簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林巧婷
Ciao-Ting Lin
論文名稱: 後設語言知識與動機、自制力、自我語言能力評估以及語言成就之關係探究
An investigation of the relationships between metalinguistic knowledge, motivation, self-regulation, self-perceived proficiency and language achievement.
指導教授: 曾文鐽
Tseng, Wen-Ta
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 113
中文關鍵詞: 後設語言知識動機自制力自我語言能力評估語言成就
英文關鍵詞: metalinguistic knowledge, motviation, self-regulation, self-perceived proficiency, language achievement
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:143下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 後設語言知識屬於一種外顯知識,指的是學習者對於目標語言的文法規則及術語等方面的明確認知。後設語言知識對語言學習十分重要,但是如何測量學習者的後設語言知識,以及後設語言知識和學習者的第二語言能力之關係究竟為何,則還沒有定論。目前也鮮少有研究探討後設語言知識和情意因素之間的關係,而大部分與動機相關的研究都著重在動機對於字彙學習以及學習策略的影響。因此,本研究將學習者之第二語言能力分為自我語言能力評估以及實際上的語言成就兩方面,依據文獻研擬了一份後設語言知識試卷,在情意因素方面採用了動機及自制力問卷,旨在探討後設語言知識、動機、自制力以及自我語言能力評估和語言成就之間的關係。
    本研究對象為來自中台灣一所女子高中六個班級的279位高二學生。在沒有時間限制的情況下,279位高二學生依序完成試題冊上的題目,包括自我能力評估(聽、說、讀、寫)、自制力問卷、動機問卷(自我效能、內在動機、外在動機、表現取向、精熟取向)、以及後設語言知識測驗。並在收集施測結果之後,進行相關及階層迴歸分析。
    研究發現: (一)自我效能、外在動機以及精熟取向對於學習者的自我語言能力評估有顯著影響。(二)後設語言知識、自制力、自我閱讀能力評估、以及內在動機則對語言成就有顯著的影響 (三)自我效能對於自我能力評估的影響力最大,後設語言知識則對語言成就最有預測力。(四)自制力為抑制變項,能使內在動機的預測力由不顯著變為顯著。

    Metalinguistic knowledge is defined as learners’ explicit knowledge about the rules and grammatical terms of the target language and is important in language learning. However, many former studies presented inconsistent findings about the relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and L2 performance. Besides, affective factors like motivation and self-regulation were seldom included in previous research. L2 performance in the present study is determined as learners’ own perceptions of their proficiency and actual language achievement to examine different factors that may contribute to the two dimensions of L2 performance. Thus, the present study aims to investigate the relationships between metalinguistic knowledge, motivation, self-regulation, self-perceived proficiency and language achievement.
    279 2nd-grade students from a senior high school in central Taiwan were invited to participate in the study. They were asked to evaluate their proficiency on the four language skills, finish the self-regulation and motivation questionnaires, and complete a metalinguistic knowledge test, which was established by the researcher herself. All the data were analyzed with correlation and hierarchical regression models.
    The findings showed that: (1) motivational components such as self-efficacy, extrinsic motivation and mastery orientation had a strong influence on self-perceived proficiency; (2) metalinguistic knowledge and self-regulation held a significant predictive power on language achievement; (3) self-efficacy was found to be the best predictor of self-perceived proficiency and metalinguistic knowledge had the strongest predictive power on language achievement; (4) self-regulation was a suppressor variable which altered the predictive power of intrinsic motivation on language achievement.

    摘要 i ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii List of Tables vii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Definition of Terms 8 1.2.1 Implicit Knowledge 8 1.2.2 Explicit Knowledge 8 1.2.3 Metalinguistic Knowledge 9 1.2.4 Motivation 10 1.2.5 Self-regulation 12 1.2.6 Self-perceived Proficiency 13 1.2.7 Language Achievement 13 1.3 Significance of the Study 13 1.4 Organization of the Thesis 13 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 15 2.1 From Meaning to Form 15 2.2 Implicit Knowledge & Explicit Knowledge 17 2.3 Interaction between Implicit & Explicit Knowledge 19 2.4 Studies & Measurement of Explicit Knowledge 24 2.4.1 Grammaticality Judgment Tests 25 2.4.2 Language Aptitude Tests 28 2.5 Studies and Measurement of Metalinguistic Ability 30 2.6 Measurement of Metalinguistic Knowledge 34 2.7 Studies of Metalinguistic Knowledge: Metalinguistic Knowledge and L2 Performance 36 2.8 Motivational Studies 42 2.9 Self-regulation Theories 44 2.10 Purposes & Research Questions 47 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 50 3.1 Participants 50 3.2 Instruments 51 3.2.1 Metalinguistic Knowledge Test 51 3.2.2 Motivation Questionnaire 52 3.2.3 Self-regulation Questionnaire 53 3.2.4 Self-perceived Proficiency Scale 53 3.2.5 Language Achievement 54 3.3 Procedures 54 3.4 Data Collection and Analysis 54 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 57 4.1 Correlation Analysis 57 4.2 Regression Analysis 59 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION 65 5.1 Learners’ Self-perceived Proficiency 65 5.1.1 Self-perceived Proficiency & Metalinguistic Knowledge 65 5.1.2 Self-perceived Proficiency & Self-regulation 67 5.1.3 Self-perceived Proficiency & Motivation 68 5.2 Learners’ Language Achievement 70 5.2.1 Language Achievement & Metalinguistic Knowledge 70 5.2.2 Language Achievement & Self-perceived Proficiency 71 5.2.3 Language Achievement & Self-regulation 73 5.2.4 Language Achievement & Motivation 74 5.3 Chapter Summary 75 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION 77 6.1 General Conclusions 77 6.2 Pedagogical Implications 78 6.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 79 REFERENCES 81 APPENDICES 91 Appendix A Specific Plan for Metalinguistic Knowledge Test 91 Appendix B Self-perceived Proficiency Scale 93 Appendix C Self-regulation Questionnaire 94 Appendix D Motivation Questionnaire 95 Appendix E Metalinguistic Knowledge Test 97

    Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Steel, D. (1996). Metalinguistic Knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. CRLE, University of Lancaster Working Papers, 26.
    Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Steel, D. (1997). Metalinguistic Knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 1, 93-121.
    Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms, goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 267-271.
    Andrews, S. (1999). “All these like little name things”: a comparative study of language teachers’ explicit knowledge grammar and grammatical terminology. Language Awareness, 8, 143-159.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thoughts and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Bialystok, E. (1979). Explicit and implicit judgments of L2 grammaticality. Language Learning, 29(1), 89-103.
    Bialystok, E. (1994). Representation and ways of knowing: Three issues in second language acquisition. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 549-569). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Biggs, J. (1988). The role of metacognition in enhancing learning. Australian Journal of Education, 32, 127-138.
    Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Brown, D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Butler, Y. (2002). Second language learners’ theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451-480.
    Carroll, J. (1959). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training, research, and education (pp.87-136). New York: Wiley.
    Carroll, J. B. and Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test—Form A. New York: Psychological Corporation.
    Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL QUARTERLY, 25, 459-480.
    Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation: Results of structural equation modelling. Modern Language Journal, 89, 19-36.
    De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2005). Second Language Acquisition: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.
    Dekeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.
    Dekeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Ed.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2001a). Teaching and Research Motivation. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2001b). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Motivational dynamics in second language acquisition: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23, 421-462.
    Elder, C. & Manwaring, D. (2004). The relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and learning outcomes among undergraduate students of Chinese. Language Awareness, 13(3), 145-161.
    Elder, C., J. Warren, J., Hajek, J., Manwaring, D., and Davies, A. (1999). Metalinguistic knowledge: How important is it in studying a language at university? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 81-95.
    Elley, W. (1989). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 174-187.
    Ellis, N. (Ed.) (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic.
    Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Studies, 34, 143-188.
    Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275.
    Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-172.
    Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 57-72.
    Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F., & Masgoret, A.-M. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 344-362.
    Germain, C. & Seguin, H. (1995). Le Point sur: La Grammaire. Montreal: Centre Educatif Culturel.
    Green, P., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: an empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 168-184.
    Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic Development. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Han, Y., & Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge, and general language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 1-23.
    Harley, B. & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies et al. (Eds.) Interlanguage (pp. 123-140). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 347-386.
    Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129-140.
    Inbar, O., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Shohamy, E. (2001). Students' motivation as a function of language learning: The teaching of Arabic in Israel. In Z. Dörnyei, & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
    Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
    Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
    Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in Experimental Personality Reseach. New York: Academic Press.
    Lightbown, P. M. and Spada, N. (1999). How Languages Are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Liu, H. T. (2009). Scale development and causal-effect studies of self-regulation in
    English language learning. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in Second Language Acquisition: Multiple Perspectives (pp.115-141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Lyster, R. (1987). Speaking immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 43, 701-717.
    Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., &Hutchinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and reseach on self-regulation. In B. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Mahawah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Maclntyre, P. D., & Noels, K. A. (1996). Using social-psychological variables to
    predict the use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 29,
    373–386.
    Macrory, G., & Stone, V. (2000). Pupil progress in the acquisition of the perfect tense in French: the relationship between knowledge and use. Language Teaching Research, 4, 55-82.
    Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
    Masny, D. (1987). The role of language and cognition in second language metalinguistic awareness. In J. Lantolf & A. Labarca (Eds.), Research in second language learning: Focus on the classroom (pp. 59-73). Norwood. NJ: Ablex.
    McCombs, B. L. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning And Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Mitchell, R. & Hooper, J. (1991). Teacher views of language knowledge. In C. James and P. Garrett (Eds.). Language Awareness in the Classroom (pp. 40-50). London: Longman.
    Morris, L. (2003). Linguistic knowledge, metalinguistic knowledge and academic success in a language teacher education programme. Language Awareness, 12(2), 109-123.
    Mowrer-Popiel, E. & Woolfolk, A. E. (1998). Study Guide for Educational Psychology. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Noels, K. A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers' communicative style and students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Modern Language Journal, 83, 23-34.
    Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393-419). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam; Philadelphia : J. Benjamins Pub.
    Paradis, M. Implicit competence and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition and learning. Retrieved Jenuary, 27th, 2009, from http://cbbc.georgetown.edu/workshops/Workshop%20talks/Paradis-Long%20Abstract-CBBC%20L2%20Workshop%202006.pdf
    Perales, J. & Cenoz, J. (2002). The effect of individual and contextual factors in adult second-language acquisition in the Basque County. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 15(1), 1-15.
    Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in Educaiton: Theory, Research, and Applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
    Purpura, J. E. (2005). Assessing Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Renou, J. (2001). An examination of the relationship between metalinguistic awareness and second-language proficiency of adult learners of French. Language Awareness, 10(4), 248-267.
    Robinson, P. (1995). Aptitude, awareness, and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp 303-358). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
    Roehr, K. (2006). Metalinguistic knowledge in L2 task performance: a verbal protocol analysis. Language Awareness, 15(3), 180-198.
    Roehr, K. (2007). Metalinguistic knowledge and language ability in university-level L2 learners. Applied Linguistics. 29(2), 173-199.
    Rutherfield, W. and Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6, 274-282.
    Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Schmidt, R. & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning in Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.) Motivation and Second language acquisition (pp. 313-359). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching Center.
    Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. (Eds.). (1994). Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Sharwood Smith, M. (1980). The competence performance distinction in the theory of second language and pedagogical grammar hypothesis. Paper presented at the Contrastive Linguistics Conference, Bszkowo, December.
    Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159-169.
    Simard, D., French, L., & Fortier, V. (2007). Elicited metalinguistic reflection and second language learning: is there a link? System, 35, 509-522.
    Simard, D. (2004). Using diaries to promote metalinguistic reflection among elementary school students. Language Awareness, 13(1), 34-48.
    Skehan, P. (1986). Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental Approaches to Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon (pp. 81-94).
    Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Arnold.
    Sorace, A. (1985). Metalinguistic knowledge and language use in acquisition-poor environments. Applied Linguistics, 6, 239-254.
    Tachibana, Y., Matsukawa, R., &Zhong, Q. X. (1996). Attitudes and motivation for learning English: A cross-national comparison of Japanese and Chinese high school students. Psychological reports, 79, 691-700.
    Terrell, T. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. The Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 165-179.
    Tremblay, P., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505-518.
    Tseng, W. T. (2008). Optimizing the response categories of a SLA ordered rating scale through Rasch-Andrich rating scale model. Journal of Applied English, 1, 59-87.
    Tseng, W. T. (2009). Motivation theories: an overview. Retrieved April, 3rd, 2009.
    Tseng, W. T & Schmitt, N. (2008). Toward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: a structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58(2), 357-400.
    Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Warner, R. M. (2008). Applied Statistics. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
    Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Wlodkowski, R. J. (1999). Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational Psychology (8th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Zimmerman, B. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.
    Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation. London: Academic Press.
    Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2nd Ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE