簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 田佩玉
Tien Pei-Yu
論文名稱: 應用PDA在國小自然科教學之個案研究
Using DPA in Teaching Elementary Science : A Case Study
指導教授: 吳正己
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
中文關鍵詞: 行動學習個案研究國小自然
英文關鍵詞: Mobile learning, Case study, Elementary science
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:182下載:233
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討教學活動中導入PDA後,對教師教學與學生的影響。探討的應包括教學方法、教學信念、師生互動、學習成效與自我控制學習等五個方面探討。本研究以個案研究法實施,研究對象為某國小自然科教師及其任課之五年級的34名學生,教學內容為「自然與生活科技領域」的三個單元。研究結果發現透過適當的教學活動規劃與教學軟體的輔助,學生對於PDA的接受度很高,且PDA確實能提供學生許多的學習輔助,例如:繪製概念圖、透過PDA中的教學資源輔助實驗進行與撰寫小組實驗報告等。PDA的應用,增進了學生小組合作學習與主動學習的機會。個案教師的教學信念也因為PDA的應用後有所改變,逐漸將學習重心還給學生本身。然而,教師在導入PDA的過程中也遭遇到一些問題,例如:藍芽傳輸的問題、學生沒有良好的存檔習慣與PDA電力的維持等。

    關鍵詞:行動學習、個案研究、國小自然

    This study aims to investigate effects of using PAD in assisting teaching and learning of elementary science subject. The effects of explored from the following five aspects: teaching methods, teaching beliefs, teacher/students interactions, students’ performance and self-control learning. The case selected was a science and living technology teacher who was teaching a year 5 class with 34 students. The results show that students appreciated using PDAs in learning. They considered the concept mapping tool and learning resources provided in the PDAs very helpful. Using PDAs also promoted students’ cooperative learning and active learning. In addition, it had effect on changing the case teacher’s teaching belief from teacher-center to student-canter. However,, there were problems encountered when integrating PDAs into learning activities, such as Bluetooth transmission failures, limited battery time, and students’ unfamiliar with PDA operations.

    Key words: Mobile learning, Case study, Elementary science

    附表目錄 IV 附圖目錄 V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 行動學習的特性 5 第二節 行動載具的教學應用 8 壹、行動載具在各科教學的應用 8 貳、行動載具在自然科教學的應用 10 第三節 科技導入對教學的影響 14 第四節 應用行動載具於教學的考量 16 壹、教師支援 16 貳、教學活動規劃 16 參、設備管理 17 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究個案 21 第二節 資料蒐集 22 壹、教學活動資料 22 貳、課堂觀察記錄與錄影 22 參、教師日誌 22 肆、教師訪談 22 伍、學生問卷 23 陸、學生訪談 23 第三節 實施步驟 24 壹、選定個案教師 25 貳、教師會談 25 參、教師教學資料蒐集 25 肆、PDA教材資源製作 25 伍、教室觀察 26 陸、教師訪談 26 柒、學生問卷 27 捌、學生訪談 27 玖、資料整理與分析 27 第四節 研究情境 28 壹、教學場域 28 貳、教學內容與活動 29 參、PDA在教學中的應用 29 肆、實驗使用之硬體設備 32 伍、研究者在教學活動中的角色 32 第四章 結果與討論 33 第一節 個案教師教學情形 33 壹、教學的準備 33 貳、第一單元 33 參、第二單元 35 肆、第三單元 35 伍、教學中遭遇的問題 36 陸、結語 37 第二節 PDA導入教學的影響 38 第三節 學生使用PDA的態度 43 壹、使用PDA於課程之學習態度 43 貳、PDA上的學習工具及教材資源 45 第五章 結論與建議 48 第一節 結論 48 第二節 建議 51 參考文獻 52 附錄一 教學軟體操作說明 57 附錄二 教學設計 77 附錄三 學生概念圖範例 84 附錄四 學生實驗報告範例 85 壹、微生物的實驗 85 贰、摩擦力的實驗 87 叁、電磁鐵的實驗 89 附錄五 觀察紀錄表 90 附錄六 教師日誌表 92 附錄七 學生使用PDA態度問卷 94

    李華隆(2004):國小自然科行動專題式學習教學設計之行動研究。私立淡江大學教育科技研究所碩士論文。
    房昔梅(2003):小學高年級教師實施討論式數學教學之行動研究。國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。
    馬藝菁(2002):行動科技設備在國中科學實驗的應用:PDA實例。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
    高台茜(2002):未來教室學習 - 以無線網路應用為基礎的認知學徒制學習環
    境。2003年12月10日。
    取自:台大教與學網站 http://edtech.ntu.edu.tw/epaper/911210/prof/prof_1.asp
    教育部(2003):九年一貫課程。2005年1月24日,
    取自:http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/index.php
    蘇麗華(2002):無線科技融入戶外賞鳥活動之行動學習情境觀察省思--人適應科技的努力與成長。 國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    Bobrowsky, W., Vath, R., Soloway, E., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2004).
    The Palm project: The impact of handhelds on science learning in 7th grade .American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, April 13.
    Chen, Y.S., Kao, T.C., & Sheu, J.P. (2003). A mobile learning system for
    scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19, 347-359.
    Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (n.d.). Implementing the seven principles Technology as lever. Retrieved May 31, 2006, from http://polaris.umuc.edu/~cschwebe/gsmt800/7 principles.htm.
    Crowe A., & Hooft, M.V. (2004). Technology and the prospective teacher:Using handheld devices in social studies education. CUFA/TI Research Initiative.
    Crawford, V. & Vahey, P. (2002). Innovating the Use of Handheld Technology in K-12 Teaching and Learning: Results from the Palm Education Pioneers Program. American Educational Research Association Annual Conference. New Orleans, April 1-5.
    Curtis, M., Luchini, K., Bobrowsky, W., Quintana, C., & Soloway, E. (2002). Handheld use in K-12: A Descriptive Account. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.
    Danesh, A., Inken, K., Lan, F., & Shu, K. (2001). GeneyTM:Designing a collaborative activity for the PalmTM handheld computer. Proceeding of CHI, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
    Facerw, K., Joiner, R. D., Stanton, D., Reidz, J., Hullz, R., & Kirk, D. (2004). Savannah: Mobile gaming and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 399-409.
    Fisher, C. (1989). The influence of high computer access on student empowerment. ACOT Report #1. Cupertino, CA:Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow Advanced Technology Group, Apple Computer, Inc.
    Gerhard Schwabe, G., & Goth, C.(2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: design and motivational effects. Journal of Computer Assisted learning 21, 204-216.
    Graham, S., & MacArthur, C. (1988). Improving learning disabled students' skills at revising essays produced on a word.processor: Self-instructional strategy training. Journal of Special Education 22(2), 133-152.
    Hooft, M. V., Diaz, S., & Swan, K. (2004). Examining the potential of handheld computers: Findings from the OHIO PEP project. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 295-311.
    Kennewell, S. (2001) Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of
    information and communications technology in teaching and learning, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1&2), 101-116
    Klopfer, E., Yoon,S., & Rivas, L. (2004). Comparative analysis of Palm and wearable computers for participatory simulations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 347-359.
    Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Perry, J. (2005). Using Palm technology in participatory simulations pf Complex Systems:A new take on ubiquitous and accessible Mobile Computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology14, No.3, September.
    Li, Q. (2003). Infusing technology into a mathematics methods course: any impact? Educational Research, 47(2). 217-233.
    Mandryk, R. L., Inkpen, K. M., Bilezikjian, M., Klemmer, S. R., & Landay, J.A. (2001).Exploring a new interaction paradigm for collaborating on handheld computers. ACM CJO 2001.
    Metcalf, S. J., & Tinker, R. F. (2004). Probeware and handhelds in elementary and middle school science. Journal of Science Education and Technology13(1).
    Morrell, M. (2002). Factors influencing meaningful integration of technology into the high school curriculum: A case study. Retrieved May 30, 2006, from http://dspace.library.drexel.edu/handle/1860/71/
    Moseley, D. & Higgins, S. (1999) Ways forward with ICT. effective pedagogy
    using information and communications technology for literacy and
    numeracy in primary schools. London: Teacher Training Agency.
    Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). Envisioning the handheld- centric classroom.
    J. Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 281-294.
    O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J.P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P. (2003).Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment.
    Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://www.mobilearn.org/results/results.htm
    Pownell, D., & Bailey, G.D. (2001). Getting a handle on handhelds: What to consider before you introduce handhelds into your schools. Retrieved May 30, 2006, from http://Electronic School.com/
    PricewaterhouseCooper(PwC). (2001). Teacher workload study:final report—5 December 2001 (London, DfES). Retrieved May 31, 2006, from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/research/policyarchive/workforceremodelling/workloadstudy/
    Rogers, L., & Finlayson, H. (2004). Developing successful pedagogy with information and communications technology: How are science teachers meeting the challenge? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, (3).
    Roschelle, J., & Mills, M. (1999). Toward low-cost, ubiquitous, collaborative computing for themath class. Communications of the ACM, August 1999 42, (8)
    Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the wild side:How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. Cognition and Technology, 1, 145-168.
    Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of ComputerAssisted Learning, 19, 260-272.
    Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with
    technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College
    Press.
    Schwartz, J. (2003). Professors vie with web for class’s attention. New York Times.
    Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in
    schools, 1990-1997. Software Publisher’s Association.
    Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Vahey, P., & Penuel,W. R. (2003).Handhelds go to school:lesson learned. IEEE Computer Society.
    Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2004). Using mobile phone in education. Proceeding of The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education(WMTE’04).
    ‘Thooft, M. V., Diaz, S. T., & Swan,. K. (2004). Examing the potential of handheld computers: findings from the Ohio PEP project. Baywood Publishing Co., Inc.
    Trilling, B., & Hood P. (1999). Learning, technology, and education reform in the knowledge age or “we’re wired, webbed, and windowed, now What?” Educational Technology, 39(3), 5-18.
    Wilson, V., & Harris, M. (2003). Designing the best: A review of effective teaching and learning of design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 223-241.
    Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computer & Education, 42, 289-314.

    QR CODE