簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 侯珏
Hou, Chueh
論文名稱: 臺北市立動物園「戀戀火金姑親子體驗營」環境教育方案之評估
Evaluation of the Environmental Education Program “Firefly Family Camp” of Taipei Zoo
指導教授: 周儒
Chou, Ju
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 環境教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 178
中文關鍵詞: 環境教育方案評估邏輯模式動物園
英文關鍵詞: environmental education, program evaluation, logic model, zoo
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100369
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:161下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究運用邏輯模式(Logic model)評估臺北市立動物園「戀戀火金姑親子體驗營」環境教育方案,瞭解方案的執行狀況以及參與之親子家庭的學習成效。本研究的研究對象為參與營隊的國小一至六年級親子家庭,研究方法採用前實驗研究單組前測-後測設計,除了以量化問卷蒐集學員參與營隊前、後以及營隊結束後一個月的學習成效,另外輔以參與觀察法及訪談法進一步瞭解學員參與營隊的學習效果及學習體驗。
    本研究量化資料顯示成人參與營隊後,在「環境覺知」及「環境知識」面向有顯著提升且持續至營隊結束一個月後。在「環境態度」面向,成人參與營隊後有顯著提升,但營隊結束一個月後則沒有顯著差異。在「環境行為」面向則無顯著改變;學童參與營隊後在「環境覺知」及「環境知識」面向有顯著提升且持續至營隊結束一個月後。在「環境態度」面向,則沒有顯著提升。在「環境行為」面向無顯著改變。本研究質化資料顯示學員在「環境覺知」及「環境知識」面向有明顯的提升。在「環境態度」面向發現學員能經由親近螢火蟲及螢火蟲的棲息環境,懂得愛護與尊重生命,並具有保育螢火蟲的意願,但還無法落實生活中的保育行為。整體而言,本營隊對於北部的家庭仍具有相當大的吸引力,學員也認為課程內容豐富充實且教學方式寓教於樂。
    本研究發現「戀戀火金姑親子體驗營」在課程安排上較著重螢火蟲生態知識的傳遞以及學員在環境中的體驗,建議未來可以在方案規劃中加強螢火蟲的保育知識以及在日常生活中落實保育行為的重要性,更積極地影響學員產生負責任的環境行為。

    This study used logic model to evaluate the environmental education program, "Firefly Family Camp" of Taipei Zoo to understand the implementation of the program and the learning outcomes of participating families. The research objects of this study are the first to sixth grade parent-child families participating in the camp. The research method adopts a pre-experimental research one-group pretest-posttest design. The quantitative questionnaire was used to collect learning outcomes of families before and after participating in the camp and one month after the end of the camp. The qualitative data such as interview and participant’s observation records were used to understand the learning experience of the families participating in the camp and the changes after participating in the camp.
    The quantitative data of this study showed that the adults who participate in the camp had immediate and persistent improvement of "environmental awareness" and "environmental knowledge" aspects. The "environmental attitude" aspect had immediate improvement, but no persistent improvement. There was no significant change in "environmental behavior"; the children participating in the camp had immediate and persistent improvement in the "environmental awareness" and "environmental knowledge" aspects. The "environmental attitude" aspect had no immediate and persistent improvement. There was no significant change in "environmental behavior". The qualitative data of this study showed that the families had significantly improvement on "environmental awareness" and "environmental knowledge" aspects. In "environmental attitudes" aspect, it is found that most of the parents were interviewed had had positive environmental attitudes and had implemented positive environmental behaviors in their daily life, such as bringing their own tableware or reducing plastics. Children were willing to conserve fireflies, but it is still unable to connect conservation actions with their own life. On the whole, the camp had considerable appeal to families in northen Taiwan, and families participating in the camp also thought that the courses were rich, substantial and the teaching methods were entertaining.
    This study found that the "Firefly Family Camp" emphasized the transfer of firefly knowledge and the families' experience in the environment. It is recommended that the cultivation of environmental attitudes and environmental behaviors in daily life can be strengthened in the program planning in the future.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目標 5 第三節 名詞界定 6 第四節 研究限制 7 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 動物園的環境教育 9 第二節 動物園的環境教育方案規劃 21 第三節 環境教育方案評估 35 第三章 研究方法 47 第一節 研究架構與流程 47 第二節 研究場域與環境教育方案 51 第三節 「戀戀火金姑親子體驗營」邏輯模式與評估計畫 54 第四節 研究設計及工具 57 第五節 資料蒐集及分析 66 第四章 研究結果與討論 69 第一節 研究對象之背景資料 69 第二節 學員的學習成效分析 75 第三節 學員在營隊中的學習體驗 103 第四節 綜合討論 107 第五章 研究結論與建議 112 第一節 研究結論 112 第二節 建議 115 參考文獻 121 附錄 129 附錄一 成人預試問卷 129 附錄二 學童預試問卷 137 附錄三 成人正式問卷前測及延宕測 145 附錄四 成人正式問卷後測 153 附錄五 學童正式問卷前測及延宕測 161 附錄六 學童正式問卷後測 169 附錄七 臺北市立動物園公文 177

    一、中文文獻
    王圻、王金源、田鳳鳴、呂苑佩、金志美、季昭華等(譯)(1994)。世界動物園保育方略-動物園暨水族館在全球保育中扮演之角色(原作者:IUDZG/CBSG)。臺北市:臺北市立動物園。
    王書貞、王喜青、許美惠、陳湘寧、邱韻璇、張志忞、吳柏毅、林純如、簡珮瑜、關召芳、徐煥喆、林素燕、李玨瑩(2017)。課程設計力:環境教育職人完全攻略。臺北市:華都文化事業公司。
    王筌宥(2013)。解說教育對賞螢遊客環境認知、環境態度與環境行為之影響。國立臺南大學生態科學與技術學系生態旅遊碩士班。碩士論文。
    王臆鈴(2012)。應用邏輯模式探討劉其偉百歲誕辰紀念活動之歷程及成果。國立臺中教育大學科學應用與推廣學系環境教育及管理碩士班。碩士論文。
    江佩芸 (2016)。中區環境教育區域中心運作機制及其推動成效之評估研究。國立臺中教育大學科學教育與應用學系環境教育及管理碩士班。碩士論文。
    余雅芳(2003)。動物園環境教育方案評鑑-以台北市國小四年級校外參觀教學為例。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。碩士論文。
    林大利(2016)。愛知生物多樣性目標與生物多樣性指標。自然保育季刊,93,4-17頁。
    吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(原作者:Pattion, M. Q.)。台北市:桂冠。(原著出版年:1990)。
    周儒(2011)。實踐環境教育:環境學習中心。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    周儒、林明瑞、蕭瑞棠(2000)。地方環境學習中心之規劃研究——以臺中都會區為例。臺北市:教育部環境保護小組委託計畫報告。
    周儒、姜永浚(2013)。透過德懷術探討優質環境學習中心之特質。環境教育研究,2,1-32。
    周儒、張子超、黃淑芬(譯)(2003)。環境教育課程規劃。台北:五南書局。
    邱皓政 (2014 )。量化研究法(一)研究設計與資料處理。台北:雙葉書廊。
    郝冰、王西敏(譯)(2009)。失去山林的孩子(原作者:Louv, R.)。台北縣:野人。(原著出版年:2006)。
    侯珏(2014年11月)。臺北市立動物園環境教育的演變與創新。「中學民國環境教育學術暨實務交流國際研討會」發表之論文,國立海洋生物博物館。
    姜璇(2020)。臺北市立動物園保育教育方案主題、內涵與學習目標分析。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。碩士論文。
    徐玉齡(2007)。環境教育設施成效之研究-以臺北市立動物園昆蟲館為例。國立政治大學教育研究所。碩士論文。
    徐家凡(2010)。花蓮池南自然中心環境教育核心課程天空之翼教學成效評估。國立東華大學觀光暨遊憩管理所。碩士論文。
    陳向明(2013)。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南。
    陳宛琦(2018)。運用繪本教學提升國小二年級學生的環境覺知與環境態度之研究。國立臺南大學教育學系學校經營與管理教學碩士班。碩士論文。
    陳麗如(2012)。國小三年級學童實施動物園生物多樣性教學之研究。國立臺北教育大學自然科學教育學系。碩士論文。
    張琬珮(1994)。臺灣動物園環境教育電腦軟體的評量:以「琵鷺傳奇」電腦軟體為例。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。碩士論文。
    張瑞恬(2011)。東眼山自然教育中心執行戶外教學方案之評估─以「森林水故鄉」為例。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。碩士論文。
    喬江濤(譯)(2007)。動物園的歷史(原作者:埃里克˙巴拉泰、伊歷莎白˙阿杜安˙菲吉耶著)。臺中市:好讀。(原著出版年:2002)。
    廖敏琪(2006)。由國小學童參與校外教學探討環境教育之實施成效-以台北市立動物園為例。世新大學觀光學研究所。碩士論文。
    臺北市立動物園(2014)。臺北市立動物園政策白皮書(2015-2024年)。2019年1月27日取自網址https://www.zoo.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=1A7199F880AAB2CB&sms=F2778D8C4876120C&s=9979D15DF60590A1
    臺北市立動物園(2014)。研發環保酵素-動物園推無臭空間。2020年11月20日取自網址https://www.zoo.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=BD065B2FA7782989&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=D542AB082087DF2E
    臺北市立動物園(2015)。動物園「點糞成金」計畫 有機堆肥環保又省錢。2020年11月20日取自網址https://www.zoo.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=BD065B2FA7782989&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=88FE7D5A10120886
    潘淑蘭(2013)。關渡自然中心環境教育方案評估之研究 :以國小五年級學童為例。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。博士論文。
    二、英文文獻
    Association of Zoos and Aquariums (n. d.). Association of Zoos and Aquariums Conservation [Website]. Retrieved August 1, 2020 from https://www.aza.org/conservation
    Braverman, I. (2011). Looking at zoos. Cultural Studies, 25(6), 809-842.
    Clayton, S., Fraser, J., & Saunders, C. D. (2009). Zoo experiences: Conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biology, 28(5), 377-397.
    Convention on Biological Diversity [CBD] (1992). Text of the convention. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/
    Convention on Biological Diversity [CBD] (2010). Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/gbo3/
    Convention on Biological Diversity [CBD] (2010). Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/sp/
    Convention on Biological Diversity [CBD] (2020). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5 Primer. Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/gbo/
    Conway, W. (2003). The role of zoos in the 21st century. International Zoo Yearbook, 38(1), 7-13.
    EAZA. (2013). The modern zoo: Foundations for management and developmentt(2nd ed.). Amsterdam: EAZA Executive Office.
    Ernst, J. A., Monroe, M. C., & Simmons, B. (2009). Evaluating your environmental education programs: A workbook for practitioners. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.
    Falk, J. H. (2014). Evidence for the educational value of zoos and aquariums. WAZA Magazine, 15, 10-13.
    Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2013). Factors contributing to adult knowledge of science and technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 431-452.
    Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C., Bronnenkant, K., Deans, N. L., & Heimlich, J. E. (2007). Why zoos & aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit to a zoo or aquarium. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos & Aquariums.
    Gusset, M., & Dick. G. (2011). The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biology, 30(5), 566-569.
    IUDZG/CBSG. (1993). The world zoo conservation strategy: The role of the zoos and aquaria of the world in global conservation. Bookfield, IL: Chicago Zoological Society.
    Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
    Litchfield, C. A., Lowry, R., & Dorrian, J. (2018). Recycling 115,369 mobile phones for gorilla conservation over a six-year period (2009-2014) at Zoos Victoria: A case study of 'points of influence' and mobile phone donations. PLoS One, 13(12), e0206890.
    Mason, P. (2007). Roles of the modern zoo: conflicting or complementary? Tourism Review International, 11(3), 251-263.
    Monterey Bay Aquarium (n. d.). What we do [website]. Retrieved August 1, 2020 from https://www.montereybayaquarium.org/act-for-the-ocean/sustainable-seafood/what-we-do
    Moss, A., & Esson, M. (2013). The educational claims of zoos: Where do we go from here? Zoo Biology, 32(1), 13-18.
    Moss, A., & Esson, M. (2014). Zoo education: Outputs, outcomes and measuring the unexpected. WAZA Magazine, 15(3), 2-5.
    Moss, A., Jensen, E., & Gusset, M. (2014). Conservation: Zoo visits boost biodiversity literacy. Nature, 508(7495), 186.
    North American Association for Environmental Education [NAAEE] (2004). Nonfromal environmental education program: Guidelines for excellence. Washington, DC: Author.
    Nygren, N. V., & Ojalammi, S. (2018). Conservation education in zoos: a literature review. TRACE∴ Journal for Human-Animal Studies, 4, 62-76.
    Ogden, J., & Heimlich, J. E. (2009). Why focus on zoo and aquarium education? Zoo Biology, 28(5), 357-360.
    Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2010). The role of zoos and aquariums in education for a sustainable future. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2010(127), 25-34.
    Patrick, P. G., Matthews, C. E., Ayers, D. F., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Conservation and education: Prominent themes in zoo mission statements. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 53 - 60.
    Patrick, P. G., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2012). Zoo talk. Springer Science & Business Media.
    Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications.
    Pearson, E. L., Dorrian, J., & Litchfield, C. A. (2013). Measuring zoo visitor learning and understanding about orangutans: Evaluation to enhance learning outcomes and to foster conservation action. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 823-843.
    Roe, K., McConney, A., & Mansfield, C. F. (2014). The role of zoos in modern society—A comparison of zoos' reported priorities and what visitors believe they should be. Anthrozoös, 27(4), 529-541.
    Roth, C. E. (1968). On the road to conservation. Massachusetts Audubon, 52(4), 38-41.
    Southeast Asian Zoos and Aquariums Association (n. d.). Southeast Asian Zoos and Aquariums Association About SEAZA[Website]. Retrieved August 1, 2020 from http://www.seaza.asia/about-seaza/
    Taylor-Powell, E., & Henert, E. (2008). Developing a logic model: Teaching and training guide. Retrieved from https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/programdevelopment/files/2016/03/lmguidecomplete.pdf
    Thomson, G., Hoffman, J., & Staniforth, S. (2003). Measuring the success of environmental education programs. Ottawa: Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and Sierra Club of Canada.
    UNESCO. (1978). The world’s first intergovernmental conference on environmental education in Tbilisi. Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC Information Reference Center.
    Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wilson, E. O. (2002). The future of life. Vintage.
    WK Kellogg Foundation. (2004). WK Kellogg Foundation logic model development guide. WK Kellogg Foundation.
    World Association of Zoos and Aquariums [WAZA] (2005). Building a future for wildlife: The world zoo and aquarium conservation strategy. WAZA Executive Office.
    World Association of Zoos and Aquariums [WAZA] (2006). Understanding Animals and Protecting Them: About the World Zoo and Aquarium Strategy. WAZA Executive Office.
    World Association of Zoos and Aquariums [WAZA] (2015). Committing to conservation: the world zoo and aquarium conservation strategy. WAZA Executive Office.
    World Association of Zoos and Aquariums [WAZA] (n. d.). About WAZA [Website]. Retrieved August 1, 2020 from https://www.waza.org/about-waza/
    WRI, IUCN, & UNEP. (1992). Global biodiversity strategy. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
    WWF. (2018). Living planet report - 2018: aiming higher. Grooten, M. and Almond, R.E.A.(Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/all_publications/living_planet_report_2018/
    Schultz, J. G., & Joordens, S. (2014). The effect of visitor motivation on the success of environmental education at the Toronto Zoo. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 753 - 775.
    Zimmermann, A., Hatchwell, M., Dickie, L. A., & West, C. (2007). Zoos in the 21st century: Catalysts for conservation? (pp. 303-321). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Zoos Victoria (n. d.). Fighting Extinction [website]. Retrieved August 8, 2020 from https://www.zoo.org.au/

    下載圖示
    QR CODE