前言：不論國內外，高水準的比賽一直是球員夢想中的舞台以及球迷眾所矚目的焦點；不僅球員能夠呈現給球迷精采的比賽內容，有興趣觀賞及了解排球運動的同好應該也可從球員的運動表現內容中得到使其動作技術進步之訊息。而比賽內容複雜多變，怎樣才能從比賽的內容中獲得有用的訊息以及如何被利用，應該是運動科學研究者關注的重點。目的：以不同性別與不同分差區分世界最高水準以及臺灣最高水準排球比賽內容，以得分方式、攻勢波數、得分情況來探討其與勝負之關係。方法：以2012倫敦奧運排球以及臺灣企業八年甲級排球聯賽此兩比賽內容影片進行運動表現記錄，記錄內容為球數、發球隊伍、得分隊伍、攻勢波數與得分方式。以局為單位，將各項數據彙整並化為次數百分比，進行變異數分析，顯著水準定為 α= .05。結果：在實力相當時得分方式與勝負無交互作用，以攻擊為主；攻勢波數也與勝負無交互作用，男女排之間得分攻勢不同，男排以一波攻勢為主，女排則以多波攻勢為主。實力越懸殊的時候得分方式、攻勢波數、得分情況都會與勝負有交互作用，影響勝負的關鍵分別為除了違例以外的四種得分方式、多波的得分攻勢、發球時得分的多寡。結論：以標記分析的方式定義得分方式、攻勢波數、得分情況來探討高水準的排球比賽內容，確實不同性別與分差之間會有其主要得分表現且不完全相同。進一步探討與勝負之關係，種種結果都顯示排球比賽的得分表現是存在著可加以區分的趨勢性，如何面面俱到才能更有機會掌握勝負。而以此架構再更細部地定義與觀察記錄比賽內容進行分析以提供重要的訊息作為回饋，是未來繼續研究競技運動行為表現的方向。

Background: Throughout the world, high-level games are the stage all athletes dream of, and the center of fans' attention. Besides the breathtaking performance of the players, those who are interested in volleyball and understand the sport can acquire the information they need for improving their own skills by watching the games. However, the contents of volleyball games are complicated. The focus of a sports science researcher is how to acquire the valuable information in the games and how to make use of it. Purpose of the study: Dividing the games in the highest-level championship in the world, and the highest-level championship in Taiwan into groups according to the gender of the players and the scores difference of the games. The types of scoring, numbers of the waves of attack, and scoring situations in a game were examined in relation to game results. Method: The videos of 2012 London Olympics Volleyball matches and the 8th Top Volleyball League in Taiwan were used to record data. The analysis of variances were conducted (significant level =. 05). Results: In an even match, the main scoring type of a team is always spike regardless the game results. There are differences in the numbers of waves of attack between men and women volleyball games—one-wave scoring is dominant in men's games and multi-wave scoring is dominant in women's games. When there is a greater score difference between the two teams, the result of the game influences the type of scoring, the numbers of waves of attack, and the scoring situation. The key factors responsible for the result of the game includes the four types of scoring other than fouls, the scores gained with multi-wave attacks, and the numbers of scores won when serving for the point. Conclusion: By using notational analysis to define types of scoring, numbers of waves of attack, scoring situations, and discuss the content of high-level volleyball games, prominent differences can be found between men's and women's games as well as among teams with different skill levels. In the further discussion of the factors responsible for the match results, data show that the scoring patterns in volleyball games can be classified into groups, and that only grasping every perspective can lead to victory. By using the research methods in this study to define, observe, and analyze the contents of games in a more precise and detailed way, one can acquire more important messages. This is a possibility for future study on athletic performance.

中文文獻
王文科、王智弘(2009)。教育研究法(增訂第十二版)。臺北：五南。
王敏憲、呂莉婷(2012)。排球比賽六項技術表現對勝負影響之研究-以男子甲級企業聯賽七年為例。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，3，184-190。
吳茂昌(2010)。國內外男子排球賽比賽時間差異性之分析。淡江體育，13，64-75。
紀世清(2001)。羽球運動技術內容結構之探討。國立體育學院論叢，11，159-173。
邱鑾英、洪至祥、解德春(2011)。排球運動後排攻擊的歷史與戰術分析。嶺東體育暨休閒學刊，9，63-69。
林孟賢(2005)。競技排球運動致勝因素之探討。輔仁大學體育學刊，4，383-394。
郭生玉(1993)。心理與教育研究法。台北市：精華書局。
張木山(1997）。排球單雙腳跳躍發球動作之比較分析。花蓮師院學報，7，1-22。
胡林煥、吳智民、陳永祥、董惠美(2007)。優秀排球選手跳躍發球運動學分析：以吳智民為例。大專體育學刊，9(1)，37-45。
姚漢禱(1983)。桌球運動技術系統分析。現代體育，19，36-42。
陳佳郁、劉有德(2010)。數據會說話：球類運動技戰術分析方法探討。台灣運動心理學報，17，49-68。
陳儷勻(1999)。排球運動中發球、攔網、扣球相互關係之探討。大專體育雙月刊，54，79-86。
袁國偉、孫杰、張豔萍(2007)。1994-2005年我國排球科研現狀分析與研究。綿陽師範學院學報，26(8)，144-149。
稅尚雪、王俊明、黃正一(2010)。我國排球科學近十年(2000~2009)的研究主題與發展趨勢。排球教練科學，15，73-79。
曾國棟(2011)。板凳教練制勝之道：籃球進攻技戰術動態分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。台北市。
維基百科(2012年12月28日)。排球。2013年1月17日，取自http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/。
潘勛(2012年7月21日)。游得更快 梭魚裝遠勝鯊魚裝。中時電子報。2013年1月17日，取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/。

英文文獻
Asterios, P., Kostantinos, C., Athanasios, M., & Dimitrios, K. (2009). Comparison of technical skills effectiveness of men’s National Volleyball teams. International Journal of Performance Analysis of Sport, 9(1), 1-7.
Cooper, J. M., & Siesentop, D. (1975). The theory and Science of basketball. Lea and Febiger, Pliadelphia.
Drikos, S., Kountouris, P., Laios, A., & Laios, Y. (2009). Correlates of Team Performance in Volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis of Sport, 9(2), 149-156.
Eom, H. J., and Schutz, R. W. (1992). Statistical Analysis of Volleyball Team Performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(1), 11-18.
George, M., Evangelos, T., Alexandros, K., & Athanasios, L. (2009). The inside game in World Basketball. Comparison between European and NBA teams. International journal of performance analysis of sport, 9, 157-164.
Hong, Y., & Tong, Y. M. (2000).The playing pattern of world’s top single badminton players. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 38, 185-200.
Hughes, M., & Bartlett, R. (2002). The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. Journal of Sporys Sciences, 20, 739-754.
Hughes, M., & Franks, I. M. (2004). Notational analysis of sports: Systems for better coaching and performance in sport (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
Zetou, E., Tsiggilis, N., Moustakidis, A., & Komninakidou, A. (2006). Playing characteristics of men’s Olympic Volleyball teams in complex II. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 6(1), 172-177.