簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張正平
Chang Cheng-ping
論文名稱: 教師溝通傳達能力對學生學習的影響
The influence of teachers' communication and transmission ability upon students' studies.
指導教授: 陳文典
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 物理學系
Department of Physics
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 106
中文關鍵詞: 溝通能力傳達能力教學溝通教師溝通能力學生學習
英文關鍵詞: communication ability, transmission ability, communication of teaching, teachers' communication ability, students' studies
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:421下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 由於教學活動是一種溝通傳達的過程,溝通能力在教學中應扮演著重要的角色。故本研究的主要目的,在於探求教師的溝通能力對於高中學生在物理科學習上的情形是否具有影響,以及影響的方式為何。為了達此目的,需先探究教師的溝通能力包含了哪些溝通技巧?學生的學習情形如何評估?以及兩者之間的關係如何?此外,本研究也試圖從學生的角度,來比較在不同的學習管道(如同儕、自修、課外補習...等)之間,在溝通技巧上之差異。

    為了進行此項研究,本研究探討出教師在教學上的溝通能力可用:「引起動機、熱情活力」、「結構清晰、清楚簡明」、「多元訊息、加強管道」、「檢測反饋、適時回應」以及「態度尊重、地位平等」五大類的溝通技巧來代表,而本研究以學生在學校物理課時所自覺的「專心度」、「理解度」與「興趣度」三個面向,來代表學生在物理科學習時的情形。在研究的方法上,本研究以問卷調查法的方式,試圖從學生的觀點中,找到老師教學溝通能力與學生學習之間的關係。

    本研究的結論為:(一)教師的教學溝通能力對學生學習確實具有影響、(二)「多元訊息、加強管道」與「結構清晰、清楚簡明」是影響最鉅的兩個因素,其次是「檢測反饋」與「引起動機」,而「態度尊重」似乎影響不大、(三)學生碰到物理問題或不理解課程內容時,最常解決的辦法是找同學問,因為同學間用語較淺、較無壓力感,也有較多時間可以學習。

    Teachers’ communication ability plays an important part in teaching since teaching itself is a kind of communication and transmission process. The main purpose of this study is to find out whether teachers' communication ability bear influence upon high school students' Physics studies, and the ways it affect them. In this study, the researcher would resolve several questions such as: what are the communication ability and skills? How can we appraise students' studying in Physics? and What’s the correlation between them? as well. In addition, the researcher also attempts to compare the different study channels (peer study, self study, after-school study…) with each other regarding communication skills from the students’ point of view.

    In order to proceed this study, the researcher assumed that teachers’ communication ability could be divided into five skills as the following: "Prompting motivation, being vigorous and enthusiastic", "Clarifying the structure of the context, being simple and plain", "Diversifying and strenghtening learning channels", "Examining feedback from students and responding properly" and "Respecting students and keeping in equal status with them" as well. Besides, the researcher chose the degree of "Concentration", "Understanding" and "Interest" representing the situation of students’ studying in Physics. The researcher used questionnaires to find out the correlation between teachers’ communication ability and students’ studying in Physics from students' viewpoint.

    The conclusions of this study are: (1) teacher's communication ability of teaching does influence students’ studying in Physics; (2) " Diversifying learning channels" and "Clarifying the structure of the context" are the two major factors. "Examining feedback" and "Prompting motivation" are of minor importance, and "Respecting students" seems to be insignificant; (3) students mostly ask their classmates to solve their problems when they encounter difficulties in Physics studies because their classmates use relatively simple and plain words, pose less pressure to them, and they have more time to study and discuss.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 3 第三節 名詞解釋 4 第二章 溝通傳達能力之文獻探討 5 第一節 溝通傳達的意涵 5 第二節 溝通傳達的心理活動探討 7 第三節 溝通傳達的社會功能探討 18 第四節 溝通傳達的特質探討 22 第五節 教學活動中的溝通傳達 29 第三章 研究方法 33 第一節 研究流程設計 33 第二節 研究對象 34 第三節 研究工具與設計 35 第四節 研究範圍與限制 43 第四章 資料整理與分析 44 壹、學生在物理課的學習情形調查結果 45 貳、教師溝通的技巧調查結果與學生學習情形之對照與討論 49 參、教師的溝通技巧對於學生學習情形的影響關係調查結果 53 肆、不同的學習管之間的差異調查結果 61 第五章 結果與討論 64 第一節 研究結果 64 第二節 討論 69 第六章 結論與建議 70 第一節 結論 70 第二節 建議 71 參考文獻 74 附註 77 附錄 82 附錄一 研究問卷 82 附錄二 各班學生在物理課的學習情形調查結果 86 附錄三 影響學生物理學習情形的可能因素記實 87 附錄四 各班教師之教學溝通技巧的符合程度調查結果 98 附錄五 全部學生對於影響其學習情況的因素分析 99 附錄六 當學習物理碰到問題時採取的反應原因記實 100

    中文部分:
    Maslow, A. H.等著,孫大川譯(民79)。人的潛能和價值。台北:結構群。
    Vanderber, R. F.等著,曾端真等譯(民85)。人際關係與溝通。台北:揚智。
    Warren, H. S.著,蕭羨一譯(民90)。談判與解決衝突—哈佛商業評論。台北:天下遠見。
    王淑俐(民89a):人際關係與溝通。台北:三民。
    王淑俐(民89b):做個教學溝通的智者。台北:師大書苑。
    張華葆(民83):社會心理學。台北:三民。
    黃秀瑄、林瑞欽(編譯)(民80):認知心理學。台北:師大書苑。
    鄭昭明(民82):認知心理學-理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。
    鄭麗玉(民82):認知心理學-理論與運用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。

    英文部分:
    Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Freeman.
    Butland, M. J. & Beebe, S. A. (1992). A Study of the Application of Implicit Communication Theory to Teacher Immediacy and Student Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 346532.)
    Cooper, P. A. (1995). Communication for the classroom teacher. Scottsdalo: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, Pub.
    Covey, S. R. (1990). The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People. New York: Fireside Books, Simon and Schuster.
    Darwin, C. J., Turvey, M. T., & Crowder, R. G. (1972). An auditory analogue of the Sperling partial report procedure: Evidence for brief auditory storage. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 255-267.
    Deutsch, J. A. & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
    FCC (1974). U.S. Law week, 2404, Feb. 5, 74-78.
    Gemmet, Richard. (1977). A Monograph on Interpersonal Communications. Redwood City, California: San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools.
    Glaser, Susan, & Anthony Biglan. (1977). Increase Your Confidence and Skill in Interpersonal Situations: Instructional Manual. Eugene, Oregon: Authors.
    Hansford, B. (1988). Teacher and classroom communication. London: Harcourt Braoe Jovanovich, publishers.
    Hockett, C. F. (1960). The original of speech. Scientific American, 203(3), 88-96.
    Irmsher, Karen. Communication Skills. Eric Digest, Number102. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED390114.)
    Johnston, W. A. & Heinz, S. P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 168-175.
    Jung, Charles, et al. (1973). Interpersonal Communications: Participant Materials and Leader’s Manual. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
    Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 232-251.
    Kelley, J. (1969). Organizational Behavior, Homewood:Richard D. Irwin Inc, 450.
    Luthans, F. (1973). Organizational Behavior, N.Y. : McGraw-Hill, 208-210.
    Mayer, R. E. (1981). The promise of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
    Mckay, F. G. (1973). Aspects of the theory of comprehension, memory and attention. Quartely, 22-40.
    Moates, D. R. & Schumacher, G. M. (1980). An introduction to cognitive psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 441-474.
    Reed, S. K. (1988). Cognition: Theory and applications. Pacific Grove, Ca. : Brools/Cole.
    Rutherford J., Robert B., Mathur, S. R. & Quinn, M. M. (1998). Promoting Social Communication Skills Through Cooperative Learning and Direct Instruction. Education & Treatment of Children, Aug, 21(3), 354-369.
    Sensenbaugh, Roger. (1995). How Effective Communication Can Enhance Teaching at the College Level. Eric Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED380847.)
    Solso, R. L. (1998). Congnitive Psychology. 5th ed., MA:Alln & Bacon.
    Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74.
    Stewart, D. K. (1968). The Psychology of Communication. Funk Wagralls, N.Y., 13-14.
    Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interferences in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
    Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242-248.
    Wayne, F.S. & Mitchell, R.B. (1992). Vital communication skills and competencies in the workforce of the 1990s. Journal of Education for Business, Jan/Feb92, 67(3), 141-146.

    QR CODE