因應產業結構變動、市場變遷、科技快速演進以及人類追求超越物質層面享受的需求變化，基於消費者需求及偏好為導向之行銷2.0概念已經無法滿足高科技廠商於精神層面及環境友善的訴求，且顧客與供應商的界線逐漸模糊，故行銷大師Kotler提出本於參與及合作行銷、全球化悖論與文化行銷、及創意社會興起的新一代行銷3.0概念，唯少有學者著墨行銷3.0於企業對企業交易之應用，因此，本研究擬基於行銷3.0概念之精神行銷為基礎，透過文獻回顧建構品牌內涵之分析架構，先透過專家問卷以修正式德菲法確認影響消費電子廠商決定選擇代工廠品牌之關鍵要素與分析模式之合理性，並結合決策實驗室分析法(DEMATEL)找出各要素間的影響程度，並建立假設模型。以結構方程模型(Structural Equation Model; SEM)之適配度(fitness)驗證假設是否成立，再以約略集合理論(Rough Set Theory; RST)歸納出十三條決策規則推衍消費電子廠商選擇代工廠之行為模式分析規則，依所推衍之核心(core)確定最具影響力之關鍵要素後，邀集消費電子廠商之資深行銷人員，以灰關聯分析(Grey Relational Analysis; GRA)選擇最合適之行銷策略為向消費者傳遞企業願景及最好社會回饋與公益。本研究將以我國消費性電子產品廠商為實證分析對象，並依據實證之結果定義影響代工廠選擇偏好之關鍵要素與佳策略。研究結果將可作為未來消費性電子產品供應商選擇代工廠時訂定品牌行銷策略之依據。

The industry structure evolutions, market migrations, fast technology enhancements and the people’s pursue for spiritual lives urged the dramatic change and fundamental transformation of marketing concepts. The traditional Marketing 2.0 concepts based on consumer preferences and demands can no more fulfill high technology marketing needs for pursuing spiritual lives and environment friendly lifestyles. Furthermore, the boundary between suppliers and consumers decline gradually. Therefore, Philip Kotler, the marketing guru, introduced the new Marketing 3.0 concept consisting of three main themes, participation and collaborative marketing, globalization paradox and cultural marketing, as well as the rise in the creative society. However, very few scholars tried to uncover how the Marketing 3.0 concepts can be applied in business to business transactions. Therefore, based on the spiritual marketing concepts of Marketing 3.0, the construct the brand marketing theoretic framework and the corresponding hypothesis will be proposed. First, criteria can be derived by using literature review and the framework will be confirmed by experts by using the modified Delphi method. Then, DEMATEL will be introduced for deriving the influences between the factors. After that, the hypothesis can be tested by SEM and every hypothesis is supported. Furthermore, the Rough Set Theory (RST) will be introduced for deriving the prediction rules for suppliers‘ preferences in choosing a subcontractor. There are 13 main rules be found. Finally, the Grey Related Analysis (GRA) will be used to derive Grey coefficients corresponding each criteria and the Marketing 3.0 brand strategies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing the Corporate Mission to the Consumers are the suitable strategies in this research. An empirical study will be based on a Taiwanese consumer electronic firms‘ preferences toward subcontractors. Based on the empirical study results, the major factors influencing suppliers‘ behaviors and the best barnding strategies in Marketing 3.0 will be defined. The research result can also serve as a basis for consumer electronics manufacturer service providers’ branding strategy definitions.

Azoulay, A., & Kapferer, J. N. (2003). Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? The Journal of Brand Management, 11(2), 143-155.
Baoli, W., & Juan, T. (2010). E-brand building based on consumers' cognitive processes. Paper presented at the Communication Systems, Networks and Applications (ICCSNA), 2010 Second International Conference on.
Bauer, H. H., Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., & Exler, S. (2008). Brand image and fan loyalty in professional team sport: A refined model and empirical assessment. Journal of Sport Management, 22(2), 205.
Beauchamp, T. L. and Norman, E. Bowie (editors)(2001) Ethical Theory and Business: Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
Berthold, M. R., & Hand, D. J. (2007). Intelligent data analysis: an introduction: Springer.
Burmann, C., & Zeplin, S. (2005). Building brand commitment: A behavioural approach to internal brand management. The Journal of Brand Management, 12(4), 279-300.
Burmann, C., & Zeplin, S. (2005). Building brand commitment: A behavioural approach to internal brand management. The Journal of Brand Management, 12(4), 279-300.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Chiou, H. K., & Tzeng, G. H. (2001). Fuzzy hierarchical evaluation with grey relation model of green engineering for industry. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 3(3), 466-475.
Chakravarti, A. K., Vasanta, B., Krishnan, A. S. A. and Dubash, R. K. (1998). Modified Delphi methodology for technology forecasting case study of electronics and information technology in India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58(2), 155–165.
Chang, P. T., Huang, L. C. and Linc, H. J. (2000). The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112(3), 511-520.
Clair, J. A., Crary, M., McDaniels, M., Spelman, D., Buote, J. D., & MacLean, T. (1997). A Cooperative Inquiry Into Teaching and Taking a Course on ‘Managing Diversity’. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 25-62.
Clark, G. L., Kaminski, P. F., & Rink, D. R. (1992). Consumer complaints: advice on how companies should respond based on an empirical study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(3), 5-14.
Cull, B. W. (2011). Reading revolutions: Online digital text and implications for reading in academe. First Monday, June, 6, 2011.
Deng, J. (1985). Fundamental methods of grey systems. Huazhoug University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Deng, J. (1986). Grey forecasting and decision. Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, 97-134.
Deng, J. (1988). Grey System Book. Science and Technology Information Services, Windsor.
Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215-231.
Fornell, C., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint management: a theoretical analysis. Journal of marketing research, 337-346.
Ford, D. and Fulkerson. D. R. (2010). Flows in networks, Princeton university press.
Fryxell, G. E., & Dooley, R. S. (1997). Saving the Commons: A behavioral simulation for experiencing the role of collaboration and trust in devising workable solutions to environmental and other social issues. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 2, 149-183.
Gagliardi, A. R., Fung, M. F. K., Langer, B., Stern, H. and Brown, A. D. (2005). Development of ovarian cancer surgery quality indicators using a modified Delphi approach. Gynecologic Oncology, 97(2), 446-456.
Ginsberg, J. M., & Bloom, P. N. (2004). Choosing the right green marketing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 79-84.
Gundlach, G. T. (2007). The American Marketing Association's 2004 definition of marketing: Perspectives on its implications for scholarship and the role and responsibility of marketing in society. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(2), 243-250.
Gurviez, P., & Korchia, M. (2003). Proposal for a multidimensional brand trust scale. 32nd EMAC Conference2glasgow Marketing: Responsible and Relevant, 5, 56258.
Handy, C. (1995). The age of paradox: Harvard Business Press.
Hosokawa, M. and Zweig, S. (1990). Future directions in family medicine: Results of a Delphi survey. Family Medicine, 22(6), 429–433.
Jennings, M. M., & Entine, J. (1998). Business with a soul: A reexamination of what counts in business ethics. Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y, 20, 1.
Jobber, D. (2004). Principles and Practice of Marketing, 4th edition (London: McGraw-Hill).
Konecnik, M., & Go, F. (2007). Tourism destination brand identity: The case of Slovenia. Journal of Brand Management, 15(3), 177-189.
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2010). Marketing 3.0: from products to customers to the human spirit: Wiley.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2003). A framework for marketing management.
Lancaster, G., & Massingham, L. (2010). Essentials of marketing management: Taylor & Francis.
Lau, G. T., & Lee, S. H. (1999). Consumers' trust in a brand and the link to brand loyalty. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4(4), 341-370.
Lawlor, J. (1998). Brand Identity. Currents, 24(9), 16-23.
Llewellyn, J. T. (1998). Evaluating corporate claims of social responsibility: Developing a citizenship checklist. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 15, 89-106.
Mallot, M. J. (1998). An interview with Keith Davis. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 15, 241-250.
McIntosh, M. (2007). Progressing from corporate social responsibility to brand integrity. The debate over corporate social responsibility, 45-56.
Mon, D., Tzeng, G., & Lu, H. (1995). Grey decision making in weapon system evaluation. Journal of Chung Chen Institute of Technology, 26(1), 73-84.
Murry, J. W. J. and Hammons, J. O.(1995). Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436.
Olson, E. G. (2008). Creating an enterprise-level “green” strategy. Journal of business strategy, 29(2), 22-30.
Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 11(5), 341-356.
Pawlak, Z. (1997). Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support. European journal of operational research, 99(1), 48-57.
Pawlak, Z. (1998). Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. Cybernetics & Systems, 29(7), 661-688.
Pawlak, Z. (2003). Probability, truth and flow graph. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 82(4), 1-9.
Pawlak, Z., & Skowron, A. (2007). Rudiments of rough sets. Information sciences, 177(1), 3-27.
Porter, M. (1985). E.(1985), Competitive Advantage. New York.
Rotfeld, H. J. (2008). The stealth influence of covert marketing and much ado about what may be nothing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(1), 63-68.
Schmalensee, R. (1978). A model of advertising and product quality. The Journal of Political Economy, 485-503.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (Vol. 1): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Smallwood, D. E., & Conlisk, J. (1979). Product quality in markets where consumers are imperfectly informed. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(1), 1-23.
Steele. Eric H.(1977)" Two Approaches to Contemporary Dispute Behavior and Consumer Problems,". Law & Society Review, 11, 667.
Tzeng, G. H., & Tasur, S. (1994). The multiple criteria evaluation of grey relation model. The Journal of Grey System, 6(2), 87-108.
Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2007). Effects of television brand placement on brand image. Psychology and Marketing, 24(5), 403-420.
Velasquez, M. G., & Velazquez, M. (2002). Business ethics: Concepts and cases: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Wei, P. L., Huang, J. H., Tzeng, G. H., & SHWU-ING, W. (2010). Causal modeling of web-advertising effects by improving SEM based on DEMATEL technique. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 9(05), 799-829.
Wokutch, R. E. (1992). Worker protection, Japanese style: occupational safety and health in the auto industry (Vol. 21): Ilr Pr.
Wokutch, R. E., & Mallot, M. J. (1998). Capturing the creation of a field: documenting the history of social issues in management. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 15, 207-212.
Wu, H. S., Deng, J. L., & Wen, K. (1996). Introduction of Grey Analysis. Gau-Li Publication Inc., Taiwan, 12-52.