摘 要

本研究主要目的在探討大專男子優秀一百一十公尺跨欄選手六位與一百公尺選手五位共十一位選手(身高177.27±4公分，體重為68.46±1.5公斤及年齡21.82±1.5歲)，從起跑預備動作、起跑推蹬階段與起跑後第一、二、三步著地為止之生物力學變數上的差異。實驗儀器為一台Redlake(250HZ)高速數位攝影機、安裝於起跑架上之測力計一組來蒐集選手的運動學與動力學資料。運動學參數使用Dempster 的人體肢段參數將人體分成14個肢段19個關節點，以Kwon3D動作分析系統計算二度空間的運動學數據。統計方法是採用獨立樣本無母數Mann-Whitney U test進行考驗，顯著水準訂為α= .05。所獲得結果如下：
一、欄架組反應時間為0.2±0.04秒、前腳推蹬起跑架時間為0.34±0.03秒、後腳為0.18±0.05秒；百公尺組反應時間為0.19±0.03秒、前腳推蹬時間為0.29±0.004秒、後腳為0.15±0.01秒，百公尺選手前腳推蹬時間顯著比百十高欄組要快。
二、欄架組起跑推蹬至第一、二、三步著地重心高度變化皆愈來愈高跨欄組重心高度顯著高於百公尺組。
三、百公尺組重心水平速度高於跨欄組，重心垂直與水平位移則跨欄組高於百公尺組；在步幅部份，起跑第一、二、三步步幅，跨欄組也大於百公尺組。
四、本研究中起跑推蹬最大反作用力與世界級優秀選手明顯不同，由此看
出國內大專短距離選手在後腳推蹬力量仍有相當大的進步空間。

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the difference of biomechanical parameters between men’s 110m hurdles’ and 100m dash sprint starts. The subjects were eleven collegiate athletes (six hurdles and five dashes) with average height of 177.27 ± 4 cm, weight of 68.46 ± 1.5 kg and age of 21.82 ± 1.5 years. We were interested in analyzing from the set positions of each runner, through the push-off stage, to the first, the second, and the third steps after push-off. A Redlake (250Hz) high-speed digital camera and a force gauge system installed on the push-off frame were used to collect the kinematics and kinetics data. The body segment parameters of the subject was calculated by the model of Dempster(1955). The body was separated in 14 limbs and 19 joints of each athlete. The Kwon3D motion analyzer system was to calculate the 2D kinematics variables. The nonparametric statistical test of the Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis at α = .05 significant level. The results are as follows:
1. Mean reaction time for the hurdles group was 0.2 ± 0.04 seconds, while push-off time for the front and rear feet were 0.34 ± 0.03 and 0.18 ± 0.05 seconds, respectively. Reaction time for the dash group was 0.19 ± 0.03 seconds, with push-off time for the front and rear feet being 0.29 ± 0.004 and 0.15 ± 0.01 seconds. The differences between the front foot push-off duration time were significant.
2. The heights of center of gravity for the hurdles group were significantly higher than the 100m dash group in the first, the second, and the third steps. This was all because the hurdle athletes had to raise their center of gravity in advance to prepare to jump over the first hurdle.
3. Horizontal velocity for the dash group was higher than the hurdles group, while their vertical and horizontal center of gravity displacements were greater than the 100 dash group. The step lengths of 110m hurdle group from the first to the third steps were all greater than the step lengths of 100m dash group.
4. To increase the impulse value of the push off in sprint start might be one of the most important approaches to improve the performance of collegiate short-distance athletes.

參考文獻
中文部分：
丁春枝（1990）100公尺、110公尺跨欄起跑至第一欄之技術分析研究。碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園縣。
林宗賢（1999）起跑跨欄之運動學探討。藝術學報，65，187-203。
林宗賢（1986）跨欄及起跑運動之運動學研究。中原學報，15，104-120
姚衛宇（2003）。影響短跑起跑速度的若干因素分析。成都體育學報，4，
翁梓林(2000)。影響短距離起跑之生物力學分析。國立臺北師範學院學報，13，569-581。
張博智(2004)。國內優秀男子百公尺起跑出發運動學分析。碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園縣。
陶武訓(2002)。優秀短距離選手百公尺跑之分段速度、步頻、步幅分析。碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園縣。
許樹淵(1997)。運動生物力學。國立編譯館。
許樹淵(1996)。田徑論。台北市：偉彬體育研究社。
許樹淵（1992b）。障礙跑，田徑論。臺北市：偉彬體育研究社。831-874
許樹淵(1978)。田徑運動力學。台北市:協進圖書有限公司。
陳維科（2000）。100M跑的生物力學分析。固原師範學報，21（3），90-93
陳依清（1974）跨欄運動研究，高雄市：新民書局發行
曾凡輝、王路德、邢文華等著（1992）。運動員科學選材。北京：人民體育出版社，126-131
黃宗成， 李誠志（ 1986）， 研究百米技術的方法。四川體育科學
學報， 3、4 。31-35。
蔡於儒（2000）。百公尺跑地面反作用力的控制與技術動作研究。碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。
簡鴻玟（1995）黃信平跑百公尺技術之生物力學研究。碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園縣。
簡鴻玟(1994)。蹲踞起跑不同起跑踏板角度之生物力學分析。體育學報，18，171-182。

西文部份：
Atwater,A.E.（1982）.Kinematic analyses of sprinting. Track & Field Quarterly Review,82,6-12.
Alstin,B（1993）.Quick draw on the track reaction time and the 100m race. Track and field Quarterly Review,93（1），11-12
Dickinson, A. D. (1934). The effect of foot spacing on the starting time and speed in sprinting and relation of physical measurements to foot spacing. The Research Quarterly, 5, 12-19.
Harland, H. J. and Steele, J. R. (1997). Biomechanics of the sprint start. Sport Medicine, 23(1), 11-20.
Martin,D.E. and Buonc ristiani, J. F (1995).Influence of Reaction Time on Athletic Performance,International Amateur Athletic Federation.
Mero, A. & Komi, P.V.(1990). Reaction time and electromyongraphic activity during a sprint start .
Mero, A. , Luhtanen , P. & Komi, P.V.(1983). A biomechanical study of the sprint start. Scand Journal Sport Science, 5(1), 20-28.
Schot, P.K. & Knutzen, K.M. (1992). A biomechanica; and analysis of four sprint start positions.Res Q Exerc Sport, 63(2), 137-147.
Stock(1962). Influence of various track starting positions on speed, The Research Quarterly, 33, 607-614.
Van Coppenolle et al. (1989). Technology and development of speed ：evaluation of the start sprint and body composition of Pavoni, Cooman & Desruelles. Athletics Coach, 23(1), 82-89.