簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 粘玉秀
Yu-Hsiu Nien
論文名稱: 教師信念及其對教學行為的影響:一位高中英文教師的個案研究
Teacher Beliefs and Their Influence on Classroom Practice: A case study of a senior high school English teacher
指導教授: 許月貴
Hsu, Yueh-Kuei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 132
中文關鍵詞: 教師信念教學行為個案研究英語教學
英文關鍵詞: teacher beliefs, classroom practice, case study, English teaching
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:402下載:165
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討一位高中英文教師對於英語教學的信念及其對教學行為的影響。本研究以北台灣某一公立高中英文教師為例,進行個案研究。本研究承接晚進英語教學研究中之質性研究派典,採質性之資料收集及分析法,以觀察,訪談,文件分析為主,以期對於該英文教師之信念及教學能有整體的瞭解。研究進行為期五個月。研究重點如下:一是找出受訪英文教師教學信念的主要特徵及其對於教學行為的影響;二是探討該英文教師教學信念及教學行為之間是否存有歧異,並探討造成歧異之因。
    從該教師對英語、教學、及學習的信念,以及實際課堂教學結果顯示,該教師的信念及其教學反映出目前外語教學的趨勢,並呈現溝通式教學的特色。本研究的主要發現如下所述。針對第一個研究問題,研究發現指出該受訪英文教師教學信念影響其教學行為有五大特徵,即:〈一〉重視教學上情意之考量 (affective variables),〈二〉彈性的教學策略及方法 (flexibility),〈三〉以學生為中心的教學導向 (learner-centeredness),〈四〉強調情境式學習 (contextualization),以及〈五〉語言知識與語用功能並重 (form & function)。針對第二項研究問題方面,研究結果顯示該教師的教學信念與其教學行為整體而言一致。然而其中仍存在些微歧異,如傳統式教學的應用,而非全然溝通式教學;課堂上70-80% 的英文使用率,而非100% 全英文式教學;以及課堂上較多時間分配於語言知識的教導。研究者分析該受訪英文教師之教學信念及教學行為,辨認出學生因素(如學生程度,學習態度等等),及整體英語教學環境(如通用於各學生程度的教材課程,不足的教學時數,大班制教學,重文法的考試),為影響該教師實踐其教學理想及理念之主因。
    最後,研究者依據研究發現,分別對英語教學,英語教學環境,及英語師資培育提出建議。對英語教學的建議是:教師應激發學生學習動機及興趣,採用聽說讀寫兼備、以學生為主導、彈性的教學策略,並培養教師自我語用能力以提升溝通式教學的適切性,以及縮小師生間有關英語學習認知的差距以提高英語教學及學習成效。對英語教學環境的建議是:英語教學學者與政策單位應合作以改善整體教學環境,以提昇教師教學成效並確保學生受教品質。對師資培育的建議是:師資培育單位應提供英語教師實際有效的教學方法,並訓練英語教師反思其教學信念及行為。

    This study aimed to explore an English teacher’s beliefs about teaching English to senior high school students in Taiwan and discussed how these beliefs influenced the teacher’s classroom practice. The researcher subsumed this study under the recent tendency in ESL/EFL research to use qualitative methods to capture a holistic understanding of an English teacher’s thinking and action. Data collection for this study occurred over five months. The sources of data included semi-structured interviews, beliefs inventories, lesson plans, classroom observations followed by post-observation interviews, teaching materials, and the researcher’s reflective journal. The analysis focused on (a) the characteristics of the teacher’s beliefs about English teaching and the influence they had on her classroom practice, (b) the incongruency between her beliefs and classroom practice and the causes of the discrepancy.
    Drawing on the comprehensive findings on the teacher’s beliefs about the English language, teaching, learning, and actual classroom practice, it was found that the teacher’s teaching beliefs and approach reflected current trends in foreign language pedagogy, and were highly compatible with the principles of the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). The teacher’s beliefs and practice were identified into five categories: (a) emphasis on affective variables, such as motives, interests, and anxiety; (b) flexibility in teaching approaches and performance; (c) learner-centeredness with the view to addressing to student variables; (d) teaching English in a contextualized way; and (e) focusing on both form and function to ensure students’ communicative competence. Data showed a great consistency between the teacher’s beliefs and her actual practice. However, some minor inconsistencies were also identified. These inconsistencies included a mixture of traditional methods (instead of completely CLT) applied in her actual practice, an average of 70-80% of English utilization in her daily instruction (instead of all English instruction), and a greater proportion of class time spent developing students’ basic linguistic ability (focusing on “form” mainly). Causes of the inconsistencies were identified as (a) influences of student variables such as students’ ability, learning attitudes, etc.; and (b) educational contexts which caused some constraints such as a common syllabus for students of all proficiency levels, insufficient instruction hours, large size classes, or grammar-based examinations.
    Findings of this research provide several pedagogical implications for English teaching, the English teaching contexts, and English teacher education in Taiwan. For English teaching, it is suggested that English teachers should (a) induce students’ interests or motives in learning English; (b) designate creative communicative activities in flexible and learner-centered instruction to ensure students’ communicative competence with all four language skills; (c) constantly self-update teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and strategic or sociolinguistic competence to conduct a communicative class; and (d) minimize possible discrepancy between teachers’ and students’ beliefs to increase teaching/learning effectiveness. For the English teaching contexts, it is recommended that English educators work together with policy makers to create a supportive and optimal teaching environment to enhance the teaching/learning effectiveness. For English teacher education, either preservice or inservice programs should compensate for the lack of instruction in effective and workable teaching practice and help/guide teachers to reflect upon their own teaching practice.

    中文摘要 i Abstract iii Acknowledgements v Table of Contents vi List of Tables ix 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background of the Research 1 1.2 Purpose of the Study 3 1.3 Research Questions 4 2. Literature Review 5 2.1 Teachers’ Beliefs 5 2.2 The Role of Teachers’ Beliefs in Teaching Process 7 2.3 Research on Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice 12 2.3.1 The Impact of Beliefs on Practice 12 2.3.2 Teacher Beliefs-Practice Congruency/Incongruency 14 2.4 Research on ESL/EFL Teachers’ Beliefs 17 2.5 Studies on English Teachers’ Beliefs/Knowledge in Taiwan 20 2.6 Conclusion 23 3. Methodology 25 3.1 The Participants 25 3.2 Data Collection 31 3.2.1 Instruments 31 3.2.2 Procedures 34 3.3 Data Analysis 37 3.4 Validity 39 3.5 Ethical Considerations 41 4. Findings 43 4.1 Major Findings of the Teacher’s Beliefs 43 4.1.1 Beliefs on the English Language 43 4.1.2 Beliefs on Teaching and Teacher’s Role 45 4.1.3 Beliefs on Learning 48 4.1.4 Beliefs on Classroom Practice 51 4.1.5 Beliefs on the Teaching Contexts and Curriculum 54 4.2 Major Findings of the Teacher’s Practice 57 4.2.1 Lesson Planning 57 4.2.2 Teaching Approach 59 4.2.3 Classroom Practice 61 4.2.4 Special Instructional Strategies 72 4.3 Data Gathered from Beliefs Inventories, and Students’ Interviews 76 4.3.1 Beliefs Inventories 76 4.3.2 Students’ Interviews 85 4.4 Conclusion 91 5. Discussion 93 5.1 Characteristics of the Teacher’s Beliefs and Their Influence on Classroom Practice 93 5.1.1 Affective Variables 94 5.1.2 Flexibility 96 5.1.3 Learner-Centeredness 99 5.1.4 Contextualization 102 5.1.5 Form & Function 104 5.2 Causes of Incongruency between the Teacher’s Beliefs and Practice 107 5.3 Limitations of the Research 110 5.4 Researcher’s Reflection 111 6. Conclusion and Implications 114 6.1 Conclusion 114 6.2 Pedagogical Implications 115 6.3 Recommendations for Future Research 116 Appendices 118 Appendix A: The Teacher’s Semi-Structured Interview Questions 118 Appendix B: The Students’ Semi-Structured Interview Questions 121 Appendix C: Post-Observation Interview Questions 122 Appendix D: Teachers’ Beliefs Inventory—Approaches to ESL Instruction 123 Appendix E: Teachers’ Beliefs Inventory about Classroom Instruction 124 Appendix F: Permit Form 126 Appendix G: Evaluation Sheet 127 References 128 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1: Focuses for the semi-structured interviews 32 Table 4-1: The teacher’s responses to the beliefs inventory about approaches to ESL instruction 77 Table 4-2: The teacher’s responses to the beliefs inventory about classroom instruction 78 Table 4-3: The students’ interview data on English learning 85 Table 4-4: The students’ ideal English classroom practice and expectations of an ideal English teacher 87

    Bauch, P. A. (1984). The impact of teachers’ instructional beliefs on their teaching: Implications for research and practice. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED252954)
    Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Borko, H., Livingston, C., McCaleb, J., & Mauro, L. (1988). Student teachers’ planning and post-lesson reflections: Patterns and implications for teacher preparation. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teacher professional learning (pp. 13-34). London: Falmer Press.
    Borko, H., & Shavelson, R. J. (1990). Teacher decision making. In B. F. Jones, & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 311-346). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Burns, A. (1992). Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice. Prospect, 7 (3), 56-66.
    Burns, A. (1996). Starting all over again: From teaching adults to teaching beginners. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 154-177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5 (1), 43-51.
    Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Macmillan.
    Calderhead, J., & Shorrock, S. B. (1997). Understanding teacher education: Case studies in the professional development of beginning teachers. London: Falmer Press.
    Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 1-47.
    Chang, B-L. (張碧玲) (2000). 國民中學英語教師對溝通式教學觀之信念研究 [Study of junior high school English teachers' beliefs towards the communicative approach]. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
    Chang, H-C. (張惠昭) (1996). 高中英文教師教學專業知識之探究 [A senior high school English teacher' s professional knowledge for teaching]. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
    Chang, S. & Huang, Y-K. (2001). Communicative language teaching: Senior high school teachers’ beliefs and practice. In The Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 219-227). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
    Chang, Y-H. (張瑜弦) (2001). 專家教師教學專業知識之個案研究 [Pedagogical knowledge held by an expert English teacher]. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
    Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17 (2), 5-12.
    Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
    Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1987). Teachers' thinking. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 84-102). London: Cassell Educational.
    Cornett, J. W. (1990). Teacher thinking about curriculum and instruction: A case study of a secondary social studies teacher. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18 (3), 248-273.
    Cummins, J. (1980). The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 175-188.
    Dobson, R. L., & Dobson, J. E. (1983). Teacher beliefs-practice congruency. Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 59, 20-27.
    Duffy, G. (1981). Theory to practice: How does it work in real classrooms? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED204715)
    Freeman, D. (1991a). The same things done differently: A study of the development of four foreign language teachers’ conceptions of practice through an in-service teacher education program. Dissertation Abstracts International. (University Microfilms No. 91-32338)
    Freeman, D. (1991b). To make the tacit explicit: Teacher education, emerging discourse, and conceptions of teaching. In D. C. Li, D. Mahoney, & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Exploring second language teacher development (pp. 1-20). Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.
    Freeman, D. (1996). The “unstudied problem”: Research on teacher learning in language teaching. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 351-378). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher-research: From inquiry to understanding. Pacific Grove: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Galton, M., Simon, B., & Croll, P. (1980). Inside the primary classroom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Graden, E. C. (1996). How language teachers’ beliefs about reading instruction are mediated by their beliefs about students. Foreign Language Annals, 29 (3), 387-395.
    Hadley, A. O. (1993). Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Heaton, J. B. (1990). Classroom testing. London: Longman.
    Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 333-340.
    Huang, S-C., & Huang, S-S. (2000). Implementing the communicative approach in junior high school classes: Teaching reflection. In The Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 356-366). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Joe, S-G., Hung, C-H., & Wu, S-R. (1998). A study of perspectives of English teachers at technological institutes about reading instruction. In The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 559-570). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Johnson, K. E. (1992). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14 (1), 83-108.
    Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27 (1), 65-90.
    Kern, R. G. (1995). Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28 (1), 71-92.
    Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.
    Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 27-48.
    Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: an information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135-158.
    McNeil, L. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. London: Methuen/Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Nunan, D. (1988). Learner-centered curriculum design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    O’Loughlin, M. (1989). The influence of teachers’ beliefs about knowledge, teaching, and their pedagogy: A constructivist reconceptualization and research agenda for teacher education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED339679)
    Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 60 (3), 307-332.
    Punch, M. (1986). The politics and ethics of field work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Richards, J. C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training: Perspectives on language teacher education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., Ho, B., & Giblin, K. (1996). Learning how to teach in the RSA Gert. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 242-259). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Rokeach, M. (1980). Beliefs, attitudes, and values (7th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
    Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgements, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51 (4), 455-498.
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
    Sigel, I. E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 345-371). NJ: Erlbaum.
    Swaffar, J. K., Arens, K., & Morgan, M. (1982). Teacher classroom practices: Redefining method as task hierarchy. Modern Language Journal, 66, 24-33.
    Taylor, B. P. (1983). Teaching ESL: Incorporating a communicative, student-centered component. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 69-88.
    Wehling, L. J., & Charters, JR. W. W. (1969). Dimensions of teacher beliefs about the teaching process. American Educational Research Journal, 6 (1), 7-30.
    Williams, M., & Burden R. L. (1997). What do teachers bring to the teaching-learning process? In Psychology for language teachers (pp. 56-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Woods, D. (1991). Teachers’ interpretations of second language teaching curricula. RELC Journal, 22 (2), 1-19.
    Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making, and classroom practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Wu, S-R. (1998). A study of technological-institute English teachers' beliefs and knowledge about reading instruction. Unpublished master's thesis, National Chang-Hua Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.
    Yang, N-D. (2000). What do prospective teachers think about teaching English to children? In The Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 556-565). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
    Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    QR CODE