研究生: |
陳伊琳 Chen Yi-lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
情緒、道德與道德教育—亞理斯多德《尼各馬科倫理學》的哲學檢視 Emotion, morality, and moral education:A philosophical examination on Aristotle’s 〈Nicomachean Ethics〉 |
指導教授: |
林建福
Lin, Chien-Fu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育學系 Department of Education |
論文出版年: | 2004 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 183 |
中文關鍵詞: | 情緒 、道德教育 、德行倫理學 、亞理斯多德 、尼各馬科倫理學 、中庸之道 |
英文關鍵詞: | emotion, moral education, virtue ethics, Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, the doctrine of mean |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:1556 下載:279 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文旨在探討情緒與道德之間的關係,並對當前道德教育的偏失發展—「缺情現象」提出修正。為此,研究者選擇對該一議題有許多獨到見解的亞理斯多德《尼各馬科倫理學》進行哲學檢視。
本論文採用概念分析、及詮釋學研究法。研究的步驟首先是從哲學的角度來釐清情緒概念,以及與之密切相關的概念進行區辨。第二,對德行倫理學、亞理斯多德的倫理學做一簡要說明,以瞭解德行倫理學在道德議題上的思維特點。第三,針對亞理斯多德的情緒觀、情緒與道德之間的關係做一探討。最後,根據上述研究結果,研究者衍生出對當前道德教育的意義。
本論文的研究結果如下:
壹、情緒概念相當複雜,而其中至少包含認知性及評價性這兩項重要特質;換言之,情緒是主體對外在情境所進行的評價性認知。如此一來,這表示情緒可以提供關於道德情境的重要訊息,引導道德行動者留心微妙的、或顯著的道德特徵。總之,情緒扮演著提供道德知識的重要角色。
貳、除了道德認知及道德行動之外,適當的情緒感受及表達也是道德教育中不可或缺的環節。因此,道德教育應該重視情緒教養的面向。
參、亞理斯多德認為情緒本身並無好壞之別,關鍵在於以適當的方式來感受及表現情緒;對此,亞理斯多德提出「中庸之道」作為指引。
肆、羞恥這項情緒有助於警惕道德行動者免於再做出錯誤的道德行為,而適當的友誼關係也有助於增進自我理解,並且刺激雙方一同發展道德德行。
伍、道德教育的進行應該按照序階性的發展,亞理斯多德提出「習慣先於理性」的主張。然而,第一階段的習慣化(習慣養成)並非制約活動,相反的,它是一種批判性的實踐,實蘊含著理性反省。
陸、家庭中情感的自然依附對於孩童的德育發展扮演十分關鍵的角色,因此,亞理斯多德特別重視以家庭作為道德教育發展的始點,再輔以學校教育及整體社會的教育功能。
The purpose of this thesis aims at exploring the relation between emotions and morality, and providing revision for the deviation of modern moral education—the lack of emotions. For this sake, the researcher chooses to make a philosophical examination on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics in which Aristotle offered many insightful opinions.
Conceptual analysis and hermeneutics are used. The procedures start from clarifying the concept of emotions, and differentiating related concepts in terms of a philosophical angle. Secondly, the researcher makes brief and concise explanations of virtue ethics and Aristotle’s ethics to understand the characteristic way of thinking of virtue ethics on moral issues. Thirdly, the researcher explores Aristotle’s perspective on emotions, and the relation between emotions and morality. Finally, according to the findings above, the research draws out some significance on modern moral education.
The findings of this research are as follows:
First of all, the concept of emotions is very complex, and it includes at least two important characteristics, cognition and evaluation. In other words, emotions are cognitive evaluations of the moral agent toward the external moral situations. If so, it indicates that emotions can provide for important information about the moral situations, and direct the moral agent to take care of subtle or conspicuous moral features. In sum, emotions play an important role providing moral knowledge.
Secondly, in addition to moral cognitions and moral actions, the proper way of feeling and expressing emotions is also the essential segment of moral education. Accordingly, moral education should attach importance to the education of emotions.
Thirdly, Aristotle thought that emotions are by themselves neither good nor bad, and the key point depends on how to feel and express emotions in a proper way, and for this, Aristotle proposed the doctrine of mean as guidance.
Fourthly, shame is beneficial for the moral agent to be alert to prevention from recurrence of wrong moral actions, and proper friendship is helpful to enhancing self-understanding, and stimulating two parties to develop moral virtues altogether.
Fifthly, the proceedings of moral education should be in accordance with the serial development, and Aristotle proposed habits prior to rationality. However, the first phase of habituation (acquirement of habits) is not condition, contrary to that, it is a critical practice, and it actually implies rational introspection.
Finally, the natural emotional attachments in the family play a critical role in the moral development of children, so Aristotle especially emphasized the family as the starting point of moral education, and then assisted with the educational functions of schooling and the whole society.
壹、中文部分
王立陽(1992)。十九個娃娃兵。2003年10月4日,取自http://www.vtsh.tc.edu.tw/student/vtyoung/vtah05-1-t5.html。
生命教育的內涵與實施(2001)。2001年10月14日,取自http://life.edu.tw/data/plan/091/H51100-0000008/index.htm。
朱啟華(1993)。康德德育方法之理論基礎研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
何琦瑜、鄭一青(2004)。品格決勝負:未來人才的秘密。台北市:天下雜誌。
但昭偉(1995)。國家學校應該有什麼樣的道德教育?—從Aristotle的理論出發。載於郭實渝(主編),「當代教育哲學」論文集(頁89-117)。台北市:中央研究院歐美研究所。
但昭偉(2002)。重讀彌爾的效益論。台北市:學富。
李明輝(譯)(2003)。I. Kant著。道德底形上學之基礎(Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals)。台北市:聯經。
李琪明(2003)。德行取向之品德教育理論與實踐。哲學與文化,30(8),153-174
沈清松(1993)。評效益主義新探。哲學雜誌,3,230-235。
沈清松(1995)。德行倫理學與儒家倫理思想的現代意義。哲學與文化,22(11),975-991。
沈清松(1996)。倫理學理論與專業倫理教育。通識教育季刊,3(2),1-17。
沈清松(1998)。非哲學專長教師講授專業倫理學的倫理認知。哲學與文化,25(6),690-705。
周勳男、高俊一(譯)(1975)。J. A. Shaffer 著。心靈哲學(Philosophy of mind)。台北市:幼獅。
林火旺(1999)。倫理學。台北市:五南。
林尚平、陳敦生(1996)。情緒勞務與人力資源管理方案關係之研究—以台灣境內航空業為例。國立雲林技術學院學報,5(2),65-72。
林芳蕙(1994)。亞里斯多德《尼高邁倫理學》之「靜觀生活」研究。私立輔仁大學哲學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
林建福(2001)。教育哲學—情緒層面的特殊觀照(第一版)。台北市:五南。
林素梅(2001)。走出倫理困境—重振亞里斯多德倫理學中之「德行」觀。私立輔仁大學哲學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
林逢祺(2000a)。美感與道德教育:論道德教學的審美判斷。教育資料集刊,25,127-146。
林逢祺(2000b)。新世紀的德育困境與出路。載於中國教育學會(主編),新世紀的教育願景(頁97-115)。台北市:台灣書店。
青少年輔導計畫(1991)。2002年10月14日,取自http://www.edu.tw/displ/index.htm。
段德智、尹大貽、金常政(譯)(2001)。P. A. Angeles著。哲學辭典(Harper Collins dictionary of philosophy)。台北市:貓頭鷹。
苗力田(譯)(1992)。Aristotle著。尼各馬科倫理學(Nicomachean Ethics)。北京:中國社會科學。
孫振青(1987)。康德的批判哲學。台北市:黎明文化。
高思謙(1979)。亞里士多德之宜高邁倫理學。台北市:台灣商務。
張勻翔(2002)。亞里斯多德《尼各馬科倫理學》之幸福觀—由「幸福」與諸概念的關係談起。國立中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
張春興(1992)。現代心理學—現代人研究自身的科學。台北市:東華。
張春興、楊國樞、文崇一(1987)。心理學。台北市:東華。
張美惠(譯)(1996)。D. Goleman 著。EQ(Emotional intelligence)。台北市:時報。
畢恆達(1995)。生活經驗研究的反省:詮釋學的觀點。載於楊國樞(主編),組織心理與行為(頁224-259)。台北市:桂冠。
莊國銘(2003)。亞里斯多德論鞏固政治共同體的兩大德性:正義與友誼。政治學論叢,18,191-216。
陳芳郁(譯)(1973)。F. W. Nietzsche著。偶像的黃昏(Twilight of the idols)。台北市:水牛。
傅偉勳(2002)。西洋哲學史。台北市:三民。
游恆山(譯)(2002)。K. T. Strongman著。情緒心理學—情緒理論的透視(The psychology of emotion : theories of emotion in perspective)。台北市:五南。
游惠瑜(2000)。從友愛到幸福—對亞里士多德倫理學的一個詮釋。私立東海大學哲學研究所博士論文,未出版,台中縣。
程諾蘭(1994)。亞里斯多德倫理思想研究。私立東海大學哲學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中縣。
黃藿(1996)。理性、德行與幸福—亞理斯多德倫理學研究。台北市:學生書局。
黃藿(1999)。德行倫理學的復興與當代道德教育。央大社會文化學報,9,1-18。
黃藿(2002)。德行倫理學與情緒教育。社會文化學報,15,1-22。
楊國榮(2000)。道德系統中的德性。哲學雜誌,33,100-129。
溫明麗(1997)。批判性思考教學—哲學之旅。台北市:師大書苑。
落實校園品德教育(2003)。2003年2月25日,取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/DISPL/EDU7742001/importance/930223-1.htm?UNITID=102&CATEGORYID=223&FILEID=87490。
鄔昆如(1996)。倫理學的各種學說。哲學與文化,23(10),3044-3055。
疑男友移情別戀,水果刀刺死對方(2003,10月4日)。民視社會新聞。2003年10月4日,取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/2003/10/04/society/ftv/4290801.html。
蒙培元(2001)。情感與理性。哲學與文化,28(11),1019-1033。
歐陽教(1986)。德育原理。台北市:文景。
潘小慧(1996)。論友誼(愛)—以亞理斯多德及多瑪斯的思想為據。哲學與文化,23(1),1191-1199。
潘小慧(2003)。德行與倫理—多瑪斯的德行倫理學。台北:哲學與文化月刊。
蕭永倫(2000)。評論《尼各馬科倫理學》之幸福目的論。哲學與文化,27(8),787-795。
顏一、秦華典(譯)(2001)。Aristotle著。亞里士多德政治學。台北市:知書房。
羅念生(譯)(1991)。Aristotle著。修辭學(Rhetoric)。北京:三聯。
嚴群(2003)。亞里士多德之倫理思想。上海:商務。
龔群、戴揚毅(譯)(1984)。A. MacIntyre 著。德性之后(After virtue)。北京:中國社會科學。
貳、英文部分
Aristotle (1984). Eudemian ethics (J. Solomon, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (volume two). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Aristotle (1984). On the soul (J. A. Smith, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (volume one). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Aristotle (1984). Poetics (J. Byeater, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (volume two). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Aristotle (1984). Politics (B. Jowett, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (volume two). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Aristotle (1984). Rhetoric (W. R. Roberts, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (volume two). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Aristotle (1992). The Nicomachean ethics (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Arnold, M. B. (1974). Historical development of the concept of emotion, Philosophical Studies, 22, 147-157.
Belfiore, E. S. (1992). Tragic pleasure: Aristotle on plot and emotion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ben-Ze’ev (2000). The subtlety of emotions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Byrnyeat, M. F. (1980). Aristotle on learning to be good. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s ethics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Calhoun, C., & Solomon, R. C. (1984). What is an emotion? Classical readings in philosophical psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cambridge University Press.
Carr, D. (1991). Educating the virtues: An essay on the philosophical psychology of moral development and education. New York: Routledge.
Carr, D., & Steutel, J. (1999).The virtue approach to moral education. In D. Carr & J. Steutel (Eds.), Virtue ethics and moral education. New York: Routledge.
Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, J. M. (1980). Aristotle on friendship. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s ethics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Craic, E. (Ed.). (1998). Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol.3). New York: Routledge.
Crisp, R., & Sltoe, M. (Eds.). (1997). Virtue ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J. (1980). Theory of the moral life. New York: Irvington.
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1983). Aristotle’s theory of moral insight. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Gastaldi, S. (1987). Pathe and polis. Aristotle’s theory of passions in the Rhetoric and the ethics. Topoi, 6, 105-110.
Gordon, R. M. (1987). The structure of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hursthouse, R. (1997). Virtue ethics and the emotions. In D. Statman (Ed.), Virtue ethics: A critical reader (pp. 99-117). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Hursthouse, R. (1999a). A false doctrine of the mean. In N. Sherman (Ed.), Aristotle’s ethics: Critical essays (pp. 105-119 ). Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hursthouse, R. (1999b). On virtue ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kenny, A. (1963). Action, emotion and will. London : Routledge & K. Paul.
Kenny, A. (1989). The metaphysics of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koons, J. R. (2001). Emotions and incommernsurable moral concepts. Philisophy, 76, 585-604.
Kosman, L. A. (1999). Being properly affected: virtues and feeling in Aristotle’s ethics. In N. Sherman (Ed.), Aristotle’s ethics: Critical essays (pp. 261-275). Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lickona, T. (1991). Education for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam.
Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.
Lin, Chien-Fu (1997). Love in Education, a philosophical examination with special reflection to the phenomenology of Max Scheler. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, London.
Little, M. O. (1995). Seeing and caring: The role of affect in feminist moral epistemology, Hypatia, 10(3), 117-137.
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1968). Aristotle: The growth and structure of his thought. London: Cambridge.
Lyons, W. E. (1980). Emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, W. E. (1999). The philosophy of cognition and emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 21-44). New York: Wiley.
Manion, J. C. (2002). The moral relevance of shame. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 73-90.
Mendus, S. (1998). De-moralizing education. In G. Haydon (Ed.), 50 years of philosophy of education : Pogress and prospect (pp. 41-58). London: Institute of Education University of London.
Muzio, G. D. (2000). Aristotle on improving one’s character. Phronisis, 45(3), 205-219.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). Love’s knowledge: Essays in philosophy and literature. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oakley, J. (1992). Morality and the emotions. New York: Routledge.
Oakley, J., & Cocking, D. (2001). Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Peters, F. E. (1967). Greek philosophical terms: A historical lexicon. New York: New York University Press.
Peters, R. S. (1972). The education of the emotions. In R. F. Dearden, Hirst, P. H.& Peters, R. S. (Eds.), Education and the development of reason (pp. 466-483). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Peters, R. S. (1998). Reason and habit: The paradox of moral education. In P. H. Hirst& P. White (Eds.), Philosophy of education: Major themes in the analytic tradition (pp. 27-39). London: Routledge.
Pojman, L. P. (1995). Ethics: Discovering right and wrong. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Power, C., Higgins, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). The habit of the common life: Building character through democratic community schools. In L. P. Nucci (Ed.), Moral development and character education: A dialogue (pp. 125-143). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
Rogers, K. (1994). Aristotle on loving another for his own sake. Phronesis, 39(3), 291-302.
Ross, D. (1995). Aristotle. New York: Routledge.
Ryan, K., & Lickona, T. (1992). Character development in schools and beyond. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Cataloging- In Publication.
Sherman, N. (1982). Aristotle's theory of moral education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Sherman, N. (1989). The fabric of character: Aristotle’s theory of virtues. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Sherman, N. (1997). Making a necessity of virtue: Aristotle and Kant on virtue. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sherman, N. (1999a). The habituation of character. In N. Sherman (Ed.), Aristotle’s ethics: Critical essays (pp. 231-260). Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sherman, N. (1999b). Character development and Aristotelian virtue. In D. Carr & J. Steutel (Eds.), Virtue ethics and moral education (pp. 35-48). New York: Routledge.
Solomon, R. C. (1992). Beyond reason: The importance of emotion in philosophy . In H. Oglivy (Ed.), Revisioning philosophy (pp. 19-47). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Solomon, R. C. (1993). The philosophy of emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 3-15). New York: The Guilford Press.
Spiecker, B. (1999). Habituation and training in early moral upbringing. In D. Carr & Steutel, J. (Eds.), Vitue ethics and moral education (pp. 210-223). New York: Routledge.
Statman, D. (Ed.). (1997). Virtue ethics: A critical reader. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Stocker, M. (1996). How emotions reveal value and help cure the schizophrenia of modern ethical theories. In R. Crisp (Ed.), How should one live? Essays on the virtues (pp. 173-190). New York: Clarendon Press.
Sullivan, R. J. (1994). An introduction to Kant’s ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, R. (2002). An introduction: Virtue ethics. New York: Prometheus Books.
Thomson, A. (1989). Emotional origins of morality—A sketch. Journal of Moral Education, 18(3), 199-207.
Thomson, J. A. K. (1953). The ethics of Aristotle. London: Whitefriars Press.
Trianosky, G. V. (1997). What is virtue ethics all about ? In D. Statman (Ed.), Virtue ethics (pp. 42-55). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Urmson, J. O. (1988). Aristotle’s ethics. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
White, J. (1984). The education of the emotions. Journal of philosophy of education, 18(2), 233-244.
Williams, B. A. O. (1973). Problems of the self: Philosophical papers 1956-1972. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. A. O. (1993). Shame and necessity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.