本研究旨在探討中學職前與實習體育教師的課程價值取向。研究中所指體育教師的體育課程價值取向是依據美國現代體育課程專家Jewett（1995）所揭櫫之五個體育課程價值取向，分別為學科精熟取向(Disciplinary mastery, DM)、學習歷程取向(Learning process, LP)、自我實現取向(Self-actualization, SA)、社會重建取向(Social reconstruction, SR)及生態整合取向(Ecological integration, EI)。研究對象為大專校院教育學程中心修習「中等學校體育教師教育學程」之121名職前與103名實習體育教師，以Ennis & Chen (1993)修訂之「體育教師課程價值取向量表」（Physical Educator Value Orientation Inventory）為研究工具。獲得結果：（一）不同背景、教學經驗之中學職前體育教師課程價值取向不同；（二）不同背景、教學經驗之中學實習體育教師課程價值取向不同；（三）不同背景之中學職前與實習體育教師課程價值取向不同。結果獲得以下結論：中學職前體育教師課程價值取向傾向社會重建取向(SR)，實習體育教師課程價值取向傾向學科精熟(DM)與學習歷程(LP)取向； 中學職前體育教師之教學理念強調使學生重視合作與團隊精神；實習體育教師則強調使學生學會運動技能。
關鍵詞：職前體育教師、實習體育教師、課程價值取向

The purpose of this study was to investigate high school physical education preservice teacher’s and student teacher’s value orientation. The five orientations in physical education curriculum were proposed by Jewett, Bain and Ennis (1995), namely disciplinary mastery (DM), learning process (LP), self-actualization (SA), social reconstruction (SR) and ecological integration (EI). The participants of this study were 121 physical education preservice teachers and 103 physical education student teachers. Five-point Likert scale of Physical Educator Value Orientation Inventory (Ennis & Chen, 1993) was used to collect data. One-way ANOVA and independent t-test were employed to analyze the difference between the two groups. The results indicated that (1) the value orientations were significantly different between preservice teachers with different background and teaching experience; (2) the value orientation was significantly different between student teachers with different background and teaching experience; (3) the value orientation was significantly different between preservice teachers and student teachers with different background. The results suggested that high school physical education preservice teachers placed high priority on SR while high school student teachers placed high priority on DM and LP. It implied that high school physical education preservice teachers focused on student learning in cooperation and team spirit while high school physical education student teachers emphasized on student learning in motor skill.
Key words: physical education, preservice teacher, student teacher,
value orientation

一、 中文部份
王文科等。（民89）。教育概論。台北：五南。
王春堎。（民88）。彰化縣國小教師對體育課程價值取向暨課程決定之調查研究。國立體育學院體育研究所論文。
李文田。（民85）。體育課程的設計模式與價值取向。學校體育雙月刊，6卷，5號，頁42-48。
周宏室。（民91）。九年一貫教材內容之設計（以體育教學為例）。九十一年度寒假健康與體育學習領域國中教師研習演講稿。
林建宏等。（民87）。體育課程模式。載於運動教育與人文關懷（下）。台北：師大書苑，頁21-40。
林進材。（民86）。教師教學思考－理論、研究與應用。高雄：復文。
張春秀等。（民87）。體育課程模式。載於運動教育與人文關懷（下）。台北：師大書苑，頁2-19。
教育部。（民86）。學校體育教材教法與評量（一）目標與架構。
教育部。（民84）。師資培育法及相關法規選輯。中教司。
楊國樞。（民83）。中國人的價值觀—社會科學觀。台北：桂冠。
張春秀。（民89）。體育教師課程價值取向對學生體育學習思考與學習態度
之影響 。國立台灣師範大學體育學系博士學位論文。
張春興。（民78）。心理學。台北：東華。
張俊紳。（民86）。國民小學教師效能研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所
博士論文。
藍金香。（民86）。體育教師價值取向之探討。學校體育雙月刊，7卷，1號，頁26-32。
藍金香。（民86）。台北市國小教師的體育課程價值取向之調查研究。國立體育學院體育研究所論文。
二、英文部份
Chen, A., & Ennis, C. D. (1996). Teaching value-laden curriculum in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 338-354.
Chen, Y. C. (1999, October). The value orientation of physical education curriculum for elementary school student teacher - case study in Taitung Teachers College. Proceedings of 3rd International Congress Asian-South Pacific Association of Sport Phychology, 136-138.Wuhan, China: Wuhan Institute of Physical Education.
Ennis, C. D. (1992). Curriculum theory as practiced: Case studies of operationalized value orientation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11,358-375.
Ennis, C. D., & Chen (1993). Domain specifications and content representativeness of the revised value orientation inventory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(4), 436-446.
Ennis, C. D., & Chen (1995). Teachers’ value orientation in urban and rural school setting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66(1), 41-50.
Ennis, C. D., Mueller, L. K., & Hooper, M. (1990). The influence of teacher
value orientation on curriculum planning within the parameters of
theoretical framework. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
Sport, 61(4), 360-368.
Ennis, C. D., Ross, J., & Chen A. (1992). The role of value orientations in curricular decision making: A rationale for teachers’ goal and expectations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(1), 38-47.
Ennis, C. D., & Zhu W. (1991). Value orientations: A description of teachers’ goals for student learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and port, 62(1), 33-40.
Ennis, C. D. (1997). The influence of teachers’ educational beliefs on their knowledge organization. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30(2), 73-86.
Jewett, A. E., Bain, L.L., & Ennis, C. D. (1995). The curriculum process in physical education (2nd ed). Dubuque, IA: Wm.C.Brown.
Jewett, A. E., & Ennis, C. D. (1990). Ecological integration as value orientation for curriculum decision making. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,
5, 120-131.
Keh, N. C., & Jwo, H. (1998, July). Value orientations of in-service physical education teachers: A case study. In R. S. Feingold, C. R. Rees, G. T. Barrette, L. Fiorentino, S. Virgilio, & E. Kowalski (Eds.). Proceedings of 1998 AIESEP World Sport Science Congress: “Education for life”, 260-264. Long Island, NY: Adelphi University.
Martin, V. P. (1993). Educational value orientations and physical education goals. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(supple), A-89.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62,307-332.
Solmon, M. A., & Ashy, M. H. (1995). Value orientation of preservice teacher. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66(3), 219-230.
Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgment, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51 (4), 455-498.
Wang, S. M., & Keh, N. C. (2001, November). Comparison of adapted physical education teacher’s and physical education teacher’s value orientation. Paper presented at 2001 International Adapted Physical Education Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.