摘 要

本研究依據遊戲式模擬軟體設計原則，實做設計科學教育的遊戲式模擬系統，並且比較遊戲式模擬學習和傳統式模擬學習在國小六年級自然科槓桿學習的影響。
研究對象為台北縣某國小六年級學生共136 位，研究設計採因子設計之準實驗研究法。自變項為不同的模擬方式，包含遊戲式模擬系統與傳統式模擬系統，控制組有兩班，使用傳統式模擬系統學習；實驗組兩班，使用遊戲式模擬系統學習。依變項為自然科學習成就、學習者的神馳經驗、和自然科學習態度。本研究旨在探討不同模擬方式，對國小六年級學生自然科學習成就、學習者的神馳經驗、和自然科學習態度的影響。
研究結果發現：(a)運用遊戲式模擬系統能提升學習成效；(b)運用遊戲式模擬系統學習可達到較佳的神馳經驗；(c)運用遊戲式模擬系統學習，學習者有較佳的學習態度；(d)學習者對於遊戲式模擬系統有較高的滿意度。

Abstract

Based on the principle of simulation game software, this research is to design simulation game for scientific education and compare the effects of simulation game with traditional simulation learning system for the sixth grade in lever principles of
scientific education in the elementary school.

The participants in this study were 136 sixth graders from four classes of an elementary school in Taipei, Taiwan. The quasi-experimental design with factorial design was employed in the study. The independent variables were two simulation systems, including simulation game system and traditional simulation system.Traditional simulation system was done in 2 classes as control group and the simulation game was done in 2 classes as experimental group. The dependent variables included learning achievements in scientific education, flow experience and scientific attitudes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different simulation on the sixth graders’ learning achievements, flow experience and scientific attitude.

The results showed that (a) the application of simulation game system promoted the learning achievements in scientific education; (b) the application of simulation game system promoted the flow experience; (c) the application of simulation game system had the better scientific attitudes; (d) the application of simulation game had the better system satisfaction.

一、中文部分
王曉璿(1999)。資訊科技融入各科教學探究。菁莪季刊，10(4)，18-24。

江蕙茹(2002)。新的教育代理人：資訊科技融入教學。教育趨勢導報，2，1-7。

李田英(1985)。國小三至五年級自然科學課程學習困難之教材分析。師大學報，40，475-508。

李玉慶(2000)。自然科網路教學設計模式之研究—以國小「認識魚類」為例。元智大學資訊研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園市。

宋曜廷、張國恩、侯惠澤 (2005)。資訊科技融入教學：借鏡美國經驗，反思台灣發展。 教育研究集刊，51-1，31-62 (TSSCI)。

林清山(1997)。教育心理學－認知取向。臺北市：遠流。

陳義勳(1996)。國小高年級學生自然科學中力學單元迷思概念之探討。臺北市立師範學院學報，27，83-104。

陳龍川(1998)。教學模擬之意涵與設計模式。花蓮師院學報，8，1-21。

張志銘(1994)。國小六年級學童槓桿迷思概念之二階層診斷研究。台北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。

張國恩(2002)。從學習科技的發展看資訊科技融入教學之內涵，北縣教育，41， 16-25。

張意欣(2004)。學習槓桿原理對國小學童判斷簡單機械省力費力之影響。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。

許瑛昭(1999)。網路科技支援之電腦教學軟體對學生學習科學概念的影響。師大學報，44，1-16。

湯宗益、廖莉芬(2002)。遠距教學系統人機互動之研究:以Flow理論為基礎。資訊、科技與社會學報，2(2)，79-94。

黃隆華(2005)。小學數學乘法遊戲化學習軟體設計研究。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。

歐陽鍾仁(1987)。科學教育概論。臺北市：五南。

賴明照(2004)。國小高年級學童槓桿迷思概念之研究。台中師範學院自然科學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台中市。

二、英文部分
Alan, A., Kevin, N., Jacky , V., & Claudia , A . (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: Identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Education Technology, 30(4), 311-321.

Alessi, M. S. & Trollip, R. S. (1991). Instrcutional games. Computer-based instruction.
(2nd ed)Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Alessi, M. S. & Trollip, R. S. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Alsagoff, Z. A. (2005). The challenges & potential of educational gaming in higher education. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, August 4-7.

Chan, T. S., & Ahern, T. C. (1999). Targeting motivation – adapting flow theory to instructional design. Journal of Educational Computing Research,21(2), 152-163.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The envolving self: A psychology for the millennium.
New York: Harper & Row.

de Jong, T. & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998)Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-202.

FengFeng, K. & Barbara, G. (2006). Gameplaying for maths learning: Cooperative or not. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249-259.

Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model, Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441-467.

Gredler, M. E. (1996). Educational games and simulations: A technology in search of a research paradigm, in: D. H. Jonassen (Ed.). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology(New York, Simon & Schuster Macmillan), 521-540.

Hoffman, L. D., & Novak, P. T. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(July), 50-68.

Hoffman, L. D., & Novak, P. T., & Yung, Y. F. (1998). Modeling the structure of the flow experience among web users, INFORMS Marketing Science and the Internet Mini-Conference, MIT.

Hoffman, L. D., & Novak, P. T., & Yung, Y. F. (1999). Measuring the flow construct in online environment: A structural modeling approach. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from the http://ecommerce.vanderbilt.edu/reseach/topics/flow/index.htm

Jonnavithula, L. & Kinshuk. (2005). Exploring Multimedia Educational GAMES: An Aid To Reinforce Classroom Teaching And Learning. Proceedings of the 4th IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education, 22-27.

Lloyd, P. & Rieber. (1996). Seriously considering play-Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 44, 43-58.

McKenna, A. & Agogino, A. (1997). A web-based instructional module for teaching middle school students engineering design with simple Machine. Education Conference, 27th Annual Conference, 3, 1496-1501.

McFarlance, A., Sparrowhawk, A., & Heald, Y. (2002). Report on the educational use of games: An exploration by TEEM of the contibution which games can make to education process. Cambridge: TEEM.

O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 155-474.

Pintrich, R. R. & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., & Correa, M. (2003). Beyond nintendo: Design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40, 71-94.

Siegler, R. S. (1976). Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 481-450.

Siegler, R. S. (1983). How knowledge influence learning. American Science, 71,631-638.

Snir, J., Smith, C. & Grosslight, L. (1993). Conceptually enhanced simulations: A computer tool for science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2(2), 373-388.

van Houten, S. P. & Verbraeck, A. (2006). Controlling Simulation Games Through Rule-Based Scenarios. Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, 2261 - 2269.

Virvou, M., Katsionis, G., Manos, K. (2005). Combining software games with education: Evaluation of its educational effectiveness. Education Technology & Society, 8(2), 54-65.

Webster, J., Trevino, K. L., & Ryan, L. (1993). The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237-244.