研究生: |
謝銘峰 Sie, Ming-Fong |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
高中生數位使用落差探討研究 A Survey of the Digital Use Divide among High School Students |
指導教授: |
吳正己
Wu, Cheng-Chih |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
資訊教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 62 |
中文關鍵詞: | 數位落差 、數位使用落差 、積極的使用 |
英文關鍵詞: | Digital divide, Digital use divide, Active use |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GICE.003.2018.F02 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:147 下載:21 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討高中學生積極的數位使用之內涵、以及暸解其相關影響因素。研究以線上調查問卷方式進行,採方便取樣,以大臺北地區4所高中共四班學生為調查對象,共有136人填答,有效問卷數共136份。
調查結果獲得結論如下:(1)參與調查學生在整體積極的數位使用為中低程度,而以沉浸式學習為最低;(2)學生家庭經濟狀況對學生積極的數位使用並無顯著影響;(3)學生入學成就表現的對其積極的數位使用具有顯著影響;(4)學生擁有數位設備數量對積極的數位使用有顯著影響;(5)學生課程中數位使用時間對其積極的數位使用具有顯著影響;(6)學生生活中數位使用時間對其積極的數位使用具有顯著影響。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the digital use divide among high school students and factors which may cause the divide to happen. How will student active use digital technology in and outside school. It uses simply sampling and the survey samples to extract senior high school form 4 classes in Taipei and its immediate vicinity via online digital use questionnaire.
The conclusions of the survey are follow: (1) Students participating in the survey have a moderate low level of overall active use of digital devices and a low level of immersive simulation; (2) There is no significant effect of students' family economic status on their active use of digital devices; (3) The performance of student admissions has a significant effect on their active use of digital devices; (4) The number of students having a digital device has a significant impact on their active use of digital devices; (5) The number of hours of use in a student's curriculum has a significant impact on their active use of digital devices; (6) The number of hours of use in a student's daily life has a significant impact on their active use of digital devices.
一、外文文獻
Anderson, J. (2010). ICT Transforming Education: Regional Guide. Bangkok: UNESCO.
America National Park Service. Journey Through Hallowed Ground. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from the World Wide Web: www.hallowedground.org
Bach, A., Shaffer, G., & Wolfson, T. (2013). Digital human capital: Developing a framework for understanding the economic impact of digital exclusion in low-income communities. Journal of Information Policy, 3, 247-266.
Cushman, M., & McLean, R. (2008). Exclusion, inclusion and changing the face of information systems research. Information Technology & People, 21(3), 213-221.
Chen, W. & Wellman, B. (2004), The global digital divide - within and between countries, IT & Society, 1(7), 18-25.
Choi, N. G., & DiNitto, D. M. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(5), e93.
Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2007, October). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-learning. In Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (Vol. 16, p. 2008). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Ettema, J. S., & Kline, F. G. (1977). Deficits, differences, and ceilings contingent conditions for understanding the knowledge gap. Communication research, 4(2), 179-202.
Forman, C., Goldfarb, A., & Greenstein, S. (2002). Digital dispersion: An industrial and geographic census of commerical internet use (No. w9287). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hargittai, E. (2001). Second-level digital divide: Mapping differences in people's online skills. arXiv preprint cs/0109068.
Hargittai, E. & Y.P. Hsieh (2013). "Digital inequality", in W.H. Dutton (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, Oxford University Press, pp. 129-150.
Herold, B. (2016). What It Takes to Move From'Passive'to'Active'Tech Use in K-12 Schools. The Education Digest, 82(2), 33.
Hilbert, M. (2011). The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 715-736.
Groff, J. (2013). Technology-rich innovative learning environments. OCED CERI Innovative Learning Environment project, 1-30.
Irving, L., Klegar-Levy, K., Everette, D. W., Reynolds, T., & Lader, W. (1999). Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide. A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Department of Commerce.
IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2016). The Future of Ed Tech Starts Here: Identifying and Understanding Pragmatic Trends in the Application of Technology to Improve Learning Impact. Learning Impact Awards Reports.
Light, J. (2001). Rethinking the digital divide. Harvard educational review, 71(4), 709-734.
Lloyd, A. D., Antonioletti, M., & Sloan, T. M. (2016). Able but not willing? Exploring divides in digital versus physical payment use in China. Information Technology & People, 29(2), 250-279.
McKelvie. (1978). Graphic rating scales: How many categories: British Journal of Psychology, 69, 185-202.
Office of Educational Technology (OET). (2016). Future ready learning reimagining the role of technology in education. National education technology plan.
Office of Educational Technology (OET). (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education. National education technology plan update.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001). Understanding the digital divide. OECD Pub.
Organization for Economic. Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2007). Working Party on the Information. Economy. OECD Pub.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2008). Information Technology Outlook. OECD Pub.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). Educational Research and Innovation Are the New Millennium Learners Making the Grade?: Technology Use and Educational Performance in PISA 2006. S. Author (Ed.). OECD Pub.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012). PISA 2012 Database, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933253134
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012). PISA 2012 Database, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933253199
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012). PISA 2012 Database, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933253203
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). Innovative Learning Environment project. J. Author (Ed.). OECD Pub.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Qiu, J. L., Castells, M., & Cartier, C. (2009). Working-class network society: Communication technology and the information have-less in urban China. MIT Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations.(fifth ed.)NY, US: A Divi- sion of Simon & Schuster.
Rogers, E. M. (2004). A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. Journal of health communication, 9(S1), 13-19.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383.
Van Welsum, D., & Montaigner, P. (2007). ICTs and Gender, Working Party on the Information Economy.
Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New media & society, 16(3), 507-526.
Warschauer, M. (2010), "Digital divide", in Bates, M.J. and Maack, M.N. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 1, 1551-1556.
World Bank (2015), Internet users (per 100 people), Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2?order1⁄4wbapi_data_value_2013+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_ data_value-last&sort1⁄4desc.
Marton, K. and Singh, R.K. (1991), Technology crisis for third world countries, World Economy, 14(2), 199-213.
McConnaughey, J. W., Lader, W., Chin, R., & Everette, D. (1998). Falling through the Net II: New data on the digital divide. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (DOC), Washington, DC. (1995). Falling through the net: A survey of the" have nots" in rural and urban America. ERIC Clearinghouse.
Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2008). Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. Information Technology & People, 21(3), 222-243.
二、中文文獻
王國政(2007)。縮減數位落差 創造數位機會。國家菁英季刊,3(3),15-34。
王國政、柯炳式、程麗華(2012)。建構公平數位機會。研考雙月刊,36(6),80-89。
行政院研究發展考核委員會(2001)。臺灣地區數位落差問題之研究(行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告 RDEC-RES-090-006)。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
行政院研究發展考核委員會(2003)。臺閩地區九十一年數位落差調查報告。取自行政院研究發展考核委員會網站http://archive.rdec.gov.tw/public/Attachment/710301421671
行政院研究發展考核委員會(2013)。6-11歲學童數位學習及數位機會調查報告。取自行政院研究發展考核委員會網站http://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=55C8164714DFD9E9
行政院研究發展考核委員會(2004-2011)。個人/家戶數位落差調查報告。取自行政院研究發展考核委員會網站http:// archive.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4024389
行政院研究發展考核委員會(2012a)。101年個人家戶數位機會調查報告。取自行政院研究發展考核委員會網站http://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=55C8164714DFD9E9
教育部(2016)。2016-2020資訊教育總藍圖。
教育部(2017)。106學年度高級中等學校特色招生考試分發入學。取自教育部全球資訊網站http://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=E20FE7871D499429
項靖(2003)。邁向資訊均富:我國數位落差現況之探討。東吳政治學報,16,125-178。
黃雅容(2009)。從上課方式、補習與課外閱讀比較就讀明星高中與一般高中的學習經驗。教育實踐與研究,22(1),113-137。
國家發展委員會(2016)。105年個人家戶數位機會調查報告。臺北:國家發展委員會。
國家教育研究院(2003)。資訊與通信術語辭典。取自雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1274758/。
國家教育研究院(2017)。教育大辭書。取自雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/415068/
國家教育研究院(2017)。取自雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/3257660/
國家教育研究院(2017)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。取自雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/240355/
國家教育研究院(2017)。取自雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/2830111/
國家教育研究院(2017)。教育大辭書。取自雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/517714/
國中基本學力測驗網站(2013)。102年國中基測PR值、總分,及扣除免試錄取報到前後累積人數對照表。取自國中基本學力測驗網站 http://www.bctest.ntnu.edu.tw/index2.html
曾淑芬(2002)。數位落差。資訊社會研究,2,234-237。