本研究採用質性的單一個案研究方法，以深度了解父母離異後孩童拒絕與非同住親方接觸的現象，以及法院的積極介入將為此家庭帶來什麼轉變。研究者以一個在父母離婚過程中出現兒童拒絕探視現象的家庭為單位，以家庭成員和專業人員為訪談對象，包括該家庭之父、母、孩子乙名，以及一位程序監理人、三位法院心理諮詢師。透過觀察、訪談與文書資料，以家庭系統的觀點了解家庭各成員的主觀認知、家庭內的互動關係會如何影響兒童與非同住親方的關係，以及法院專業人員如何以兒童的最佳利益為依歸，相互合作、評估與介入。

本研究指出，孩子拒絕非同住親方的現象，受到許多因素所影響，而直接影響因素則來自於父母如何看待並回應孩子的拒絕、孩子對於處在父母衝突下感到的壓力、以及孩子想要照顧同住親方的心情。

本研究的研究結果如下：
一、 當離異家庭出現兒童拒絕探視現象時，同住親方與非同住親方對孩子的理解有極大差異，其理解不只建基於孩子表現的態度，也來自過去在婚姻中或分居時所累積的負面情緒，使雙方皆有受害的感受。
二、 專業人員的評估，可以了解孩子拒絕與非同住親方見面的原因，是來自於同住親方的不樂意、非同住親方的不當親職作為、孩子迴避雙方衝突的場合，或是上述原因之綜合。
三、 法院積極介入後，可以量身訂做出符合孩子最佳利益的介入策略，並且使得孩子恢復與非同住親方的情感連結。

針對本研究之結果，研究者得到以下結論：（1）孩子拒絕探視的現象不僅是孩子與非同住親方的關係出現困難，家庭中所有成員的態度和反應都會產生影響，須以家庭系統的觀點理解之；（2）法院的積極介入得以評估家庭各成員的狀態，並制訂有效的策略協助親子關係的修復；（3）本介入模式為一短期介入方案，難以有效解決父母雙方長期累積下來的不信任感，在法院介入過後，孩子仍可能因父母再次衝突而中斷探視。並依短期介入方案之限制進行以下三點討論：（1）長期心理諮商/治療的需要；（2）法院的強制性；以及（3）值得正視文化議題。並針對未來研究、實務工作以及面臨兒童拒絕探視的家庭提出進一步建議，以供參考。

A qualitative single-case study is conducted on one separated family, in order to understand the “Visitation Resistance and Refusal” of a family between the child and the nonresidential parent. The purpose of this study is to investigate the phenomenon in a systemic perspective, and the legal response collaboration with mental health professionals. In this study, the family members, three court consultants who were assigned for the family members and the Guardian Ad Litem of the child, are interviewed. Several ways of information gathering are adopted, which include interview, observation, and evaluation report, to enrich the results of the research.
This study discovers that the phenomenon of visitation resistance and refusal is affected by many factors. One major factor is the parents’ views and responses to the child’s refusal of the visitation, a second factor is the child’s vulnerability under the stress of parental conflicts, and the third factor is the child’s feeling of need to take care of the residential parent.
The research has found:
1. When the child in a separated family refuses to visit the nonresidential parent, the views of the situation from the residential and the nonresidential parents are different, it is not solely affected by the child’s behaviors and attitudes, but also is affected by their negative feelings from their past experiences in the marriage and during the separation.
2. Mental health professionals are able to understand visitation difficulties are the result of unwillingness of the residential parent, poor parenting skills of the nonresidential parent, high-conflicting situations, and/or combination of the above through a family systemic point of view.
3. There should be individually designed intervention for each child in a case based on the best interests of the child. The purpose is to repair the connection between the child and the nonresidential parent.
Based on the findings, the researcher has reached the following conclusions:
1. Due to the fact that there are relational difficulties between the child and the nonresidential parent, and the effect of the attitude and reaction of family members, the phenomenon of visitation resistance and refusal should be understood through a family systemic perspective.
2. Court intervention needs to be able to evaluate the mental state of each family member and apply useful strategies to repair the relationship between the child and the nonresidential parent.
3. In this study, one of the limitations of repairing family member relationship is the short-term court intervention. The trust between the two parents who have been through marriage difficulties is not able to be repaired during a short-term intervention, and as a result, unstable visitations might come forth during high family conflict situations.
Based on the research outcomes and analytic discussion above, the researcher would like to emphasize on the following: the need for long-term psychological counseling or therapy for any troubled individual in the family; the enforcement of the court intervention; and to take cultural issues in custody cases into intervention and evaluation consideration.

中文部份
王智弘（1994）。諮商與心理治療研究的倫理問題。輔導學報，17，95-121。
王佩辰、謝馨儀、翟宗悌、鄔佩麗（2011）。心理諮商、社會福利與法院調解服務之跨機構資源連結十年經驗回顧與展望—以中華民國社區諮商學會於臺北地院家庭心理諮詢直接服務及教育訓練經驗為例。臺灣社會福利學會主辦「第十一屆臺灣社會福利學會年會暨國際學術研討會」宣讀之論文（台中）。
林秋芬（2013）。諮商心理師於民間團體場域進行夫妻家事商談之實務經驗初談。輔導季刊，49（1），72-77。
林佩璇（2000）。個案研究在其教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所（主編），質的研究方法（239-259）。高雄：力文文化公司。
林詩敏（2014）。程序監理人制度在親權酌定事件之運用：諮商心理師經驗。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
陳美秀（2007）。離婚訴訟家庭未成年子女的家庭角色因應行為及保護因子之初探。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
彭南元（2003）。讓當事人轉危為機－我國家事審判實務採用心理諮詢服務成果之初探。月旦法學雜誌，103，243-257。
彭南元（2006）。審理家事事件整合心理諮詢模式之初探─以臺灣臺北地方法院家事法庭祥股試行之經驗為例。載於彭南元（主編），兒童及家事法專題研究（417-529）。台北市：新學林。
鄔佩麗、黃兆慧（2008）。諮詢的理論與實務。台北市：心理出版社。
葉素萍（2013年8月25日）。監委澄清：不是倡導不離婚。中央通訊社。取自http://www.cna.com.tw/
翟宗悌、王佩辰、鄔佩麗（2013）。善了？！家事法庭內的家庭創傷修復--助人者觀點。國立嘉義大學輔導與諮商學系主辦「第十六屆海峽兩岸家庭教育學術研討會暨2013現今家庭與社區中的關係經營：人際的創傷與修復國際學術研討會」宣讀之論文（嘉義）。
蔡彰盛（2013年8月26日）。嬤挑撥孫恨生母，爭監護權判輸一半。自由時報。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/708282
鄧學仁（2010）。子女最佳利益之適用爭議與發展方向。台灣法學雜誌，155，45-61。
鄧學仁（2011）。離婚後子女親權酌定之問題與對策。月旦法學雜誌，191，34-33。
鄧學仁（2013）。善意父母原則之內涵與落實─兼評民法第1055條之1之修正。台灣法學雜誌，238，1-10。
賴月蜜（2005）。「程序監理人」─兒童司法權保護的天使與尖兵。全國律師，17（5），18-28。
 
英文部份
Ahrons, C. (2004/2008). 我們仍是一家人─孩子成年後對父母離婚有何意見（楊淑智譯）。臺北市：新視野。
Benedek, E. P., & Brown, C. F. (1995/ 1997). 折翼家庭也能翱翔 : 如何幫助孩子走出父母離異的陰影 （張滿玲譯）。台北市 : 經典傳訊文化。
Brown, P. M. (1990). Biracial identity and social marginality. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 7(4), 319-337.
Bruch, C. (2001). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Getting it wrong in child custody cases. Family Law Quarterly, 35, 527-552.
Bracey, J. R., Bamaca, M. Y., & Umana-Taylor, A. J. (2004). Examining ethnic identity and self-esteem among biracial and monoracial adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(2), 123-132.
Billings, J. C., Robbins, G. L., & Gordon, D. A. (2008). High conflict parent education. In Coates and L. Fieldstone (Eds), Innovations in Interventions for High Conflict Cases (pp. 83-116). Madison, WI: AFCC.
Bala, N., Hunt, S., & McCarney, C. (2010). Parental alienation: Canadian court cases 1989-2008. Family Court Review. 48(1), 164-179.
Clawar, S. S., & Rivlin, B. V. (1991). Children held hostage: Dealing with programmed and brainwashed children. Chicago: American Bar Association. Section of Family Law.
Caplan, G. (1993). Mental health consultation, community mental health, and population-oriented psychiatry. In W. P. Erchul (Eds), Consultation in community, school, and organizational practice (pp. 41-55). Washington, D. C.: Taylor & Francis.
Darnall, D. (1998). Divorce casualties: Protecting your children from parental alienation. Lanham, MD: Taylor Publishing.
Drozd, L. M. & Olesen, N. W. (2004). Is It Abuse, Alienation, and/or Estrangement? A Decision Tree. Journal of Child Custody, 1(3), 65-106.
Ellis, E. (2007). A stepwise approach to evaluating children for parental alienation syndrome. Journal of Child Custody, 4(1/2), 55-78.
Ellis, E. M. & Boyan S. (2010). Intervention strategies for parent coordinators in parental alienation cases. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 38, 218-236.
Forde-Mazrui, K. (1994). Black identity and child placement: The best interest of black and biracial children. Michigan Law Review, 92(4), 925-967.
Filder, B., Bala, N., Birnbaum, R., & Kavassalis, K. (2008). Challenging issues in child custody disputes. Ontario, Canada: Carswell
Filder, B. J., & Bala, N. (2010). Children who resisting post separation contact with a parent: Concepts, controversies, and conundrums. Family Court Review, 48(1),10-47.
Friedlander, S. & Walters, G. W. (2010). When a child rejects a parent: Tailoring the intervention to fit the problem. Family Court Review, 48(1), 98-111.
Filder, B. J., Bala, N., & Saini, M. A. (2013). Children who resist postseparation parental contact. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R. A. (1985). Recent trends in divorce and custody litigation. Academy Forum, 29(2), p.3-7.
Gilbert, R. (2006/2012). Bowen家庭系統理論之八大概念：一種思考個人與團體的新方式。（江文賢等譯）。臺北市：秀威資訊科技。
Garber, B. D. (2007). Conceptualizing visitation resistance and refusal in the context of parental conflict, separation, and divorce. Family Court Review,45(4), 588-599.
Hobbs-Minor, E. & Sullivan, M. J. (2008). Mental health consultation in child custody cases. In Coates and L. Fieldstone (Eds), Innovations in Interventions for High Conflict Cases (pp. 1-28). Madison, WI: AFCC.
Jaffe, P. G., Ashbourne, D., & Mamo, A. A. (2010). Early identification and prevention of parent-child alienation :A framework for balancing risks and benefits of intervention. Family Court Review, 48(1), 136-152.
Johnston, J. R. (1993). Children of divorce who refuse visitation. In C. Depner & J. H. Bray(Eds.), Non-residential parenting: New vistas in family living (pp. 109-135), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Johnson, P., Thorngren, J. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Parental Divorce and Family Functioning: Effects on Differentiation Levels of Young Adults. The Family Journal, 9(3), 265-272.
Johnston, J. R., Walters, M. G., & Friedlander, S. (2001). Therapeutic work with alienated children and their families. Family Court Review, 39(3), 316-333.
Johnston, J. R., Roseby, V. R., & Kuehnle, K. (2009). In the name of the child: a developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. NY: Springer Publisher.
Johnston, J. R. & Goldman, J. R. (2010). Outcomes of family counseling interventions with children who resist visitation: An addendum to Friedlander and Walters. Family Court Review, 48(1), 112-115.
Kelly, J. B., & Johnston, J. R. (2001). The alienated child: A reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Family Court Review, 39(3), 249-266.
Klosinski, G. (2004/ 2006). 如何幫助父母離異的孩子：附離婚法律問題。（張婉儀譯）。臺北市：華文網。
Lee, S. M. & Olesen, N. W. (2001). Assessing for alienation in child custody and access evaluations. Family Court Review, 39(3), 282-298.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994/2006). 質性研究資料分析（張芬芬譯）。台北市：雙葉。
Martinez, R. O. & Dukes, R. L. (1997). The effects of ethnic identity, ethnicity, and gender on adolescent well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(5), 503-516.
Miller, R. B., Anderson, S. and Keals, D. K. (2004). Is Bowen Theory valid? A review of basic research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 453–466.
Mabry, C. R. (2010). The browning of America ─Multicultural and bicultural families in conflict: Making culture a customary factor for consideration in child custody disputes. Washington and Lee journal of civil rights and social justice, 16(2), 413-443.
Martinson, H. D. J. (2010). One case- One specialized judge: Why courts have an obligation to manage alienation and other high-conflict case. Family Court Review, 48(1), 180-189.
Meier, J. S. (2009). A historical perspective on parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation. Journal of Child Custody, 6, 232-257.
McLeod, J. (2010). Case Study Research in counseling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.
Mone, J. G., MacPhee, D., Anderson, S. A., & Banning, J. H. (2011). Family members’ narratives of divorce and interparental conflict: Implications for parental alienation. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 52, 642-667.
Pedro-Carroll, J. (2010). Putting children first: Proven parenting strategies for helping children thrive through divorce. NY: Avery Trade.
Saposnek, D. T. & Rose, C. (1990). The psychology of divorce. In D. L. Crumbley and N. G. Apostolou, Handbook of financial planning for divorce and separation. NY: John Wiley.
Sullivan, M. J. & Kelly, J. B. (2001). Legal and psychological management of cases with alienated child. Family Court Review, 39(3), 299-315.
Shih, M., Bonam, C., Sanchez, D., & Peck, C. (2007). The social construction of race: Biracial identity and vulnerability to stereotypes. Cultural Diversity and Minority Psychology, 13(2), 125-133.
Smith, T. B. & Silva, L. (2011). Ethnic identity and personal well-being of people of color: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 42-60.
Thompson, R. A. & Amato, P. R. (1993/2002). 後離婚的家庭（江淑琳譯）。新北市：韋伯文化事業出版社。
Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your case study: A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage.
Warshak, R. A. (2010a). Family Bridges: Using Insights From Social Science to Reconnect Parents and Alienated Children. Family Court Review, 48(1), 48-80.
Warshak, R. A. (2010b). Divorce Poison: How to Protect Your Family from Bad-mouthing and Brainwashing. New York: Harper Collins.
Wallerstein, J. S., & Kelly, J. B. (1996). Surviving the Breakup. Pennsylvania: Perseus Books Group.
Wallerstein, J., Lewis J., & Blakeslee, S. (2000/ 2002). 父母離婚後—孩子走過的內心路（張美惠譯）。臺北市：張老師文化。
Woodall, K., & Woodall, N. (2009). The Guide for Separated Parents—Putting Your Children First. London, England: Piatkus.
Yin, R. K. (1994/2001). 個案研究法（尚榮安譯）。臺北市：弘智。
Yin, R. K.(2003/ 2009). 個案研究設計與方法（周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯）。臺北市：五南。