簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 藍怡婷
Yi Ting Lan
論文名稱: 一個月前的打鬥經驗是否會影響Kryptolebias marmoratus魚類之近期
Does contest experience from more than a month previously in Kryptolebias marmoratus influence winner/loser effects arising from recent contests?
指導教授: 許鈺鸚
Hsu, Yu-Ying
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 生命科學系
Department of Life Science
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 41
中文關鍵詞: 輸贏效應攻擊行為打鬥行為
英文關鍵詞: aggressiveness, loser effect, winner effect, Kryptolebias marmoratus
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:135下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 打鬥的輸/贏經驗會影響個體在未來打鬥的行為並且降低/增加個體的勝率。一般認為這些經驗效應多為短效性,在幾小時到幾天後即會消失,然而Kryptolebias marmoratus魚類之先前研究,卻顯示輸贏經驗對此魚打鬥行為的影響可能超過一個月。然而這些先前研究中,一個月前有獲勝/落敗經驗的個體同時也具備了較高/較低的打鬥能力,因此無法區分這些個體打鬥行為之差異是源自於一個月前的勝敗經驗或者打鬥能力上的差別。因此,本研究主要目的在於測試一個月前的勝敗經驗是否還會對打鬥行為造成影響。如果一個月前的勝敗經驗仍對打鬥行為有所影響,此經驗亦可能對新的打鬥經驗效應的強弱造成影響;所以本研究同時測試此可能性。實驗結果發現,與一個月前被給予贏經驗的個體相比,一個月前獲得輸經驗的個體在打鬥中展現較低的攻擊性,而且這些(一個月前輸經驗)個體的行為較易受到近期(一天前)打鬥經驗的影響而展現出較明顯的勝者與敗者效應。本研究更進一步發現,兩個月前的勝敗經驗對此魚打鬥行為仍可能造成影響,然而由於此經驗同時伴隨著打鬥能力的差異,無法分辨影響是來自於何項因子。然而此兩個月前之經驗或打鬥能力對來自近期(一天前)打鬥經驗之勝者或敗者效應之顯著性已不再有顯著影響。

    A prior winning or losing experience can alter an individual’s behavior in and its probability of winning a subsequent contest. Although these effects have been supposed to be short lived, there is evidence from many previous studies of Kryptolebias marmoratus of an unexplained influence from contests more than a month previously on subsequent contest behavior. These previous experiments, nonetheless, could not distinguish the long-term experience effect from the result of intrinsic fighting ability. This study examined whether/how contest experiences from more than a month previously influence current contest behavior and the magnitude of subsequent winner/loser effects, using fish matched for the outcome of the contest staged two months previously against similarly-sized opponents. The results showed that the winning/losing experience obtained more than a month previously significantly affected both the fish’s subsequent contest behavior and the magnitude of subsequent winner/loser effects. Individuals randomly assigned to receive a losing experience one month previously, were less aggressive; i.e., took longer to initiate displays and attacks and were less likely to escalate contests into physical fights than those assigned a winning experience. Moreover, these individuals displayed stronger winner and loser effects from recent contest experiences. The outcome of the size-matched contests from two months previously also significantly affected current contest behavior but did not influence the significance of the winner or loser effect from recent contest experiences. These results show that contest experience has long-term effect on contest behavior and suggest that the value of information from a recent win or loss may depend on contest history.

    Introduction 2 1.1 Animal contests 2 1.1.1 The importance of the value of a resource on animal contests 2 1.1.2 The importance of fighting cost on animal contests 3 1.2 Winner and loser effect 3 1.3 Objectives 5 Material and methods 7 2.1 Study species 7 2.2 Experimental design and procedures 8 2.3 Providing a randomly-selected winning/losing experience 10 2.4 Staging contest on Test Day 11 2.5 Contest behavior 12 2.6 Statistical analyses 12 Results 15 3.1 Winner and loser effects arising from recent contest experiences 15 3.2 The influence of the 2-month SS and 1-month RS experiences on contest behavior 16 3.3 The influence of the 2-month SS and 1-month RS experiences on the winner/loser effects arising from recent contest experiences 16 Discussion 19 4.1 The effect of recent contest experiences on contest behavior and outcome 19 4.2 Long-term experience effects 21 4.3 The influence of contest experiences from one month previously on the winner and loser effects arising from recent contest experiences 23 4.4 The influence of the self-selected contest experiences on contest behavior 24 References 26 Tables and Figures 31

    Bakker TCM, Bruijn E, Sevenster P. 1989. Asymmetrical effects of prior winning and losing on dominance in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ethology. 82:224-229.
    Beaugrand JP, Payette D, Goulet C. 1996. Conflict outcome in male green swordtail fish dyads (Xiphophorus helleri): Interaction of body size, prior dominance/subordination experience, and prior residency. Behaviour. 133:303-319.
    Bégin J, Beaugrand JP, Zayan R. 1996. Selecting dominants and subordinates at conflict outcome can confound the effects of prior dominance or subordination experience. Behav Processes. 36:219-226.
    Bergman DA, Kozlowski CP, McIntyre JC, Huber R, Daws AG, Moore PA. 2003. Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, orconectes rusticus. Behaviour. 140:805-825.
    Brick O. 1999. A test of the sequential assessment game: the effect of increased cost of sampling. Behav Ecol. 10:726-732.
    Briffa M, Sneddon LU. 2007. Physiological constraints on contest behaviour. Funct Ecol. 21:627-637.
    Chase ID, Bartolomeo C, Dugatkin LA. 1994. Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning? Anim Behav. 48:393-400.
    Chen MH. 2008. Do different prior experiences interference with each other? Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
    Cheng KC. 2008. The effect of multiple winning and losing experiences in Kryptolebias marmoratus. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
    Costa WJEM. 2004. Kryptolebias, a substitute name for Cryptolebias, (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 2:107-108.
    Davis WP, Taylor DS, Turner BJ. 1990. Field observations of the ecology and habits of mangrove rivulus (Rivulus marmoratus) in Belize and Florida (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Ichthyol explor freshwaters.1:123-134.
    Drummond H, Canales C. 1998. Dominance between booby nestlings involves winner and loser effects. Anim Behav. 55:1669-1676.
    Earley RL, Dugatkin LA. 2002. Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci. 269:943-952.
    Earley RL, Hsu Y. 2008. Reciprocity between endocrine state and contest behavior in the killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus. Horm Behav. 53:442-451.
    Elwood RW, Briffa M. 2001. Information gathering and communication during agonistic encounters: a case study of hermit crabs. In: Slater PJB, editor. Advances in the study of behavior. New York: Academic Press. p. 53-97.
    Enquist M, Leimar O, Ljungberg T, Mallner Y, Segerdahl N. 1990. A test of the sequential assessment game-fighting in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala. Anim Behav. 40:1-14.
    Francis RC. 1983. Experiential effects on agonistic behavior in the paradise fish, Macroposu opercularis. Beahviour. 85:292-313.
    Fromhage L, Schneider JM. 2005. Virgin doves and mated hawks: contest behaviour in a spider. Anim Behav. 70:1099-1104.
    Gabor CR, Jaeger RG. 1995. Resource quality affects the agonistic behaviour of territorial salamanders. Anim Behav. 49:71-79.
    Grizzle JM, Thiyagarajah A. 1987. Skin Histology of Rivulus ocellatus marmoratus: Apparent Adaptation for Aerial Respiration. Copeia. 1987:237-240.
    Harrington RWJ. 1961. Ovipaous hermaphroditic fish with internal self-fertilization. Science. 134:1740-1750.
    Hsu Y, Lee IH, Lu CK. 2009. Prior contest information: mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 63:1247-1257.
    Hsu Y, Lee SP, Chen MH, Yang SY, Cheng KC. 2008. Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. Anim Behav. 75:1641-1649.
    Hsu Y, Wolf LL. 1999. The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav. 57:903-910.
    Hsu Y, Wolf LL. 2001. The winner and loser effect: What fighting behaviours are influenced? Anim Behav. 61:777-786.
    Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL. 2006. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev. 81:33-74.
    Huhman KL, Solomon MB, Janicki M, Harmon AC, Lin SM, Israel JE, Jasnow AM. 2003. Conditioned defeat in male and female Syrian hamsters. Horm Behav. 44:293-299.
    Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Punzalan D, Mason AC, Andrade MCB. 2009. Experience affects the outcome of agonistic contests without affecting the selective advantage of size. Anim Behav. 77:1533-1538.
    Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Sivalinghem S, Mason AC, Andrade MCB. 2010. Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol. 21:404-409.
    Laidre ME, Elwood RW. 2008. Motivation matters: cheliped extension displays in the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus, are honest signals of hunger. Anim Behav. 75:2041-2047.
    Lin HC, Dunson WA. 1995. An explanation of the high strain diversity of a self-fertilizing hermaphroditic fish. Ecology. 76:593-605.
    Mackiewicz M, Tatarenkov A, Taylor DS, Turner BJ, Avise JC. 2006. Extensive outcrossing and androdioecy in a vertebrate species that otherwise reproduces as a self-fertilizing hermaphrodite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:9924-9928.
    Maynard Smith J. 1974. The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J Theor Biol. 47:209-221.
    Maynard Smith J, Parker GA. 1976. The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav. 24:159-175.
    Maynard Smith J, Price GR. 1973. The logic of animal contests. Nature. 246:15-18.
    Mesterton-Gibbons M. 1999. On the evolution of pure winner and loser effects: A game-theoretic model. Bull Math Biol. 61:1151-1186.
    Neat FC, Taylor AC, Huntingford FA. 1998. Proximate costs of fighting in male cichlid fish: the role of injuries and energy metabolism. Anim Behav. 55:875-882.
    Ong KJ, Stevens ED, Wright PA. 2007. Gill morphology of the mangrove killifish (Kryptolebias marmoratus) is plastic and changes in response to terrestrial air exposure. J Experi Biol. 210:1109-1115.
    Riechert SE. 1998. Game Theory and animal contests. In: Dugatkin LA, Reeve HK, eds. Game theory and animal behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Schuett GW. 1997. Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav. 54:213-224.
    Taylor DS. 1992. Diet of the killifish Rivulus marmoratus collected from land crab burrows, with further ecological notes. Environ Biol Fishes. 33:389-393.
    Taylor DS. 2001a. Adaptive specializations of the Cyprinodont fish Rivulus marmoratus. Fla Sci. 53:239-248.
    Taylor DS, Fisher MT, Turner BJ. 2001b. Homozygosity and heterozygosity in three populations of Rivulus marmoratus. Environ Biol Fishes. 61:455-459.
    Taylor DS, Turner BJ, Davis WP, Chapman BB. 2008. A novel terrestrial fish habitat inside emergent logs. Am Nat. 171:263-266.
    Wells MS. 1988. Effects of body size and resource value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Anim Behav. 36:321-326.
    Whitehouse MEA. 1997. Experience influences male-male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Anim Behav. 53:913-923.
    Yang SY. 2008. The decay function of experience effects in the contest of Kryptolebias marmoratus. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE