研究生: |
吳明臻 WU, Ming-Jhen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
教練威權領導對女子職業籃球選手運動投入之預測:以教練選手關係為中介變項 The Prediction of Coach’s Authoritarian Leadership on Sport Engagement among Women's Professional Basketball Players:The Mediating effect of Coach-Athlete Relationship |
指導教授: |
梁嘉音
Liang, Chia-Yin |
口試委員: |
梁嘉音
Liang, Chia-Yin 季力康 Chi, Li-Kang 曾郁嫻 Tseng, Yu-Hsien |
口試日期: | 2024/07/12 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
運動競技學系 Department of Athletic Performance |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 61 |
中文關鍵詞: | 專權領導 、尚嚴領導 、互補性 、熱忱 、自信 |
英文關鍵詞: | Juan-Chiuan Leadership, Shang-Yan Leadership, Complementarity, Enthusiasm, Confidence |
研究方法: | 比較研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401676 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:139 下載:3 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
目的:本研究主要探討女子職業籃球選手知覺教練專權領導與尚嚴領導對運動投入之影響,並檢驗教練-選手關係對其中介效果。方法:以第19屆超級籃球聯賽女子選手為收案對象,共計有四隊58人 (國泰人壽:15人、台元紡織:15人、中華電信:14人、台灣電力:14人),發放58份,回收57份,經篩選有效問卷51份,回收率87.93%。研究以「威權領導量表」、「運動投入量表」、「教練-選手關係量表」進行施測,所得資料用描述性統計、皮爾森積差相關與、簡單線性迴歸以及多元階層迴歸來進行分析。結果:(一) 「專權領導」能有效負向預測「教練-選手關係」,但無法有效預測「運動投入」,而「尚嚴領導」皆能有效正向預測「運動投入」與「教練-選手關係」;(二) 「教練-選手關係」與「運動投入」呈現正相關,且「教練-選手關係」,能有效正向預測「運動投入」;(三) 「教練-選手關係」可完全中介「尚嚴領導」與「運動投入」,深入分析「教練-選手關係」的互補性可有效中介「尚嚴領導」與「運動投入」的熱忱以及自信。結論:(一) 球員知覺教練較多「尚嚴領導」,其「運動投入」與「教練-選手關係」兩者則有愈多和愈佳的趨勢,反之,若知覺到較多的「專權領導」,「教練-選手關係」則愈不佳,「運動投入」不受影響;(二) 球員知覺到「教練-選手關係」越好時,運動投入也就越高;(三) 「教練-選手關係」佳,無論「尚嚴領導」多寡,皆會提升「運動投入」,尤其「教練-選手關係」中互補性愈多時,愈能增加「運動投入」中的熱忱及自信。
Purpose: This study examined the effects of perceived Juan-Chiuan and Shang-Yan leadership on sport engagement among Women's professional basketball players and examined the mediating effects of the coach-athlete relationship. Methods: The 19th Women's Super Basketball League (WSBL) players were the target of this study. There were total of 58 players from four teams (Cathay Life: 15 players, Taoyuan Textile: 15 players, Chunghwa Telecom: 14 players, and Taipower: 14 players), and 58 questionnaires were distributed. 57 questionnaires were collected, and 51 questionnaires were screened for validity, with a recovery rate of 87.93%. The study was conducted using the Authoritative Leadership Scale, the Sports Commitment Scale, and the Coach-Athlete Relationship Scale. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's cumulative correlation, simple linear regression, and multilevel regression. Results: (1) “Juan-Chiuan leadership” can negatively predict “Coach-Athlete relationship”, but can’t effectively predict “sport engagement”. “Shang-Yan leadership” can positively predict “sport engagement” and “Coach-Athlete relationship”; (2) The “Coach-Athlete relationship” was positively related to “sport engagement”, and the “Coach-Athlete relationship” can positively predict “sport engagement”; (3) The “Coach-Athlete relationship” can fully mediate the “Shang-Yan leadership” and “sport engagement”. Further analysis of the complementarity of the “Coach-Athlete relationship” can effectively mediate the “Shang-Yan leadership” and the enthusiasm and confidence of “sport engagement”. Conclusion: (1) Players who perceive more “Shang-Yan leadership” in their coaches tend to have more and better “sport engagement” and “Coach-Athlete relationship”. On the contrary, if they perceive more “Juan-Chiuan leadership”, “Coach-Athlete relationship” will be worse, but “sport engagement” will not be affected; (2) When players perceive a better “Coach-Athlete relationship”, “sport engagement” will be higher; (3) A good “Coach-Athlete relationship”, regardless of the amount of “Shang-Yan leadership”, will enhance “sport engagement”. Especially when there is more complementarity in the "Coach-Athlete relationship", the more enthusiasm and confidence in “sport engagement” can be increased.
McShan, S. L & Glinow, M. A. V. (2009)。組織行為學 (丁明勇、鄭毅萍譯;2版)。智勝文化事。(原著出版於2008)。
王政文 (2022)。威權領導對領導者信任的影響-以程序公平為調節變項 [未出版碩士論文]。國防大學。
方慈霞 (2011)。領導風格、工作動機對工作投入之影響以組織公平為調節變項 [未出版碩士論文]。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
宋一夫、湯慧娟 (2005)。我國大專院校游泳教練家長式領導之調查研究。大專體育學刊,7(3),151-160。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.200509_7(3).0012
吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎 (2002)。怒不可遏?或忍氣吞聲?華人企業中主管威權領導行為與部屬憤怒情緒反應的關係。本土心理學研究,19,3-49。
吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎 (2008)。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究,30,65-115。https://doi.org/10.6254/2008.30.65
吳清山 (2004)。學校創新經營理念奥策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
李烱煌 (2002)。教練領導行為與教練-選手關係滿意度之相關研究。大專體育學刊,4(2),67-77。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.200212_4(2).0006
李宜臻 (2021)。威權領導對工作滿意度的影響:員工情緒與鄭念之雙重效果 [未出版碩士論文]。國立清華大學。
李筱苹、季力康 (2018)。運動知覺教練效能與教練選手關係對身心倦怠之預測。靜宜體育,11,12-26。https://doi.org/10.6260/PUPE.201807_(11).0002
林姿葶、連玉輝 (2016)。運動情境中的家長式教練領導研究回顧。體育學報,49(2),125-142。https://doi.org/10.3966/102472972016064902001
林夙豐、蘇秦玉 (2008)。教練領導風格對高中排球球員團隊承諾及滿意度影響之研究。運動與遊憩研究,2(3),37-49。https://doi.org/10.29423/JSRR.200803_2(3).0003
林子群、高三福 (2012)。教練家長式領導與球員同儕互動關係。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,11(2),25-33。https://doi.org/10.6169/NCYUJPEHR.11.2.03
林姿葶、鄭伯壎、周麗芳 (2014)。家長式領導:回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,42,3-82。https://doi.org/10.6254/2014.42.3
周俊三 (2003)。臺灣與中國大陸籃球選手家長式領導、動機氣候、團隊凝聚力與團隊滿意關係之研究 [未出版碩士論文]。國立體育學院。
周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛 (2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究,43,223-284。https://doi.org/10.6254/2010.34.223
周婉茹 (2009)。專權與威權領導的效果:心理賦能的中介與仁慈領導的調節 [未出版碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學。
周婉茹、鄭伯壎 (2014)。掀開神秘的面紗:雙向度威權領導與工作績效。中華心理學刊,1-18。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20140619
季力康、陳思羽、葉允棋、江衍宏 (2013)。中文版 [教練-選手關係量表] 之編製。大專體育學刊,15(4),429-438。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1504.005
東方介德 (2015)。賦權動機氣候介入對青少年籃球選手基本需求、動機與幸福感之影響 [未出版博士論文]。國立體育大學。
高三福 (2001)。團隊文化與教練領導:質化與量化兩種途徑研究 [未出版博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
高三福 (2007)。運動領導理論的發展及可行的研究方向。中華體育季刊,21(1),59-66。https://doi.org/10.6223/qcpe.2101.200703.1707
高三福、莊仲仁 (2009)。家長式領導、團隊社會化與團隊文化關係之研究:以運動團隊為例。應用心理研究,42,187-213。
班哲明、陳美綺 (2013)。大學運動員知覺教練領導行為的一致性對選手無動機之預測-教練選手關係的中介效果。臺灣體育學術研究,55,47-62。https://doi.org/10.6590/TJSSR.2013.12.03
郭泓毅 (2018)。不可忤逆的安全號令:威權領導與安全績效之探討 [未出版博士論文]。國立政治大學。
許子淵、張艾君、張志銘、趙宸紳、張世沛 (2017)。教練領導與團隊凝聚力對羽球選手滿意度之研究。運動休閒餐旅研究,12,16-30。https://doi.org/10.29429/JSLHR.201709_12(3).02
許時清 (2019)。賦權與削權動機氣候對教練選手關係之預測-基本心理需求的中介效果 [未出版博士論文]。國立體育大學。
許自雄 (2020)。高中體育班學生心理堅韌性與知覺教練賦權動機氣候對運動投入之預 [未出版博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
許士軍 (2002)。管理學。東華書局。
陳其昌 (1993)。排球教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力的影響暨驗證運動情境領導理論之研究 [未出版碩士論文]。國立體育學院。
陳怡娟 (2016)。大專游泳選手知覺教練領導風格與競技倦怠之研究 [未出版博士論文]。臺北市立大學。
陳美綺、陳鈺芳 (2015)。大專運動員知覺教練領導行為對其運動倦怠之預測-教練選手關係的中介效果。休閒運動管理學刊,2,1-12。
陳建志、鐘巧如 (2014)。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊,10(3),1-24。https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042014091003001
陳龍弘、蔡英美、陳瓊茶 (2005)。家長式領導、負面情緒感受、離隊意圖和團隊滿意度之關係。國立體育學院論叢,15,205-216。https://doi.org/10.6591/JPES.2005.04.18
黃國恩 (2020)。教練威權領導對集體效能之影響:一個調節式中介模式之檢驗 [未出版博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
黃少伯 (2023)。教練領導行為與教練選手關係對團隊凝聚力的影響 [未出版博士論文]。國立彰化師範大學。
黃英忠 (2007)。人力資源管理。三民書局。
黃虹瑛 (2014)。大專院校籃球選手知覺教練-選手關係對團隊衝突與運動表現之預測 [未出版博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
黃國恩、郭建志、鄭志富 (2019)。華人教練威權領導對教練效能知覺之影響:心理集體性中介效果的驗證。體育學刊,52(1),109-125。https://doi.org/10.3966/102472972019035201009
湯慧娟、宋一夫 (2010)。教練領導行為、情緒感受與運動員領導信任。臺大體育學報,18,45-55。https://doi.org/10.6569/NTUJPE.201009_(18).0004
康真娥 (2003)。台南地區幼稚園園長領導風格、教師工作價值觀與教師組纖承諾關係之研究 [未出版博士論文]。國立台南師範學院。
康正男 (2006)。棒球總教練威權領導與球員效能之研究:職棒與業餘之比較。大專體育學刊,8(1),112-123。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.200603_8(1).0008
康正男 (2005)。棒球運動教練領導行為之探討-概念建構與模式分析。體育學報,38(4),53-68。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.3804.200512.0905
郭添財 (2004)。國小桌球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究 [未出版博士論文]。臺北市立師範學院。
曾秋美、王俊明 (2011)。家長式領導對大專體育科系運動代表隊團隊氣氛及競技倦怠的影響。長榮運動休閒學刊,5,93-112。https://doi.org/10.29632/CRYDSSSK.201106.0010
曾建興、林彥伯 (2008)。家長式領導行為對大學棒球運動員運動倦怠之影響。北體學報,16,26-37。https://doi.org/10.6167/TPEC/2008.16.3
張富均 (2016)。大學運動員之運動熱情、流暢體驗及運動幸福感---以教練-選手關係為中介效果。運動教練科學,44,67-80。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2016.44.08
張曉玉 (2011)。高中籃球選手知覺運動動機氣候、教練-選手關係與身心倦怠之相關研究-探討教練選手關係的中介效果 [未出版博士論文]。國立體育大學。
楊國樞 (1993)。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存。載於楊國樞、余安邦(主編),中國人的價值觀—社會科學觀點 (頁66-119)。桂冠圖書。
楊銘賢 (1995)。管理概論。中興管理顧問公司。
趙安安、高尚仁 (2005)。台灣地區華人企業家長式領導風格與員工壓力之關聯。應用心理學研究,27,111-131。
樂秀芬 (2017)。新北市高中體育班與非體育班選手之課業學習自我效能及運動投入 [未出版博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
蔡英美 (2006)。家長式領導、情緒感受與團隊凝聚力之關係研究。國立體育學院論叢,16(2),347-358。https://doi.org/10.6591/JPES.2005.09.27
鄭伯勳、樊景立、周麗芳 (2006)。家長式領導:模式與證據。華泰文化。
鄭伯壎 (1995)。家長權威與領導行為之關係:一個臺灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,79,119-173。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清 (2003)。家長式領導的三元模式:中國大陸企業組織的證據。本土心理學研究,20,209-250。
鄭昱宏、周婉茹、周德賢、鄭伯壎 (2019)。教練威權領導一定不好嗎?一項權變概念的提出與驗證。中華心理學刊,61(2),97-130。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.201906_61(2).0002
鄭振洋、宋一夫、湯慧娟 (2013)。木球選手知覺教練-選手關係與運動價值觀對訓練滿意度之影響。運動教練科學,32,27-38。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2013.32.03
鄭秀貴、高麗娟 (2008)。威權、仁慈、德行家長式領導:李瑞麟教練之個案研究。北體學報,16,157-170。https://doi.org/10.6167/TPEC/2008.16.15
劉義傳、王清欉、黃崇儒 (2013)。高中棒球球員心理韌性、教練威權領導與競技倦怠的關係。臺灣運動教育學報,8(1),1-14。https://doi.org/10.6580/JTSP.2013.8(1).01
賴芝妤 (2021)。賦權與削權動機氣候對大專籃球選手運動投入之預測:以教練選手關係為中介變項 [未出版博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
賴柏豪 (2020)。知覺與偏好領導行為一致性對教練選手關係及領導效能之影響 [未出版博士論文]。朝陽科技大學。
蔣奎雨 (2006)。高雄市國民小學校長領導風格、教師工作壓力與學校效能的關係研究 [未出版博士論文]。國立臺南大學。
蕭承佑 (2023)。國民小學體育班與非體育班選手之課業學習自我效能與運動投入之研究 [未出版博士論文]。台北市立大學。
謝宛君、高三福、呂雲梅 (2008)。教練威權領導的比較與省思。中華體育季刊,22(3),67-72。https://doi.org/10.6223/qcpe.2203.200809.1709
謝偉雄 (2008)。大學生正向心理、運動參與動機、運動自我效能與運動行為的研究 [未出版博士論文]。國立體育大學。
謝傳崇 (2011)。校長正向領導對教師教學影響之研究。教育資料奥研究變月刊,101,59-82。
謝文彬 (2014)。驗證工作需求-資源模式影響國中體育班學生運動投入之研究 [未出版博士論文]。國立嘉義大學。
簡晉龍、黃囇莉 (2015)。華人權威取向之內涵與形成歷程。本土心理學研究,43,55-123。https://doi.org/10.6254/2015.43.55
顏肇廷、曾冠堯、高三福 (2008)。運動團隊家長式領導研究之探討。中華體育季刊,22(4),96-102。https://doi.org/10.6223/qcpe.2204.200812.1711
Amorose, A. J., & Horn, T. S. (2001). Pre-to post-season changes in the intrinsic motivation of first year college athletes: Relationships with coaching behavior and scholarship status. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(4), 355-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/104132001753226247
Antonini Philippe, R., & Seiler, R. (2006). Closeness, co-orientation and complementarity in coach-athlete relationships: What male swimmers say about their male coaches. Psychology of sport and exercise, 7, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.08.004
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and stogdills handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial application. New York: Free Press.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bird, A. M. (1977). Development of a model for predicting team performance. Research Quarterly, 48 , 24-32.
Bishop. W. H. (2013). Defining the authenticity in authentice leadership. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 6(1): 7.
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., & ThoØgersenNtoumani, C., (2008). A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: Implications for sports coaches. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(2), 215-233. http://doi.org./10.1080/17509840903235330
Coulter, T. J., Mallett, C. J., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2010). Understanding mental toughness in Australian soccer: Perceptions of players, parents, and coaches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(7), 699-716. http://doi.org./10.1080/02640411003734085
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117. http://doi.org./10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00137.x
Curran, T., Hill, A. P., Hall, H. K., & Jowett, G. E. (2015). Relationships between the coach-created motivational climate and athlete engagement in youth sport. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 37(2), 193-198. http://doi.org./10.1123/jsep.2014-0203
Fielder, F. E. (1972). Personality, motivational systems, and behavior of high and low LPC persons. Human Relation, 25, 391-412. http://doi.org./10.1177/001872677202500502
Farh, J.-L., Cheng, B.-S, Chou, L. F., & Chu X. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, & L. Cheng. (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230-260). New York, Sharpe.
Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., Amoura, S., & Baldes, B. (2010). Influence of coaches' autonomy support on athletes' motivation and sport performance: A test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(2), 155-161. http://doi.org./10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.10.004
Gaertner, S. (1999). Structural Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Turnover Models. Human Resource Management Review, 9(4): 479-493. http://doi.org./10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00030-3
Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental psychology, 17(3), 300-312. http://doi.org./10.1037/0012-1649.17.3.300
Hollembeak, J., & Amorose, A. J. (2005). Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes’ intrinsic motivation: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17(1), 20-36. http://doi.org./10.1080/10413200590907540
Hodge, K., Lonsdale, C., & Jackson, S. A. (2009). Athlete engagement in elite sport an exploratory investigation of antecedents and consequences.pdf>. Sport Psychologist, 23(2), 186-202. http://doi.org./10.1123/tsp.23.2.186
Jenkins, S. (2014). John R. Wooden, Stephen R. Covey and Servant Leadership. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 9(1), 1-24. http://doi.org./10.1260/1747-9541.9.1.1
Jowett, S., & Cockerill, I. M. (2003). Olympic medallists’ perspective of the althlete–coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(4), 313-331. http://doi.org./10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00011-0
Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the Coach-Athlete Relationship. In S. Jowette & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social Psychology in Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Jowett, S. (2005). On repairing and enhancing the coach-athlete relationship. In S. Jowett & M. Jones (Eds.), The psychology of coaching (pp. 14-26). Sport and Exercise Psychology Division. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
Jowett, S., & Timson-Katchis, M. (2005). Social networks in sport: Parental influence on the coach-athlete relationship. The Sport Psychologist, 19(3), 267-287. http://doi.org./10.1123/tsp.19.3.267
Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The coach–athlete relationship questionnaire (CART‐Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 14(4), 245-257. http://doi.org./10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.
Jowett, S., & Cramer, D. (2010). The prediction of young athletes’ physical self from perceptions of relationships with parents and coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(2), 140-147. http://doi.org./10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.10.001
Kiesler, D. J. (1997). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York: Wiley.
Koontz, H. & Weihrich, C. (1990). Essentials of Management (5nd ed.). McGrawHill Book Company.
Kotter, J. P. (1999). On What Leaders Really Do. Harvard Business School Press.
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Jackson, S. L. (2007). Athlete engagement: II. Development and initial validation of the Athlete Engagement Questionnaire. International journal of sport psychology, 38(4), 471-492. http://doi.org./10.1037/t50268-000
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Raedeke, T. D. (2007). Athlete engagement: I. A qualitative investigation of relevance and dimensions. International journal of sport psychology, 38(4), 451-470.
LaVoi, N. M. (2004). Dimensions of closeness and conflict in the coach-athlete relationship. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology, Minneapolis, MN.
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Jackson, S. L. (2007). Athlete engagement: II. Development and initial validation of the Athlete Engagement Questionnaire. International journal of sport psychology, 38(4), 471-492. http://doi.org./10.1037/t50268-000
Martens, R. (1987). Coaches guide to sport psychology: A publication for the American Coaching Effectiveness Program: Level 2 sport science curriculum: Human Kinetics Books.
McGee, V., & DeFreese, J. D. (2019). The coach-athlete relationship and athlete psychological outcomes. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 13(1), 1-29. http://doi.org./10.1123/jcsp.2018-0010
Newcomb, T. M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological review, 60(6), 393-404. http://doi.org./10.1037/h0063098
Olympiou, A., Jowett, S., & Duda, J. L. (2008). The psychological interface between the coach-created motivational climate and the coach-athlete relationship in team sports. The Sport Psychologist, 22(4), 423-438. http://doi.org./10.1123/tsp.22.4.423
Poczwardowski, A. (1997). Athletes and coaches: An exploration of their relationship and its meaning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Utah.
Robbins, Stephen P. & Coulter, Mary (2005). Management, (8th) Edition. Pearson/Prentice Hall Publishers.
Roberts, G. C., Treasure, D., & Conroy, D. E. (2007). Understanding the Dynamics of Motivation in Sport and Physical Activity: An Achievement Goal Interpretation. In G. Tenenbaum, & R. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 3-30). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch1
Smoll, F. L., & Smith, R. E. (1989). Leadership Behaviors in Sport: A Theoretical Model and Research Paradigm 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 19(18), 1522-1551. http://doi.org./10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01462.
Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. and Bakker, A. (2002) The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Stadies, 3, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, stress, and coping, 20(2), 177-196. http://doi.org./10.1080/10615800701217878
Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 6(1), 94-102. http://doi.org./10.1123/jsp.6.1.94
Wylleman, P. (2000). Interpersonal relationships in sport: Uncharted territory in sport psychology research. International journal of sport psychology, 31(4), 555-572.
Wu, M., & Xu, E. (2012). Paternalistic leadership: From here to where? In X. Huang & M. H. Bond (Eds.), Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice (pp. 449-466). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857933409.00032
Weiss, M. R., & Friedrichs, W. D. (1986). The influence of leader behavior, coach attributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball team. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8, 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.8.4.332
Westre, K. R., & Weiss, M. R. (1991). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and group cohesion in high school football teams. The Sport Psychology, 5, 41-54.
Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in organization. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.