簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李坤益
論文名稱: 網路資源的引用與學生學習方式的改變
指導教授: 陳文典
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 物理學系
Department of Physics
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 73
中文關鍵詞: 網路資源學習方式
英文關鍵詞: internet-resources, learning-style
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:138下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 新課程的推展及教材的多樣化,使得網路資源的運用及課堂上使用多媒體呈現等教學方式越來越普遍,也讓學習知識的路徑更加活潑與多元。因此,我們希望將網路上豐富的資源用在教學上,提高學生的學習興趣與主動學習意願。
    利用網路上各項資源,可讓教師廣泛地蒐集、吸收資訊,解決多重教材與教學時間的衝突,並藉著良好的網路傳達,讓學生建構成為自己的知識。利用網路資源,由學生自己選擇資料,也可培養學生的搜集、分析、判斷、解難資料的能力,再配合教師的解說與協助,使不同學習程度的學生皆能獲得學習的成效。
    本研究發展適合國中學生搜尋與整理網路資料的課程,利用『資料搜尋講義』於電腦教室從事試驗教學,使其有效率的引用網路資源,並以『學習狀況調查問卷』及『學生作業的表現』探討學生因為使用網路而引起的學習方式及態度的改變。

    The extension of new courses and the variety of the teaching materials, urged some teaching methods to become more and more common, which liked using Internet-resources and presenting in the classroom by multi-medium, etc..These teaching methods also made the learning route become more lively and diverse. Therefore, we hoped to use the plentiful Internet-resources in teaching, and made students improve their study interest and the active aspiration in studying.
    Using different resources on Internet, would let teachers search and collect information widely and solve the conflict between multiple teaching materials and teaching time, even let students construct knowledge of their own via fine communication from Internet. By using Internet-resources, students choiced information which was suitable for them, it would train them to collect, analyze, judge, and solve those information, then coupled with the explanation and assistance from teachers, each student who stood in different study levels would obtain the learning effect.
    The research developed the courses which would be suitable for junior-high students to search and arrange Internet-resources, it utilized “Information searching handout” in experimental teaching in the computer classroom, to make students use Internet-resources more effectively, and via the “questionnaire of study situation”and the “representation of study assignments”to probe into the changes of learning-style and attitude of students for utilizing Internet.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景、動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 名詞解釋 2 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 學習理論 5 第二節 網路學習 13 第三節 網路運用於教學 23 第三章 研究方法與設計 37 第一節 研究的問題與方法 37 第二節 研究對象 38 第三節 研究工具 39 第四章 結果與討論 43 第五章 結論與建議 55 附錄 57 附錄1 教學講義 57 附錄2 九年一貫學習領域教材內容細目次主題 64 附錄3 網頁推薦評比 66 附錄4.學習狀況調查問卷 67 附錄5 學習狀況調查問卷統計圖 71 圖次: 圖3.1 試驗教學工作流程圖 38 圖4.1 兩班『推薦網頁數與網頁品質積分』對『上課時間序』關係圖44 圖4.2 兩班『推薦人數與技術積分』對『上課時間序』關係圖 46 表次: 表2.1 西元2003年青少年休閒調查 17 表2.2 西元1997~2003年青少年休閒活動排名 18 表2.3 網路搜尋的步驟與技巧 31 表2.4 搜尋軟體的適用範圍 34 表3.1 試驗教學課程內容教學目標 40 表4.1 學生推薦網頁引用品質表-積分總整理 44 表4.2 學生推薦網頁引用技術表-積分總整理 46 表4.3 學習狀況調查問卷與統計 48

    中文部份
    01.尹玫君(1995)。遠距教學系統於國民小學之應用研究─子計畫㆓教學策略學習行為之研究,國科會專題研究計畫,未出版。
    02.比爾.蓋茲等著、王美音譯(1996)。擁抱未來— 「資訊高速公路」未來新藍圖。台北:遠流
    03.王敏僑、黃悅民、張志強( 2001)。課程隨選系統之同步化教材製作軟體實作。2001年台灣區學術網路研討會暨網路學習與繼續專業教育國際會議論文集上冊,209-214。
    04.王曉璿(1998)。網路環境與教學應用。教師之友,1 期,7-14。
    05.何榮桂(2002)。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展— 兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育,87,22-48。
    06.汪瓊(2001)。網路課程:我們的實踐和認識。載於國立中央大學編:「第五屆球華人學習科技研討會/第十屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會大會論文集」(p511-514頁)。桃園:國立中央大學。
    07.周文忠(2000)。全球資訊網建構教學理論與設計模式。載於國立台北師範學院編:八十八學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集(549-567頁)。台北:國立台北師範學院。
    08.周斯畏(1998)。電腦媒體的合作學習,資訊與電腦,7月號,116-119。
    09.果芸 (1997)。遠距教學的新展望。資訊與電腦,204,22-23。
    10.林呈潢(1998)。現代圖書館目錄的功能與角色。大學圖書館。第二卷第二期,62-82。
    11.林奇賢(1997)。全球資訊網輔助學習系統:網際網路與國小教育。資訊與教育,58 期,2-11。
    12.林奇賢(1998)。虛擬學校之建構與應用。2000 中小學網路學習環境設計與應用國際研討會,台南師院,57-75
    13.林奇賢(1998)。網路學習環境的設計與應用。資訊與教育,67 期,34-50。
    14.林奇賢(2000a)。網路學習環境設計與虛擬學習社群的營造。載於國立空中大學編:迎接新世紀 開放學習學術研討會論文集(41-55頁)。台北:國立空中大學。
    15.林奇賢(2000b)。虛擬學校之建構與應用。載於國立台南師範學院編:中小學網路學習環境設計與應用國際研討會論文集(57-75頁)。台南:國立台南師範學院。
    16.林建仲、鄭宗文(2002)。合作式學習與問題解決---培養以問題解決為中心的網路合作學習。資訊與教育,85,55-62。
    17.林惠生(2000)。2000 年台灣地區高中、高職及五專在校學生之性知識、態度、危害健康行為及網路之使用。台北:行政院衛生署國民健康局人口與健康調查研究中心。
    18.洪明洲(1999)。網路教學。台北:華彩軟體股份有限公司。
    19.胡嘉璽 (2000)。網路資料蒐尋攻略。台北:學貫行銷股份有限公司。
    20.孫春在(2000)。網路學習趨勢與原理。2000網路學習理論與實務研討會,13-20。
    21.張政亮(2001)。多媒體網路教學的發展趨勢~以模組式網頁教材的設計為例。2001資訊與教育雜誌特刊,45-55。
    22.陳年興、曾建翰(1997)。全球資訊網上 WebTitle 之製作。遠距教育,2 期,12-21。
    23.陳年興、楊子青、賴宏仁 (1997)。以網際網路為基礎之學習環境。電腦學刊,9 (2),667-674。
    24.陳明溥、莊良寶(1999)。知識圖建構對網路化學習的影響。載於中華民國電腦輔助教學學會舉辦:第八屆電腦輔助教學研討會論文集[線上資料]。取自http://acbe.tku.edu.tw/iccai8/40/40.htm。
    25.彭郁歡(2004)。青少年休閒時間網路使用行為與網路與網路成癮之研究。台北:第四屆中華民國運動與休閒管理國際學術研討會。
    26.彭郁歡(2004)。青少年媒體使用行為研究調查。台北:富邦文教基金會。
    27.彭富源(2001)將資訊科技融入各科教學的困境與因應。研習資訊,18(3),40-48。
    28.黃仁竑、許政穆、尹惠瑛、宋怡昆(2001)。網路教學系統之多媒體互動機制。資訊與教育,82,2-11。
    29.黃武元(2000)。寬頻非同步教材架構的研究。資訊與教育,77,48-64。
    30.黃厚銘(2000)。網路人際關係的親疏遠近。臺大社會學刊,6 月號
    31.葉耀明 (2001)。從網路虛擬實境技術談情境式學習。資訊與教育,82,35-42。
    32.廖建智(2000)。分散式資源分享與推薦。新竹:國立交通大學資訊科學研究所碩士論文
    33.劉秀嫚(1998)。合作學習的教學策略。公民訓育學報,7 期,285-294。
    34.劉惠芬、孫欽儒 (2000)。人際傳播對網路教學的影響。第四屆全球華人教育資訊科技大會論文集,2,551-557。
    35.潘致強(2000)。網路資源融入高中基礎生物科教學之行動研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    36.盧信彰(2000)。網路學習情境之探討。發表於國立成功大學主辦:2000年台灣區網際網路研討會[線上資料]。取自http://www.ncku.edu.tw/TANET2000/download/paper/C1-1tanetM01.doc。
    37.賴阿福(1999)。資料庫與WWW 結合技術之研究。載於國立教育資料館主編:現代教育論壇(四)(p344-376頁)。台北:國立教育資料館。
    38.賴苑玲(2001)。如何將 BIG SIX 技能融入國小課程。網址:http://www.ntl.gov.tw/publish/suyan/48/25.htm。
    39.戴建耘、翁榮銅(1999)。以Internet 平台建構主動學習的教育環境。資訊與教育,74,57-67。
    40.謝寶煖(2000)。網站搜尋e 網打盡。台北:華文網。

    英文部分
    01. Ali , A., & Franklin, T. (2001). Internet use in the classroom: Potential and pitfalls for student learning and teacher-student relationships. Educational Technology, 46(4), 57-59.
    02. Ayersman, D. J., and von Minden, A. (1995), “Individual differences,Computer, and Instruction,” Computers in human behaviors, 11, pp 371-390.
    03. Barker, J. (2002). Recommended search strategy: Analyze your topic & search with peripheral vision. The regents of the University of California. Retrieved September 14, 2002 from the World Wide Web:http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Strategies.html
    04. Batey, A. and Cowell, R. N. (1986), “Distance education: An overview. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory,” (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 278 519).
    05. Carhart, C., and Hannafin, M. (1986), “The accuracy of cognitive monitoring during computer-based instruction,” Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 13(3), pp 88-93.
    06. Cohen, L. (2002e). Evaluating Internet resources. Network Services Librarian.Retrieved July 8, 2002 from the World Wide Web:http://library.albany.edu/internet/evaluate.html
    07. David A.Tyckoson, (Feb. 1989) “The 98% Solution: The Failure of the Catalog and the Role of Electronic Database,” Technicalities 9: 8-12.
    08. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., and Wood- Robinson, V. (1994), Making Sense of Secondary Science, In Research into Children’s Ideas.Routledge,London.
    09. Eisenberg, M. (2003). A Big6? skills overview. Retrieved May 5, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.big6.com
    10. Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1995). The six habbits of highly effective students. Using the Big Six to link parents, students, and homework. School Library Journal, 8, 22-25.
    11. Eisenberg, M., & Berkowitz, R. (1998). The Big6 and student achievement:Report of an action research study. The Big6 Newsletter, 2(2), 1-15.
    12. Eisenberg, M., & Berkowitz, R. (1999). The new improved Big6TM workshop handbook. (pp.47-51). Ohio: Linworth.
    13. Flavell, J. H. (1977), Metacognition aspects of problem-solving, In L. B. Resnick (Eds.), The nature of intelligence.Hillsdale﹐NJ:Erlbaum.
    14. Fosnot, C. T. (1989), Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. NY: Teachers College Press.
    15. Fosnot, C. T. (1989), Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. NY: Teachers College Press.
    16. Harasim, L. (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a New Environment. New York: Praeger.
    17. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., and Turoff, M. (1995), “Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online,” Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    18. Hiltz, S. R., and Wellman, B. (1997), “Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom,” Communications of the ACM, 40(9), pp 44-49.
    19. Hiltz, S.R.(1994). The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits via Computer Networks, Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
    20. Hofstetter, F. T. (2001). Internet literacy. McGraw-Haii Irwin.
    21. Jacobson, T., & Cohen, L. (2002, June). Evaluate Internet resource. Network Services Librarian. Retrieved September 14, 2002 from the World Wide Web:http://library.albany.edu/internet/evaluate.html
    22. Jonassen, D. (1999), “Activity Theory as a Framework for Designing Constructvist Learning Enviroments,” Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1).
    23. Jonassen, D. H. (1991), “Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?” Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), pp 5-14.
    24. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computer as mindtool for schools(2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc
    25. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with Technology: A constructivist perspective. Prentice Hall Inc. Simon & Schuster Company, New Jersey.
    26. Keegan, D. (1980), On defining distance education. Distance Education, 1(1),pp 13-16.
    27. Keegan, D. (1986), “Problems in defining the field of distance education,” The American Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), pp 4-11.
    28. King, K. M. (1994), “Leading classroom discussion: Using computers for a new approach,” Teaching Sociology, 22, pp 174-182.
    29. Kintsch, E. (1993), Principles of instruction from research on human cognition. In J .M. Spector, M. C. Polson, and D. J. Muraida (Eds), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issue (23-42). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational technology.
    30. Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (1999). Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature,400, 107-109.
    31. Lebow, D. (1993), “Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindest,” Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3) pp 4-16.
    32. LERN(Learning Resources Network) (1998), “Online education: Growing presence and growing pains,” Lifelong Learning Today, 6(1), pp 6-7.
    33. Mayadas, F. (1997), “Asynchronous learning networks: A Sloan foundation perspective,” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1(1), pp 1-14.
    34. McGrath, D. (1992), “Hypertext, CAI, Paper, or Program Control: do learners benefit form choices?” Journal of research on computing in education, 24(4), pp 513-532.
    35. Merrill, M. D. (1991), “Constructivism and instructional design,” Educational Technology, 31(5), pp 45-53.
    36. Millar, R. (1989), “Constructive criticisms,” International Journal of Science Education, 11, Special issue, pp 587-596.
    37. Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13-29.
    38. Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1997). Measuring the experience Among Web Users. Retrieved December 18, 2003, from the World Wide Web:http://elab.vanderbilt.edu/research/papers/html/manuscripts/flow.july.1997/flow.htm
    39. Oliver , R. & Omari , A.(1998)Exploring student interactions in collaborative World Wide Web computer-based learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia , 7(2), 263-287
    40. Osborne, R. J. and Wittrock, M. C. (1983), “Learning science: A generative process,” Science Education, 67(4), pp 489-508.
    41. Pekins, D. N. (1991), “Technology meets construction: A state of the art assessment,” New York: Educational Technology, 31(5), pp 18-23.
    42. Piaget, J. (1980), Adaptation and intelligence: Organic selection and phenocopy, S. Eames, Trans, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    43. Rainer, H., Manfred, N. H., & Stefan, S. (1998). ATM Networks:concepts,protocols, and applications. 3rd. England: Addison Wesley.
    44. Savery, J. R., Duffy, T. M. (1995), “Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework,” Educational Technology, 35(5), pp 31-38.
    45. Schon, D. A. (1983), The reflective professionals think in action, New York: Basic Books.
    46. Sharan, S., and Shaulov, A. (1990), Cooperative Learning, Motivation to Learning, and Academic Achievement, In S. Sharan Ed., Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, New York: Praeger Publishers, pp 173-202.
    47. Shepardson, D. P. and Britsch, S. J. (2001), “The Role of Children’s Journals in Elementary School Science Activities,” Journal of Research in Science Education, 38(1), pp 43-69.
    48. Sigel (1978), Constructivism and teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 78, pp 333-338.
    49. Skinner, B. F.(1949), Verbal behavior, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    50. Slavin, R. E. (1991), Student team learning: A practical guide to cooperative learning (3rd ed.), Washington, DC: National Education Association.
    51. Spink, A., Batman, J., & Jansen, M. B. (1998). Searching heterogeneous collections on the Web: Behavior of excite users. Retrieved June 7, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://informationR.net/ir/4-2/paper53.html
    52. Sutton, R. (1991), “Equality and computers in the school: A decade of research,” Review of Educational Research, 61, pp 475-503.
    53. Turkle, S.(1998). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon &Schuster.
    54. Vosniadou, S., and Brewer. W. F. (1987), “Theories of knowledge restructuring in development,” Review of Educational Research, 57, pp 51-67.
    55. Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    56. Woolfolk, A. E. (1993), Educational psychology, 5th ed., Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    57. Young, K. S. (1997). Levels of depression and addiction underlying pathological Internet Use. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
    58. Zakon, R. H. (2003). Hobbes' Internet timeline. Retrieved March 15, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline/

    QR CODE