本研究旨在探究創造性問題解決團體之討論歷程與其所發想出之產品的創造力之關聯。本研究使用錄影評量之探索型混合型研究，先以質化之方式處理，再進行量化處理。研究參與者以便利抽樣之方式，以舉辦工作坊的形式，公開招募各大專院生為受試者，共招募33位成員，將受試者分為七組。過程中以錄影觀察之方式進行，將工作坊討論階段分為需求產生、問題建構、點子產生和產品規劃四階段，各組經由四階段討論後，產生創造性產品，請領域專家依據CSDS量表，針對此產品進行評分。研究結果發現：一、各組在四階段內之討論歷程，可歸類出「提供資訊」、「解釋」、「統整」、「提出點子」、「精緻化」、「表達贊否」、「確認」、「任務參與」和「無關」九種類別對話類別。二、研究參與者之討論表現皆符合各階段預期之特徵，且「解釋」與「統整」類別對於產品創造性產出有正向影響；最有利於需求產生與問題建構階段中的對話類別為「提供資訊」，點子產生階段中最有效益的對話類別為「提出點子」，而在產品規劃階段中，最有幫助的類別為「精緻化」。三、小組產品創造性與正向情緒有關聯。最後本研究依據研究結果，提供創造性問題解決團體討論之相關研究的未來建議方向。

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the creative problem solving groups’ discussion process and the creative products they came up with. This study was based on mixed design. Qualitative research design was first used, then quantitative. In order to facilitate the sampling, the study recruited college students to participate in workshops. A total of 33 members were recruited and the subjects were divided into seven groups. This study used video observation. The discussion portion of the workshop was divided into four stages: demand generation, problem construction, idea generation and product planning. After the four stages of discussion each group completed creative products. Field experts were invited to judge creative products using the CSDS Scale. The videos of group discussion were used to categorize dialogue as "Providing Information", "Explanation", "Integration", "Idea Generation", "Refinement", "Expressing Comments", "Confirmation", "Task Participation" and " Not Related". Then, according to the creativity scores given by the experts, variance analysis was used to divide the groups into high, medium and low. Two coders were invited to assist in coding the dialogue at each stage. The chi-squared test was then used to analyze the differences in dialogues at each stage. Next, two-factor mixed design variation analysis was used to analyze the product creativity and the pre-test and post-test mood questionnaires. The analysis showed that group product creativity is correlated to with positive emotions. The results of this study provide future direction for research related to creative problem solving group discussion.

中文部份

毛連溫、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台（2000）。創造力研究。臺北市：心理。
吳心楷、宋曜廷、簡馨瑩（2010）。錄影分析在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），1-37。
吳清山、林天佑（2010）。教育e辭書。臺北: 高等教育。
吳鈿富（2009）。歐美澳公民關鍵能力發展之研究。教育資料集刊第，48，273-299。
林耀南、朱志忠、林書宇（2012）。幽默風格、團體衝突與團體凝聚力之關聯性研究。創造學刊，3（1），71-92。
邱發忠、林耀南（2017）。應用 STEAM 體驗式學習在跨領域工程教育課程提升想像力及創造力 之研究: 以未來想像升級高齡健康促進科技為例-工程想像力教學模式與課程發展研究。科技部跨領域工程教育人才培育與研究計畫（編號：105WFD0750393）。
邱皓政（1999）。組織創新環境的概念建構與測量工具發展。國立政治大學主辦「技術創造力學術研討會」。宣讀之論文（臺北市）。
邱皓政（2005）。創造力的測量與共識衡鑑。教育集刊，30，50-73。
施曉峯（2008）。創造性問題解決融入教學單元設計-以 “創意美術用具收納盒” 教學活動設計為例。花蓮教育大學特教通訊，40，47-54。
洪文東（2006）。以創造性問題解決教學活動設計提升學生解決問題能力。科學教育研究與發展季刊。科學教育研究與發展季刊，43，26-42。
貢喆、劉昌、沈汪兵（2016）。有關創造力測量的一些思考。心理科學進展， 24（1）, 31-45。
張仁和、陳學志、徐芝君、林耀南（2009）。高中職創意競賽之團隊歷程── 成員歧異度與團隊氣氛對團隊創造力的影響。教育與心理研究，32（4），73-97。
張世彗（2011）。創造力教學、學習與評量之探究。教育資料與研究雙月刊, 100, 54-74。
陳映伶（2011）。不同設計方法對於思考過程與成果的影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣科技大學，臺北市。
陳龍安（1997）。創造思考教學。臺北市：師大書苑。
陳龍安（2005）。創造思考的策略與技法。教育資料集刊，30，201-265。
陳龍安、朱湘吉（2005）。創造與生活。台北：五南。
陳耀茂（1998）。創意激發術。台北市：探索。
游世甫（2013）圖像式腦力激盪研究探討-以工業產品設計草圖概念構想階段為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
湯偉君、邱美虹（1999）。創造性問題解決（CPS）模式的沿革與應用。科學教育月刊，223，2-20。
黃惇勝（1993）。KJ 法的基本理念及應用。創造思考教育，5，28-34。
楊深坑（2000）。迎向新世紀的教育改革-方法論之省察與國際改革趨勢之比較分析。教育研究集刊，44, 1-34。
蒲怡靜（2004）電子腦力激盪術於設計創意值之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
蕭錫錡、張仁家、黃金益（2000）。合作學習對大學生專題製作創造力影響之研究。科學教育學刊，8（4），395-410。
江麗美譯（1996）。六頂思考帽法（原作者：Edward de Bono）。台北：桂冠。
林隆儀譯（1992）。創造性思考與腦力激盪法（原作者：J. Geoffrey Rawlinson.）。臺北市：清華管理科學圖書中心。
林義雄、陳澤民譯（1993）。數學學習心理學（原作者：R.R. Skemp.）。台北：九章。
鄭聖敏、王曼娜、桑慧芬、顏靖芳譯（2014）。創造力與創新教育：創造力教學實務指引（原作者：Donald J. Treffinger, Patricia F. Schoonover, Edwin C. Selby）。臺北市：華騰文化。
賴麗珍譯（2007）。創意思考教學的 100 個點子（原作者：Stephen Bowkett.）。台北市：心理出版。

英文部份

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluators. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(2), 146-156.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
Amabile, T. M. (1986). The personality of creativity. Creative Living, 15(3), 12-16.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of management journal, 39(1), 123-148.
Antes, A. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Effects of time frame on creative thought: Process versus problem-solving effects. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2-3), 166-182.
Baillie, C., & Walker, P. (1998). Fostering creative thinking in student engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 35–44.
Barbara, K., & Camea, G. (2003). Measuring creativity in research and practice. In Lopes, SJ & Snyder, C.R.(Eds), Positive psychology assessment: a handbook of models and measures (pp. 141-145). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2001). Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development. Mis Quarterly, 25(2), 195-228.
Barki, H., and Hartwick, J. (2001). Interpersonal conflict and its management in information systems development. MIS Quarterly, 25, 2 195-228.
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.
Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes, and behaviors work together: A causal process model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 77–100.
Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. HBR’s 10 must reads on change, 78(3), 133-141.
Besemer, S.P., & O’quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287–296.
Bossidy, L., Charan, R., & Burck, C. (2002). The discipline of getting things done. New South Wales: Random House Business Books.
Bowkett, S. (2007). Emotional intelligence. Network Continuum Education.
Carnevale, A. P., Gainer, L. J., & Meltzer, A. (1990). Workplace basics: The essential skills employers want. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categoriza- tion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1300-1309.
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of sport psychology, 7(3), 244-266.
Carson, D. K., & Runco, M. A. (1999). Creative problem solving and problem finding in young adults: Interconnections with stress, hassles, and coping abilities. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(3), 167-188.
Christiaans, H.H.C.M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 41–54.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What Makes Teams Work : Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.
Connelly, M.S., Gilberty, JA., Zaccaro, S.J., Threlfall, K. V., Marks, M.A.&Mumford, M.D. (2000) Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 65-86.
Cota, A. A., Longman, S. R., Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1995). Using and misusing factor analysis to explore group cohesion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(2), 308-316
Crawford, R.P. (1954). The techniques of creative thinking. New York: Hawthorn Books.
Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco. (Ed.) Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83-114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Cropley, D. &. (2005). Engineering Creativity: A Systems Concept of Functional Creativity. In K. &. Baer (Eds), Creativity Across Domains: Faces of the Muse (pp. 169-185). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Non‐expert raters and the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(2), 119-137.
Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: empirical validation of the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale (CSDS). Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(2), 119-137.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2011). Measuring creativity for innovation management. Journal of technology management & innovation, 6(3), 13-30.
Cropley, D.H., & Cropley, A. J. (2010a) Functional creativity: Products and the generation of effective novelty. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 301-320). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417-449.
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in in- tellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58–64.
Davidson, N., & O’Leary, P. W. (1990). How cooperative learning can enhance mastery teaching. Educational Leadership, 47, 30-40.
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 280-295.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. New York: Heath.
Dreu, C. K. D. (2002). Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 285-298.
Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22(2), 175-186.
Farrell, M. P. (2001). Collaborative circles: Friendship dynamics and creative work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Festinger, L., Schacter, S., & Back, K., (1950). Social pressures in informed groups: A study of a housing project. New York, NY: Harare.
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S.M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Florida, R. (2002) The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, life, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Gammage, K. L., Carron, A. V., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2001). Team cohesion and individual productivity: The influence of the norm for productivity and the identifiability of individual effort. Small Group Research, 32(1), 3-18.
Getzels J.W. (1976). Longitudinal study of problem-finding in art. New York: Wiley.
Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). Concern for discovery in the creative process. In Albert Rothenberg and Carl R. Hausman, (Eds.), The creativity question (pp.161-165). Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Ghiselin, B. (1963) Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity, inTaylor, C. and Barron, F. (Eds.) Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp.30-43). New York, N.Y: Wiley.
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). A Model of Task Group Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
Grudin, R. (1990) The grace of great things: Creativity and innovation. New York: Ticknor and Fields.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454.
Guilford, J. P., & Tenopyr, M. L. (1968). Implications of the structure-of-intellect model for high school and college students. In W. B. Michael (Ed.), Teaching for creative endeavor (pp. 25–45). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of levels of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26(4), 497-520.
Han, S. H., Yun, M. H., Kim, K., & Kwahk, J. (2000). Evaluation of product usability: Development and validation of usability dimensions and design elements based on empirical models. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26, 477–488.
Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming Groups in Context: Effectiveness in a Product Design Firm Robert 1. Sutton. Administrative science quarterly, 41(4), 685-718.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1987). Creativity and Learning: What Research Says to the Teacher. West Haven, Connecticut: National Education Association.
Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (1999). Consensual assessment. Encyclopedia of creativity, 1, 346-359.
Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(2), 276.
Howe, R.(1997). Creative problem solving approaches processes for teaching and doing creative activity. Handbook of seminar on instruction for creative thinking. Taipei, Taiwan: NTNU.
Isaksen, S. G. (1995). CPS: Linking creativity and problem solving. In G. Kaufinann, T. Helstrup, & K. H. Teigen, (Eds), Problem solving and cognitive processes: A festschrift in honour of Kjell Raaheim (pp. 145-181). Bergen- sandviken, Norway: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjorke AS.
Isaksen, S. G. (1995). On The Conceptual Foundations of Creative Problem Solving: A Response to Magyari‐Beck. Creativity and Innovation management, 4(1), 52-63.
Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (1994). Creative approaches to problem solving. Dubuque Iowa, NY: Hunt.
Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for change. Dubuque Iowa, NY: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
Isaksen, S. G., Puccio, G. J., & Treffinger, D. J. (1993). An ecological approach to creativity research: Profiling for creative problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 27(3), 149-170.
Ishii, N., Suzuki, Y., Fujiyoshi, H., Fujii, T., & Kozawa, M. (2006). A framework for designing learning environments fostering creativity. In A. Mendez-Vilas, A. Solano Martın, J.A. Mesa Gonzalez, & J. Mesa Gonzalez (Eds.), Current developments in technology-assisted education (pp. 228–232). Badajoz, Spain: Formatex.
Jablokow, K. (2001, June). The thinking expedition: A course in creativity, innovation and change. Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, NM.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. M. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International journal of conflict management, 8(4), 287-305.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta‐analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95-105.
John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Cole, J. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the consensual assessment technique. The Journal of creative behavior, 43(4), 223-233.
Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: Structural model for self‐reported creativity ratings. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(2), 119-134.
Ma, H.-H. (2006). A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 435–446. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1804_3
Magyari-Beck, I. (1993). Creatology: A post- psychological study. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 183-192.
Meyer, A. S., & Isaksen, A. (1995). Application of enzymes as food antioxidants. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 6(9), 300-304.
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. (1996). Search- ing for common threads: Understanding the multiple effect of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
Mobley, M. I., Doares, L., & Mumford, M. D. (1992). Process ana- lytic models of creative capacities: Evidence for the combina- tion and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 125–156.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210-227.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Supinski, E. P., & Maher, M. A. (1996). Process based measures of creative problem solving skills: II. Information encoding. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 77–88.
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30-47.
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative ca- pacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative ca- pacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.
Mumford, M.D., & Gustafson, S.B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.
Mumford, M.D., & Gustafson, S.B. (2007). Creative thought: Cognition and problem solving in a dynamic system. In M.A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Volume II, pp. 33–77). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Mumford, M.D., Mobley, M.I., Reiter-palmon, R., Uhlman, C.E., & Doares, L.M. (1991). Pro- cess analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.
Mumford, M.D., Olsen, K.A., & James, L.R. (1989). Age-related changes in the likelihood of major con- tributions. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 29, 9–32.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392-430). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Nijhof, W., & Kommers, P. (1985). An analysis of cooperation in relation to cognitive controversy. In Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 125-145). Springer, Boston, MA.
Ocker, R. (2005). Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: A qualita- tive analysis of experimental teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 22-39.
Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 145–153.
Ordonez, L., & Benson, L. (1997). Decisions under time pressure: How time constraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 121–140.
Osborn , A.F.(1953).Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative
problem-solving. New York: Scribner.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. Oxford, England: Scribner'S.
Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams and creativity: The creative potential of idea generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237-262.
Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (Ed.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford University Press.
Perkins, D. N. (1990). The nature and nurture of creativity. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 415-443). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 258-264.
Pinkley, R. L. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of applied psychology, 75(2), 117.
Prentky, R. A. (1980). Creativity and psychopathology: A neurocognitive perspective. Westport, NY: Praeger Publishers.
Qin, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1990). Laboratory replication of scientific discovery processes. Cognitive Science, 14, 281–312.
Rahim, M. A., (2001). Managing Conflict in Organizations. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., & Threlfall, K. V. (1998). Solving everyday problems creatively: The role of problem construction and personality type. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 187–198.
Robbins, S. P. (2002). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). New Jersey, NY: Upper Saddle River.
Rothenberg, A. (1986). Artistic creation as stimulated by super-im- posed versus combined-composite visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 370–381.
Rothenberg, A. (1996). The Janusian Process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 207–231.
Runco, M. A. (1999). Time. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 659–663). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 45, 483–501.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. London, UK: Psychology Press.
Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 3(2), 81.
Sawyer, R. K., & Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Connecticut, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 79-98.
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388.
Selby, E. C., Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2014). Historical Development of VIEW. Orchard Park, NY: Creative Problem Solving Group, Inc.
Stamovlasis, D., Dimos, A., & Tsaparlis, G. (2006). A study of group interaction processes in learning lower secondary physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 43(6), 556-576.
Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1970). Influence of dyadic interaction on creative functioning. Psychological Reports, 26,391-394.
Treffinger, D. J. & Isaksen, S. G. (1992). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2013). Creative problem solving: An overview. In Runco, M. A. (Eds.), Problem finding, problem solving and creativity (pp. 153-159). Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Treffinger, D. J., Selby, E. C., & Isaksen, S. G. (2008). Understanding individual problem-solving style: A key to learning and applying creative problem solving. Learning and individual Differences, 18(4), 390-401.
Triffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (1994). Creative problem solving: An overview. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 167-169). New Jersey, NY: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Wall, V., & Nolan L. (1986). Perceptions of inequity, satisfaction, and conflict in task-oriented groups. Human Relations, 39, 1033-1052.
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). A new look at the creativity– intelligence distinction. Journal of Personality, 33, 348–369.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp 189–212). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology An International Review, 51, 355-387.
Woodan, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321.