研究生: |
朱家瑩 Chu, Chia-Ying |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
行動社群參與者社交動機與自我呈現策略之研究 A Study of Mobile Community Participants’ Social Motivation and Self-Presentation Strategies |
指導教授: |
楊美雪
Yang, Mei-Hsueh |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖文傳播學系 Department of Graphic Arts and Communications |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 84 |
中文關鍵詞: | 行動社群 、社交動機 、自我呈現策略 |
英文關鍵詞: | mobile comunity, social motivation, self-presentation strategy |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204785 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:300 下載:103 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討行動社群參與者社交動機與自我呈現策略。以網路問卷調查法,搜集行動社群參與者之社交動機,與自我呈現策略之情形。總計回收578份有效問卷。再以敘述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析等統計方式進行分析比對。最後,根據研究所得之結論,分別給予行動社群業者及後續研究者相關具體建議。茲將本研究重要發現分述如下:
一、建立關係」、「維持關係」、「尋求歸屬感」、「尋求人氣」與「迎合性策略」、「炫耀性策略」、「示弱性策略」、「協助性策略」有著高度的相互影響力;尋求歸屬感」與「示弱性策略」,有中度正相關;「維持關係」、「尋求歸屬感」與「迎合性策略」呈中度正相關
二、女性參與者「維持關係」之動機高於男性;31歲以上之組別其「維持關係」之動機較30歲以下之組別高,41歲以上組別之「尋求歸屬感」之動機顯著低於其他年齡層組別
三、教育程度較低者,其「建立關係」、「維持關係」、「尋求人氣」動機高於教育程度高者,研究所(含)以上在「尋求歸屬感」之動機顯著高於高中職;動態更新次數高者,其「尋求人氣」動機高於動態更新次數低者;使用時間較長者,在「建立關係」、「維持關係」、「尋求歸屬感」、「尋求人氣」之動機均高於使用時間較短者
四、男性採用「示弱性策略」高於女性;年齡較低之組別,採用「炫耀性策略」高於年齡較高之組別
五、參與者自我呈現策略中,國中(含)以下使用「炫耀性策略」高於高中職和大專院校;動態更新3-4次者,採用「炫耀性策略」、「協助性策略」上顯著高於動態更新1-2次者;使用時間為1-2、3-4、5小時以上之組別,在採用「迎合性策略」、「炫耀性策略」、「協助性策略」上皆顯著高於1小時以內之組別
The purpose of this study is to explore the social motivation of mobile community participants and self-presentation strategies. Through the online questionnaires, a total of 578 valid questionnaires were recoverd, to collect the opinion of the users’ social motivation on the mobile social software and their self-presentation strategies .The collected data were analyzed by statistical methods, as Descriptive Statistics, the Independent samples t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Canonical Analysis.
In the end, based on the conclusion, this study makes some concrete suggestions to the operators of mobile community and further study. The major findings are as follows:
1. There is a high significant relationship between “build relationship“, “maintain relationship“, “belonging“, “need for popularity“ and “ingratiate strategy“, “self-enhancement strategy“, “supplication strategy“, “assistance strategy“; There is a moderate significant relationship between “belonging“and“supplication strategy“; There is a moderate significant relationship between “maintain relationship“, “belonging“ and “ingratiate strategy“.
2. The motivation of "maintain relationship" on female participants is significantly higher than male participants; The motivation of "maintain relationship" on over 31years old participants is significantly higher than under 30 ears old groups; The motivation of " belonging " on over 41years old groups is significantly lower than other age groups.
3. The motivation of “build relationship“, "maintain relationship" and "need for popularity " on the low level of education is significantly higher than the high level of education; The motivation of " belonging " on graduate students is significantly higher than Senior high school student; The higher update times, the motivation of " need for popularity " is significantly higher than other groups. The longer using times, the motivation of “build relationship“, “maintain relationship“, “belonging“, “need for popularity“ is significantly higher than other groups.
4. The using of " supplication strategy " on male participants is significantly higher than female participants; The using of " self-enhancement strategy " on young participants is significantly higher than older participants.
5. The using of “ngratiate strategy “ on Junior high school students is significantly higher than Senior high school students and College students; The using of “self-enhancement strategy“ and “assistance strategy “ on updating by 3-4 times is significantly higher than updating by 1-2 times; The using of “ingratiate strategy“, “self-enhancement strategy“ and “assistance strategy “ on using times by 1-2, 3-4, over 5 hours is significantly higher than using times under 1 hour.
Bazarova, N. N., Taft, J. G., Choi, Y. H., & Cosley, D. (2013). Managing impressions and relationships on facebook: self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(2), 121–141.
Beer, D. (2008). Social network(ing) sites … revisiting the story so far: a response to danah boyd & Nicole Ellison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(2), 516-529.
Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to non-contingent structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405-417.
Bonebrake, K. (2002). College students’ Internet use, relationship formation, and personality correlates. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(6), 551-557.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Bozeman, D.P., & Kacmar, K.M. (1997). A cybernetic model of impression management processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 69(1), 9-30.
Brandtzæg, P. B., Luders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many facebook 'friends'? content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11-12), 1006-1030.
Brocke, J. V., Richter, D., & Riemer, K. (2009). Motives of using social network sites (SNSs) - an analysis of SNS adoption among students. Proceedings of the 22nd Bled eConference eEnablement: Facilitating an Open, Effective and Representative eSociety, Bled, Slovenia.
Bronstein, J. (2014). Creating possible selves: information disclosure behaviour on social networks. Information Research, 19(1), 19-1.
Bryant, E., & Marmo, J. (2009). Relational maintenance strategies on facebook. Kentucky Journal of Communication, 28(2), 129-150.
Buffardi, E. L., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1303–1314.
Bukowski, W. M., & Hoza, B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In T.J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd [Eds]. Peer Relations in Child Development: Wiley Series on Personality Processes (pp. 15-45). New York: Wiley.
Cao, H., Jiang, J., Oh, L. B., Li, H., Liao, X., & Chen, Z. (2013). A Maslow's hierarchy of needs analysis of social networking services continuance. Journal of Service Management, 24(2), 170-190.
Chang, C. (2015). Self-construal and facebook activities: exploring differences in social interaction orientation. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 91-101.
Chang, Y. P., & Zhu, D.H. (2011). Understanding social networking sites adoption in china: a comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1840-1848.
Chaulk, K., & Jones, T. (2011). Online obsessive relational intrusion: further concerns about facebook. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 245-254.
Cheikh-Ammar, M., & Barki, H. (2014, August). "Like" is more than just a thumbs up: the role of feedback and sociability in SNS usage. Proceedings of 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, GA.
Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: why do students use facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343.
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information and Management, 45(7), 458-465.
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes?. CyberPsychology &Behavior, 12(3), 341–345.
Chu, S. C., &Choi, S. M. (2010). Social capital and self-presentation on social networking sites: a comparative study of Chinese and American young generations. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(4), 402-420.
Cialdini, R. B., & Richardson, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of image management: basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 406-415.
Coed magazine (2013, December 8). Where are the women at? How men and women use social media [Report]. Retrieved from http://coed.com/2012/07/07/where-are-the-women-at-how-men-and-women-use-social-media/
Colliander, J., & Dahlén, M. (2011). Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 313–320.
Collins, D. R., & Stukas, A. A. (2008). Narcissism and self‐presentation: the moderating effects of accountability and contingencies of self‐worth. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1629-1634.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawreence Erlbaum Associates.
Counts, S. ter Hofte, H., & Smith, I. (2006, April). Mobile social software: realizing potential, managing risks. Proceedings of CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Quebec, Canada.
Dainton, M. (2013). Relationship maintenance on facebook: development of a measure, relationship to general maintenance, and relationship satisfaction. College Student Journal, 47(1), 113-121.
Dainton, M., & Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25(3), 179–191.
de Souza e Silva, A. (2013). Location-aware mobile technologies: historical, social and spatial approaches. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 116–121.
Dindia, K., & Baxter, L. A. (1987). Strategies for maintaining and repairing marital relationships. Journal of social and personal relationships, 4(2), 143-158.
Dominick, J. R. (1999). Who do you think you are? personal home pages and self-presentation on the world wide web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(4), 646-658.
Eagle, N., & Pentland, A. (2005, April/June). Social serendipity: mobilizing social software. Pervasive Computing, 4(2), 28-34.
Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R.P. (2002). The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: a function of question type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1200–1208.
Ellison, N. B., & boyd, d. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In Dutton, W. H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.
eMarketer (2014b, November 12). Mobile devices spur sharing of timely content [online news]. Retrived fromhttp://www.emarketer.com/Article/Mobile-Devices-Spur-Sharing-of-Timely-Content/1011571
Farnham, S. D., & Churchill, E. F. (2011, March). Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online. Proceedings of CSCW 2011, Hangzhou, China.
Gangadharbatla, H. (2008). Facebook me: collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of interactive advertising, 8(2), 5-15.
Gibson, B., & Sachau, D. (2000). Sandbagging as a self-presentation strategy: claiming to be less than you are. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 56-70.
Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009, April). Predicting tie strength with social media. Proceedings of CHI online relationships, Boston, MA.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1130-1161.
Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Tolan, G. A., & Marrington, J. (2013). Face-to-face or facebook: can social connectedness be derived online. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 604-609.
Gruber, D. A., Smerek, R. E., Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & James, E. H. (2015). The real-time power of Twitter: crisis management and leadership in an age of social media. Business Horizons, 58(2), 163–172.
Guerrero, L. K., & Andersen, P. A. (1998). Jealousy experience and expression in romantic relationships. In L. K. Guerrero & P. A. Andersen (Eds.). Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp.155-188). New York: Academic Press
Gülnar, B., Balcı, Ş., & Çakır, V. (2010). Motivations of facebook, youtube and similar web sites users. Bilig Journal of Social Sciences of the Turkish World, 54, 161-184.
Ha, Y. W., Kim, J., Libaque-Saenz, C. F., Chang, Y., & Park, M. C. (2015). Use and gratifications of mobile SNSs: facebook and kakao talk in Korea. Telematics and Informatics, 32(3), 425–438.
Hadden, B. W., Øverup, C. S., &Knee, C. R. (2014). Removing the Ego: need fulfillment, self-Image goals, and self-presentation. Self and Identity, 13(3), 274-293.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). I’ve never clicked this much with anyone in my life: trust and hyperpersonal communicationn online friendships. New Media & Society, 6(4), 487–506.
Hesse, B. W., Werner, C. M., & Altman, I. (1988). Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 4(1), 147–165.
Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1-11. Brown, A. D. & Jones, M. (2000). Honourable members and dishonourable deeds: sensemaking, impression management and legitimation in the ’arms to iraq affair’. Human Relations, 53(5), 655-689.
Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Ferris, A. L. (2014). Facebook self-disclosure: examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50-58.
Houser, M. l., Fleuriet, C., & Estrada, D. (2012). The cyber factor: An analysis of relational maintenance through the use of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research Reports, 29(1), 34–43.
Hsu, C. H., Cai, L. A., & Li, M. (2010). Expectation, motivation, and attitude: a tourist behavioral model. Journal of Travel Research, 49(3), 282-296.
Huang, C. Y., Shen, Y. Z., Lin, H. X., & Chang, S.-S. (2007). Bloggers’ motivations and behaviors: a model. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 472-484.
Huang, H. (2014, November). Self-presentation tactics in social media. Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Social Science, Atlantis Press.
Hwang, Y. (2011). Is communication competence still good for interpersonal media?: mobile phone and instant messenger. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 924-934.
Ibrahim, Y. (2015). Instagramming life: banal imaging and the poetics of the everyday. Journal of Media Practice, 16(1), 42-54.
Jabeur, N., Zeadally, S., & Sayed, B. (2013, March). Mobile social networking applications. Communications of the ACM, 56(3), 71-79.
Jakimoski, K. (2014). Analysis of the usability of m-commerce applications. International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology, 7(6), 13-20.
Johansson, F. (2008). Extending mobile social software with contextual information. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Applied Physics and Electronics, Universityof Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.
Johnson, J. A. (1981). The "self-disclosure" and "self-presentation" views of item response and personality scale validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(4), 761-769.
Johnson, J. A., & Hogan, R. (1981). Moral judgments and self-presentations. Journal of Research in Personality, 15(1), 57-63.
Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives of the self (pp. 231-261). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: the relationship between multiple indices of facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198.
Jung, T., Youn, H., & McClung, S. (2007). Motivations and self-presentation strategies on korean-based "Cyworld" weblog format personal homepages. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 24-31.
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? get serious! understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.
Kim, J., & Lee, J. E.R. (2011). The facebook paths to happiness: effects of the number of facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & SocialNetworking, 14(6), 359-364.
Kim, J., & Tussyadiah, I. P. (2013). Social networking and social support in tourism experience: the moderating role of online self-presentation strategies. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(1-2), 78-92.
Kim, S. B., Choi, K. W., & Kim, D. Y. (2013). The motivations of college students’ use of social networking sites in travel information search behavior: the mediating effect of interacting with other users. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(3), 238-252.
Kim, W., Jeong, O. R., & Lee, S. W. (2010). On social websites. Information Systems, 35(2), 215–236.
Kolko, B. E., Johnson, E., & Rose, E. (2007). Mobile social software for the developing world. In D. Schuler (Series Eds.), Online Communities and Social Computing: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (385-394). doi:978-3-540-73257-0
Kong, J. S. L., Kwok, R. C. W., & Fang, Y. (2012). The effects of peer intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on MMOG game-based collaborative learning. Information & Management, 49(1), 1–9.
Koo, C., Wati, Y., & Jung, J. J. (2011). Examination of how social aspects moderate the relationship between task characteristics and usage of social communication technologies (SCTs). International Journal of Information Management, 31(5), 445–459.
Lamanauskas, V., Šlekienė, V., & Ragulienė, L. (2012). Usage of social networking websites: Lithuanian university student's position. Problems Of Education In The 21St Century, 45(1), 27-39.
Leary, M. R., & Allen, A. B. (2011). Personality and persona: personality processes in self-presentation. Journal of Personality, 79(6), 889-916.
Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: a literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47.
Lee, E., Ahn, J. & Kim, Y. J. (2014). Personality traits and self-presentation at facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 69(1), 162–167.
Lee, S. J., Quigley, B. M., Nesler, M. S., Corbett, A. B., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Development of a self-presentation tactics scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(4), 701–722.
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007, January 7). Social networking websites and teens [Online news]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org/2007/01/07/social-networking-websites-and-teens/
Lim, J. S., Nicholson, J., Yang, S. U., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Online authenticity, popularity, and the “real me” in a microblogging environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 132-143.
Lin, H., & Qiu, L. (2013). Two sites, two voices: Linguistic differences between facebook status updates and tweets. In P. L. Patrick Rau (Ed.). Cultural differencesin everyday life (pp. 432–440). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Zeng, Y. T. (2007). Why people blog: an expectancy theory analysis. Information Systems, 7(2), 232–237.
Lugano, G. (2012, September). Social computing: a classification of existing paradigms. Proceedings of 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: it is more for socializing and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.
Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2011). An initial examination of college students' expressions of affection through facebook. Southern Communication Journal, 76(2), 155-168.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969
Marshall, T. C., Lefringhausen, K., & Ferenczi, N. (2015). The big five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in facebook status updates. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 35–40.
Marwick, A. (2005, October). ‘‘I’m a lot more interesting than a friendster profile:’’ identity presentation, authenticity, and power in social networking services. Proceedings of Internet Research 6.0, Chicago, IL.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.
Mazur, E., & Kozarian, L. (2010). Self-presentation and interaction in blogs of adolescents and young emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 124-144.
McCown, J. A., Fischer, D., Page, R., & Homant, M. (2001). Internet relationships: people who meet people. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(5), 593-596.
McEwan, B. (2013). Sharing, caring, and surveilling: an actor-partner interdependence model examination of facebook relational maintenance strategies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 16(12), 863-869.
McGreal, J. (2012). Befriending one's parents online and the influence of popularity and self-esteem on facebook behavior (Master dissertation, Department of Psychology DBS School of Arts). Retrieved from http://esource.dbs.ie/bitstream/handle/10788/438/ba_mcgreal_j_2012.pdf?sequence=1
Meeker, M. (2015, May 26). 2015 Internet trends report [online report]. Retrived fromhttp://www.slideshare.net/kleinerperkins/internet-trends-v1
Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 13(4), 357-364.
Menkens, C. (2009, April). Towards a context aware mobile community application platform. Proceedings of Information Technology: New Generations, Las Vegas, NV.
Nezlek, J. B., Schütz, A., & Sellin, I. (2007). Self-presentational success in daily social interaction. Self & Identity, 6(4), 361-379.
Ng, J. W., & Lau, D. H. (2013, June). Social ontology and semantic actions: Enabling social networking services for distributed web tasking. Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Ninth World Congress, Santa Clara, CA.
O’Sullivan, B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 403–431.
Ordache, D. D., & Lamanauskas, V. (2013). Exploring the usage of social networking websites: perceptions and opinions of romanian university students. Informatica Economica, 17(4), 18-25.
O'Riordan, S., Feller J., & Nagle T. (2011, June). The Impact of social network sites on the consumption of cultural goods. Proceedings of ECIS, Helsinki, Finland.
Pai, P., & Arnott, D. C. (2013). User adoption of social networking sites: eliciting uses and gratifications through a means–end approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1039-1053.
Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The presentation of self in virtual life: characteristics of personal home pages. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(3), 643-660.
Park, N., & Lee, S. (2014). College students' motivations for facebook use and psychological outcomes. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 601-620.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125-144.
Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80-97.
Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: an examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 95-97.
Pew Research (2014, August 26). How social media silences debate [News]. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/upshot/how-social-media-silences-debate.html?ref=technology&_r=1&abt=0002&abg=1
Planalp, S., Fitness, J., & Fehr, B. (2006). Emotions in theories of close relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 369–384). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169–174.
Radovanovic, D., & Regnedda, M. (2012, April). Small talk in the digital age: making sense of phatic posts. Proceedings of the MSM2012 Workshop, Lyon, France.
Rains, S. A., & Brunner, S. R. (2015). What can we learn about social network sites by studying facebook? a call and recommendations for research on social network sites. New media & society, 17(1), 114-131.
Ramirez, A. Jr, & Bromeck, K. (2009). IM me': Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2-3), 291-314.
Rau, P. L. P., Gao, Q., & Ding, Y. N. (2008). Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2757-2770.
Reitz, A. (2012). Social media’s function in organizations. Global Media Journal, 5(2), 41-56.
Richter, A., & Koch, M. (2008, May). Functions of social networking services. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Carry-le-Rouet, France.
Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual community attraction: why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), 00-00.
Rosenbaum, J. E., Johnson, B. K., Stepman, P. A., & Nuijten, K. C. (2010). Just being themselves? goals and strategies for self-presentation on facebook. Proceedings of Southern States Communication Association, Memphis, TN.
Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self‐presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(1), 1-18.
Rui, H., & Whinston, A. (2012). Information or attention? An empirical study of user contribution on Twitter. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 10(3), 309-324.
Rui, J., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Strategic self-presentation online: a cross-cultural study. Computers in Human Behavior 29(1), 110-118.
Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the big five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658–1664.
Santor, D. A., Messervey, D., & Kusumakar, V. (2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: predicting school performance, school attitudes and substance abuse. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 29(2), 163–182.
Scheepers, H., Scheepers, R., Stockdale, R., & Nurdin, N. (2014). The dependent variable in social media use. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(2), 25-34.
Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept social identity and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: a Three Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on facebook: how personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality & Individual Differences, 54(3), 402-407.
Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students’ education-related use of facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157–174.
Sezer, O., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2015, April). Humblebragging: a distinct–and ineffective–self-presentation strategy. Paper presented at Harvard Business School Working Paper. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2597626
Shareaholic (2014, October 25). Shareaholic: facebook still drives the most traffic, but Pinterest is a contender [online news]. Retrived from http://technews.tw/2014/10/28/shareaholic-facebook-still-drives-traffic-pinterest-contender/
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170.
Sinn, D., & Syn. S. Y. (2014). Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life?. Archival Science, 14(2), 95-124.
Skoric, M.M., Ying, D., & Ng, Y. (2009). Bowling online, not alone: online social capital and political participation in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 414–433.
Smith, I. (2005, April). Social-mobile applications. Computer, 38(4), 84-85.
Snyder, C. R. (1985). Collaborative companions: the relationship of self-deception and excuse making. In M. W. Martin [Ed]. Self-deception and self-understanding: new essays in philosophy and psychology (pp. 33-35). Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas.
Son, J. E., & Kim, H. W. (2013, June). Examining SNS users' citizenship behavior: a social capital perspective. Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Jeju Island, South Korea.
Sosik, V. S., & Bazarova, N. N. (2014). Relational maintenance on social network sites: how facebook communication predicts relational escalation. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 124-131.
Special, W. P., & Li-Barber, K. T. (2012). Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 624–630.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512.
Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217–242.
Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67(3), 306-323.
Syn, S. Y., & Oh, S. (2015). Why do social network site users share information on facebook and twitter?. Journal of Information Science, 41(4), 1-17.
SzAbó, A. U. É. (2014, September). Sharing on facebook from “loners” to “popularity seekers”. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Argumentation and Rhetoric, Nagyvárad, Romania.
Tedeschi, J. T, & Lindskold, S. (1976). Social psychology: Interdependence, interaction, and influence. New York: Wiley.
Tedeschi, J. T., & Norman, N. (1985). Social power, self-presentation, and the self. In B, R. Schlenker (Ed.). The Self and social life (pp. 293-322). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thelwall, M. (2009). Social network sites: users and uses. In M. V. Zelkowitz (Ed.). Advances in Computers: Social Networking and the Web, Vol 76 (Vol. 76, pp. 19-73). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press Inc.
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348.
TNS (2015, October 6). The new social frontier: Instant messaging usage jumps 12% as more people opt for closed platforms. Retrieved from http://www.tnsglobal.com/press-release/new-social-frontier-instant-messaging-usage-jumps
Tolstedt, B. E., & Stokes, J. P. (1983). Relation of verbal, affective, and physical intimacy to marital satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(4), 573-580.
Tong, S. T, Kashian, N., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98-118). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Trottier, D. (2012). Interpersonal surveillance on social media. Canadian Journal of Communication, 37, 319–332.
Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(1), 20-36.
Utz, S. (2012). Social network site use among Dutch students: effects of time and platform. In C. Francesca (Ed.), Networked sociability and individualism: Technology for personal and professional relationships (pp. 103–125). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Utz, S., Tanis, M., & Vermeulen, I. (2012). It is all about being popular: the effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 37-42.
Valente, T. W., Gallaher, P., & Mouttapa, M. (2004). Using social networks to understand and prevent substance use: a transdisciplinary perspective. Substance use & misuse, 39(10-12), 1685-1712.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1-5.
Vasalou, A., & Joinson, A. N. (2009). Me, myself and I: the role of interactional context on self-presentation through avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 510–520.
Vitak, J. (2014, February). Facebook makes the heart grow fonder: relationship maintenance strategies among geographically dispersed and communication-restricted connections. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, MD
Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F. & Ciarocco, N. J. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 632-657.
Walther, B. J., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S. Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on facebook: are we known by the company we keep?. Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28–49.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.
Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer mediated communication: hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557.
Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50–88.
Watson, G., & Johnson, D. (1972). Social psychology : issues and insights. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Wayne, S. J. & Kacmar, K. M. (1991).The effect of impression management on the performance appraisal process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 70-88.
Wilken, R. (2014). Places nearby: facebook as a location-based social media platform. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1087-1103.
Winter, S., Neubaum, G., Eimler, S. C., Gordon, V., Theil, J., Herrmann, J., Meinert, J., & Krämer, N. C. (2014). Another brick in the facebook wall–how personality traits relate to the content of status updates. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 194-202.
Wirtz, B. w., Piehler, R. P., & Ullrich, S. (2013). Determinants of social media website attractiveness. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(1), 11-33.
Wittkower, D. E. (2010). Facebook and philosophy: what’ s on your mind?. Chicago: Opencourt.
Wong, W. K. W. (2012). Faces on facebook: a study of self-presentation and social support on facebook. Discovery–SS Student E-Journal, 1, 184-214.
Yoder, C., & Stutzman, F. (2011, May). Identifying social capital in the facebook interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC.
Yong, G. J., Hwan, H., Ji, S. Y., Rau, P. L. P., Fang, X., & Chen, L. (2010). The Influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11-12), 1100-1121.
Yoo, J. J., Kim, D., & Moon, J. (2012). Exploring cross-cultural differences in self-presentation and self-disclosure in social networking sites: a comparison of Korean and american SNS users. Journal of Advertising and Promotion Research, 1(2), 77-118.
Yurchisin, J., Watchravesringkan, K., & McCabe, D. B. (2005). An exploration of identity re-creation in the context of Internet dating. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(8), 735–750.
Zhang, Y., Tang, L. S.-T., & Leung, L. (2011). Gratifications, collective self-esteem, online emotional openness, and trait like communication apprehension as predictors of Facebook uses. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(2), 733-739.
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816-1836.
Zolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2015). Social media adoption: the role of media needs and innovation characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 189-209.
Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook™ and offline popularity from sociability and self‐esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(1), 1-34.