依據動機的人際歸因理論，本研究提出教師對幼兒行為問題之歸因歷程模式，研究目的為（1）建構幼兒教師對幼兒行為問題的歸因歷程模式，運用結構方程式進行檢驗，以實徵資料驗證模式適配度；（2）分析教學年資在教師歸因歷程模式的調節效果；（3）檢驗教師效能信念在教師歸因歷程模式的調節效果與中介效果；（4）採用質性研究方法，探討教師面對幼兒行為問題時的歸因歷程現象；（5）依據研究結果提出建議，以作為幼兒園教學、輔導與未來研究之參考。
本研究採取問卷調查與觀察、訪談研究方式來蒐集量化與質性資料。量化研究部分，以研究者自編「教師處理幼兒在校行為問題問卷」為研究工具，正式有效樣本為684位在幼兒園服務的教保人員，量化資料以描述統計、結構方程模式SEM及多群組樣本分析進行考驗；在質性研究部分，以苗栗縣勝利幼兒園（化名）的四個教室情境為觀察場域，以四位幼兒園老師為訪談對象，質性資料透過質化分析軟體MAXQDA的協助來建立編碼。
本研究得到以下結論：
一、本研究修正後之「幼兒教師對行為問題歸因歷程模式」，包含控制性歸因向度、幼兒原因、責任判斷、生氣情緒、與負向因應策略等變項，獲得實證資料的驗證，可以用來解釋幼兒教師面對幼兒行為問題時的歸因歷程情形。各變項關係為：幼兒原因歸因與控制性歸因向度對責任判斷有顯著的直接效果、責任判斷對教師生氣情緒與負向因應策略皆有顯著的直接效果、教師生氣情緒對負向因應策略的使用有顯著的直接效果。
二、教學年資對教師歸因歷程模式不具調節效果。
三、教師效能信念對教師歸因歷程模式不具調節效果。
四、教師效能信念對包含幼兒原因、責任判斷、生氣情緒與負向因應策略之歸因歷程模式具有中介效果，是幼兒原因對責任判斷的中介變項。
五、透過質性研究，發現教師面對幼兒行為問題時的歸因歷程現象，確實存在教師歸因、情緒反應、責任判斷、未來期待、與因應策略等歷程。

The study based on interpersonal attribution theory of motivation, attempted to construct the teachers’ attributional process model for the young children’s problem behavior in the preschool, the purposes of the study were: (1)to construct the teachers’ attributional process model for the young children’s problem behavior in the preschool and to verify the goodness of fit between empirically observed data and the model with the theory structure equation model(SEM); (2)to analysis of the moderating effect of teaching years in the teachers’ attributional process model; (3)to analyze moderating effects of the latent variables in the teachers’ attributional process model due to teachers' efficacy beliefs; and to test teachers' efficacy beliefs in the teachers’ attributional process model with the mediating effect; (4) using qualitative research methods to explore the phenomenon of the teachers’ attributional process for the young children’s problem behavior; (5)to make recommendations based on the findings, as teaching, counseling and future research reference.
This study adopted the questionnaire survey, observation and interview methods to collect quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative study subjects were 684 teachers in the preschool. The instrument was "teachers deal with childrens’ problem behavior in the preschool questionnaire". The obtained quantitative data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, structural equation modeling (SEM), and multi-sample SEM analysis. About the qualitative study, researcher observed in four classroom settings of a preschool in Miaoli County. The participants of the interview were four preschool teachers. The qualitative data coding used the MAXQDA software.
The conclusions of the study were summarized as following.
(a)In this study, the teachers’ attributional process modify model, contains controllability, children reasons, responsibility judgments, anger, and negative coping strategies variables, can be used to well explain the empirically data.Between the relations of each latent variable, there were some results: (1) Controllability, children reasons had significant positive direct effects on responsibility judgments variables; (2) responsibility judgments variable significant had significant positive direct effects on teachers angry emotions and negative coping strategies variables. (3) teachers angry emotions had significant positive direct effects on negative coping strategies variables.
(b)There wasn’t moderating effect for teaching years of teachers to teachers’ attributional process model.
(c)There wasn’t moderating effect for teachers’ efficacy beliefs to teachers’ attributional process model.
(d)The effects of responsibility judgments and children reasons are mediated by teachers’ efficacy beliefs variable.
(e)Through qualitative research, the researchers found that the phenomenon of children problem behavior existence of teachers’ attribution, emotional response, the responsibility judgments, future expectations, and coping strategies.

王月貞（2003）：一位幼稚園教師處理幼兒學習行為問題之策略分析，國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文。
江麗莉、鍾梅菁（1997）：幼稚園初任教師困擾問題之研究，新竹師院學報，10，1-20。
吳明清（1994）：教育研究-基本觀念與方法分析。台北：五南出版社。
吳明隆（1998）：國小學童家庭結構、學業成就及偏差行為關係之研究，訓育研究，37(4)，35-54。
吳明隆（2001）：班級經營中學生不當行為內涵的探究與因應，諮商與輔導，186，5-10。
吳明隆、張毓仁（2010）：結構方程模式-實務應用秘笈。台北：五南出版社。
李新民、李建興、陳嬿旨、蘇文嫻、林美杏（2006）：幼兒教師的個人傳統性—現代性以及其對成就歸因型態之影響，幼兒保育學刊，4，1-31。
谷生華、申繼亮與辛濤（2000）：中學教師教學歸因的初步探討，中小學教育，2000(4)，73-77。
余桂霖（2011）：結構方程式模型分析。台北：五南出版社。
林一鳳（2003）：幼稚園實習教師教學困擾及其因應之個案研究，國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
周天賜等譯（1996）：幼兒行為與輔導，台北：心理。Essa, E. L. (1990). A practical guide to solving preschool behavior problems. NY: Delmar.
洪莉竹（1997）：學生偏差行為的診斷與輔導，諮商與輔導，138，2-8。
洪雪萍（1997）：國小教師對智能障礙態度與歸因之調查研究，國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所，未出版。
施香如（1990）：國中學生、教師對學生問題行為的態度與歸因研究，國立彰化師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版。
姚惠馨（2002）：國小教師對注意力缺陷過動症之歸因與因應策略之探討，國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
姜得勝（2004）：偏差行為學生的辨識與輔導之研究，中等教育學報，11，1-23。
高月梅、張泓（1995）：幼兒心理學。台北：五南。
高淑清（2008）：質性研究的18堂課-首航初探之旅。高雄：麗文文化。
梁茂森（1996）：魏納歸因理論之探研，高師大學報，7，101-126。
莊志偉（2010年9月13日）：幼教老師好兇！學童頸掛針孔揭弊。奇摩新聞。2010年9月16日，取自 http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/100913/8/2cyxp.html.
陳娟娟、陳淑琦（2001）：幼教理念，載於陳娟娟等人（2001）：新手老師上路囉！-幼師的第一本入門書，台北：信誼出版社。
陳幗眉、洪福財（2001）：兒童發展與輔導，台北：五南出版社。
陳向明（2002）：教師如何作質的研究。台北：洪葉文化。
陳介宇（2006）：幼兒情緒與行為問題檢核表編製之研究，臺北市立教育大學身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳紀萍譯（2006）：幼兒行為輔導與重塑，台北：華騰文化。Rogers, B. (2004). Behaviour recovery. London: Sage.
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2009）：多變量分析方法－統計軟體應用。台北：五南。
陳寬裕、王正華（2010）：結構方程模型分析實務－AMOS的運用。台北：五南。
張春興（1996）：教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐，台北：東華書局。
張愛卿、劉華山（2003）：人際責任推斷與行為應對策略的歸因分析，心理學報，35(2)，231-236。
張愛卿、鄭葳譯（2004）：責任推斷：社會行為的理論基礎，上海：華東師範大學出版社。Weiner, B. (1995). Judgement of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. NY: Guilford Press.
張芬芬譯（2005）：質性研究資料分析，台北市：雙葉書廊。Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.
張彩云、申繼亮（2008）：小學教師對學生課堂問題行為的歸因研究，教育學報，4(5), 62-67.
張琇茹（2010）：台南市外籍配偶子女在父母與老師評量孩童行為問題的一致性，國立成功大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文，未出版。
許惠萍（1996）：幼兒氣質與問題行為之研究，文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
郭生玉（1982）：教師期望與學生內外控信念關係之研究。教育心理學報，15，139-148。
郭彩虹（2001）：公立幼稚園教師效能感及其相關因素之研究，國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
曾端真（1998）：兒童行為評估與輔導，諮商與輔導，150，37-42。
溫淑盈（2004）：家庭結構、功能、自我控制與兒童問題行為之縱貫性研究，國立台北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃瑞琴（1994）：質的教育研究方法，台北：心理。
黃月霞（2002）：兒童輔導與諮商-了解兒童、諮商服務、技巧訓練，台北：五南出版社。
黃芳銘（2004）：結構方程模式理論與應用。台北：五南。
黃儒傑（2004）：國小教師效能信念與成敗歸因對教學表現之關係，教育研究資訊，12(4)，83-104。
黃利、劉培英（2007）：幼兒行為問題之影響因素之研究，發表於2007年學校家庭教育推展學術研討會，嘉義大學主辦（2007/11/01-02）。
楊碧桃（2002）：啟智班學生問題行為及管理的調查研究，屏東師院學報，16，99-134。
鄭慧玲、楊國樞（1977）：成就歸因歷程對成就動機與學業成就的影響，中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，43，85-127。
鄭采惠（2006）：新制實習制度下幼稚園實習教師實習現況及困擾之個案研究，國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文，未出版。
劉永芳（2010）：歸因理論及其應用，上海：上海教育出版社。
謝志偉、王慧玉譯（2010）：混合方法研究導論，台北：心理。Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (1995). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publication.
簡楚瑛（1996）：幼稚園教師教室管理困擾問題調查研究，幼兒教育年刊，9，273-306。
羅玉霞（1999）。國小高年級級任教師對學童外向性行為問題的知覺與因應策略：一個初探性研究，國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
羅良、沃建中、陳尚寶、與王福興（2005）：中學教師歸因方式與自我效能感的關係研究，中國臨床心理學雜誌，13(4)，427-428。
韓貴香（2010）：華人對成就的人際歸因方式與動機之分析研究，人文及社會科學集刊，22（1），41-76。
龔如菲、陳姣伶、李德芬與游淑芬（2001）：嬰幼兒發展與輔導，台北：啟英文化出版。

Anthony, G. M. (1999). Attributions in action: A practical approach to coding qualitative data. New York: Wiley.
Arnold, D. H., McWilliams, L., & Arnold, E. H. (1998). Teacher discipline and child misbehavior in day care: Untangling causality with correlation data. Developmental Psychology, 34, 276–287.
Ashton, P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy : A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 28-32.
Baker, J. A., Grant, S., & Morlock, L. (2008). The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 3–15.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy : The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Barrow, G. (2002). Delivering effective behaviour support in schools. London: David Fulton.
Bar-Tal, D. (1982). The effects of teachers’ behaviour on pupils’ attributions: a review. In C. Antaki & C. Brewin. (Eds.), Attributions and psychological change: applications of attributional theories to clinical and education practice (pp.177-194). London: Academic Press.
Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education 16, 239–253.
Bub, K. L., McCartney, K., & Willett, J. B. (2007). Behavior problem trajectories and first-grade cognitive ability and achievement skills: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 653–670.
Butler, R. (1994). Teacher communications and student interpretations: Effects of teacher responses to failing students on attributional inferences in two age groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 277-294.
Campbell, S. B. (2002). Behavior problems in preschool children: Clinical and developmental issues. New York: Guilford Press.
Clark, M. D., & Artiles, A. J. (2000). A cross-national study of teachers' attributional patterns. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 77-89.
Ding, M., Li, Y., Li, X., Kulm, G. (2010). Chinese teachers' attributions and coping strategies for student classroom misbehaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(3). 321-337.
DiStefano, C. A., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2010). A typology of Teacher-Rated Child Behavior: revisiting subgroups over 10 years later. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(3), 152–163.
Dobbs, J., & Arnold, D. H. (2009). Relationship between preschool teachers’ reports of children’s behavior and their behavior toward those children. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 95-105.
Eiser, J. R. (1983). From attributions to behaviour. In M. Hewstone. (Ed.), Attribution Theory:Social and functional extensions. (pp.160-169). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Elig, T. W., ＆ Frieze, I. H. (1979). Measuring casual attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(4), 621-634.
Feitler, F., & Tokar, E. (1992). Getting a handle on teacher stress: How bad is the problem? Educational Leadership, 49, 456–458.
Fields, M. V., Perry, N. J. & Fields, D. M. (2009).Constructive guidance and discipline: Preschool and primary education. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Frigerio, A., Cattaneo, C., Cataldo, M. G., Schiatti, A., Molteni, M., & Battaglia, M. (2004). Behavioral and emotional problems among italian children and adolescents aged 4 to 18 years as reported by parents and teachers. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 124–133.
Fincham, F. (1983). Developmental dimensions of attribution theory. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham & M. Hewstone. (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: conceptual, developmental, and social dimensions (pp.117-164). New York: Academic Press.
Fincham, F. D., Bradbury, T. N., & Grych, J. H. (1990). Conflict in close relationships: The role of intrapersonal phenomena. In S. Graham & V. S. Folkes. (Eds.), Attribution theory: applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict (pp.161-184). NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Gailey, J., Falk, R., & Christie-Mizell, C. A. (2004). Is attribution of responsibility a multidimensional or unidimensional concept? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Aug 14, San Francisco, CA.
Georgiou, S. N., Christou, C., Stavrinides, P., & Panaoura, G. (2002). Teacher attributions of student failure and teacher behavior toward the failing student. Psychology in the Schools, 39(5), p583-595.
Goyette, R., Doré, R.,& Dion, É. (2000). Pupils’ misbehaviors and the reactions and causal attributions of physical education student teachers: a sequential analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 3-14.
Graham, S. (1990). Communicating low ability in the classroom: Bad things good teachers sometimes do. In S. Graham & V. S. Folkes. (Eds.), Attribution theory: applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict (pp.17-36). NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Graham, S., & Barker, G. P. (1990). The down side of help: An attributional-developmental analysis of helping behavior as a low-ability cue. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 7-14.
Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp.71-84). New York: Macmillan.
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
Gresham, F. M., Elliott, S. N., Cook, C. R., Vance, M. J., & Kettler, R. (2010). Cross-informant agreement for ratings for social skill and problem behavior ratings: An investigation of the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales. Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 157–166.
Hareli, S., & Weiner, B. (2002). Social emotions and personality inferences: A scaffold for a new direction in the study of achievement motivation. Educational Psychologist, 37, 183-193.
Hewstone, M. (1989). Causal attribution: From cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ho, Irene T. (2004). A comparison of Australian and Chinese teachers' attributions for student problem behaviors. Educational Psychology, 24(3), 375-391.
Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., & Hodge, C. N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 69-84.
Jaspars, J. (1983). The process of causal attribution in common sense. In M. R. C. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions (pp. 28-44). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Jaspars, J., Hewstone, M., & Finsham, F. D. (1983). Attribution theory and research: The state of the art. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham & M. Hewstone. (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: conceptual, developmental, and social dimensions (pp.3-36). New York: Academic Press.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26.
Kauffman, J. M. (1997). Characteristics of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders of Children and Youth. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attributions. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
Kennedy Marx, S. M. (1988). The attribution of causality by teachers and parents to school problem behavior: an empirical test of interacting systems. (EDD)--University of Massachusetts.
Kremer, L., & Lifmann, M. (1982). Locus of control and its reflection in teachers’ professional attributions. College Student Journal, 16(3), 209-215.
Mavropoulou, S., & Padeliadu, S. (2002). Teachers' causal attributions for behaviour problems in relation to perceptions of control. Educational Psychology, 22(2), 191-202.
Medway, F. J. (1979). Causal attributions for school-related problems: Teacher perceptions and teacher feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 809-818.
Merrell, K. W. (2008). Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children and adolescents. New York : Routledge.
Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329-335.
Petri H. L., & Govern, J. M. (2004). Motivation: Theory, research, and applications. CA : Wadsworth/Thomson.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Poulou, M., & Norwich, B. (2000). Teachers’ casual attributions, cognitive, emotional and behavioral responses to students with emotional and behavior difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 559-581.
Poulou, M., & Norwich, B. (2002). Cognitive, emotional and behavioral responses to students with emotional and behavioural difficulties: A model of decision-making. British Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 111-138.
Reyna, C. (2000). Lazy, dumb, or industrious: When stereotypes convey attribution information in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 85–110.
Rodriguez, R., & Tollefson, N. (1987). Consequences of Costa Rican teachers’ attribution for students’ failure. Instructional Science, 16, 381-387.
Rhee, S. H., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 490–529.
Saudino, K. J., Carter, A. S., Purper-Ouakil, D., & Gorwood, P. (2008). The etiology of behavioral problems and competencies in very young twins. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(1), 48–62.
Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (1997). Group processes in the classroom. 7th ed. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
Shultz, T. R., & Schleifer, M. (1983).Towards a refinement of attribution concepts. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham & M. Hewstone. (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: conceptual, developmental, and social dimensions (pp.37-62). New York: Academic Press.
Silver, W. S., Mitchell, T. R.,& Gist, M. E. (1995). Responses to Successful and Unsuccessful Performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 286-299.
Sjostrom, M. (2004). Teaching efficacy and attributions for student failure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Oct 21, Canada.
Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M (1994). Teachers’ thinking about difficult-to-teach students. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 44-51.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228-245.
Waguespack, A. M. & Moore, L. A. (1993). Teacher preferences for service delivery: A look at attribution research. School Psychology Quarterly, 8(2), 153-158.
Walker, E., Bettes, B., & Ceci, S. (1984). Teachers' assumptions regarding the severity, causes, and outcomes of behavioral problems in preschoolers: Implications for referral. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52(5), 899-902.
Weiner. B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Weiner, B. (2000). Interpersonal and intrapersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12 (1), 1-14.
Weiner, B. (2005). Motivation from an attribution perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp.73-84). New York: Guilford Press.
Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weiner, B. (2008). Reflections on the history of attribution theory and research: People, personalities, publications, problems. Sacial Psychology, 39 (3), 151-156.
Weiner, B., & Reyna, C. (2001). Justice and utility in the classroom: An attributional analysis of the goals of teachers’ punishment and intervention strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 309-319.
Wong, P. T. & Weiner, B. (1981). When people say `why' question, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650-663.