營管理學系碩士論文。
陳小紅(1995)都市住宅區位分化及其成因之探討──以臺北市為例。中西都會區之發展與面臨的問題。臺北市:中研院歐美所。
陳世龍(2018)[設計翻轉 地方創生]計畫願景目標及推動情形。國土及公共治理季刊,(2)6,8-17。
陳勃聿、黃珮婷(2013)臺東縣關山鎮親水休閒農業區發展策略之研究。臺東區農業改良場研究彙報,(23),75-94。
張明宜、傅仰止(2019)社群媒體與大學生的網絡界限 : 伴遊圈、 談話圈、接觸圈。臺灣社會學,(37),1-46。
張紹勳(2000)研究方法。臺中市:滄海。
莊晨、余孟和、章明哲(2011)臺東鄉村新移民生活型態與生活調適之研究。農業經營管理年刊,(17),29-44。
彭杏珠(2017)喚回返鄉務農熱潮,仍有五大困境待解決。遠見雜誌。取自https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/40485,2021年07月10日。
國家發展委員會(2020)加速推動地方創生計畫(110-114年)。臺北市:行政院國家發展委員會。
國家發展委員會(2018)我國地方創生國家戰略初步構想。臺北市:行政院國家發展委員會。
國家發展委員會(2019)地方創生國家戰略計畫。臺北市:行政院國家發展委員會。
張文霞、朱冬亮、鄭鑫(2004)外來打工青年的社會支持網絡與社會工作的介入。中國青年研究,(9),40-50。
張詞詠(2014)生活風格遷移研究:苗栗「三義藝術村」居民自我認同與地方感。國立臺灣大學理學院地理環境資源學系碩士論文。
黃如珍、李允斐、吳奕德(2007)臺灣現代返鄉務農現象之初探。中興大學2007農村規劃學術研討會,國立中興大學。
黃如珍(2008)苑裡「回農」的逃離與追尋。樹德科技大學建築與古蹟維護研究所碩士論文。
黃光國(1988)中國人的權力遊戲。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
黃源協、莊俐昕、劉素珍(2011)社區社會資本的促成、阻礙因素及其發展策略:社區領導者觀點之分析。行政暨政策學報,(52),87–130。
黃淑楣(2004)生活風格的創製:民宿狂潮中的意義生產與想像漂流。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所學位論文。
曾竫萌(2015)花宜地區百大青年農民從事有機農業關鍵成功因素之個案研究。花蓮區農業改良場研究彙報,(33),57-72。
曾竫萌 、林正木 、劉興榮(2017)花宜地區青年農民經營有機農業關鍵成功因素之研究 -以在地青年農民為例。花蓮區農業改良場研究彙報,(35),59-73。
傅仰止(2002)個人網絡中他人聯繫強度的結構原理。臺灣社會學,(3),163-209。
傅仰止(2005)社會資本的概念化與運作:論家人重疊網絡中的「時間投資」機制。臺灣社會學,(9),165-203。
熊瑞梅(2001)性別、個人網絡與社會資本。華人社會的調查研究:方法與發現。香港:牛津大學出版社。 179–216。
廖正宏(1985)人口遷移。臺北:三民書局。
劉于琪、劉曄、李志剛(2014)中國城市新移民的定居意願及其影響機制。地理科學,34(7),780-787。
蔡必焜、王俊豪、卓正(2004)社會資本與永續社區發展。臺灣鄉村研究,(3),53-76。
潘淑滿(2003)質性研究。臺北:心理出版社。
鄭鈺琳(2007)種出綠色生活圈:志願務農者的生活方式選擇與農耕生活風格社群之形成。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所學位論文。
蕭揚基,2015,社區營造中社會資本對公民治理的影響。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,5(2),137–176。
賴虎生(2016)臺灣鄉村返鄉青年在地知識之建構。國立彰化師範大學地理系碩士論文。
薛立敏、曾喜鵬、謝鈺偉(2007)臺灣地區近年來遷移行為變化之影響因素分析-家戶遷移決策與遷移地點選擇之聯合估計。人口學刊,(34),69-107。
薛妤娟(2016)新退休族島內移居意願探討。中原大學建築學系碩士學位論文
譚鴻仁(2007)關係空間與鄉村發展:以龍潭椪風茶產業為例。地理學報,(50),47 - 72。
魏書娥(2005)全球文化中的陌生人經驗 - 以Georg Simmel陌生人概念為核心的社會學考察。行政院國科會計畫(編號:NSC93-2412-H-343-004)。臺北市:內政部。
蘇國賢(2014)臺灣基督宗派的人口組成與基督徒信仰行為之分析, 頁 185-244,收錄於伊慶春編。基督信仰在臺灣:2010 基督信仰與社會研究調查,臺北市:21 世紀智庫。
蘇國賢(2020)臺灣個人核心網絡的變化: 比較1997 年與 2017 年的差異。臺灣社會學刊,(67),63-134。
(二)外文文獻
内閣官房まち•ひと•しごと創生本部事務局(2015)まち.ひと.しごと創生基本方針 2015—ローカル•アベノミクスの実現に向け て—。取自https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/topics/2015/20150630hontai.pdf ,2021年7月10日。
小田切德美(2014)農山村は消滅しない。東京都:岩波書店。
田中輝美 (2021)関係人口の社会学―人口減少時代の地域再生。大阪都:大阪大学出版会。
增田寬也(2014)地方消滅:東京一極集中が招く人口急減(賴庭筠、李欣怡、雷鎮興、曾鈺珮譯),2019。臺北市:行人。
Agency, C. I. (2021) World Factbook Urbanization. Central Intelligence Agency
. 取自https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/urbanization/, 2021.07.25.
Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995) Institutional issues for the European regions: from markets and plans to socioeconomics and powers of association. Economy and Society, 24 (1), 41-66.
Astone, Nan Marie, Constance A. Nathanson, Robert Schoen, and Young J. Kim (1999) Family Demography, Social Theory and Investment in Social Capital. Population and Development Review ,25(1), 1-31.
Benson, M and O'Reilly, K.(2009) Migration and the search for a better way of life: a critical exploration of lifestyle migration. The Sociological Review, 57(4), 608-629.
Bott, M. H. P. (1975) Structure and evolution of the North Scottish shelf, the Faeroe Block and the intervening region. Petroleum and the continental shelf of North-west Europe, (1), 105-113.
Bourdieu, P. (1992) Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1997) The forms of capital. In: Halsey, A. H., H. Launder, P. Brown and A. Stuart Wells (eds.), Education, Culture, Economy and Society, 46-58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burt, R.(1992) Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R.(1998) TheGender of Social Capital. Rationality and Society, 10(1), 5-46.
Caplan, G. (1974). Support systems and community mental health: Lectures on concept development. Behavioral Publications.
Chen, C. and A. Spear (1991) Migration Transition and Educational Differentials in Taiwan, 1981-85. Journal of Social Science and Philosophy, 4(1), 447-469.
Cantor, M. H.(1979)Neighbors and friends: an overlooked resource on the informal support system. Research on aging, 1(4), 434-463.
Cloke(1999) The Country. In: Cloke P., Crang, P., and Goodwin, M. (eds) Introducing Human Geography. London: Arnold, 256-267.
Cohen, S., & Wills. T. A. (1985) Stress social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
Coleman, James. (1988) Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, (94), S95-S120.
Coleman, J. S.(1990) 社會理論的基礎(鄧方譯),1992。臺北:五南。
Cortazzi, M. (2001) Narrative Analysis in Ethnography. In: Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. (eds) Handbook of Ethnography, London: Sage.
Crang, Mike(1998) 文化地理學(王志弘、余佳玲、方淑惠譯),2004。臺北市:巨流。
Cresswell, Tim(2004) 地方:記憶、想像與認同(徐苔玲、王志弘譯),2006。新北市:群學。
Erikson and Occhiuto (2017) Social Networks and Macro social Change. Annual Review of Sociology, (43), 229-248.
Fischer, Claude S. (1972) Urbanism as a Way of Life: A Review and an Agenda. Sociological Methods and Research, (1), 187-242.
Fischer, Claude S. (1982) To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.
Fischer, Claud. S., 2011, Still Connected: Family and Friends in America Since 1970. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Giddens, A. (1991) 現代性與自我認同(趙旭東、方文譯),2005。臺北縣:左岸文化。
Giddens, A. (2000) The Third Way and its critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gittell, R. and A. Vidal. 1998. Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy, California: Sage.
Gottlieb, B. H. (1985) Assessing and strengthening the impact of social support on mental health. Social Work, 30(4), 293–300.
Granovetter, Mark S. (1973) The Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, (78), 1360-1380.
Halpern, A. (2005) Social Capital. Cambridge: Policy Press.
Highmore, Ben (2002) 日常生活與文化理論(周群英譯),2005。臺北:韋伯文化。
Hoey, B. A. (2009) Pursuing the Good Life: American Narratives of Travel and
Search Refuge. In Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (eds.) Lifestyle Migration: Expectations, Aspirations and Experiences, Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub Co, 31-50.
Ilbery, B. and Bowler, I. (1998) From agricultural productivism to post-productivism. In: Ilbery, B. (ed.) The Geography of Rural Change, London: Longman, 57-84.
Jarvis, H. (1999) Housing Mobility as a Function of Household Structure. Housing Studies, 14(4), 491-505.
John Urry, Jonas Larsen. (2012) The Tourist Gaze 3.0. Los Angeles: Sage.
Johnston , R. J. , and D. Gregory , G. Pratt , M. . Watts. (2000) The Dictionary of Human Geography 4th edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, M. P. and Milardo, R. M. (1984) Network interference in pair relationships: A
social psychological recasting of Slater’s theory of social regression. Journal of Marriage and the Family,46(4), 893-899.
Kay, A. (2006) Social Capital, the social economy and community development. Community Development Journal, 41(2), 160-173.
Korcelli, P. (1982) Migration and Urban Change. International Regional Science Review, 7(2), 94-105.
Kontuly, T. (1998) Contrasting the counterurbanisation experience in European Nations. Migration into rural areas-Theories and issues, 61-78.
Langbauer, Laurie (1993) The City, the Everyday, and Boredom: The Case of Sherlock Holmes, Difference, 5(3), 80-120.
Ledbetter, Andrew M. (2015) Media Multiplexity Theory: Technology Use and Interpersonal Tie Strength. p. 357-370 in Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives, 2nd Ed., edited by Dawn O. Braithwaite and Paul Schrodt. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986) Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8(4), 365–385.
Lin, N. (1982) Social resources and instrumental action. In: P. V. Marsden, & y N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis, 131-145. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lin, N. and Mary D. (1986) Access to Occupations Through Social Ties. Social Networks, 8(4), 365-385.
Lin, N. (1997) Guanxi: A Conceptual Analysis. The Chinese Triangle of Mainland-Hong Kong: Comparative and Institutional Analysis.
Lin, N. (2001) Social Capital: Theory of Social Structure and Action. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992) Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. Human Behavior & Environment: Advances in Theory & Research, (12), 1–12.
Lauman, Edward O. (1973) Bonds of Pluralism: The form and Substance of Urban Social Network, New York: John Wiley.
Lowe, P., Murdoch, J. and Ward, N. (1995) Networks in rural development: beyond exogenous and endogenous models. In: van der Ploeg, J. D. and van Dijk, G. (eds.) Beyond Modernization: The Impact of Endogenous Rural Development, Assen: Van Gorcum, 87-105.
Marsden, P. V. (1987) Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, (52), 122-131.
Massey, D. B. (1994) Space, place, and gender. University of Minnesota Press.
Marsden, T. (1998) Economic perspectives. In: Ilbery, B. (ed.) The Geography of Rural Change, Longman: London, 13-30.
McCashen, W. (2005) The Strengths Approach: A Strengths-based Resource for Sharing Power and Creating Change. Bendigo: St. Lukes Innovative Resources.
McGee, Terry G. (1991) The Emergence of Desakota Regions in Asia: Expanding a Hypothesis. The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition Is Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Mitchell, J. C. (1969) Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relation- ships in Central African Towns. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Mitchell, J. C. (1973) Network analysis: Studies in Human Interaction. The Hague: Mouton.
Moon, B. (1995) Paradigms in Migration Research: Exploring ‘Moorings’ as a Schema. Progress in Human Geography, 19(4), 504-524.
Molenaers, N. (2003) Associations or Informal Networks? Social Capital and Local Development
Norbeck (1981) Social support: a model for clinical research and application. Advanced Nursing Science, 3(4), 43-59.
Practices. In: Hooghe, M. and D. Stolle, (eds.), Generating Social Capital – Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective, 113-132. New York: Palgrave.
O'Reilly, K. (2007) The Rural Idyll, Residential Tourism and the Spirit of Lifestyle Migration. Thinking through tourism. Association of Social Anthropologists conference 2007 (ASA 2007), London Metropolitan University, UK.
Paxton, P. (1999) Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88-127.
Pera, L. (2008) Amenity Migration in the Americas: Population and Policy in Costa Rica and Panama. Oregon: Department of Planning and Public Policy Management, University of Oregon.
Perry, Brea L. , Bernice A. Pescosolido and Stephen P. Borgatti (2018) Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pescosolido, B. A., & Rubin, B. A. (2000) The web of group affiliations revisited: Social life, postmodernism, and sociology. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 52–76.
Pollet, Thomas V., Sam G. B. Roberts, and Robin I. M. Dunbar(2011) Extraverts Have Larger Social Network Layers: But Do Not Feel Emotionally Closer to Individuals at any Layer. Journal of Individual Differences, 32(3), 161-169.
Portes, Alejandro and Patricia Landolt(1996) The Downside of Social Capital. The American Prospect, (26), 18-21.
Portes, Alejandro (1998) Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
Putnam, R.D (1993a) The prosperous community – social capital and public life. The American Prospect, (13), 1-11.
Putnam, R.D (1993b) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rainie, Lee and Barry Wellman (2011) Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Reich, Stephanie M., Kaveri Subrahmanyam, and Guadalupe Espinoza(2012) Friending, IMing, and Hanging out Face-To-Face: Overlap in Adolescents Online and Offline Social Networks. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 356-368.
Simmel Georg (1955) Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Translated by K. H. Wolff and B. R. New York: Free Press.
Simmel Georg(1997) Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Sjaastad, L.A. (1962) The Costs and Returns of Human Migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 80-93.
Small, Mario L. (2017) Someone to Talk To. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Small, Mario L. and Laura Adler (2019) The Role of Space in the Formation of Social Ties. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 111- 132.
Smith, Jeffrey A., Miller Mcpherson and Lynn Smith-Lovin (2014) Social Distance in the United States: Sex, Race, Religion, Age, and Education Homophily among Confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 432-456.
Snijders, Tom A. B. (1999) Prologue to the Measurement of Social Capital. Tocqueville- Review / Revue-Tocqueville, 20(1), 27-44.
Stegner, W. (1992). The Sense of Place. New York: Random House.
Sweetman, P. (2003) Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus. The Sociological Review, 51(4), 528–549.
Swindle, R. W. (1983). Social networks, perceived social support and coping with stress. Preventive psychology : Theory, research and practice in community intervention. New York : Pergramon.
Thoits, P. A. (1986) Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(4), 416–423.
Thrift N., (1989) Image of Social Chang, in C. Hamnett, L. McDowell and P. Sarre (eds), The Changing Social Structure. London: Sage, 12-42.
Tolsdorf, C. C. (1976) Social networks, support, and coping: An exploratory study. Family Process, 15(4), 407–417.
Trundle, C. (2009) Romance Tourists, Foreign Wives or Retirement Migrants? Cross-cultural
Tuan Yi-fu(1977) 經驗透視中的空間和地方(潘桂成譯),1999。臺北:國立編譯館。
Marriage in Florence, Italy. In: Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (eds.) Lifestyle Migration: Expectations, Aspirations and Experiences, Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub Co, 51-58.
Ven der Poel, M. (1993) Delineating personal support networks. Social Networks, 15(1), 49-70.
Wade, Cynthia K., Frank M. Howell, and J. Gipson Wells (1994) Turning to Family, Friends, or Others: A Model of Social Network Usage During Stressful Events. Sociological Spectrum, (14), 385-407.
Wellman, Barry and Barry Leighton(1979) Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities: Approaches to the Study of the Community Question. Urban Affairs Quarterly, (14),363-390.
Wellman and Wortley (1990) Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal 0f Sociology, (96), 558-588.
Whitten, N. E. and Wolfe, A. W. (1974) Network Analysis. In: Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Honigmann, J. ed., Chicago: Rand McNally.
Woolcock, M. (1998) “Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework,” Theory and society, 27(2):151-208.
Wright, S. (1990) Development theory and community development practice. In: Buller, H. and Wright, S. (eds.) Rural Development: Problems and Practices, Sydney: Avebury, 41-63.
Y Bian(1997) Bring the Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 366-385.
Y Bian(2019) Guanxi: How China Works. Cambridge: Polity Press.