研究生: |
許文堂 Hsu, Wen-Tang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
鑄造單元實習教具之開發及其應用 The Development and Application of Practical Materials of Casting and Foundry Unit Course |
指導教授: |
郭金國
Kuo, Chin-Guo |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 123 |
中文關鍵詞: | 機械群 、鑄造實習 、做中學 |
英文關鍵詞: | mechanicas students, foundry practicium, learn by doing |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DIE.027.2018.E01 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:117 下載:6 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
研究者身為鑄造科教師多年教學發現,在教授機械製造科目鑄造單元時,由於鑄造程序的抽象概念,多數機械群學生無法理解。在新課綱機械群增加鑄造單元實習課程,礙於學校添購鑄造設備經費與規劃教學場地之問題。
本研究將鑄造單元實習教具縮小化、輕便化與實體化,自製一套簡易鑄造單元實習之教具,使教學教具不受時間、地點限制,故機械群的學生可以隨時使用操作教具,有效提升學生學習行動力。讓學生達到做中學、學中思,以提升學習成效,也能解決技術型高中機械群課程設備經費與場地問題。
本自製教具相較傳於統鑄造單元實習設備有以下四項大突破:
一、教具成本低(約相差793倍)。
二、教具重量輕(約相差406倍)。
三、教具體積小(約相差1180倍)。
四、具有行動力,不受時間、地點限制。
關鍵詞:機械群、鑄造實習、做中學
According to the years of my teaching experiences as a foundry teacher, the unit of foundry practicium has been taught in the subject of mechanical production still, most mechanics students can’t get a whole picture due to the abstract concepts of foundry procedures and thus they have no choice but to quit learning. In addition, the foundry practicium has been added to the latest standard curricula. However, its teaching is hindered by the problems that teachinical high schools have insufficient funding for foundry equipment or lack proper teaching fields.
In this study, I attempt to make the teaching aids for foundry practicium smaller, more convenient, and more authentic. The set of simpler teaching aids for foundry practicium enables students to learn by doing and think by learning, so that more satisfactory learning results can be produced, and the problems of teaching equipment and fields for mechanics students in technical high schools can be solved.
The following are the major innovations of the teaching aids that are created through this research , compared with traditional foundry practicium equipment:
1. The cost is a lot lower (by 793 times ).
2. The weight is a lot less (by 406 times ).
3. The size is a lot smaller (by 1180 times).
4. The mobility is a lot better, without any time or place limits.
Keywords: mechanicas students, foundry practicium, learn by doing
中文部分
毛連溫(1984)。創造力研究。臺北市:心理出版社。
方德隆譯(2004)。課程發展與設計(Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues, 4th ed.)(A. C. Ornstein & F. P. Hunkins 原著,2004 年出版)。臺北:高等教育。
王智弘(2006)。多方塊虛擬教具的開發與教學研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹。
林英明、徐文法、林彥伶(2015)。機械製造實習Ⅰ。新北市:全華圖書。
林敏宜、楊素玲(2000)。實用教具的設計與製作。臺北市:啟英文化。
林進材(2000)。教學理論與方法。臺北市:五南圖書。
吳清山(2002)。創意教學的重要理念與實施策略。台灣教育,614,2-8。
何翠華(2000)。翰林「九年一貫課程」各領域研究與發展:「國語科」 教學媒體-教具的應用。翰林文教雜誌,10,12-15。
李隆盛(1998)。科技概念的形式。生活科技教育月刊, 8(4)。
周宴安、劉威德(2004)。國小英語教師對教具之看法及較常使用教具之類型—以彰化縣市四所國小為例。中州學報,20,243-263。
高廣孚(1976)。杜威教育思想。臺北市:水牛。
張春興(2002)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
張晉昌(2011)。鑄造學。新北市:全華圖書。
教育部高級中等學校課程資訊網(2017)。國民及學前教育署課程綱要。取自http://course.tchcvs.tc.edu.tw/
郭怡然(2015年2月)。我的孩子是「動覺觸覺學習型」?春動季刊網。取自http://www.cgds.com.tw/2015-spring-move/content_4.html
郭春在、卓素慧(2008)。從認知發展觀點探討教具設計原則之研究。應用藝術與設計學報,3,27-36。
陳和寬(2005)。科技概念量表的發展—以中學階段傳播技為例。生活科技教育月刊, 8(4)。
陳美如(2005)。課程發展已逝?課程發展與課程理解的關係探究。課程與教學季刊, 8(4),165-177。
陳沛涵(2007)。屏東縣國小教師使用國語科教具教學需求、意願與滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東。
陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際(第六版)。臺北市: 心理。
游家政譯(2000)。學校本位課程發展的評鑑。邁向課程新紀元(二):學校本位課程發展工作坊資料集。臺北市:編印者。
賈馥茗(1976)。英才教育。臺北市:開明。
蔡清田(2004)。「課程即研究假設」對教師專業之啟示。現代教育論壇,11,322-328。
蔡清田(2008)。課程學。臺北:五南書局。
蔡清田(2017)。課程實驗:課綱爭議的出路。臺北:五南書局。
謝寶梅(2015)。課程如何統整?十二年國民基本教育國中教師有效教學深耕推廣計畫。取自:https://goo.gl/DBG6cX
英文部分
Babadogan, C., & Ünal, F. (2011). Examples of instructional design for social studies according to meaningful learning and information processing theories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2155-2158.
Campigotto, R., McEwen, R., & Demmans Epp, C. (2013). Especially social: Exploring the use of an iOS application in special needs classrooms. Computers & Education, 60(1), 74-86.
Chandrasekaran, S., Stojcevski, A., Joordens, M., & Littlefair, G. (2012). “Learning through projects in engineering education”, in: The 40th SEFI Annual Conference 2012, Thessaloniki, Greece
Char, C. A. (1989). Computer graphics feltboard: New soft-ware approaches for young children’s mathematical exploration. San Francisco: American Education Research Association.
Colin Rose. (2011). Accelerated Learning for the 21st Century: The Six-Step Plan to Unlock Your Master-Mind, Random House Publishing Group.
Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual methods in teaching (3rd ed.). New York: The Dryden Press.
Hong, J., Nguyen, T. V., & Prose, N. S. (2013). Compassionate care: Enhancing physician–patient communication and education in dermatology: Part II: Patient education. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 68(3), 364.e1-364.e10.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V, N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88, 28-54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106
Izydorczak, A. E. (2003). A study of virtual manipulatives for elementary mathematics. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=765118631&sid=2&Fmt=2&clientId=23855 &RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Jamian, A. R., & Baharom, R. (2012). The application of teaching aids and school supportive factors in learning reading skill among the remedial students in under enrolment schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 187-194.
Lanning, L. A. (2009). Four powerful strategies for struggling readers, grades 3-8: Small group instruction that improves comprehension. CA: Corwin.
Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J. & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics. 8(6), 372-377.
Parham, J. L. (1983). A meta-analysis of the use of manipulative materials and student achievement in elementary school mathematics. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44A: 96.
Perl, T. (1990). Manipulatives and the computer: A powerful partnership for learners of all ages. Classroom Computer Learning, 10(6), 20-29.
Rasul, S., Bukhsh, Q., & Batool, S. (2011). A study to analyze the effectiveness of audio visual aids in teaching learning process at uvniversity level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 78-81.
Smithenry, D. W.(2010).Integrating guided inquiry into a traditional chemistry curricular framework.International Journal of Science Education,32(13),1689-1714.
Spicer, J. (2000). Virtual manipulatives: A new tool for Hands-On Math. ENC Focus, 7(4), 14-15.
Toney, J. S. (1989). The effectiveness of individual manipulation of instructional materials as compared to a teacher demonstration in developing understanding in mathematics, Dissertation Abstracts International.: Indiana University.