研究生: |
甘逸琪 Kan, I-Chee |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
新創企業制度建立之歷程研究-以航空公司人事政策為例 The Process of Formulating Rules and Regulations of New Ventures:Using the Personnel Policy of an Airliner as an Example |
指導教授: |
康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 72 |
中文關鍵詞: | 組織制度 、新創公司 |
英文關鍵詞: | Organizational institution, New venture |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204912 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:166 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
企業的成長以及是否能永續經營發展,與其組織制度的建立及執行有著密切的關係。其中又以人事制度的建構及運作模式尤為重要。一家舊企業,其規章制度早已既定,組織成員只需按章行事。然,一家新企業,組織制度要如何制訂? 以及制度的決策者有什麼影響力? 以及制度的形成對組織的重要性為何? 這都是引人想一探究竟的問題。
本研究以台灣新成立的航空公司為例,探究新創公司的人事制度建立歷程。是以「個案研究法」觀察新創公司制度來源、制度建立流程及制度決策者對於組織運作模式的影響;並以「行動研究法」分析個案制度運作模式,期以發現問題,進而解決問題,提升工作效能。
研究發現,該新創公司的制度建立來源並非完全複製母公司制度,反而是制度的決策者CEO扮演著舉足輕重的角色。而特別之處,新公司之首任CEO並非由母公司派任,而是自國外航空公司挑選航空專業人士擔任。此CEO具有航空飛安及航務專業,以及豐富的國際航空公司管理經驗,除了能提供新航空公司航務專業意見外,在制定組織制度的決策時,以其國際管理經驗帶給該新創公司不同於國內航空業界的新思維。鑒此,一家新創公司的首任CEO的背景經歷將對公司的組織制度形成及組織未來的發展形勢有著絕對性的影響。
Business growth and sustainable development are closely related to the establishment and execution of the organizational institution. Construction and operation mode of personnel rules and regulations are particularly important. Since company rules and regulations have already been established, members of organization can only be acted by rules. However for a new venture, I am interested in following issues: “ How should the company establish a suitable organization in its pioneering stage?” “ What is the build-up process of personnel system to a new venture? “ “What role does the decision-maker play?”
In this study, a new domestic airliner was taken as the example to explore the course of the new business personnel system, including the source of system design, the importance of company’s decision-makers, the formation of the institution operation mode, and problems that the company has encountered. Therefore, this case adopted the “case research method” to observe the sources of new venture systems, system establishment processes, and the impact of the decision-maker on the organizational operation mode. In addition, the “action research method” was adopted to carry out the case’s system operation mode, with hopes of discovering problems, solving problems, and enhancing work performance.
The Study found that this new start-up company doesn’t fully replicate its parent company’s system. Instead, decision maker - CEO plays an important role. It’s worth mentioning that the first CEO is not from the airline’s parent company, but selected from aviation professionals. The CEO is well experienced in flight safety, flight operation as well as management experience in international airlines. The first CEO with a rich aviation background is very important to the new airliner. The CEO not only provides flight operation advices, but also come up with innovative thinking in decision-making process. In view of this, the first CEO’s background of a new start-up business could contribute significantly to company’s organization system and its future development.
中文文獻
1. 李立心(2015)。新創企業為何活不下去。天下雜誌,565
2. 李宿逸(2012)。台灣人身保險行銷通路變革的社會學分析:組織、制度與
環境分析。國立臺北大學社會學系碩士班碩士論文。
3. 交通部(2015):行政院國情簡介(空運)。台北市:交通部。
4. 洪鉛財、張文龍(2002)。創新育成中心進駐戶類型與培育服務需求關係探
討-進駐戶觀點。中華管理學報,3(2),17-29。
5. 陳墀元(2006)。從組織即興與組織慣例演化的動態觀探討團隊即興現象的
影響因素。國立雲林科技大學管理研究所博士論文。
6. 陳彥亮、高闖(2014)。組織慣例的跨層級演化機制。取自中國社會科學網
http://mgmt.cssn.cn/glx/glx_glgc/201407/t20140715_1254764.shtml
7. 張仲堯(2010)。新創企業經營效率與創業投資關聯性研究。中國文化大學
國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
8. 張鈞(1994)。建立中小企業全面輔導體制之研究。台灣中小企業發展論文
集。台北:聯經出版事業公司
9. 賴佳吟(2008)。企業導入跨組織資訊系統之成效─從組織制度之觀點。國
立暨南國際大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
10. 劉瑞華 (1994)。制度,制度變遷與經濟成就。台北: 時報文化出版企業有
限公司
11. 顏愛民、劉志成、劉媛(2007)。組織慣例研究述評。湖南長沙,中南大學
學報(社會科學版),13(2),187-192。
12. 郭熙保、胡漢昌(2004)。論制度模仿[J]。江漢論壇,3,10-14
英文文獻
1. Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. (2008). Founding the future: Path
dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to
IPO. Organization science, 19(1), 3-24.
2. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.
3. Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: a review of the literature.
Industrial and corporate change, 13(4), 643-678.
4. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational
learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of
management review,24(3), 522-537.
5. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the
firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2.
6. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in
organizational analysis (Vol. 17). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press.
7. FIELDS, C. R. I. O., Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage
revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in
organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
8. Feldman Martha S.(2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous
change. Organization Science, 11(6),611−629.
9. Feldman Martha S, and Pentland Brian T.(2003). Reconceptualizing
Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94−118.
10. Hines, H. H. (1957). Effectiveness of" entry" by already established firms.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71(1), 132-150.
11. Hodgson, G. M. (1988). Economics and institutions. In Journal of Economic
Issues.
12. Honjo, Y. (2000). Business failure of new firms: an empirical analysis using a
multiplicative hazards model. International Journal of Industrial
Organization,18(4), 557-574.
13. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual review of
sociology, 319-340.
14. Jorg Sydow, Georg Schreyogg, and Jochen Koch (2009). Organizational Path
Dependence:Opening The Black Box, Academy of Management
Review .34(4), 689–709.
15. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations.
16. Marquis Christopher and András Tilcsik (2013).Imprinting: Toward A
Multilevel Theory. Academy of Management Annals: 193–243.
17. Nelson R R, and Winter S G. (1982).An Evolutionary Theory of Economic
Change[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic
performance. Cambridge university press.
19. Pentland Brian T. and Feldman Martha S.(2005). Organizational Routines as a
unit of analysis[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793−815.
20. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension.--.
21. Mainwaring, Scott, & Scully, T. (Eds.). (1995). Building democratic
institutions: Party systems in Latin America (pp. 1-36). Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
22. Timmons J. A., (1990),“New business opportunities: Getting to the right place
at the right time Action ,MA: Brick House Publishing Co
23. Victoria Johnson(2007). What Is Organizational Imprinting? Cultural
Entrepreneurship in the Founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal
of Sociology,113(1),97-127
24. Weiss, L.A., “Start-up Businesses: A Comparison of Performance,” Sloan
Management Review, 37-53(1981).
25. Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and new venture performance: a
study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology
ventures. Journal of business venturing, 11(4), 289-321.