簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張瓊文
論文名稱: 幼兒人際知覺與同儕社會地位之關聯
The Association of Young Children’s Interpersonal Perception and Social Status
指導教授: 鍾志從
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人類發展與家庭學系
Department of Human Development and Family Studies
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 82
中文關鍵詞: 人際知覺幼兒幼兒人際知覺測驗同儕社會地位
英文關鍵詞: interpersonal perception, Interpersonal Perception Task, social status, young children
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:129下載:30
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在瞭解幼兒人際知覺的狀況,以及幼兒的人際知覺和同儕社會地位之間的關聯,並探討性別、年齡對不同人際知覺群體幼兒的同儕社會地位之差異。本研究採用立意取樣方式,以407位來自台北市、新北市公、私立幼稚園的四至六歲幼兒為研究對象。研究者透過自編「人際知覺測驗」與「照片式社會計量法」,進行一對一施測及記錄幼兒的人際知覺與同儕社會地位情形,藉此瞭解受試幼兒的人際知覺現況,並分析其與同儕社會地位的關聯。本研究結果如下:
    一、受試幼兒人際知覺現況傾向:在「人性可信」方面多傾向信任;「人性利他」方面多傾向利他;「人性獨立」方面多傾向獨立;「人性意志」方面多傾向外控。二、幼兒人際知覺的人性利他與同儕社會地位有顯著關聯:幼兒人際知覺屬公平、利他者,在同儕之間較受歡迎;而人際知覺屬利己者則易被同儕拒絕。三、在不同人際知覺群體中,受試幼兒的年齡與同儕社會地位無關。四、在不同人際知覺群體中,受試幼兒的性別與同儕社會地位有關:(一)「人性可信」方面:信任組幼兒在受歡迎組的女生百分比高於男生、被拒絕組及受爭議組的男生百分比則高於女生。(二)「人性利他」方面:利己組幼兒在受歡迎組及受忽視組的女生百分比高於男生、被拒絕組及受爭議組的男生百分比則高於女生;公平組幼兒在受歡迎組及一般組的女生百分比高於男生、被拒絕組的男生百分比高於女生。(三)「人性獨立」方面:獨立組幼兒在受歡迎組及一般組的女生百分比高於男生、被拒絕組及受爭議組的男生百分比高於女生。(四)「人性意志」方面:內控組及外控組幼兒在受歡迎組的女生百分比皆高於男生;被拒絕組的男生百分比則皆高於女生。

    This study were to understand the association between young children’s interpersonal perception and their social status, as well as the influence of gender and age on the different group of interpersonal perception of young children and their social status. The 407 participants were through purposive sampling who were 4 to 6 years old young children from public and private kindergartens in Taipei City as well as New Taipei City. By using “Interpersonal Perception Task” and “Picture Sociometric Technique” during one-to-one interview, the results showed as follows:
    First, the participants’ interpersonal perception currently were trustful in the test of trustworthiness, altruistic in the test of altruism, independent in the test of independence, and external control in the test of strength of will and rationality. Second, young children’s interpersonal perception of altruism is associated with their social status. If young children perceived more fairness and altruism, they were more popular in social status. In contrary, those perceived more selfishness were tend to be rejected by peers. Third, there was no significant association between age and social status. Fourth, young children’s gender is associated with their social status: (A) Trustworthiness: In the trust group of young children, the percentage of popular girls is higher than boys’, and in the group of rejection and controversy, the percentage of boys is higher than girls’. (B) Altruism: In the selfish group of young children, the percentage of popular and being neglected girls is higher than boys’, and the percentage of being rejected and controversial boys is higher than girls’. In the fair group of young children, the percentage of popular and average girls is higher than boys’, and the percentage of being rejected boys is higher than girls’. (C) Independence: In the independent group of young children, the percentage of popular and average girls is higher than boys’, and the percentage of being rejected and controversial boys is higher than girls’. (D) Strength of will and rationality: In the internal and external control group of young children, the percentage of popular girls is higher than boys’, and the percentage of being rejected boys is higher than girls’.

    謝誌……………………………………………………………..i 摘要……………………………………………………………iii ABSTRACT………………………………………...………….v 目次…………………………………………………...………vii 表次……………………………………………………………ix 圖次…………………………………………………………...xii 第一章 緒論…………………………………………..…………...1 第一節 研究動機…………………………………………………..1 第二節 研究目的與問題…………………………………………..3 第三節 名詞釋義…………………………………………………..4 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………….…………...7 第一節 人際知覺…………………………………………………..7 第二節 同儕社會地位…………………………………………….19 第三節 人際知覺與同儕社會地位的相關探討………………….27 第三章 研究方法……………………………………...……........31 第一節 研究架構………………………………………………….31 第二節 研究對象………………………………………………….32 第三節 研究工具………………………………………………….34 第四節 實施步驟………………………………………………….42 第五節 資料處理與分析………………………………………….43 第四章 研究結果與討論..…………………………...……........45 第一節 幼兒的人際知覺現況…………………………………….45 第二節 幼兒人際知覺與其同儕社會地位之關聯……………….54 第三節 年齡、性別對不同人際知覺群體受試幼兒的同儕 社會地位關聯……………………………………………..57 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………...……........67 第一節 結論……………………………………………………….67 第二節 建議……………………………………………………….70 參考文獻………………………………………………..………..........73 壹、中文部分..............................................................................73 貳、英文部分.............................................................................76

    壹、中文部分
    王耀輝(1994)。孟子的人生哲學:慷慨人生。臺北市:揚智文化。
    江麗珠(2006)。高雄市國小學童內外控信念、情緒智力與利社會行為之相關研究。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
    吳武典(1977)。制握信念與學業成就、自我觀念、社會互動之關係及其改變技術。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,19,163-178。
    李伊珮(2005)。學前兒童社會地位穩定性及相關因素之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
    李佳穗(2005)。學齡前幼兒之人際衝突研究:社會地位、衝突解決目標與策略之探討(未出版碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園縣。
    李美枝(2000)。社會心理學:理論硏究與應用。臺北市:大洋。
    李雅芬(2003)。受歡迎與被拒絕兒童社交技巧、生活適應之比較研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。
    李赫(1996)。人性解讀。臺北市:稻田。
    李駱遜(1997)。兒童的同儕關係-老師怎麼說。林錦英主編,道德與健康-國民小學課程與教學。臺北:師大書苑。
    李駱遜(2002)。「教室中的隱形人」:被忽略幼兒的研究。幼兒教育年刊,14,91-112 。
    李麗卿(2007)。高中生同儕社會地位之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
    車文博(2001)。當代西方心理學新詞典。長春市:吉林人民。
    林文瑛(2003)教養觀背後的人性觀--以能力觀為例。本土心理學研究,20,253-293。
    林文瑛(2004)教師的人性觀與教育觀--以能力觀為例。教育心理學報,35(4),355-374。
    林雯菁(2000)。國小兒童社會計量地位與自評同儕互動關係之研究(未出版碩士論文)。靜宜大學,臺中縣。
    林瑞雯(2004)。國小學童家庭氣氛、內外控信念與同儕衝突因應策略之相關研究。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
    保心怡(2003)。幼兒對於心智理解作業的理解情形及運用故事活動介入的效果研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    徐光國(1996)。社會心理學。臺北市:五南。
    時蓉華(1996)。社會心理學。臺北市:臺灣東華。
    崔景貴(2004)。現代人性觀與心理教育人性化。教育研究,7,43-48。
    張小芬(1999)。後設溝通訓練課程對增進聽障學生人際知覺與後設溝通能力之教學效果研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    張松禮(1976)。人性論。臺北市:幼獅文化。
    張春興編著(2006)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:臺灣東華
    許永熹(1982)。從眾行為。輔導月刊,18,12-19。
    許錫珍、蘇建文和邱連煌(1979)。兒童制握信念與父母制握信念以及社經水準的關係。測驗年刊,26,37-46。
    陳昌文、鍾玉英、奉春梅、周瑾和顏炯(2004)。社會心理學。臺北縣:新文京開發。
    陳皎眉、王叢桂和孫蒨如(2007)。社會心理學。臺北市:雙葉。
    彭聃齡和張必隱(2000)。認知心理學。臺北市:臺灣東華。
    彭萬榮(1994)。荀子的人生哲學:進取人生。臺北市:揚智文化。
    黃文玟(2004)。普通班同儕對資優生人際知覺之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    黃希庭(2005)。簡明心理學辭典。臺北市:國家。
    楊瑞珠、楊國樞(1976)。兒童內外控信念的先決及後果變項。中華心理學刊,18,105-120。
    溫世頌(2006)。心理學辭典。臺北市:三民
    廖凱嫆(2009)。幼兒心智理論與社會計量地位之關係研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
    熊秉眞(2000)。童年憶往:中國孩子的歷史。臺北市:麥田。
    趙恕平(2007)。利社會學習活動對幼兒利社會行為影響效果之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    潘秀雯(2005)。幼兒人際衝突中的角色取替能力與其社會計量地位的關聯(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    鄭冠仁(2008)。國小高年級學童自我概念、人際知覺與人際關係之相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
    黎建球(2004)。人生哲學。臺北市:五南。
    盧美貴(2005)。幼兒教育概論。臺北市:五南。
    蕭彩琴(2004)。臺中縣外籍配偶之國小低年級子女同儕社會地位與學業成就之研究(未出版碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中縣。
    賴佳菁(1996)。被同儕拒絕丶攻擊行為與兒童內外控信念丶自尊之研究:以臺中地區國小四丶六年級為例。文化大學,臺北市。
    戴禹心(2005)。幼兒園環境對幼兒社會行為之影響。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    顏肇基、陳姣伶、張召雅、周育如和鍾志從(2005)。幼兒利他分享之認知、情感與行為探討。家政教育學報,7,30-54。
    貳、英文部分
    Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (1997). Social psychology(2nd ed.). New York : Longman.
    Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31-35.
    Barclay, J. R. (1992). Sociometry, temperament, and school psychology. In Kratochwill, T. R., Elliot, S. N., & Gettinger, M. (Eds). Advances in school psychology, pp. 79-114, Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
    Baron, R. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Byrne, D.(2008). Social psychology(12th ed.). Boston, MA : Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
    Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Baumeister, R. F., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Social psychology and human nature. Belmont, CA : Thomson Higher Education.
    Bjorklund, D. F. (2005). Children's thinking : Cognitive development and individual differences. Australia ; Belmont, CA :Thomson/Wadsworth.
    Brehm, S. S., Kassin, S. M., & Fein, S. (2005). Social psychology(6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 42, 33-44.
    Carollee, H., & Leslie, P. (1998). Continuity in children relations with peers. Social Development, 7(3) , 340-349.
    child psychology. Vol. 4: Socialization, personality, and social
    Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1988) . Mutiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in school: A cross -age comparison. Child Development, 59, 815-829.
    Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and type of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
    Costanzo, M., & Archer, D.(1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The interpersonal perception task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13(4), 225-245.
    Denham, S. A., McKinley, M., Couchoud, E. A., & Holt, R.(1990). Emotional and behavioral predictors of preschool peer ratings. Child Development, 61, 1145-1152.
    development (pp. 103-196). New York: Wiley.
    Eisenberg-Berg, N., & Hand, M. (1979). The relationship of preschooler’s reasoning about prosocial moral conflicts to prosocial behavior. Child Development, 50(2), 356-363.
    Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. (2003). Cognitive psychology : A student's handbook(4th ed.)(認知心理學)。臺北市:五南。
    Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall.
    Foder, J. A. (2008). The modularity of mind(模組心智)。臺北:五南。
    Gibson, J. J.(1950). The perception of the visual world. Boton : Houghton Mifflin Co.
    Gleitman, H. (1997). Psychology (心理學下)。臺北市:遠流。
    Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of
    Hay, D. F., Caplan, M., Castle, J., &Stimson, C. A. (1991). Does sharing become increasing” rational” in the second year of life? Developmental Psychology, 27(6), 987-993.
    Hollingshead, A. B., & Redlish, F. C. (1958). Social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.
    Hughes, C., Dunn, J., & White, A. (1998). Trick or treat? : Uneven understanding of mind and emotion and executive dysfunction in ``hard-to-manage'' preschoolers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(7), 981-994.
    Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1-19.
    Jones, E. E.(1990). Interpersonal perception. New York : W. H. Freeman.
    Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). The role of social cognition in early trust. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 457-459.
    Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1990). The role of poor relationships in the development of disorder. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie. (Eds. ) , Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 274-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Langlois, J. H., & Chris Downs, A. (1979). Peer relations as a function of physical attractiveness: The eye of the beholder or behavioral reality? Child Development, 50, 409-418.
    LeMare, L. J., & Rubin, K. H. (1987). Perspective taking and peer interaction: Structural and developmental analysis. Child Development, 58(2), 306-315.
    Lewis, M., & Rosenblum, L. A. (1975). Friendship and peer relations. New York : Wiley.
    MacDonald, A. P. (1973). Internal-external locus, In J.P.Robinson & P. R Shaver(Eds), Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
    McCandless, B. R., & Marshall, H. R. (1957). A picture sociometric technique for preschool children and its relations to teacher judgements of friendship. Child Development, 28, 139-147.
    Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to problem of human int eractions. Washington: Publishing Co.
    Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 99-128.
    Nowicki, S., & Duke, M. P. (1974). A preschool and primary internal-external control scale. Developmental Psychology, 10(6), 874-880.
    Ollendick, T. H., Weist, M. D., Borden, M. C., & Greene, W. G. (1992). Sociometric status and academic, behavioral, and psychological adjustment: A five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 80-87.
    Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    Pakaslahti, L., Karjalainen, A., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2002). Relationships between adolescent prosocial problem-solving strategies, prosocial behaviour, and social acceptance. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(2), 137-144.
    Parkhurst, J. T., & Asher, S. R. (1992). Peer rejection in middle school: Subgroup differences in behavior, loneliness, and interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 231-241.
    Perry, J. C. (1979). Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: A conceptualization of sociometric status in preschool children. Child Development, 50, 1231-1234.
    Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does chimpanzee have a theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515-526.
    Prinstein, M. J., La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of adolescent girls' externalizing and health risk behaviors: A 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 103-112.
    Reber, A. S. (2003). The penguin dictionary of psychology(2nd ed.)(心理學辭典)。臺北市:五南。
    Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1997). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes(性格與社會心理測量總覽,下冊)。臺北市:遠流。
    Rookes, P., & Willson, J. (2003). Perception: Theory, development and organization(知覺-理論、發展與組織)。臺北市:五南。
    Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon(Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg(Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development(5th ed., pp. 619-700). New York:Wiley.
    Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon(Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg(Vol. Ed. ) , Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development(6th ed., pp. 571-645). New York:Wiley.
    Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112(4), 585–615.
    Schachter, S.(1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
    Shaffer, D. R. (2003). Development psychology(發展心理學)。臺北市:學富。
    Shaffer, D. R. (2009). Social and personality development. (6th ed. ) . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
    Slaughter, V., Dennis, M. J., & Pritchard, M. (2002). Theory of mind and peer acceptance in preschool children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(4), 545-564.
    Stevenson, L. (1993). Seven theories of human nature(人性七論)。臺北市:臺灣商務。
    Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L., & Sears, D. O. (2006). Social psychology(社會心理學)。臺北市:雙葉。
    Trenholm, S., & Jensen, A. (1994). Interpersonal communication(人際溝通)。臺北:揚智文化。
    Von Der Haar, C. M. (2005). Social psychology: A sociological perspective. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York : Springer-Verlag.
    Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66(3), 754-763.
    Wrightsman, L. S. (1964). Measurement of philosophies of human nature. Psychological Reports, 14, 743-751.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE