本研究旨在探討不同概念的人境適配度模式與大學生創造行為之間的關係，主要目的有三項：(一)修訂Eugene發展的創造行為量表，進一步瞭解其內容結構。(二)探討不同性別、科系領域的大學生在創造行為、人境適配度上的差異情形，以及不同性別、科系領域與人境適配度對創造行為的交互作用。(三)探討大學生的人境適配度在創造行為上是否同樣具有多元面向的特性。本研究採問卷調查法，以「創造行為量表」、「人境適配度量表」、「生涯興趣量表(大專版)」作為研究工具。並以紙本和網路問卷兩種管道收集國內大二到大四學生資料，共獲得324筆有效樣本(男生168人；女生156人)。所得資料分別以描述統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析(ANOVA)、Pearson積差相關、典型相關、逐步多元迴歸等統計方法進行資料處理。綜合整個研究結果發現：

一、不同性別大學生的人境適配度未有顯著差異；不同科系領域大學生的人境適配度有顯著差異。

二、不同性別、科系領域的大學生在創造行為部份分量表上有顯著差異。

三、從大學生的人境適配度和創造行為的關係可知，人境適配度在創造行為上具有多元面向的特性；人境適配度與創造行為之間存在典型相關。

The purpose of this study were (a) to modify version of Eugene’s Inventory of Creativity Behavior, and discuss the structure of the inventory; (b) to investigate differences of gender, major field of college students on creativity behavior and person-environment fit(P-E fit), and interaction effects of gender, major field and P-E fit. Final, (c) examining whether P-E fit is multidimensional through the different structure of P-E fit on the creativity behavior of college students. The data for the present study were collected from 324 undergraduate students (except freshman) at universities in Taiwan, which 168 male and 156 female completed the Inventory of Creativity Behavior, Inventory of P-E fit, and Inventory of Career Interest. The applied analysis methods were Descriptive Statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson Product-moment Correlation, Canonical Correlation, Stepwise Multiple Regression.

The finding and conclusion of this study were as follows:

1.No gender differences were existed on P-E fit of college students, but major field differences were existed on P-E fit of college students.

2.Gender differences and major field differences were existed on partial scales of the Inventory of Creativity Behavior.

3.P-E fit was multidimensional through the different structure of P-E fit on the creativity behavior of college students; the canonical correlation was existed between the P-E fit and creativity behavior.

一、中文部份

王佳玲（民93）。大學生情緒智力信念、創造力信念與情緒智力、創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王春展（民93）。專科生情緒智慧、人境適配度與生涯阻隔之研究－以中部某專科學校為例。嘉南學報，30，477-493。
王振德（民86）。創造力三面模式評介－兼論創造力的本質與研究取向。資優教育季刊，64，1-5。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台（民89）。創造力研究。台北：心理。
田秀蘭（民77）。影響男女大學生職業興趣類型及職業選擇人境適配程度之有關因素研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
田秀蘭（民89）。大學生生涯阻礙因素與職業選擇適配性之相關研究。屏東師院學報，13，1-18。
朱倩儀（民94）。成人學習思考風格與創造力之相關研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所博士論文。
余嬪（民70）。性別、創造力與職業興趣之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
余鑑譯（民88）。終生之生涯輔導與諮上冊。台北：國立編譯館。
吳芝儀（民85）譯。生涯發展的理論與實務。台北：揚智。（Zunker, V. G., 1990）
吳靜吉、高泉豐、丁興祥、葉玉珠、陳炳林（民81）。建立「拓弄思語文創造思考測驗乙式」常模。教育部訓委會研究。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、陳甫彥、葉玉珠（民82）。建立「拓弄思圖形創造思考測驗甲式」常模。教育部訓委會研究。
呂佳陵（民97）。高中職音樂班主修西樂學生人格特質、學習動機、學習適應與生涯抉擇之研究。國立台中技術學院學報，12（9-2），49-76。
呂佳陵、楊淳斐（民96）。國樂系科學生的人格特質、職業興趣、學習適應與生涯抉擇之探討。國立台中技術學院通識教育學報，1，79-106。
呂玲誼（民95）。大學生生活經驗與創造思考關係之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
李乙明、李淑真（民94）譯。創造力I理論：激發創造力必讀經典。台北：五南。（Sternberg, R. J. （ed）, 1999 ）
李賢慧（民85）。原住民學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究：年級、性別、教師教學創新行為、父母教養態度、社會支持與創意經驗、創造思考能力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
周明武（民97）。國小高年級試掘型與觸覺型學生創造力傾向之研究。國立新竹教育大學人資處美勞教學碩士論文。
林幸台、金樹人、張小鳳、陳清平（民93）。生涯興趣量表（大專版）。台北：測驗出版社。
林咨攸（民97）。國際觀光旅遊與餐飲部員工工作價值觀、適配度、組織承諾與職涯滿意之相關。台南科技大學生活應用研究所碩士論文。
林桂鳳（民80）。生涯探索期男女學生職業興趣結構及其適配性、一致性、分化性、與職業認定之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
邱皓政（民91年11月）。「通情」才能「達理」？創造歷程的社會文化影響與人際互動機制之探討。論文發表於第六屆華人心理與行為科技學術研討會，中央研究院民族學研究所，台北南港。（NSC90-2511-S-128-001）。
邱皓政（民92年3月）。創造性行為的人情困境與性格組型之相關研究。論文發表於第二屆創新與創造力研討會，政治大學，台北。
青輔會（民91）。女性職涯促進方案（91-95年）。線上檢索日期：2008年12月25日。網址：http://life.nyc.gov.tw/expand/expandview.asp?catid=100
俞儉、周夢榕（民97年4月25日）。霍金斯：創意是每個人都擁有的資源。新華網。民97年9月19日取自：http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-04/26/ content_8054014.htm
張世慧（民96）。創造力理論、技法與教學。台北：五南。
張佩甄（民92）。國小五年級學童性別、出生序、家庭結構、情緒、創意個人特質與科技創造力之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
張春興（民91）。張氏心理學辭典修正版（六刷）。台北：台灣東華。
張詠惠（民95）譯（Fisher, R. 原著）。創意的心靈：培養富有創造力的未來公民。資優教育季刊，100，28-34。
莊璦嘉、蘇弘文（民94）。主觀適配的特質環境前因與工作態度後果之探討。人力資源管理學報，5（1），1-27。
郭有遹（民90）。創造心理學第三版。台北：正中書局。
陳李綢（民77）。大學生創造性行為與其相關因素的研究。教育心理學報，21，99-112。
陳宜黛（民96）。學校職員人格特質和職業類型匹配情形對工作滿足與組織承諾影響之研究－以中部地區暨專院校為例。朝陽科技科技大學工業工程與管理系碩士論文。
陳冠浤（民95）。知識工作者對偶同質性對人際脈絡績效影響之研究：關係品質的中介效果。人力資源管理學報，6（2），23-47。
陳映羽（民94）。餐飲業員工之溝通滿意度與個人-工作契合程度對個人-組織契合度之影響研究。旅遊管理研究，5（1），55-76。
陳昭儀（民95）。傑出表演藝術家創造歷程之探析。師大學報：教育類（創造力特刊），51，29-50。
陳昭儀（民97）。傑出音樂家生涯歷程之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，33（2），113-132。
陳淑惠（民96）。台灣地區學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究：年級、性別、教師教學創新行為、父母教養態度、社會支持與創意經驗、創造思考能力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳惠玉（民94）。大學生人格特質與職業興趣關係之研究。大葉大學教育發展研究所碩士論文。
陳智遠（民94）。人與組織契合類型的區分：組織社會化之應用。中原大學心理學系碩士論文。
陳龍安（民73）。創造思考教學對國小資優班與普通班學生創造思考能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳龍安（民82）。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北：心理。
創造力教育入口網（http://creativity.kh.edu.tw/inside.asp）。
曾敬梅（民91）。研究生玩興、幽默、創意態度、所知覺系所創造氛圍與創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
黃朝凱（民92）。國民小學學童之覺到班級氣氛、學習態度與創造傾向之相關研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
楊敏英、游萬來、陳斐娟（民94）。探討工業設計系學生面臨的困擾及生涯輔導需求對設計教育的意涵。設計學報，10（2），57-75。
經觀榮（民94）。創造學：理論與應用。台北縣：新文京開發。
萬同軒（民90）。員工人格特質與知覺組織價值觀間關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專案委託。銘傳大學企業管理系研究。
葉玉珠（民95）。創造力教學－過去、現在與未來。台北：心理。
葉玉珠(民89)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報，32(1)，95-122。
葉玉珠、吳靜吉、鄭英耀（民89）。影響創意發展的個人特質、家庭及學校因素量表之發展。國科會整合型計劃（NSC 88-2519-S-004-001-C）的部分結果報告。
劉士豪（民87）。年齡、性別、成就目標、目標導向與創意生活經驗、創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
劉世南、郭誌光（民90）。創造力的概念與定義。資優教育季刊，81，p1-7。
蔡幸樺（民95）。個人－組織契合、心理契約違反與違背關係之研究。長榮大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
蔣國英（民96）譯。創意心理學-探索創意的運作機制，掌握影響創造力的因素。台北：遠流。（Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., Zenasni, F., 2003 ）
鄭仁偉、郭智輝（民93）。個人與組織契合、工作滿足與組織公民行為關係之研究。 人力資源管理學報，4（4），85-104。
鄭如吟（民93）。高一舞蹈資優班學生生涯決定及相關影響因素研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修碩士論文。
鄭宇樑（民91）。營造富創造思考的教育環境。師友，426，82-85。
黎德權（民94）。工作特性、工作動機、網路使用行為對創造行為之影響。私立輔仁大學心理學所碩士論文。
韓亞娟、李冬紅（民94）。高等教育怎樣培養大學生的創造力。遼寧師專學報社會科學版，5，67-68。
簡楚瑛、陳淑芳、黃譯瑩、黃婉貞、李宜倫、邱慧玲（民90）。教育部創造力教育白皮書子計畫（一）幼兒教育創造力教育政策規劃。台北：教育部。
魏美惠（民85）。創造力的認識與培養。台中師院幼兒教育年刊，7，117-192。
蘇玄芷（民96）。大學生正向心理學與創造力之相關研究。台北市立教育大學創造思考暨資賦優異教育研究所碩士論文。
饒瑞霖（民89）。創造力攸關之內外在環境特質與內外在動機之關係-學童與廠商跨領域之比較研究。國立中央大學企研所碩士論文。

二、英文部份

Adkins, C. L., Ravlin, E. C. & Meglino, B. M.　(1996). Value congruence between coworkers and its relationship to work outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 21(4), 439-460.
Amabile, T. M. (1987). The motivation to be creativity. In S. C. Isaksen(Ed.), Frontiers of Creativity Research(pp.223-254). New York: Bearly Limited.
Ambile, T. M. (1997). Entreprenurial creativity through motivational synergy. Journal of Creativity Behavior, 31(1), 18-26.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Josser- Bass.
Baer J. (1997). Gender difference in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 25-31.
Bailin, S. (1988). Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Baird, L. L. (1988). The college environment revisited. In: Smart, J. (ed. Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research, 25, Agathon, Edison, NJ, 1-52.)
Barron, F. X. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bem, Sandra L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 42, 155-62.
Besemer, S. P., Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Analysis of creative products: review and synthesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 15(3), p158-178.
Boling S. E., & Boling J. L. (1993). Creativity and birth order/ sex differences in children. Education, 114(2), 224-226.
Bowers KS. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307-336.
Breeden, S. A. (1993). Job and occupational change as function of occupational correspondence and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 30–45.
Brent W. R., Richard W. R. (2004). Person- environment fit and its implications for personality development: a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 71:1, 89-110.
Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32–54.
Bretz, RD., Ash, RA. & Dreher, G.F. (1989). Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction-selection-attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42, 561-581.
Burke R J, Deszca E. (1982). Preferred organizational climates of Type A individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 50~59.
Cable D. M. & Parsons C. K. (2001). Socialization tactics and person- organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 1-23.
Cable, D. M. & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and Supplementary Fit: A Theoretical and Empirical Integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822-834.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875-884.
Cable, D., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311.
Chatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly,36, 459–484.
Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14 (3), 333-349.
Chickering, A. (1969). Education and Identity. San Francisco: Josser- Bass.
Choi J. N. (2004). Person- environment fit and creative behavior: differential impacts of supplies- values and demands- Abilities versions of fit. Human Relations, 57, 531-552.
Christine C., Glenn E. S. (2007). Engineer’s and masicians’ choices of self-descriptive adjectives as potential indicators of creativity by gender and domain. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 91-99.
Collins, M. A., and Amabile, T. M. (1999) "Motivation and Creativity." In Handbook of Creativity, edited by R. J. Sternberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
Darnell, C. G., Heather S. L., Lisa, Y. C. (1999). Supportive classroom environment for creativity in higher education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(4), 277-293.
Dave, K. (1979). Effects of hypnotically induced dearms on creativity problem sovling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 293-302.
Dawins, R. V., Lofquist, L. H. (1978). A Note on the dynamics of work adjustment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 12, 76-79.
Dawis, R. V. (1994). The theory of work adjustment as convergent theory. In M. L. Savikas & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Convergence in career development theories: Implications for science and practice (pp. 33–43). Palo Alto, CA: CPP Books.
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual differences model and its applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1993). Rejoinder: From the TWA to PEC. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 113–121.
Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1964). A theory of work adjustment. (Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation No. 15.) Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
Dawis, R. V., Lofquist, L. H., & Weiss, D. J. (1968). A theory of work adjustment: A revision. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 23.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
Edwards JR. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review and methodological critique. International Review of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, 6, 283-357. London: Wiley.
Edwards, J. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Manage-ment Journal, 39(2), 292-339.
Edwards, J. R., & Cooper, C. L. (1990). The person-environment fit approach to stress: Recurring problems and some suggested solutions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(4), 293-307.
Eisenman R. (1969). Creativity and academic major: Business versus English majors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 392-395.
Elliott, P. C. (1986). Right (or left) brain cognition, wrong metaphor for creative behavior: It is prefrontal lobe volition that makes the human difference in the release of creative potential. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(3), 202-214.
Endler NS, Magnusson D (Eds.). (1976). Interactional psychology and personality. New York: Hemisphere.
Eugene, R. (1981). How creative are you? N.Y.: Academic Press.
Eugene, R. (1992, August 20). How do you think left... or right? Machine Design, 64, 85-89.
Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (1969). The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Josser- Bass.
Feldman, K. A., Smart, J. C., Ethington, C. A. (1999). Major field and person- environment fit: using Holland’s theory to study change and stability of college students. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 642-669.
Feldman, K.A., Ethington, C.A., Smart, J.C. (2001). A futher investigation of major field and person-environment fit. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(6), 670-698.
Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New York.
French, J. R. P., Jr., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. New York: Wiley.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligencs: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Garrett, S. V. (1976). Putting our whole brain to use: A fresh look at the creative process. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 10(4), 239-249.
Good, L. R., & Good, K.C. (1974). Similarity to a group and desire for leadership status. Psychological Reports, 34, 759-762.
Gowan,J.C.(1971).The Development of Creative Individual. In J.C.Gowan,J.Khatena, and E.P.Torrance.(Eds). Educating the Ablest.
Gruber, H.E. & Davis, S. N. (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: the evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Eternberg (Ed.), The nature of Creativity (p. 243-270). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guzzo R, Salas E(Eds.). (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
H. Tinsley, E. A. (2000). The Congruence Myth: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the Person–Environment Fit Model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 147–179.
Harrington, D. M., & Andersen, S. M. (1981). Creativity, Masculinity, Femininity, and three models of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 744-757.
Harrison, R. V. (1978). Person- environment fit and job stress. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne(Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 175-205). New York: Wiley.
Helson, R. (1967). Personality characteristics and developmental history of creative college women. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 76, 205-205.
Helson, R. (1973). Heroic and tender modes in women authors of fantasy. Journal of Personality, 41, 493-512.
Hoerr J. (1989, July 10). The payoff from teamwork, Business Week, 56-62.
Holland JL. (1977). The vocational preference inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Holland JL. (1985). Making Vocational choices: A theory of careers(2nd ed.). Englewo Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35–45.
Howley, A., Howley, C., & Pendarvis, E. (1986). Teaching gifted children: Principles and strategies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simiplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kaplan, J. D. (Ed.). (1950). Dialogues of Plato. New York: Washington Square Press.
Katz A. H. (1978). Creativity and the right cerebral hemisphere: Towards a physiological based theory of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 253-264.
Kaufman J. C., Stemberg R. J. ( 2007). Creativity. Change, 39(4), p55-60.
Kaufman, J. C., Baer J., Gentile, C. A.(2004). Differences in gender and ethnicity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(1), 56-69.
Kershner, J. R., Gwen, L. (1985). Effect of sex, intelligence, and style of thinking on creativity: a comparison of gifted and average IQ children. Journal of personality and social psychology, 48(4), 1033-1040.
Kevin M. K., John A. S., & Glenn C. (2004). Person- environment congruence and personality domains in the prediction of job performance and work quality. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(2), 168-177.
Kristen R. S., Frances A. K., & James W. (2001). Gender differences in creativity among American Indian third and fourth grade students. Journal of American Indian Education, 40(1), 57-65.
Kristof, A. L., Jansen, K. J., & Colbert, A. E. (2002). A policy-capturing study of the simultaneous effects of fit with jobs, groups, and organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 985-993.
Kristof, A.L. (1996). Person-Organization Fit: An integrative of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
Kristof-Brown A & Stevens CK.(2001). Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members’ personal mastery and performance goals matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1083–1095.
Lau. S., & Li. W. L. (1996). Peer status and perceived creativity: Are popular children viewed by peers and teachers as creative? Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 347-352.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.), New York: Harper & Row.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1343). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1987). Creative and mental groeth(8^th ED.). New York: Macmillan.
Lubart, T. I. & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creative Research Journal, 10(4), 285-301.
Lyons, H. Z., Brenner, B. R., & Fassinger, R. (2005). Multicultural test of the theory of work adjustment: Investigating the role of heterosexism and person-environment fit in the job satisfaction of lesbian, gay, and bisexual employees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 537-548.
Magnusson D, Endler NS (Eds.). (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Maier, N. R. F., Hoffman, L. R. (1961). Organization and creative problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45(4), 277-280.
Martin, W. E., Jr., & Swartz-Kulstad, J. L. (2000). Person-environment psychology and mental health: Assessment and intervention. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Handbook of Creativity(pp. 449-460). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351-389.
Meier, N. C. (1941). Studies of the psychology of art. Blloomington.
Michael P. B. (2007). Religious beliefs about ministerial and non-ministerial work as a moderator of the relationship between person- environment fit and college major satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio.
Mischel W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
Mischel W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
Mischel, W. (1976). Introduction to personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person–environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268–277.
Murdock, M. C., Puccio, G. P. (1993). Contextual organizers for creativity research. In Scott G. Isaksen; Mary C. Murdock; Roger L. Firestien; Donald J. Treffinger (Eds.), Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 249-280). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487–516.
Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Boston: Houghton–Mifflin.
Patterson, D. G., & Darley, J. G. (1936). Men, women and jobs: A study in human engineering. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
Paul, M. W. (2000). Measuring person-organization fit in the context ofvnational cultures: congruency between organization-wide, country-specific and individual values in a mulyinational firm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the George Washington university, Washington DC.
Pervin LA, Lewis M. (Eds.). (1978). Perspectives in interactional psychology. New York:Plenum.
Porter, S. R., Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: an analysis of person- environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 429-449.
Puccio, G. J., Talbot, R. J., Joniak, A. J. (2000). Examining creative performance in the workplace through a person- environment fit model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(4), 227-247.
Ripple, R. E. (1989). Ordinary creativity. Contemparay Educational Psychology, 14, 189-202.
Rounds, J. B. (1990). The comparative and combined utility of work value and interest data in career counseling with adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 32–45.
Rounds, J. B., Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1987). Measurement of person-environment fit and prediction of satisfaction in the theory of work adjustment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 297–318.
Rounds, J., Tracey, T. J., & Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239–259.
Saeki N., Fan X., Van Dusen, L. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanse college students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 24-36.
Sajjadi-Bafghi, Seyed H. (2007). Sex and grade differences in verbal creative thinking among Iranian middle-school children. Psychological Reports, 100(3), 759-767.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
Sharf, R. (2006). Applying career development theory to counselling (4th ed.), p91. Belmont, CA: Thomson.
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stein, M. I. (1967). Creativity and culture. In R. L. Moony & T. A. Razik (Eds.), Explorations in creativity. New York: Harper.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995): Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
Super DE. (1953). A theory of vocational development. American Psychologist, 8, 185-190.
Taris, R., & Feij, J. A. (2001). Longitudinal examination of the relationship between supplies-values fit and work outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 52–80.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed), The Nature of Creativity. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Torrance, E. P., Myers, R.E. (1970). Creative learning and teaching. New York: Harper & Row.
Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's vocational interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229-246.
Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184-193.
Westerman, J. W., Cyr, L. A. (2004). An Integrative Analysis of Person–Organization Fit Theories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(3), 252-261.
Wheatley, G. H. (1977). The right hemisphere’s role in problem solving. Arithmeic Teacher, 25, 36-39.
Xiaoxia A. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: an investigation of gender difference. Creativity Researh Journal, 12(4), 329-337.
Young, G. (1985). What is creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(2), 77-87.