本研究主要目的為編製《馬來西亞獨中生涯興趣量表》，以及瞭解馬來西亞獨中生之職業興趣，是否符合Holland的六角形模式。本量表改編自《國中生涯興趣量表》，考驗Holland的職業結構方面，包括六角形的排列順序、相關距離及符合指數。並求出馬來西亞獨中生之六角形的性別、年級的差異。研究對象為馬來西亞北中南區的六間獨中學校，男生885人，女生625人，全部受試者共有1510名。本研究採問卷調查法，統計方法有：多向度量尺(MDS)、多項特質多項方法及變異數分析。研究發現：
(一)、《馬來西亞獨中生涯興趣量表》編製之信效度尚可接受。六個分量表a係數介於.63~.82之間。
(二)、馬來西亞獨中生，其職業興趣結構不符合Holland的六角形模式。
(三)、馬來西亞獨中生之職業興趣，有性別、年級的差異。不同性別、年級的職業興趣有別，初一、初二或初三的男生皆以實用型、研究型和企業型為主；初一、初二或初三的女生則偏好藝術型、社會型和事務型。男生以實用型最高，女生之藝術型最高。
(四)、馬來西亞獨中生之職業興趣，在六角形的排列順序會因性別而有所不同，男生排列順序呈現R-I-E-S-A-C，女生之排列順序呈現R-E-I-C-S-A，皆不符合Holland的 R-I-A-S-E-C模式。
(五)、台灣中學與馬來西亞獨立中學之比較結果大致相同。
針對上述之研究發現，本研究發現馬來西亞獨中學生所覺察之社會職業結構不同於其他亞洲華人地區，並進一步提出未來的研究及建議。

The main purpose of this study were: (1) to revision a Vocational Interests Inventory for Malaysia Chinese Independence High School Students. (2) to examine the vocational structure for Malaysia Chinese Independence High School Students based on Holland’s hexagon theory. With a sample of 1510 junior high school students(885males and 625 females), analyses using MDS, MTMM and MANOVA, The main findings were as follows:
1. The reliabilities and validity of the revision is acceptable.
2. The vocational structure not fit Holland’s hexagon theory and ordering.
3. The comparison of high school on Taiwan and Malaysia are similar.
4. There are significant difference between sex and grade.
Possible explanations and implications of these results are discussed within the context of social vocational structure on Malaysia Chinese cultural thought and practice.

參考文獻
中文部份
木馬城(2004)。馬來西亞教育概況。2004年9月20日取自http://www.foonyew.edu.my/edu/edu03.htm
毛國楠(1985)。職業成熟與職業興趣的相關研究。教育心理學報，18，229-238。
王思惠(2004)。國中生涯檔案形成過程之行動研究--以臺北市立永吉國民中學為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職進修碩士論文。
田秀蘭(1988)。影響男女大學生職業興趣類型及職業選擇人境適配程度之有關因素研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
田秀蘭(1996)。我國高中學生職業興趣結構之比較研究。中華輔導學報，4，69-93。
印度之社會結構(2004)。2004年6月20日取自http://www.hanyin.net/c-india/intro.htm。
李素卿(1997)。職業社會學。台北：五南。
林宇涵(2000)。國中舞蹈班畢業生職業選擇相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
林秀盆(2002)。高職學生學業表現、興趣類型與人格類型之研究－以某高職為例。國立台北大學統計學系碩士論文。
林幸台(1987)。生計導輔理論與實施。台北：五南。
林幸台、吳天方、林清文、劉淑慧(1997)。生涯發展量表編製研究報告。中華輔導學報，5，19-41。
林幸台、金樹人、陳清平、張小鳳(1992)。生涯興趣量表之初步編製研究。教育心理學報，25，111-124。
林桂鳳(1992)。生涯探索期男女學生職業興趣結構及其適配性、一致性、分化性與職業認定之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政(2002)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北：五南。
金樹人(1986)。何倫(Holland) 類型論之因素結構分析。教育心理學報，19，219-253。
金樹人(1992)。我國高中學生職業興趣結構之分析。測驗年刊，39，155-173。
金樹人(1997)。生涯諮商與輔導。台北：東華書局。
金樹人、田秀蘭、林世華(2000)。國中生涯興趣量表。台北：心理出版社。
紀憲燕(1993)。生涯信念檢核表指導手冊。台北：編製測驗出版社。
高德義(1994)。族群霸權體制的形成與解構--馬來西亞族群關係的政治經濟分析。山海文化雙月刊，8-35。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學。台北：東華書局。
張逢沛譯(1972)。職業社會學。台北：復興。
張儷靜(2002)。 國中生職業興趣及其相關因素之研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。
曹榮勳(1994)。影響國中生職業自我概念的家庭因素之研究─以嘉義地區為例。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
莊懷義等人(1990)。青少年問題與輔導。台北縣:國立空中大學出版。
陳利群(2003)。關於輔導學科的定位與課程規劃的一些想法。董總：未出版。
陳清平(1999)。Holland類型論的空間構形分析研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
曾文昌(1994)。國中輕度智能不足學生職業與趣類型及其相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
黃天中(1995)。生涯規劃概念。台北：桂冠。
黃德祥(2000)。青少年發展與輔導。臺北：五南。
黃聯化(1979)。國中學生之工藝科學成就與其職業興趣之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
葉至誠(2001)。社會學概論。臺北市:揚智文化。
董奇、申繼亮(2003)。心理與教育研究法。台北：東華書局。
董總(2002)。《2001年獨中高中畢業生升學率調查報告》。馬來西亞：董總。
董教總全國華文獨中工委會學務處學生事務局（2003）。統計篇，P.41-60
董總網站(2003)。2003年12月5日取自http://www.djz.edu.my/
廖湘鴻(1980)。高中僑生學業困難問題之調查研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
潘慧玲(2004)。教育論文格式。台北：雙葉。
蔡永澤(2003)。馬來西亞之教育、旅遊與經濟。南華大學亞太所。2005年3月21日取自http://www.ncku.edu.tw/~cseas/report/%BD%B2%A5%C3%BFA% A1G%B0%A8%A8%D3%A6%E8%A8%C8%B7%A7%AAp.03doc.doc
蔡雅惠(2002)。國中小學生職業性別刻板印象與職業興趣之研究。臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡蜀雲(1992)。國中教師生涯階段.職業興趣與工作價值關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
戴萬平、顧長永(2001)。經濟發展、民主化與族群政治：馬來西亞的個案。問題與研究，40(6)，69-84。
謝孟芳(2002)。性別、家庭背景及職業興趣對國中資優班學生教育及職業選擇影響之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
顏士智(2000) 。國中音樂班學生職業興趣及休閒生活之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
顏淑玲(1991)。智能不足者圖畫式職業興趣量表的編製及其相關因素研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
顧長永(1995)。東南亞政府與政治。台北市 : 五南。

英文部份
Anderson, M. Z., Tracey, T. J. G., & Round, J. (1997). Examining the Invariance of Holland's Vocational Interest Model across Gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(3), 349-364
Athanasou, J. A. (1982 a). High School Students Preference for and Sense of Understanding of the Holland Vocational Interest Categories. Research ﹝DATABASES﹞.EBSCOHOST 2003. Abstract from: Eric Item: Report: ED222539
Athanasou, J. A. (1982 b). Vocational Interest Survey--Six Scales for the Measurement of Holland's Vocational Typology. Reserch Report. ﹝DATABASES﹞.EBSCOHOST 2003. Abstract from: Eric Item: Report: ED223643
Bull, P. E.(1975). Structure of Occupational Interests in New Zealand and America on Holland's Typology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22.(6), 554-556.
Cunningham, C. H. (1977). Use of Holland's Vocational Theory with Potential High School Dropouts. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 10. (1), 35-38.
Dayton, C. M., Norman, P. U.(n.d). Relationship between Holland Vocational Inventory Scores and Performance Measures of High School Student ﹝DATABASES﹞.EBSCOHOST 2003. Abstract from: Eric Item: ED010198
Elsworth, G. R., Harvey-Beavis, A., Ainley, J., & Fabris, S. (1999). Generic Interests and School Subject Choice. Educational Research and Evaluation. 5(3), 290-318.
Eva, S. R., & Fred, W. V. (1999). Breadth of Interest, Exploration, and Identity Development in Adolescence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 298-317.
Farh, J., Leong, F. T. L., & Law, K. S. (1998). Cross-Cultural Validity of Holland's Model in Hong Kong. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(3), 425-440.
Feldman, S., & Meir, E. I. (1976). Measuring Women's Interests Using Holland's Vocational Classification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 345-352.
Fouad, N. A. ＆dancer, L. S.(1992). Cross-Cultural Structure of Interests: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40(2), 129-143.
Fouad, N. A., Harmon, L. W., & Borgen, F. H. (1997). Structure of interests in employed male and female members of U.S. racial-ethnic minority and nonminority groups. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(4), 339-345.
Glidden-Tracey, C. E., & Parrage, M. I. (1996). Assessing the structure of vocational interests among Bolivian University Students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 96-106.
Haverkamp, B. E., Collins, R. C., & Hansen, J. C. (1994). Structure of interests of Asian-American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(2), 256-264.
Hearn, J. C., & Moos, R. H. (1978). Subject Matter and Classroom Climate: A Test of Holland's Environmental Propositions [DATABASES 2004]. American Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 111-24. Abstract from: Eric Item: EJ187938
Helms, S. T. (1996). Some Experimental Tests of Holland's Congruency Hypotheses: The Reactions of High School Students to Occupational Simulations. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(3), 253-268.
Holland, J. L. (1973). Making Vacotional Choices: A Theory of Careers. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall.
Holland, J. L.(1985). Making vocational choices : a theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
Gottfredson, G. D. (1999). Holland’s Contributions to Vocational Psychology: A Review and Evaluation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 15-40.
Gottfredson, G. D., & Holland, J. L. (1996). Dictionary of Holland Occupational Codes. Palo Alto, Calif. : Consulting Psychologists Press.
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluation Order Hypotheses Within Proximity Matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 172-178.
Jan J. L. & Keith, F. T. (1986). Holland in Australia. Australian Council for Educational Research Melbourne. Australia, H. V.: Acer.

Ji, P. Y., Lapan, R. T., & Tate, K. (2004). Vocational Interests and Career Efficacy Expectations in Relation to Occupational Sex-Typing Beliefs for Eighth Grade Students. Journal of Career Development. 31(2), 143-154.
Jin, S. R. (1986). Holland typology: an empirical study on its factorial structure. Bullentin of Educational Psychology, 19, 219-254.
Jinkook, T. (2004). Structure of Vocational Interests for Korean College Students. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(3), 289-311.
Khan, S, B., Alvi, S. A., Shaukat, N., Hussain, M. A., & Baig, T. (1990). A Study of the Validity of Holland's theory in a Non-Western Culture. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 132-146.
Leong, F. T. L. (1997). Cross-cultural career psychology: Comment on Fouad, Harmon, and Borgen (1997) and Tracey, Watanabe, and Schneider (1997). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(4), 355-359.
Leong, F. T. L., Kao, E .M. C., & Lee, S. H.,(2004). The Relationship between Family Dynamics and Career Interests among Chinese Americans and European Americans. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(1), 65-85.
Leong, T. L. F., Austin, J. T., Sekaran, U., & Komarraju, M.(1998 ). An Evaluation of the Cross-Cultural Validity of Holland's Theory: Career Choices by Workers in India. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(3), 441-455.
Savickas, M. L., ＆ Gottfredson, G. D., (1999). Introduction Holland’s Theory (1959-1999): 40 Years of Research and Application. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 14.
Sharf, R. S. (1992). Applying career development theory to counseling. 2nd. ed. Pacific Grove, Calif. : Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. 李茂興譯(1998)。生涯諮商:理論與實務。台北市:弘智文化。
Sharf, R. S. (2002). Applying career development theory to counseling. 3rd. ed. Pacific Grove, Calif. : Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.
Michael, A. M., & Andrea, F. S. (1999). Holland’s Theory and Occupational Information. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 74-85.
Milgram, R. M., Hong, E. (1999). Multipotential abilities and vocational interests in gifted adolescents: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Psychology, 34(2), 81-93.

Mullis, R. L., Mullis, A. K., & Gerwels, D. (1998). Stability of Vocational Interests Among High School Students. Academic Search Premier. 33(131). 699-708. Retrieved Jan 28, 2005, from http://search.epnet.com/ login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&an=ED407547&lang=zh-tw
Oliver, L. W., Lent. E.B., & Zack, J.S. (1998). Career and Vocational Assessment 1995-1996: A Biennial Review. Journal of Career Assessment, 6(3), 231-267.
Osborn, D. S. (2002). Using the Self-Directed search career explorer with middle school student: the practicality of Holland's RIASEC theory. Careers aeross American Conference 2002, 59-64. Retrieved March 20, 2005 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/ content_storage_01/0000000b/80/27/8c/83.pdf
Peiser,C. (1984). The Use of Holland's Typology and Interest Inventory in Israel. Journal of Social Psychology, 123(2), p169-178.
Prediger, D., Swaney, K., & Mau. W. C. (1993). Extending Holland's Hexagon: Procedures, Counseling Applications, and Research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71(4), 422-429.
Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. (1993). Prediger's dimensional representation of
Holland's RIASEC circumplex. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 875-890.
Round, J., Tracey, T.J., & Hubert, L. (1992). Research Methodology Methods for Evaluating Vocational Interest Structural Hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239-259.
Rounds, J., Tracey, T. J. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(3), 310-330.
Ryan, J. M., Tracey, T. G., & Rounds, J. (1996). Generalizability of Holland's structure of vocational interests across ethnicity, gender, and socialeconomic status. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 96(43), 330-337.
Salleh, A. H. M.(1984). An investigation of the reliability, validity, and translation of Holland's Self-directed search for utilization by a Malaysian population. Abstract from: DAI-A 46/01, 77.
Soh, S., & Leong, F. T. L. (2001). Cross-Cultural Validation of Holland's Theory in Singapore: Beyond Structural Validity of RIASEC. Journal of Career Assessment. 9(2), 115-33.
Swanson, J. L. (1992). The structure of vocational Interests for African-American College Students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 144-157.
Tan, E. (1998). Research on Vocational Behavior: The Singapore Perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(3), 323-342.
Tang, M. (2001). Investigation of Structure of Vocational Interests of Chinese College Students. Journal of Career Assessment. 9(4), 365-379.
Tawni, J. H., & Jo-Ida, C. H. (1999). Holland-style Measures of Congruence: Are Complex Indices More Effective Predictors of Satisfaction? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 471-482.
Tien, H. L (1997). The Vocational Interest Structure of Taiwanese High School Students. (ED413421). ﹝DATABASES﹞.EBSCOHOST 2005. Full text from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/ content_storage_01/0000000b/80/23/19/0b.pdf
Toit, R. D., & Bruin, G. P. D. (2002). The Structural Validity of Holland's R-I-A-S-E-C Model of Vocational Personality Types for Young Black South African Men and Women. Journal of Career Assessment, 10(1), 62-78.
Tracey, T. J. G. (1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for a randomized test of hypothesized order relations. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57(1), 164-169.
Tracey, T. J. G., Watanable,N., ＆ Schneider,P.L., (1997). Structural Invariance of Vocational Interests across Japanese and American Cultures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(4), 346-354.
Tracey, T. J., & Round. J. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's Vocational_Interest Models A Structural. Psychological Bulletin, 113(2), 229-246.
Turner, S. L., Steward, J. C., & Lapan, R. T. (2004). Family Factors Associated With Sixth-Grade Adolescents' Math and Science Career Interests. Career Development Quarterly, 53(1), 41-53.