本研究旨在探討大學學者對開放取用期刊的認知與態度之研究，目前國內研究大學教師對於開放取用期刊的看法及圖書館業務支援作法的相關文獻不多，透過本研究，期望能理解當前大學教師在學術期刊與開放取用期刊出版與使用方面所考量的因素與需求，進而有效評估圖書館在支持開放取用期刊服務之妥適性。
研究方法採用混合研究法，主要採量化問卷調查法，輔以質性半結構式訪談，向研究對象國立中山大學教師發放問卷，發放期間為2023年5月1日起至2023年6月12日止，共回收102份有效問卷。並於2023年5月15日起至2023年5月31日間，進行7位教師半結構式訪談。
根據研究結果，提出研究結論如下：一、教師發表研究成果時最重視期刊的品質或信譽；二、開放取用期刊可提升研究能見度，促進學術傳播與科學研究發展；三、教師將研究成果於開放取用期刊出版的數量比例增加；四、教師對於開放取用期刊的態度仍存在矛盾；五、作者發表開放取用期刊支付文章處理費將產生經濟負擔；六、圖書館可推廣開放取用期刊知識，舉辦投稿諮詢講座與辨識掠奪性期刊服務，與出版社簽訂投稿開放取用期刊文章處理費優惠方案；七、在傳統期刊與開放取用期刊並存的時代，圖書館應持續引進優質期刊，關注館藏傳統期刊是否轉型為開放取用期刊，適時調整讀者服務。
根據研究結果，提出研究建議如下：一、大學學者與圖書館可共同交流開放取用及衍生的相關議題資訊；二、大學圖書館可主動推廣開放取用期刊資訊，收集各學科主題優質開放取用期刊清單方便讀者研究使用；三、服務機構或研究機構資助機構應訂定開放取用期刊規範或政策。

This study aims to investigate university scholars' perceptions and attitudes towards open access journals. Currently, there is limited literature on how university faculty in Taiwan view open access journals and the related supports provided by academic libraries. Through this study, it is hoped to gain insights into the current considerations and needs of university faculty in terms of academic journal and open access journal publishing and utilization. This will enable us to effectively assess the appropriateness of library support for open access journal services.
The research methodology employed a mixed-methods approach, integrating quantitative questionnaire surveys with qualitative semi-structured interviews. A questionnaire survey was distributed to the research participants, National Sun Yat-sen University faculty members. The survey distribution period was from May 1, 2023, to June 12, 2023, resulting in a total of 102 valid responses. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 7 faculty members from May 15, 2023, to May 31, 2023.
Based on the research findings, the following conclusions are proposed: 1. Scholars prioritize the quality or reputation of journals when publishing research outcomes; 2. Open access journals enhance research visibility, promote academic dissemination, and advance scientific research; 3. Scholars are increasing the proportion of research outcomes published in open access journals; 4. There is still a contradiction in scholars’ attitudes towards open access journals; 5. Authors' publication of open access journal articles may incur economic burdens due to article processing charges; 6. Libraries can promote knowledge about open access journals, organize submission consultation seminars, and provide predatory journal identification services, along with signing agreements with publishers for favorable article processing charge schemes for open access journal submissions; 7. In an era of coexistence between traditional and open access journals, libraries should continue to acquire high-quality journals, monitor whether their journal collections are transitioning to open access, and adjust reader services as needed.
Based on the research findings, the following research suggestions are proposed: 1. University scholars and libraries should collaborate to communicate and exchange information on open access and related issues; 2. University libraries should actively promote information about open access journals, curate lists of high-quality open access journals in various subject areas, and make them easily accessible for readers' research purposes; 3. Funding agencies or research institutions should establish standards or policies for open access journals.

NTU Library(2019年3月8日)。OA行動派，實踐OA的方法。國立臺灣大學圖書館參考服務部落格。http://tul.blog.ntu.edu.tw/archives/21895
NTU Library(2021年1月26日)。OA的”OPEN”-開放授權(Open Content Licensing)。國立臺灣大學圖書館參考服務部落格。http://tul.blog.ntu.edu.tw/archives/27019
毛慶禎(2007)。開放近用運動的真諦。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，3(2)，1-14。http://lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/works/pb3-2a(1).pdf
王梅玲(2007)。電子期刊網路服務與評鑑模式之研究。圖書資訊學研究，3(1)，75-102。https://www.lac.org.tw/sites/default/files/field_files/publish/attach33_1.pdf
王梅玲、吳萱(2010)。圖書資訊學學者開放近用期刊使用研究。圖書與資訊學刊，75，1-24。https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2010.75.01
何萬順(2022年12月14日)。學術期刊開放取用平台之作法說明。在林明仁(主持)，場次二〔座談會演講〕。臺灣學術期刊開放取用平台(TOAJ)說明暨編輯實務座談會，台北市，臺灣。
吳紹群、吳明德(2007)。開放資訊取用期刊對學術傳播系統之影響。圖書資訊學研究，2(1)，21-54。https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/123456789/25705/1/05.pdf
吳紹群、陳雪華(2008)。學術出版價值鏈變遷及圖書館角色之概念性初探。國家圖書館館刊，2，23-59。
李家寧(2017)。開放取用在校園發展與實施初探：以美國加州大學系統、澳洲昆士蘭科技大學及加拿大卡加利大學為例。圖資與檔案學刊，91，97-116。https://doi.org/10.6575/jila.2017.91.05
李家寧(2020年4月13日)。OA與我們的距離：OA浪潮下非營利及學會期刊出版的轉型之道。Research Portal科技政策觀點。https://doi.org/10.6916/STPIRP.2020-4-13
林奇秀、賴璟毅(2014)。開放近用的陰暗面：掠奪型出版商及其問題。圖書與資訊學刊，85，1-21。https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2014.85.01
林孟玲、顏惠專、潘姝琪、陳紹麗、李家寧(2020)。Open Access與近期歐美主要圖書館聯盟發展。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
林家鈺、林雯瑤(2021)。醫學領域開放取用期刊文章處理費之研究。圖書資訊學刊，19(2)，173-203。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.202112_19(2).173
邱子恒、蕭淑媛(2020)。臺北醫學大學圖書館學術傳播服務之推動與成果。圖資與檔案學刊，(97)，174-209。https://doi.org/10.6575/JILA.202012_(97).0005
邱炯友(2019)。大學出版社與大學圖書館之開放取用 (Open Access) 政策合作與分享。臺灣出版與閱讀，5，4-7。https://isbn.ncl.edu.tw/FCKEDITOR_UploadFiles/1558422113.pdf
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析(三版)。五南。
柯皓仁(2020)。開放取用發展趨勢。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，29，1-15。https://www.lib.ncku.edu.tw/journal/pdf/29/29_01.pdf
柯皓仁(2022)。臺灣學者開放取用期刊認知與實踐之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，59(3)，239-276。https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202211_59(3).0022.RS.AM
郭子銘(2017)。從全文可得性與引用分析探討圖書資訊學電子期刊資源發展之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
陳明俐(2020)。圖書館與研發單位合作新觀點-訪歐研究觀察。在林孟玲(主持)，CONCERT學科館員沙盒計畫4第二場〔專題演講〕。學術研究永續經營：SDGs與OA之間的契機研討會，台北市，臺灣。
開放文化基金會(2022)。CC 授權介紹。臺灣創用CC計畫。https://tw.creativecommons.net/
黃元鶴、邱子恒(2022)。我國大學圖書館學術傳播相關服務推動現狀與未來發展初探。圖書資訊學術與實務研討會 Conference of LIS and Practices(CoLISP 2022)論文集，164-172。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所；國立臺灣師範大學圖書館；中華民國圖書館學會。https://colisp2022.conf.tw/site/userdata/1442/file/CoLISP_2022.pdf
楊美華(2012)。大學圖書館在新學術傳播體系的角色。大學圖書館，16(2)，1-19。 https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.2012-16-2.01
歐俐伶(2017)。開放取用期刊投稿推廣：以BioMed Central為例。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，26，55-66。https://www.lib.ncku.edu.tw/journal/pdf/26/26_05.pdf
潘璿安(2022)。預印本之特性、出版倫理與其在COVID-19肺炎疫情下的知識傳播影響力。教育資料與圖書館學，59(1)，35-71。https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202203_59(1).0040.OR.BM
蔡孟利（2022年4月19日）。每年百億換了什麼？台大醫學院正面表列有疑慮學術期刊的意義。《報導者》。https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-academic-journals-dispute-1
蔡明月、吳岱欒(2016)。開放取用引文資源庫系統功能比較研究。國家圖書館館刊，105(2)，39-70。https://nclfile.ncl.edu.tw/files/201706/fb7907f1-056d-4c2e-a12b-ba71874cce9a.pdf
鄭英耀(2022)。中山概覽。國立中山大學年報2021-2022 = National Sun Yat-Sen University Annual Report, 14。https://news.nsysu.edu.tw/static/file/120/1120/img/2493/2021-22Annualreport-web.pdf
總統府(2015)。圖書館法。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0010008
Arshad, A., & Ameen, K. (2021). Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297
Beall, J., & DuBois, J. M. (2016). Scholars beware. Monitor on Psychology, 47(4). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2016/04/scholars
Bi, X. (2018, Feb 21-23). Embrace and Access the Open Access Journals as Library Resources. Paper presented at the 2018 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS). https://doi.org/10.1109/ETTLIS.2018.8485192
Björk, B.-C. (2004). Open access to scientific publications–an analysis of the barriers to change? Information Research, 9(2), 170. https://informationr.net/ir/9-2/paper170.html
Boczar, J., & Schmidt, L. (2022). Analyzing Faculty Open Access Publishing: A citation analysis of select colleges at the University of South Florida. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102493
Bosch, S., Albee, B., Romaine, S. (2021). The New Abnormal: Periodicals Price Survey 2021. Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/The-New-Abnormal-Periodicals-Price-Survey-2021
Bosch, S., Albee, B., Romaine, S. (2022). Are We There Yet?: Periodicals Price Survey 2022. Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/Are-We-There-Yet-Periodicals-Price-Survey-2022
Bower, K., Sheppard, N., Bayjoo, J., & Pease, A. (2017). Establishing the Role and Impact of Academic Librarians in Supporting Open Research: A Case Study at Leeds Beckett University, UK. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(2-3), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1318767
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2012, September 12). Prologue: The Budapest Open Access Initiative after 10 years: 10th anniversary. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-recommendations
Butterfield, A. C., Galbraith, Q., & Martin, M. (2022). Expanding your institutional repository: Librarians working with faculty. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(6), 102628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102628
Cambridge Core. (2014). Open Access Glossary. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/open-research/open-access/open-access-glossary#
Cambridge University Press. (2014). Open Access Glossary. Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org/core/open-research/open-access/open-access-glossary
Collins, C. S., & Walters, W. H. (2010). Open Access Journals in College Library Collections. The Serials Librarian, 59(2), 194-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615261003623187
Dawson, P. H., & Yang, S. Q. (2016). Institutional Repositories, Open Access and Copyright: What Are the Practices and Implications? Science & Technology Libraries, 35(4), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2016.1224994
DOAJ. (2022, Nov 7). Directory of Open Access Journals. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/
Evans, S., Thompson, H., & Watkins, A. (2011). Discovering Open Access Art History: A Comparative Study of the Indexing of Open Access Art Journals. The Serials Librarian, 61(2), 168-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2011.592666
Eve, M. P. (2015). Open Access publishing and scholarly communications in non-scientific disciplines. Online Information Review, 39(5), 717-732. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0103
Frank, J., Foster, R., & Pagliari, C. (2023). Open access publishing – noble intention, flawed reality. Social Science & Medicine, 317, 115592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115592
Gray, J. (2008, Oct 16 ). Open Access Day 2008. Open Knowledge Foundation https://blog.okfn.org/2008/10/16/open-access-day-2008/
Haug, C. J. (2019). No free lunch—what Price plan S for scientific publishing?. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(12), 1181-1185.
Heaton, R., Burns, D., & Thoms, B. (2019). Altruism or Self-Interest? Exploring the Motivations of Open Access Authors. College & Research Libraries, 80(4), 485. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.4.485
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-593-0.50006-X
Lyons, C., & Booth, H. A. (2011). An Overview of Open Access in the Fields of Business and Management. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16(2), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2011.554786
McAllister, J., & Torres, J. (2022). Discovering Open Access Trends in Engineering: A Bibliometric Analysis of Open Access Publications at a Large Research University. Science & Technology Libraries, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2022.2032535
Mullen, L. B. (2010a). 1 - Introduction. In L. B. Mullen (Ed.), Open Access and its Practical Impact on the Work of Academic Librarians (pp. 1-35): Chandos Publishing.
Mullen, L. B. (2010b). 2 - Librarians and their own open access publishing. In L. B. Mullen (Ed.), Open Access and its Practical Impact on the Work of Academic Librarians (pp. 37-73): Chandos Publishing.
Mullen, L. B. (2010c). 3 - Collection development and open access. In L. B. Mullen (Ed.), Open Access and its Practical Impact on the Work of Academic Librarians (pp. 75-101): Chandos Publishing.
Mullen, L. B. (2010d). 6 - Public services work and open access. In L. B. Mullen (Ed.), Open Access and its Practical Impact on the Work of Academic Librarians (pp. 147-179): Chandos Publishing.
OSTP. (2022). Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research. USA: The White House Office. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-Access-Memo.pdf.
Peekhaus, W., & Proferes, N. (2016). An examination of North American Library and Information Studies faculty perceptions of and experience with open-access scholarly publishing. Library & Information Science Research, 38(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.01.003
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., . . . Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
Rowley, J., Johnson, F., Sbaffi, L., Frass, W., & Devine, E. (2017). Academics’behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1201-1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23710
Salaz, A. M., Johnston, N., & Pickles, C. (2018). Faculty Members Who Teach Online: A Phenomenographic Typology of Open Access Experiences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(1), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.006
Scoulas, J. M., & De Groote, S. L. (2023). Faculty perceptions, use, and needs of library resource and services in a public research university. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(1), 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102630
Shen, L. (2011). There are Discipline-Based Differences in Authors’ Perceptions Towards Open Access Publishing. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 6(3), 71–73. https://doi.org/10.18438/B89W5D
Shook, E. & Vecchione, A., (2022). Faculty Perceptions of Open Access Publishing: Investigating Faculty Publishing Habits to Evaluate Library Collection Alignment. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 10(1), eP13216. https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.13216
SPARC. (2022). International Open Access Week. SPARC. https://sparcopen.org/our-work/open-access-week/
Suber, P. (2012). Ensuring open access for publicly funded research. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 345, e5184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5184
Suber, P. (2012). Open Access. The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262300988/open-access/
Suber, P. (2019). Glossary. In Open Access (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001
Tenopir, C., Dalton, E., Christian, L., Jones, M., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish, A. (2017). Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 824. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.824
Tomaszewski, R., Poulin, S., & MacDonald, K. I. (2013). Publishing in Discipline-Specific Open Access Journals: Opportunities and Outreach for Librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.008
Torres, J. M., & Manjarrez-Dominguez, A. (2021). Toward an understanding of open access trends in business schools: A bibliometric analysis of the open access faculty publications of accounting departments at three universities. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 26(3-4), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2021.1919822