融合班級中情緒行為障礙與高危險群等特殊需求學生的挑戰行為和干擾行為，經常影響本身和同儕的學習，使得普通班教師在班級管理上面臨考驗。將正向行為支持理念從個別擴展至班級，以有效的實證性策略來介入管理，鑒於融合班教師的需求與國內相關研究的缺乏，本研究擬探究「班級層級功能本位介入小組」(Class-Wide Function-Based Intervention Teams，簡稱 CW-FIT)方案對改善國小融合班學生課堂參與行為之成效。
本研究以新北市一所國小中年級融合班全班學生與自然科教師為研究對象。自變項是CW-FIT方案，運用其於融合班自然課課堂進行介入管理，分為兩個層級實施，第一層級實施對象為融合班全體學生，先教導教室的適當行為，再透過團體增強(教師讚美、點數給予和消弱等區別性增強)進行介入管理。當CW-FIT第一層級介入之後，若有學生的課堂參與行為低於80%，或干擾行為高於30%者，則加上第二層級的介入，內容包含對個別學生進行自我管理的小團體教學，再於課堂中透過個別化的自我管理紀錄表進行自我評量。依變項是全班學生的團體課堂參與行為(遵從教師指令、獲得適當注意、忽視不適當行為)、個別學生的課堂參與行為和干擾行為，以及教師的讚美/訓誡行為之變化情形。針對融合班全班採單一受試之ABAB倒返設計，個別學生則採ABCAC之實驗設計，整個實驗為期約為11週。
觀察各階段所得的資料以視覺分析與C統計進行分析，再以問卷及訪談建立本研究之社會效度。歸納研究結果如下：
一、 實施CW-FIT方案能有效提升融合班學生團體課堂參與行為，平均約有40-53%的提升量。
二、 實施CW-FIT方案第一層級介入，對個別學生課堂參與行為能有所改善，干擾行為的下降有立即效果，但維持效果不佳；然而加上第二層級自我管理策略的實施，課堂參與行為則更明顯提升，平均提升量到50% ，干擾行為呈現顯著且穩定的下降，平均減少約40%。
三、 實施CW-FIT方案增加教師對學生適當行為讚美的頻率，口頭讚美與口頭訓誡比率，基線期到介入期從1.8提升至10.3。
四、 不論是教師或是學生，對於CW-FIT方案介入的目標、過程和結果都給予正向的回應，表示方案具有社會效度。
最後，本研究亦討論CW-FIT方案對於改善融合班課堂參與之成效、社會效度與CW-FIT方案等如何落實於實務之議題及未來研究方向，以供相關研究與實務教育人員參考。

The challenging and disruptive behaviors of students with special needs, such as emotional behavior disorders and high-risk groups, frequently affect the learning of students and peers in an inclusive class, thus generating challenges for regular education teachers in classroom management. A class-wide function-related intervention teams (CW-FIT) program based on PBS (positive behavior support), which escalates from an individual to a classroom, is an intervention management program with effective empirical strategies. Because of the requirements of inclusive teachers and the lack of relevant domestic research, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the CW-FIT program on the engagement behavior of elementary school students in an inclusive class.
The fourth grade students and their science teacher from an inclusive class of an elementary school in New Taipei City participated in this study. CW-FIT was an independent variable, which was implemented for the intervention management of a science class. The CW-FIT program, a two-level intervention program, was designed for contributing to (a) teaching appropriate classroom social skills, (b) using praise and group contingency to provide differential reinforcement, and (c) eliminating the potential reinforcement of the problematic behavior of all students. For students who demonstrated limited improvement in tasks (the number of sessions < 80%) or disruptive behaviors (the number of sessions > 30%) during the initial implementation of CW-FIT, a secondary level intervention was used. Self-management comprised (a) small group booster sessions for individual students and (b) a minichart for self-evaluation in the class. The dependent variables in the study were group on task (following directions, getting the attention of the teachers, ignoring inappropriate behavior), individual students on task and disruptive behavior, and teacher behavior (praise/reprimands). A reversal single subject design ABAB was used to demonstrate experimental control among the whole class, and an ABCAC reversal was used for participants subjected to self-management for approximately 11 weeks.
The data collected at each stage were analyzed through visual analysis and C statistics. The social validity of the study was established using questionnaires and interviews. The results of the study are summarized as follows:
1. The implementation of the CW-FIT program can effectively increase the engagement behavior of students in inclusive classes by approximately 40%–53%.
2. The implementation of the tier-1 intervention of the CW-FIT program can improve the engagement behavior of individual students in the class. Moreover, the reduction in disruptive behavior has an immediate effect, with an unsatisfactory maintenance effect. However, in addition to the implementation of self-management, the engagement behavior was significantly increased, with an average of 50%, and the disruptive behavior showed a significant and steady reduction, with an average of approximately 40%.
3. The implementation of the CW-FIT program increased the frequency of teachers praise for the appropriate behavior of students, and the ratio of verbal praise to verbal reprimand increased from 1.8 at baseline to 10.3 after intervention.
4. Teachers and students positively responded to the aims, processes, and results of CW-FIT program intervention, indicating the social validity of the program.
Finally, this study also examined the effects of CW-FIT on the engagement behavior of the inclusive class, social validity, and CW-FIT program. Implications for research and practice are further discussed.

一、中文文獻
杜正治（2006）：單一受試研究法。臺北：心理。
呂秋蓮、陳明終、孟瑛如、田仲閔(2015) ：國小普通班教師面對ADHD學生教學困擾與因應策略之現況調查與研究。特教論壇，19，85-101。
吳沂蓁（2016）：班級層級功能本位介入小組對提升普通班自閉症學生班級參與度之成效(未出版)。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士班論文，臺北。
吳武典（2005）：融合教育的迴響與檢討。教育研究月刊，136，28-42。
吳明隆（2003）：班級經營與教學新趨勢。臺北：五南。
吳信鏘（2008）：彰化縣國小學童對身心障礙同儕接納態度之研究(未出版)。國立臺東大學碩士論文，臺東。
吳淑美（2004）：融合班的理念與實務。臺北：心理出版社出版。
邱上真（2001）：普通班教師對特殊需求學生之因應措施、所面對之困境以及所需之支持系統。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系、特殊教育中心特殊教育研究學刊，21，1-26。
林東山（2005）：台中縣國小學生對接受融合教育之身心障礙同儕接納態度之研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，彰化。
林金誼（2009）：國中普通班學生對情緒障礙同儕接納態度之研究(未出版)。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，臺中。
林進材（2005）：班級經營—理論與策略。高雄市：復文。
林惠芬（2008）：如何執行正向行為支持, 特殊教育園丁, 24(1), 42-47.
周禾程（2007）：體育教學與運動訓練觀察系統之研發(未出版)。　
國立體育大學體育研究所博士論文，桃園。
孟瑛如、謝瓊慧（2012）：國小ADHD出現率、鑑定、藥物治療與教養措施之調查研究。特殊教育與輔助科技學報，5，1-36。
侯禎塘（2003）：特殊兒童行為問題處理之個案研究－以自閉症兒童的攻擊行為為例。屏東師院學報，18，155-192。
洪儷瑜（1992）：「非嫌惡行為處置」對智障者問題行為處理之運用。特殊教育季刊，45，9-14。
洪儷瑜（1998）：ADHD 學生的教育與輔導。台北：心理出版社。
洪儷瑜（2001）：英國的融合教育。臺北：學富。
洪儷瑜（2013）：情緒行為障礙學生鑑定辦法說明。取自http://iweb.ntnu.edu.tw/spe/identify2014/
施顯烇（1995）：嚴重問題行為的處理。臺北：五南。
徐瓊珠、詹士宜（2008）：國小教師對不同類別身心障礙學生就讀普通班意見之調查研究。特殊教育與復健學報，19，25-49。
教育部（2016a）：特殊教育通報網。2016年5月11日，取自 https://www.set.edu.tw/
張美華、簡瑞良（2012）：自我監控策略在身心障礙學生學業與行為問題之運用。特殊教育季刊，122，22-33。
陳佩玉、蔡淑妃（2013）：普通班教師如何應用功能行為評量概念處理問題行為-對症下藥治之宜殊，國民教育，54(1)，67-75。
陳佩玉、蔡淑妃（2015）：班級層級功能本位介入小組方案( CW-FIT)的內涵與應用。特教論壇，19，24-34。
鈕文英（2006） ：國小融合班教師班級經營策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系特殊教育學報，23，147-184。
鈕文英（2009）：身心障礙者的正向行為支持。臺北市：心理。
馮淑珍（2005）：國小普通班教師對融合教育實施困擾與其因應策略成效之研究(未出版)。臺北市立師範學院身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文，臺北。
黃瑛綺（2002）：國小融合教育班級教師教學困擾之研究(未出版)。臺東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文，臺北。
彭慧玲（2002）。國小普通班教師對融合教育態度之研究(未出版)。臺中師範學院國民教育所碩士論文，臺中。
楊坤堂（2000）：情緒障礙與行為異常。臺北：五南
楊坤堂（2004）：書寫語文學習障礙。臺北：心理。
楊坤堂（2008）。正向行為支持的 概念與策略。國小特殊教育，46，1-12。
楊舒閑（2015）：新北市國小普通班教師實施融合教育教學困擾之研究(未出版)。臺中師範學院國民教育所碩士論文，臺中。
劉佳蕙、鄭淨勻（譯）（2008）：Brenda Smith Myles著。亞斯伯格症在融合教育的成功策略。臺北：心理。
劉香芬（2013）：臺中市國民小學科任教師在融合教育中的困擾與支持需求之研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，彰化。
鄭津妃、張正芬（2014）：融合教育的績效：SNELS 資料庫國中障礙學生的學校適應與滿意。特殊教育研究學刊， 39(3)，81-109。
謝秉弘(2013) ：學習投入與目標取向之後設分析研究。教育研究月刊，234，86-106。

二、英文文獻
Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall/Merrill.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44 , 427–445.
Ardoin, S. P., & Martens, B. K. (2004). Training children to make accurate self-evaluations: Effects on behavior and the quality of self-ratings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 1–23.
Babyak A.E, Luze G.J, Kamps D.M. (2000).The Good Student Game: Behavior management for diverse classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35, 216-223.
Barbetta, P. M, Heward, W. L., Bradley, D., & Miller A. D. (1994). Effects of delayed error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 177-178.
Barebetta, P. M., Norona, K. L.,& Bicard, D. F. (2005). Classroom behavior management: A dozen common mistakes and what to do instead. Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 11-19.
Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119-124.
Beaman, R., & Wheldall, K. (2000). Teachers’ use of approval and disapproval in the classroom. Educational Psychology, 20, 431– 446
Beaman, R., Wheldall, K., & Kemp, C. (2007). Recent research on troublesome classroom behaviour: A review. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 31, 45-60.
Benedict, E. A., Horner, R. H., Squires, J. (2007). Assessment and implementation of positive behavior support in preschools. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 174-192.
Briere D. E., Simonsen B., Sugai G., Myers D. (2015). Increasing new teachers specific praise using a with-in school consultation intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 50–60.
Blood Pinter, E., East, A., & Thrush, N. Effects of a video-feedback intervention on teachers’ use of praise (2015). Education and Treatment of Children, 38(4), 451-472.
Brandi , S. & Diane, M. (2015).Classwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports: A Guide to Proactive Classroom Management. New York, NY:Guilford.
Briesch, A. M. & Briesch, J. M. (2016). Meta-analysis of behavioral self-management interventions in single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45(1), 3-18
Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on selfmanagement interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988- 2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 106-118.
Burgess, J. W., & Fordyce, W. K. (1989). Effects of preschool environments on nonverbal social behavior: toddlers" interpersonal distances to teachers and classmates change with environ. mental density, classroom design, and parent-child interactions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30(2), 261-276.
Busacca, M. L., Anderson, A., & Moore, D. W. (2015). Self-management for primary school students demonstrating problem behavior in regular classrooms: Evidence review of single-case design research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(4), 373- 401.
Caldarella, P., Williams, L., Hansen, B.D., & Wills, H. (2015). Managing student behavior with Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams: An observations study in early elementary classrooms.Early Childhood Education Journal,43(5),357-365.
Conklin.C.G.(2010) . The Effects of Class-Wide Function-related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT) on Students’ Prosocial Classroom Behaviors. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Cashwell, T.H., Skinner, C. H., & Smith, E. S. (2001). Increasing second-grade students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors via direct instruction, group reinforcement, and progress feedback: A replication and extension. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 161-175.
Chow, Jason C.& Gilmour, Allison F.(2016) .Designing and Implementing Group Contingencies in the Classroom A Teacher’s Guide. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(3) , 137-143.
Cohn, A. M. (2001). Positive behavioral supports: Information for educators (fact sheet). Retrieved from the National Association of School Psychologists website, http://www.nasponline.org/resources/factsheets/pbs_fs.aspx
Cole, C. L., & Bambara, L. M. (1992). Issues surrounding the use of self-management interventions in the schools. School Psychology Review, 21(2), 193-202
Coleman, J. M. (2008). Emotional and behavioral disorders. Needham Heights, MA:
Colvin, G., Sugai, G., Good, RH., III, & Lee, Y-Y. (1997). Using active supervision and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 344-361.
Conroy, M., Sutherland, K., Snyder, A., & Marsh, S. (2008). Classwide Interventions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 24-30
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Curcic, S. (2009). Inclusion in PK-12: An international perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(5), 517-538.
Davies S, & Witte R.(2000). Self-management and peer-monitoring within a group contingency to decrease uncontrolled verbalizations of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in Schools ,37,135–147.
De Pry, RL., & Sugai, G. (2002). The effect of active supervision and pre-correction on minor behavioral incidents in a sixth grade general education classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11,255-264.
Didden, R, de Moor, J., & Bruyns, W. (1997). Effectiveness of DRO tokens in decreasing disruptive behavior in the classroom with five multiply handicapped children. Behavioral Interventions, 12(2), 65-75.
Dupuis, D. L., Lerman, D. C., Tsami, L., & Shireman, M. L. (2015). Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 669-674.
Dunleavy, J. & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Exploring the concept of student engagement and its implications for teaching and learning in Canada. Canadian Education Association (CEA), 1-22.
Embry, D. E. (2002). The Good Behavior Game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 273–297.
Epstein, M., Atkins, M., Cullinan, D., Kutash, K., & Weaver, R. (2008). Reducing Behavior Problems in the Elementary School Classroom: A Practice Guide (NCEE #2008-012). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved June 10, 2017 from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuid/4
Evans J, Harden A, Thomas J, Benefield P. (2003) .Support for pupils with emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD) in mainstream primary classrooms: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions. Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Farmer, T W.,Goforth, J., Hives. J., Aaron,A., Hunter, R. & Sgmatto. A.(2006). Competence enhancement behavior management. Preventing School Failure, (50),39-44.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). New York,NY: Springer.
Fredricks, J. A., Phyllis, B., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fullerton. E., Conroy, M., & Correa, 1. (2009). Early childhood teachers' use of specific praise statements wiih young children at-risk for behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders. 34. 118-35.
Gardner, W. I., & Cole, C. L. (1987). Behavior treatment, behavior management, and behavior control: Needed distinctions. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 2, 37-53.
Greenwood, C. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57(6), 521–535.
Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1984).Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Greenwood, C R, Hops, H., Delquadri, J., & Guild, J. (1974). Group contingencies for group consequences in classroom management: A further analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7(3), 413-425.
Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31, 328– 349
Hansen, S.D. & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (2005). Effects of a dependent group contingency on the verbal interactions of middle school students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 30(2), 170-184.
Harlacher, J. E., Roberts, N. E., & Merrell, K. W. (2006). Class-wide Interventions for Students with ADHD. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(2), 6-12.
Heering,P. W.,& Wilder, D.A (2006). The use of dependent group contingencies on-task behavior in two general education classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children , 29,459-468 .

Hester, P. P., Hendrickson, J. M., & Gable, R. A. (2009). Forty years later- The value of praise, ignoring, and rules for preschoolers at risk for behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 513-535.
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). Theuse of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179
Huston-Stein, A., Friedrich-Cofer, L. & Susman, E. J. (1977). The relation of classroom structure to social behavior, imaginative plan, and self-regulation of economically disadvantaged children. Child Development, 48, 908-916.
James W. Tawney, David L. Gast.(1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, Ohio, C. E. Merrill Pub. Co
Jeffrey,Jennifer L.,McCurdy,Barry L., Ewing, Sam, & Polis, Dustin(2009). Classwide PBIS for Students with EBD: Initial Evaluation of an Integrity Tool .Education and Treatment of Children , 32 (4) ,537-550.
Johnson, T. C, Stoner, G. & Green, S. K. (1996). Demonstrating the experimenting society model with classwide behavior management interventions. School Psychology Review, 25(2), 199-214.
Julene D. N., Kevin J. F. (2012).A Function-Based Classroom Behavior Intervention Using Non-Contingent Reinforcement plus Response Cost. Education and Treatment of Children. 35 (3) ,419-430 .
Kamps, D., Conklin, C., & Wills, H. (2015). Use of Self-Management with the CW-FIT Group Contingency Program. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(1), 1-32
Kamps, D., Wendland, M., & Culpepper, M. (2006). Functional assessment as a tool for designing interventions for students with behavioral risks in general education classrooms. Behavioral Disorders, 31(2),128-143.
Kamps, D., Wills, H., Dawson-Bannister, H., Heitzman-Powell, L., Kottwitz, E., Hansen, B., & Fleming, K. (2015). Class-wide Function-Related Intervention Teams “CW-FIT” efficacy trial outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 17,134–145.
Katz, J. (2013). The Three-Block model of universal design for learning (UDL): Engaging students in inclusive education. Canadian Journal of Education, 36, 153–194.
Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2013).Characteristic of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education, Inc.
Kelley, M.L., & Stokes, T.F. (1984). Student-teacher contracting with goal setting for maintenance. Behavior Modification, 8(2), 223-244.
Kern, L., & Clemens, N. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in Schools, 44(1), 65-75.
Kern, L., Ringdahl, J. E., Hilt, A., & Sterling-Turner, H. E. (2001). Linking self -management procedures to functional analysis results. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 214-226.
Klimas, A., & McLaughlin, T F. (2007). The effects of a token economy system to improve social and academic behavior with a rural primary aged child with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 22(3), 72-77.
Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., & Dunlap, G. (1996). Positive behavioral support. Baltimore: Brookes.
Lambert, M.C., Cartledge, G., Lo, Y., &Heward, WL. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 88-99.
Layng, T.V.J., Twyman, J.S., & Stikeleather, G. (2003), Headsprout Early Reading: Reliably Teaching Children to Read .Behavioral Technology Today, 3, 7-20.
Lea, T., Bray, M., Kehle, T., & DioGuardi, R. (2004).Contemporary review of group-oriented contingencies for disruptive behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology,20, 79–101.
Lo, Y., Loe, S. A., & Cartledge, G. (2002). The effects of social skills instruction on the social behaviors of students at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 371-385
Lohrmann, S. Talerico, J. Dunlap, G., (2004). Anchor the Boat: A classwide intervention to reduce problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(2), 2004. 113-120.
Maggin, D., Johnson, A., Chafouleas, S., Ruberto, L.,Berggren,M. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 625–654.
Madsen, C. M., Becker, W. C., & Thomas, D. R. (1968). Rules, praise, and ignoring: elements of elementary classroom control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 139-150.
Martin, G. L., & Pear, J. J. (2007). Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it. New York, NY: Prentice Hall/Pearson
Marzano, Jana S. Marzano, & Debra Pickering. (2003) .Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Maxwell, L. E. (1996). Multiple effects of home and daycare crowding. Environment and Behavior, 28(4),494-511.
McIntyre, L., Gresham, F., DiGennaro, F., & Reed, D. (2007). Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991-2005. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 659-672.
McQuillan, K., DuPaul, G. J., Shapiro, E. S., & Cole, C. L. (1996). Classroom performance of students with serious emotional disturbance: A comparative study of evaluation methods for behavior management. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4(3), 162- 170.
Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R. (2011). Teaching students with learning problems (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall
Meyer, L. H., & Evans, I. M. (1989). Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems:A manual for home and community. Baltimore, Md: Paul H Brookes.
Mitchem K.J., Young K.R., West R.P., Benyo. J. (2001).CWPASM: A classwide peer-assisted self-management program for general education classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 111–140.
Morrison, T. L. (1979). Classroom structure, work involvement, and social climate in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4) 471-477.
Murphy, J. J. (1988). Contingency contracting in schools: A review. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 257-269.
Nelson,J.,Johnson, A.& Marchand-Martella,N.(1996).Effects of direct in struction, cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4(1), 53–62.
Northup J, Broussard C, Jones K, George T, Vollmer T.R, Herring M.(1995). The differential effects of teacher and peer attention on the disruptive classroom behavior of three children with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 227–228.
Olive, M., & Smith, B. (2005). Effect size calculations and single subject designs. Educational Psychology, 25, 313-324
Park, S., Holloway, S. D., Arendtsz, A., Bempechat, J., & Li, J. (2012). What make sstudents engaged in learning? A time-use study of within- and between- individual predictors of emotional engagement in low-performing high schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 390–401.
Reid R.(1996). Research in self-monitoring with students with learning disabilities: The present, the prospects, the pitfalls. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 29 :317–331
Robert J.Marzano, Jana S.Marzano & Debra J. Pickering. Classroom management that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Ruef, Michael B.;Higgins, Cindy;Glaeser, Barbara J. C.;Patnode, Marianne. (1998) . Positive Behavioral Support: Strategies for Teachers.Intervention in School and Clinic , 34, 21-32 .
Scheuermann, B. K., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Positive behavioral supports for the classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming inclusion, 1958-1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63, 59-74.
Shapiro, E. S. (2004). Academic skills problems workbook. New York: Guilford.
Simonsen, B., MacSuga, A.S.,Fallon, L.M.,& Sugai,G.(2013) .The effects of self monitoring on teacher’s use of specific praise. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15(1) , 5-15.
Simonsen, B., & Myers, D. (2015). Classwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports: A Guide to Proactive Classroom Management. New York: The Guilford Press.
Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351– 380
Simmons,D.C.,Fuchs,L.S., &Fuchs,D. (1995). Effects of explicitteaching and peer tutoring on the reading achievement of leaming disabled and low-performing students in regular classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 95(5),387-408.
Skinner, E.A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525.
Stacy, E.; Renee O. H., & Denise, W.(2011). Effects of a Classwide Interdependent Group Contingency Designed to Improve the Behavior of an At-Risk Student. Journal of Behavioral Education , 20(2),103-116 .
Stage, S. A., & Quiroz, D. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.
Steinbrenner, J. R. D., & Watson, L. R. (2015). Student engagement in the classroom: The impact of classroom, teacher, and student factors. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 45(8), 2392-2410.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23–50.
Sugai, G., Horner, R.H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T.J., Nelson, C.M., et al. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143.
Sutherland, K S., Wehby, J. H., & Copeland, S. R (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders, 8, 2-8.
Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Yoder, P. J. (2002). Examination of the relationship between teacher praise and opportunities for students with EBD to respond to academic requests. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 10(1),5-14.
Sutherland, KS., Alder, N., & Gunter, P.L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the behavior of students with EBD. Journal ofEmotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239-248.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, L.D. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.
Theodore, L. A., Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. C., & DioGuardi, R. J. (2004). Contemporary review of group-oriented contingencies for disruptive behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31, 79-101.
Trevino-Maack, S. I., Kamps, D., & Wills, H. P. (2015). A group contingency plus self-management intervention targeting at-risk secondary students' class-work and Active Engagement. Remedial and Special Education, 36(6) , 347-360.
Webster-Stratton C, Lindsay DW. (1999).Social competence and early-onset conduct problems: Issues in assessment. Journal of Child Clinical Psychology, 28,25-93.
Weeden, M., Wills, H. P., Kottwitz, E., & Kamps, D. (2016). The Effects of a Class-wide Behavior Intervention for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.Behavioral Disorders,42(1), 285-293.
Wills, H. P., Iwaszuk, W. M., Kamps, D., & Shumate, E. (2014). CW-FIT: Group contingency effects across the day.Education and Treatment of Children,37(2), 191-210.
Wills, H. P, Kamps, D., Fleming, K., & Hansen, B. (2016). Student and Teacher Outcomes of the Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Team Efficacy Trial. Exceptional Children,83(1), 58-76.
Wills, H. P., Kamps, D., Hansen, B. D., Conklin, C., Bellinger, S., Neaderhiser, J. & Nsubuga, B. (2010). The classwide function-basedintervention team program. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(3), 164–171.
Yawke Y, T.D., (1971). Conditioning independent work behavior in reading with seven-year-old children in a regular early childhood classroom. Child Study Journal, 2(1), 23-34.