簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳孟錞
論文名稱: 國小高年級學童自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望與行為困擾、學業表現之相關研究
指導教授: 林家興
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 117
中文關鍵詞: 自我效能父母期望教師期望行為困擾學業表現
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:833下載:317
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的主要目的在探討國小高年級學童自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望與行為困擾、學業表現之關係。
    本研究係以513位國小五六年級學童為對象,其中男生272名,女生241名。資料的收集係以「自我能力評估量表」、「國小學生對父母期望知覺問卷」、「國小學生對教師期望知覺問卷」、「行為困擾量表」為工具,並收集國民小學九十二學年度上學期期中考國語、數學考試成績用以表示學業表現。根據所得資料,分別以獨立樣本t考驗、皮爾遜積差相關、逐步多元迴歸等統計方法進行分析,獲得以下研究發現:
    一、 不同性別、年級國小高年級學童在自我效能、父母期望、教師期望、行為困擾之差異
    1、 不同性別的國小高年級學童在自我效能的自我價值觀、認知、社交向度上無顯差異,但在體育效能上有顯著差異,且男生的體育效能高於女生。
    2、 不同性別的國小高年級學童在父母期望中的參與活動的機會、成績關注、親子互動、配合課業提供四個向度上皆無顯著差異。
    3、 不同性別的國小高年級學童在教師期望中的教學輸入尚無顯著差異,但在教學回饋上有顯著差異,且女生從教學回饋向度中所知覺的教師期望程度高於男生。
    4、 不同性別的國小高年級學童在整體的行為困擾上有顯著差異,且男生的整體行為困擾程度高於女生,其差異展現在家庭困擾、人際困擾、學校困擾三個向度上尤其顯著。
    5、 國小五六年級學童在自我效能的自我價值觀、社交、認知、體育四個向度上皆無顯著差異。
    6、 國小五六年級學童在父母期望中的參與活動的機會、成績關注、課業配合提供方面無顯著差異,但在親子互動上有顯著差異,且五年級學生從親子互動中所知覺到的父母期望程度更於六年級學生。
    7、 國小五六年級學童在教師期望中的教學輸入、教學回饋兩個向度上皆無顯著差異。
    8、 國小五六年級學童在行為困擾中的人際關係困擾與身心發展困擾有顯著差異,且五年級學生在上述兩項困擾上的困擾程度皆高於六年級學生。
    二、 自我效能中的社交、自我價值觀、認知三個向度與父母期望中的成績關注、親子互動可以有效預測行為困擾。
    三、 自我效能中的認知向度、父母期望中的成績關注與教師期望中的教學回饋可以有效的預測學業表現。
    研究者根據上述研究發現,提出以下學校輔導工作上的建議:
    一、 鼓勵教師與家長將其對孩子學業上的期待擴展至生活其它層面,並根據學生的能力對學生表達具體且適度的期望。
    二、 將提升學生自我效能列為輔導工作重點,並落實於教學與輔導活動之中。
    三、 針對不同性別、年級的高年級學童,設計符合其需求的輔導活動,並提供足夠的資訊以協助學生減輕困擾
    四、 重視親職教育與親師交流,協助父母瞭解子女的身心發展歷程。
    五、 重視學生的學習感受,確實落實小班教學,以維持教學品質。

    The relationship of self efficacy, parental expectations, teacher expectations, academic performance and behavior disturbance of students in elementary schools
    Wu Meng Chung
    Abstract
    This study was designed to investigate the relationship of self efficacy, parental expectations, teacher expectations, academic performance and behavior disturbance of students in elementary schools.
    There were 513 fifth and sixth grade students of elementary schools, including 272 boys and 241 girls, who participated in this study. Self efficacy, parental expectations, teacher expectations and behavior disturbance were measured by the following tools : (1) Perceived Competence Scale for Children, (2)The Elementary School Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Expectations Inventory, (3) The elementary School Students’ Perceptions of Parents’ Expectations Inventory, (4)Behavior Disturbance Scale, besides, the academic performance was documented by scores of Chinese and mathematics examination of mid-term. The data obtained by above methods was analyzed by independent-samples t-test, Pearson production-moment correlation coefficient and stepwise multiple regression. The results were summarized as follows:
    A. Difference in social efficacy, parental expectations, teacher expectations and behavior disturbance between genders and grades of elementary schools
    1. There was no significant difference in social efficacy including general self-worth efficacy, cognitive competence efficacy and social competence efficacy between genders except physical competence efficacy, male is superior to female in physical competence efficacy.
    2. There was no significant difference in parental expectations including providing opportunity for participating in activity, regardness of academic performance, parent-child interaction, providing accessory reference for learning between genders.
    3. There was no significant difference in teacher input of teacher expectations between genders. However, the difference was noted in teacher feedback. The scores of teacher feedback in female were higher than male.
    4. General behavior disturbance revealed significant difference between genders especially in family disturbance, social disturbance and school disturbance. In addition, the extent of behavior disturbance in male was more severe than female.
    5. No significant difference was noted in self-worth efficacy, social competence efficacy, cognitive competence efficacy and physical competence efficacy between fifth and sixth grade students of primary school.
    6. There was no significant difference in providing opportunity for participating in activities, regardness of academic performance and providing accessory reference for learning of parental expectations, but fifth grade students significantly differed from sixth grade students in parent-child interaction.
    7. Fifth grade students were not significantly different from sixth grade students in teacher input and teacher feedback of teacher expectations.
    8. Fifth grade students differed significantly from sixth grade students in behavior disturbance including social disturbance and disturbance in physical and mental development, this kind of disturbance was more observed in fifth grade students.
    B. The behavior disturbance can be predicted by social competence efficacy, self-worth efficacy, cognitive competence efficacy, regardness of academic performance, and parent-child interaction.
    C. The academic performance can be predicted efficiently by cognitive competence efficacy, regradness of academic performance in parental expectations, and teacher feedback in teacher expectations.
    Suggestions for teachers involving in school guidance and directions for further research were also discussed.
    Keywords: self efficacy, parental expectations, teacher expectations, behavior disturbance

    目錄 摘要……………………………………………………………………Ⅰ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………1 第二節 研究問題與假設………………………………………………5 第三節 名詞釋義………………………………………………………6 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 自我效能的理論與相關研究…………………………………10 第二節 教師期望的理論與相關研究…………………………………19 第三節 父母期望的理論與相關研究…………………………………29 第四節 兒童行為困擾…………………………………………………32 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………45 第二節 研究對象………………………………………………………46 第三節 研究工具………………………………………………………47 第四節 實施程序………………………………………………………51 第五節 資料分析與處理………………………………………………53 第四章 研究結果 第一節 受試者的基本資料與研究變項各向度的描述統計結果……54 第二節 自我效能、 知覺父母期望、教師期望與行為困擾在性別與年級上的差異性分析……………………………………………56 第三節 自我效能、 知覺父母期望、教師期望對行為困擾的迴歸分析………………………………………………………………63 第四節 自我效能、 知覺父母期望、教師期望對學業表現的迴歸分析………………………………………………………………69 第五章 討論 第一節 不同性別、年級在自我效能、知覺教師期望、父母期望與行為困擾之差異情形的探討……………………………………74 第二節 自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望對行為困擾、學業表現的預測情形……………………………………………………79 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 …………………………………………………………83 第二節 研究限制與建議 ……………………………………………84 參考文獻 中文文獻……………………………………………………………………92 西文文獻……………………………………………………………………96 附錄 附錄一 研究工具同意書…………………………………………………103 附錄二 施測工具清單……………………………………………………106 附錄三 研究施測須知……………………………………………………107 附錄四 自我能力評估……………………………………………………110 附錄五 國小學童對教師期望知覺問卷…………………………………114 附錄六 國小學童對父母期望知覺問卷…………………………………115 附錄七 國語數學段考成績統計表………………………………………117 表次 表3-2-1 本研究正式施測之有效樣本……………………………………46 表4-1-1 研究樣本次數分配表……………………………………………54 表4-1-2 各研究變項之平均數與標準差…………………………………55 表4-1-3 行為困擾各向度之平均數與標準差……………………………55 表4-1-4 自我效能、父母期望、教師期望各向度之平均數與標準差…56 表4-2-1 不同性別國小高年級學童在自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望之差異性比較…………………………………………………57 表4-2-2 不同性別之國小高年級學童自我效能各向度之差異性比較…57 表4-2-3 不同性別之國小高年級學童知覺父母期望各向度之差異性比較…………………………………………………………………58 表4-2-4 不同性別之國小高年級學童知覺教師期望各向度之差異性比較…………………………………………………………………58 表4-2-5 不同性別之國小高年級學童行為困擾各向度之差異性比較…59 表4-2-6 國小五六年級學童之自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望差異性比較……………………………………………………………60 表4-2-7 國小五六年級學童自我效能各向度之差異性比較……………60 表4-2-8 國小五六年級學童知覺父母期望各向度之差異性比較………61 表4-2-9 國小五六年級學童知覺教師期望各向度之差異性比較………61 表4-2-10 國小五六年級學童行為困擾各向度之差異性比較 …………62 表4-3-1 自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望、行為困擾之積差相關矩陣…………………………………………………………………63 表4-3-2 自我效能各向度與行為困擾之積差相關矩陣…………………64 表4-3-3 父母期望各向度與行為困擾之積差相關矩陣…………………65 表4-3-4 教師期望各向度與行為困擾之積差相關矩陣…………………65 表4-3-5 自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望對行為困擾之逐步多元迴歸分析結果………………………………………………………67 表4-4-1 自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望與學業表現之積差相關矩陣…………………………………………………………………69 表4-4-2 自我效能各向度與學業表現之積差相關矩陣…………………70 表4-4-3 父母期望各向度與學業表現之積差相關矩陣…………………70 表4-4-4 教師期望各向度與學業表現之積差相關矩陣…………………71 表4-4-5 自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望對學業表現之逐步多元迴歸分析結果………………………………………………………72 圖次 圖2-1-1 自我效能判斷和反應結果判斷對行為和情意反應的交互效果16 圖2-2-1 強調師生交互作用觀點的教師期望模式………………………22 圖2-2-2 教師期望與學生輸入行為間的中介循環過程…………………25 圖3-1-1 研究架構…………………………………………………………45 圖4-3-1 自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望對行為困擾之逐步多元迴歸分析圖…………………………………………………………68 圖4-4-1 自我效能、知覺父母期望、教師期望對學業表現之逐步多元迴歸分析圖…………………………………………………………73

    參考文獻
    中文部分
    甘夢龍(民79):國小學生行為困擾相關因素之研究。國立台南師範學院初等教育系。
    朱瑞玲(民78):親子關係:子女的知覺與解釋及其影響。載於伊慶春、朱瑞玲合編:台灣社會現象的分析,25,181246。台北:中央研究院三民主義研記所叢刊。
    李坤崇、歐慧敏(民82):國中小學生行為困擾相關因素之調查研究。台南師院學報,第26期:109~137。
    李蕙美(民81):父母教養方式對其子女情緒穩定及行為困擾影響之比較研究。中國文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文。
    李茂興譯(民84):諮商與心理治療的理論與實務。台北,揚智。
    周意茹(民84):國小學生行為困擾的相關因素及其因應方式之分析研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,碩士論文。
    周裕欽、廖品蘭(民86):出身背景、教育程度對子女教育期望之關連性研究。教育心理研究,20,313-330。
    邱靜娟(民82):從社會心理學觀點看教師期望與國中生學業成就的關係。教育資料文摘,31(4),121-134。
    林正文(民71):「各類少年犯行為困擾與其父母教養態度之關係比較」。台南師專學報,15:80-144。
    林宜貞(民83):國中生的教師期望、歸因型態、失敗容忍力予失敗反應關係之研究。
    林淑玲(民85):教師教學行為與幼兒行為問題關係之研究。「嘉義師院學報」第10期,591-634。
    林銘宗(民87):國小六年級學童的課業壓力、因應方式及社會支持之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    林家屏(民91):青少年自我概念與行為困擾之相關研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    吳英璋、許文耀(民82):青少年偏差行為的心理病理長期追蹤研究(一)國立台灣大學心理系。
    吳燕和(民87)華人父母的權威觀念與行為:海內外華人家庭教育之比較研究。載於喬健、潘乃古主編:中國人的觀念與行為,471-485。高雄:麗文。
    吳美玲(民90):國小學童父母管教方式、教師期望與習得無助感之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
    洪冬桂(民75):我國大學生適應問題、因應行為、求偏好及其相關因素之研究。國立台灣師大教育研究所博士論文。
    洪智倫(民83):國小學生行為困擾及其相關因素之調查研究。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
    洪莉竹(民86):學生偏差行為的診斷與輔導。諮商與輔導,138期,2-8頁。
    洪世仰(民87):自我應驗預言作用的理論與應用。教育研究雙月刊。60期,67-78。
    柯銀德(民92):台南縣公私立國中學生父母期望、學生成就動機與焦慮之相關研究。國立中正大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    孫敏芝(民78):教師期望與師生交互作用-一個國小教室的觀察。高雄市,復文。
    孫志麟(民80):自我效能的基本概念及其在教育上的應用。教育研究雙月刊,第22期。
    高源令(民81):國小學生日常生活壓力之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
    徐綺櫻(民82):父母管教態度與學齡兒童行為困擾之研究-以台北縣為例。私立東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
    郭生玉(民64):父母期望水準不切實際十對子女成就動機之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理學系,教育心理學報第8期,61-80頁。
    曹琇玲(民89):原住民高低學業成就學生家庭教育之質化分析。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳靜江(民82):從生態觀點談身心障礙兒童問題行為之處理 載於何素華主編:特殊教育研習專輯。嘉義:嘉義師範學院特教中心。
    陳玉玲(民83):目標設定、目標投入與自我效能對國小數學作業表現的影響。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳延鈴(民92):現實治療取向班級輔導活動對國中學生自我概念、行為困擾、及生活適應輔導效果之研究。
    張春興(民70):高中生的自我知覺與對父母期待知覺間的差距與其學業成績的關係,教育心理學報,14,53-71。
    張世平(民72):高中生的教師期望、父母期望、自我期望與學業成就的關係。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    張娟鳳(民74):母親教養方式與兒童勝任動機及自我能力評估之關係。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
    張春興(民80):張氏心理學辭典。台北,東華書局
    張春興(民80):現代心理學。台北:東華。
    張虹雯(民88):父母爭吵時的三角關係運作與兒童行為問題之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所。
    黃明月(民77):教師期望、教師行為與學生學業成就關係。師友月刊,250期,34-60。
    游恆山譯(民79):心理學。台北:五南。
    黃裕惠(民81):培育和發展資賦優異者:學校、家庭及社區。資優教育,45,13-17。
    曾建章(民85):國中資優學生與普通學生之他人期望與壓力感受及成就動機之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
    曾秋玲(民87):台灣國中生的自我落差、學業成就與憂慮焦慮之關係。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    曾端貞(民90):兒童行為的評估與輔導。台北:天馬。
    溫明晶(民92):青少年偏差行為與整體學業自我效能及主觀人際環境之探討。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    楊敏玲(民73):高中生教師期望、父母期望與自我期望關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    楊文雄(民74):從青少年偏差行為的成因論學校訓育問題之解決途徑。國立高雄師範學院「教育文萃」,14期,145-153頁。
    楊玉女(民80):兒童的生活壓力、自我能力評估及其適應行為之相關研究。國立台灣師大輔導研究所碩士論文。
    楊淑萍(民84):自我效能在認知技巧學習和生涯發展上的應用(上)。諮商與輔導,第110期,第20-25頁。
    詹敏娟(民92):國小三年級數學學習困難學生與普通學生學業成就自我效能之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修專班碩士論文。
    廖鳳池(民77):不良認知內容的探討-從Ellis,Beck及Meichenbaun的認知治療談起。諮商與輔導,第30期,2-8頁。
    劉如蓉(民77):增進自我效能對國小兒童政治人格輔導效果之研究。國立台灣教育學院輔導研究所碩士論文。
    劉信雄(民81):國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能與學業成就關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
    劉宗信(民88):社會支持、自我效能對兒童知覺雙親衝突影響兒童生活適應歷程之調節效果研究。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    歐慧敏(民91):國小學生歸因方式、因應策略與行為困擾之調查與訪談研究。國立台北師範學院學報,第15期:283~312。
    簡茂發(民67):父母教養態度與小學兒童生活適應之關係。教育心理學報,第11期,63~86頁。
    簡伊淇(民91):國小資賦優異學生與普通學生對教師、父母期望知覺與成就動機之相關研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所。
    賴怡君(民90):國小學童情緒智力發展與依附關係、生活適應之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    西文部分
    Babad, E.Y., Taylor, P.J.(1992).Transparency of teacher expectancies across language, cultural boundaries. Journal of Educational Research, 86(2), 120-125.
    Badini, A. A., Rosental, R.(1989).Visual cues,student sex, material taught and the magnitude of teacher expectancy effects.Communication Education, 38(2),162-166.
    Balboni, G. & Pedrabissi, L.(1998). School adjustment and academic achievement, parental expectations and socio-cultural background. Early Child Development and Care, 143,79-93
    Bandura, A. (1977).Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
    Bandura, A., Reese, L.,& Adams, N.E.(1982).Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of different levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 5-21.
    Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A.(1989).Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. The British Psychological Society, The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 10,411-424.
    Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., & Pastorelli, C.( 1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning . Child Development, 67, 1206-1222
    Bandura, A. ( 1997 ).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    Bandura, A., Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., & Pastorelli, C. ( 2001 ). Sociocognitive self-regulatory governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 125-135.
    Bibou-Nakou, I., Kiosseoglou,G.., Stogiannidou, A.,(2000).Elementary teachers’ perceptions regarding school behavior problems: Implications for school psychological services. Psychology in the Schools, 37(2), 123-134.
    Blake, J. (1989). Number of siblings and education attainment. Science, 24, 32-36.
    Braun, C.(1976).Teacher expectations: sociopsychological dynamics. Reviews of Educational Research, 46(2),185-213.
    Braun,C.(1985). Teacher expectations and instruction. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education : research and studies (pp. 241-253). New York : Pergamon Press.
    Braun,C.(1987).Teacher’s expectation. In M. J. Dunkin (Ed.),The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education.(pp.598-605).New York: Pergamon Press.
    Brattesani, K. A., Weinstein, R.S., Marshall, H. H.(1984).Students perceptions of differential teacher treatment as moderators of teacher expectation effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2)236-247.
    Brophy,J.E. & Good, T.L.(1974).Teacher’s communication of differential Educational Psychology,61,365-374.
    Buck, D. ( 1991 ). Parental expectations versus child performance: A picture graph method. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling , 26(2), 150-153.
    Caspi, A., Henry, B., Mcgee., R.O., Moffitt, T.E., Silva, P. A.(1995). Temperamental origins of child and adolescent behavior problems: From age three to age fifteen. Child Develpoment, 66,55-68.
    Coleman, J.S. ( 1988 ). Social capital in the creation of human. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
    Cooper, H.,Moore, C. J.(1995).Teenage motherhood, mother-only households, and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Education,63(3),231-249.
    Crano, W. D., Mellon, P. M. (1978).Casual influence of teacher expectanctions on children’s academic performance; A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1),39-49.
    Dandy, J., Nettelbeck. T.(2002).The relationship between IQ, homework, aspirations and academic achievement for Chinese, Vietnamese and Anglo-Celtic Australian school children. Educational Psychology, 22(3)267-274.
    Darley ,J., & Fazio, R.(1980).Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist,35,867-881.
    Dusek, J.(1975).Do teacher bias children’s learning? Review of Education Research,45, 661-684.
    Dogra, N., Parkin, A., Gale, F., & Frake,C.(2002).A Multidisciplinary Handbook of Child and Adolescent Mental Health For Front-line Professionals. London and Philadelphia. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    Fan, X.,(2001).Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A growth modeling analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 70(1),27-35.
    Finn, J.D.(1972).Expectations and the educational environment. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 387-410.
    Forgays,D. K.,(1996).Children behavior problems & competencies: Individual and dyadic parental influence.(ED406044)
    Gama, E. M. P., de Jesus, D. M. (1986) . Teacher’s expectations and casual attributions for students’ academic achievement. ( ED 272281 ).
    Gelfand, D.M., Jenson, W. R., & Drew, C.J. (1982).Understanding Child Behavior Disorders. NY. CBS College Publishing.
    Glavin(1972).”Persistence of Behavior Disorder in Children”,Exceptional Children,38:367-376.
    Gottfredson, D.C., Marciniak,E.M.(1995).Increasing teacher expectations for students achievement.Journal of Educational Research.83(3),P155-164.
    Harris,M.J.,Rosenthal,R.,Snodgrass, S.E.(1986).The effect of teacher expectations ,gender,and behavior on pupil academic performance and self concept.Journal of Educational Research, 79(3),173-179.
    Helling, M.K. ( 1993 ). School-based information to parents and parents’ educational / occupational aspirations for their children. ( ED 362327 ).
    Hurlock,E.B.(1972).Child Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Jill, C.V.,Jeffrey,C.V.Harris,C.(2000).Effect of students’s after-school activities on teacher’s academic expectancies.Contem Porary Educational Psychology, 25,167-183.
    Jussim, L & Eccles, J.(1992). Teacher expectations Ⅱ: construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 63, 947-961.
    Kim, A., Park, I. ( 2000 ). Hierarchical structure of self-efficacy in terms of generality levels and its relations to academic performance: General , Academic, Domain-Specific , and Subject-Specific Self-Efficacy. ( ED 446119 ).
    Kit-Fong Au, T., Harackiewicz, J.M. ( 1986 ). The effects of perceived parental expectations on Chinese children’s mathematics performance . Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32(4), 383-392.
    Koblinsky, S. A.,Gordon, A. L., Anderson, E.A.,(2000).Changes in the social skills and behavior problems of Homeless and Housed Children during the preschool year. Early Education and development,11(3),321-338.
    Landine, J., Stewart, J. ( 1998 ). Relationship between metacognition , motivation, locus of control, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 32(3), 200-212.
    Lazarus, R.S., Delongis, A., Folkman, S.,& Gruen, R. (1985). Stress and adaptational outcomes: the problem of confounded measures. American Psychologist, 40(7), 770-779.
    Ludwig, K.B., Pittman, J.F. ( 1999) Adolescent prosocial values and self-efficacy in relation to delinquency, risky sexual behavior, and drug use. Youth & Society, 30(4),461-482.
    Martinez, P.E. (1981). The home environment and academic achievement: There is a Correlation. ( ED 212421 ).
    Mavropoulou, S.,Padeliadu, S.(2002).Teachers’ causal attributions for behaviour problems in relation to perceptions of control.Educational Psychology,22(2),191-201.
    McCulloch, A.,Wiggins, R. D., Joshi, H. E., Sachdev, D.(2000).Internalising and externalizing children’s behaviour problems in Britain and the US: Relationships to family Resources. Children & Society,14,368-383.
    Nelson, J., Martella, R. M., Marchand-Martella,N.(2002).Maximizing students learning: The effect of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional & Behavior Disorders,10(3),136-149.
    Palardy,J.M.(1998).The effects of teacher’s expectations on children’s literacy development.Reading Improvement,35(4),184-186.
    Palmer, R.B., And others. ( 1993 ). Family processes, family interventions, and adolescent school problem: A critical review and analysis. ( ED 399313 ).
    Rosenthal, R.,& Jacobson, L.(1968).Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.
    Rosenthal, R.(1974).On the social psychology of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Further evidence for Pygmalion effect and their mediating mechanisms. New York: MSS Modular.
    Sackett, J., Chun, H.(1998).How are the classroom behaviors of students with chronic behavior problems related to their perceptions of teacher ”collness? ” (ED419627)
    Salmon, A.(1998).Parental support for their children with or without behavior problems: An exploratory study.(ED425861).
    Seginer, R. ( 1983 ). Parent’s educational expectations and children’s academic achievements: A literature review. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29,1-23.
    Schunk, D.H.(1988).Perceived self-efficacy and related social cognitive process as predictors of student academic performance.(ED293866).
    Stormont, M.,(2001).Preschool family and children characteristics associated with stable behavior problems in children. Journal of Early Intervention, 24(4),241-251.
    Trivette, P., Anderson, E. ( 1995 ). The effects of four components of parental involvement on eight-grade students achievement: structural analysis of NELS-88 data. School psychology Review, 24(2), P299-318.
    Usui, W.M., And others ( 1981 ). Determinants of parental expectations for children’s education and occupation. Sociology and Social Research, 65(4), 415-423.
    Weigel, C., Wertlieb, D., & Feldstein, M. ( 1989 ). Perceptions of control, competence, and contingency as influences on the stress-behavior symptom relation in school-age children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 456-464.
    Weinsten, R.S.Marshall, H.H.,Brattesani,K.A., Middlestadt, S.E.,(1982). Student perceptions of differential treatment in open and traditional classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology,74(5),678-692.
    Weinsten, R.S.Marshall, H.H.,Sharp, L.,Botkin,M.(1987).Pygmalion and the student: Age and classroom differences in children’s awareness of teacher expectations. Child Development,58(4),1079-1093.
    White, K.J.,Kistner,J.(1992). The influence of teacher feedback on young children’s peer preference and perceptions. Development Psychology, 28(5),933-940.
    White, K.,Sherman, M. D., Jones,K.(1996).Children’s perceptions of behavior problem peers:Effect of teacher feedback and peer-reputed status.Journal of School Psychology,34(1),53-72.
    White, K. J., Jones,K.(2000). Effect of teacher feedback on the reputations and peer perceptions of children with behavior problems. Journal of Experimental Child psychology, 76,302-326.
    Wild, E., Wild, K.P. ( 1997 ). Familial socialization and students’ motivation to learn. Zeitschrift for Padagogik, 43(1), 55-77.
    Winsler, A.,Wallace, G. L.,(2002). Behavior problems and social skills in preschool children: parent-teacher agreement and relations with classroom observations. Early Education and Development,13(1),41-58.
    van As,N. M. C.,Janssens,J. M. A. M.(2002).Relationships between child behavior problems and family functioning: A literature review. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare 5(1-2),40-51.
    Zellman, G. L.(1998).Understanding the impact of parent school involvement on children’s educational outcomes.The Journal of Educational Research,91(6),370-179.

    QR CODE