簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳麗雯
Chen, Li-Wen
論文名稱: 創造思考教學融入繪畫創作對幼兒學習成就與創造力之探究
A Study on the Impact of Drawing Creation Embedded with Creative Thinking Instruction on the Learning Achievement and Creativity of Preschoolers
指導教授: 潘裕豐
Pan, Yu-Fong
口試委員: 潘裕豐
Pan, Yu-Fong
郭李宗文
Kuo, Li-Tsung-Wen
邱發忠
Chiu, Fa-Chung
口試日期: 2024/11/26
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 創造力發展碩士在職專班
Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 133
中文關鍵詞: 創造思考教學繪畫創作學習成就創造力
英文關鍵詞: creative thinking instruction, drawing creation, learning achievement, creativity
研究方法: 實驗設計法單組受試者研究設計
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401970
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:14下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討應用創造思考教學於繪畫創作活動後,對提升幼兒繪畫上的學習成就與創造力表現之影響。研究對象為臺北市某公立附設幼兒園的5至6歲混齡班幼生,總計一個班級,共26名幼生。本研究為教學實驗,採「單組受試者設計」,研究設計流程為:「前測」—「一般教學階段」—「中測」—「教學實驗階段」—「後測」,總計進行6週12次的教學課程;研究工具使用「幼兒圖形創造力測驗」、自編「幼兒學習成就表現評量表」等。蒐集量化數據後,以相依樣本T檢定進行資料分析與驗證假設,另整理幼生繪畫創作學習單、學習回饋紀錄表等質性資料輔助結果分析。研究結果顯示,在學習成就表現上,教學實驗階段組在「任務偏好」、「關注認同」以及「總得分」之統計數據上皆達顯著差異;在幼兒圖形創造力測驗方面,教學實驗階段組與一般教學階段組在「流暢力」、「變通力」、「獨創力」以及「總得分」之統計數據上皆達顯著差異。從研究結果與幼生學習回饋來看,本研究之教學設計對學齡前幼兒在繪畫學習上的學習成就與創造力表現有顯著的影響與教學成效。研究者也根據研究結果提出以下教學建議:(1) 應用腦力激盪法與曼陀羅思考法於教學活動中有助於提升學生創造力之展現 (2)未來在學習成就「自我表現」的項度評量可改以詢問之方式進行填答,以期更貼近學生內在自我表現之學習狀況;在未來研究建議:本研究之學習成就表現量表僅適用於繪畫創作之學習面向,期能發展一套更廣泛及全面性地針對學齡前幼兒所適用且完善之學習成就評量工具,以作為未來教學研究使用。

    This study aimed to investigate the impact of implementing creative thinking instruction in drawing activities on enhancing learning achievements and creativity in preschoolers. The study participants were a mixed-age class of 5- to 6-year-old children from a public kindergarten in Taipei City, consisting of a total of 26 children in one class. A ‘single-group experimental design’ was utilized in a teaching experiment, comprising a ‘pre-test,’ a ‘general teaching phase,’ a ‘mid-test,’ a ‘teaching experiment phase,’ and a ‘post-test’ over a six-week period with 12 instructional sessions. Research instruments included the ‘Children's Graphic Creativity Test’ and a self-designed ‘Children’s Learning Achievement Performance Assessment.’ Quantitative data were collected and analyzed using a paired-sample t-test, while qualitative data, such as children's painting worksheets and learning feedback forms, were organized to supplement the results.
    The research findings revealed that the experimental group displayed significant differences in ‘task preference,’ ‘focused attention,’ and ‘overall scores’ during the teaching experiment phase, indicating improved learning achievement. According to the result of ‘Children's Graphic Creativity Test’, the experimental group exhibited statistical significance in ‘luency,’ ‘flexibility,’ ‘originality,’ and ‘overall scores’ compared to the general teaching phase. Based on the results and children's feedback, the instructional design had a notable impact on preschool children's learning achievements and creativity in painting. Based on research findings, the researcher proposes the following instructional recommendations: (1) incorporating brainstorming and Mandala thinking techniques into teaching activities has been shown to effectively enhance students' creativity.; (2) to better assess students' internal self-expression learning experiences, a questioning method should be used for future assessments of the "self-expression" dimension in learning achievement.
    Furthermore, the learning achievement performance scale used in this study focuses specifically on the aspect of painting creation. It is recommended that forthcoming research prioritize the development of a comprehensive assessment tool designed to evaluate learning achievement performance across diverse domains within preschoolers for use in future teaching research.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 3 第三節 名詞釋義 3 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 幼兒繪畫 7 第二節 創造力 14 第三節 創造思考教學 25 第四節 學習成就 37 第三章 研究方法 43 第一節 研究架構 43 第二節 研究對象 45 第三節 研究工具 45 第四節 教學設計 50 第五節 資料處理與分析 56 第六節 研究倫理 57 第四章 研究結果 59 第一節 學習成就表現 59 第二節 創造力表現 63 第三節 幼兒學習單分析 79 第四節 綜合討論 98 第五章 結論與建議 101 第一節 結論 101 第二節 建議 102 第三節 研究限制 104 參考文獻 107 英文文獻 111 附 件120 附件一:「幼兒圖形創造力測驗」施測方式及計分方法說明120 附件二:家長同意書123 附件三:幼兒學習成就表現評量表124 附件四:幼兒繪畫創作回饋調查表125 附件五:教學活動設計126

    王詩惠、胡雅淳、游孟諺、張雨霖(2021)。多元感官探索聯想鬆散素材教學活動對幼兒創造力提升之效果。創造學刊,11(2),1-33。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110110001-202106-202107020017-202107020017-1-33
    毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。心理。
    李梅齡(2004)。氣質、創作性戲劇教學、情緒調節與中大班幼兒創造力之關係〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中山大學。
    李安明、鄭采珮、劉志昀(2011)。國民小學校長教學領導與學生學習成就之研究。學校行政,75,1-20。
    吳清山、黃建翔(2013)。提升學生學習成就策略之探析。教育研究月刊,232,5-17。
    吳秀娟(2017)。談曼陀羅思考技法融入閱讀理解教學。新北市教育電子報,231。
    吳中勤(2020)。幼兒成就目標向度的涵蓋性、特定性與普遍性的初探。當代教育研究季刊,28(2), 31–64。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202006_28(2).0002
    吳亭宜(2020)。幼兒繪畫創造性教學方案之探究〔碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5w2d33。
    沈翠蓮、羅美蘭(2014)。幼兒畫創意表達受個人/文化互動影響之觀察研究。國際藝術教育學刊,12(1),75-92。(THCI)
    沈翠蓮(2023)。創意原理與設計。五南。
    杜海寧、林志哲(2020)。讀者劇場融入技術型高中餐飲英文教學對學生學習動機及學習成就之影響。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,13(3),83-112。
    邱子容(2017)。桌上遊戲對國小英語學習動機與學習成就之影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
    林芸竹(2010)。萌發中的藝術小種子—幼兒日記畫繪畫表現與教育意義之探究〔碩士論文,國立東華大學〕。https://hdl. handle.net/11296/pqn4g3
    林明地、陳威良(2010)。國民小學校長道德領導對學校組織文化與學生學習表現之影響。教育學刊,35,129-165。
    林書郁(2016)。方案取向教學對幼兒繪畫創造力之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6bp9k
    范雅婷(2023)。繪本創造思考教學對國小學童視覺藝術表現及創造力之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣教育大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5nx6xh
    洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷(2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究—以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報:教育類,52(2),49-71。
    馬祖琳,江淑卿(2002)。多元面向論點對幼兒創造力發展與學習之啟示。國立臺中師範學院。
    高橋浩(1990)。突發奇想-源源不斷的創造力與聯想力。臺北:卓越。
    翁儒玉、羅家駿(2018)。詩中有畫:應用平板繪圖於幼兒唐詩教學。 第22屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會(GCCCE2018)。廣州,中國。
    陳龍安(1992)。幼稚園創造思考教學活動設計。臺北市立師範學院創造思考教育中心。
    陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。心理。
    陳秀娟(2007)。曼陀羅思考法在國小六年級國語文修辭教學之應用。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學。
    陳佩怡(2020)。心智圖法教學方案對國中美術班學生繪畫表現及創造力之成效研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001218
    張春興(2000)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。臺灣東華書局。
    張春興(2007)。教育心理學:重修二版。東華。
    張耿彬(2006)。從幼兒繪畫內容探討幼兒認知、環境因素與幼兒繪畫的關係。〔碩士論文,國立臺東大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/chs5c6
    張芳全(2023)。國中生放學後的活動時間與學習成就的關聯之研究。學校行政,143,1-24。
    黃琴雅(2024)。創造思考教學策略對低年級學童圖像創造力之影響。﹝碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yzrph5%E3%80%82
    教育部(2003)。創造力教育白皮書:打造創造力國度。教育部。
    教育部(2017)。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。教育部。
    梁瓊如(2023)。幼兒數學學習動機與學習成就之研究。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。朝陽科技大學。
    葉玉珠(2000)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報, 32(1),95-121。
    葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學。心理。
    葉玉珠、李梅齡、葉玉環、林志哲、彭月茵(2006)。“幼兒創造力測驗”之發展。測驗學刊,53(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200606.0129
    葉玉珠、葉玉環、李梅齡、彭月茵(2006)。以創作性戲劇教學啟發幼兒創造力之行動研究。師大學報:教育類,51(2S), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200610.0012
    葉重新(2011)。心理學。心理。
    黃建翔、蔡明學(2016)。影響高中職學生學習成就關鍵因素之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,19,73-98。
    黃玉欣(2015)。創造思考技法融入服務學習歷程及對 反思能力之影響-以大專生國際志工為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
    黃淑慧(2013)。幼兒園教師不同引導方式對幼兒繪畫表現與繪畫內容影響之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/39nbw7
    董奇(1995)。兒童創造力發展心理。五南。
    蔡玫君(2016)。繪本教學與幼兒繪畫表現之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺南大學。
    劉豐榮(1997)。艾斯納藝術教育思想研究。水牛。
    潘裕豐(2013)。創造力關鍵思考技法。華騰。
    簡璴瑛、陳淑芳(2003)。創造力在幼兒階段的特質實踐和傳遞歷程。(1/3)國科會專案計畫報告 (NSC91-2522-8-004-005)。政治大學幼教所。
    謝佳雯(2012)。運用圖畫書建置幼兒藝術統整課程之行動研究。〔未碩士論文,南華大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yh547q
    謝傳崇、王瓊滿(2011)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表現影響之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,28(1),35-66。
    顏肇基(2010)。童「畫」與童「話」:幼兒繪畫活動中圖像和語言交相建構現象之探究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6v9774
    蘇佑芳、林思騏、魏美惠(2016)。探討幼兒繪畫內容及影響之因素。藝術研究學報,9(1),39-66。https://doi.org/10.3966/207035892016040901003
    蘇月霞(2008)。繪畫創意教學方案對幼兒創造力影響之研究。幼兒教育,(292),70-77。https://doi.org/10.6367/ECE.200812.0070
    饒見維(2005)。創造思考訓練。五南。
    樊祖燁(2018)。情境學習應用於行銷課程之教學方法研究-三創競賽獲獎方程式,商務科技季刊,19(3),323-351。
    樊祖燁、潘博宇(2021)。雙因子理論對學生學習成就之影響-以學習態度作為中介變數。商管科技季刊,22(2),257-297。
    Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
    Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 3–15.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
    Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 80-91.
    Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
    Cartwright, R., Weiner, K., & Streamer-Veneruso, S. (2010). Student learning outcomes assessment handbook. Montgomery College.
    Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 666-679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.90.4.666
    Cherney, I. D., Seiwert, C. S., Dickey, T. M. & Flichtbeil, J. D. (2006). Children’s drawings: A mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26 (1), 127-142.
    Cox, S. (2005b). Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 24(2), 115-125.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural and energetic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(88)90001-3
    Drummond-Smith, I. (2018). “Yes, sir”: Leadership and blind obedience in hierarchal organizations. International Journal of Emergency Services, 7, 24–31.
    Dollinger, S. J. (2011). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99–116.
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00828.x
    Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further Validation of Two Creative Product Measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_4
    Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, P. H., Roberts, D. F., & Fraleigh, M. J. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58, 1244-1257.
    Dewey , J .(1916) Democracy and Education. The Free Press.
    Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3x2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648.
    Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Competence and motivation: Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. Guilford.
    Eberle, R. (1971). Scamper: Games for imagination development. D. O. K.
    Ferrara, N. (1991).Art as a reflection of child development. The American journal of Art Therapy Association, 30, 44-50
    Gardner, H. (1982). Giftedness: Speculations from a biological perspective. New Directions for Child Development, 17, 47-60.
    Hattie, J., & Anderman, E. (2013). International Guide to Student Achievement. Routledge.
    Jones, C., Svejenova, S., Pedersen, J. S., & Townley, B. (2016). Misfits, maver- icks, and mainstreams: Drivers of innovation in the creative industries. Organization Studies, 37, 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616647671
    Jackson, M. (2013). The squeezed middle: An exploration of creativity, con- formity, and social class on the academic achievement of undergraduate students within a UK art school. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32, 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.12021.x
    Kahl, C. H., & Hansen, H. (2015). Simulating creativity from a systems perspective: CRESY. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18.
    https:// doi.org/ 10.18564/jasss.2640
    Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative?. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649237
    Kaufman, A. B., Kornilov, S. A., Bristol, A. S., Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). The neurobiological foundation of creative cognition. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 216–232). Cambridge University Press.
    Kampylis, P. G., & Valtanen, J. (2010). Redefining creativity—Analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01333.x
    Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. International University Press.
    Lebuda, I., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2018). All you need is love: The importance of partner and family relations to highly creative indivi- duals’ well-being and success. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1–15.
    Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 245–251.
    Lowenfeld, V. & Brittain, W. L. (1987).Creative and mental growth 8th edition. New York:Macmillan.
    Méndez-Giménez, A., Cecchini-Estrada, J. A., Fernández-Río, J., Mendez-Alonso, D., & Prieto-Saborit, J. A. (2017). 3x2 achievement goals, self-determined motivation and life satisfaction in secondary education. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 22(2), 150-156.
    Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.
    Mumford, M. D. (2001). Something old, something new: Revisiting Guilford’s conception of creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_04 ㄑ
    Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). Cambridge University Press.
    Ozyaprak, M. (2016). The effectiveness of SCAMPER technique on creative thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS. 2016116348
    Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
    Papandreou, M. (2014). Communicating and thinking through drawing activity in early childhood. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28, 85-100.
    Pelaprat, E., & Cole, M. (2011). “Minding the gap”: Imagination, creativ- ity, and human cognition. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 4, 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9176-5
    Perels, F., Dignath, C., & Schmitz, B. (2009). Is it possible to improve mathematical achie vement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regul ar math classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 17-31.
    Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
    Ring, K. (2006). Supporting young children drawing: Developing a role. International Journal of Education through Art, 2(3), 195-209.
    Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
    Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. In S. G. (Ed ), Frontiers of Creativity Research (pp.216-2220 ) . Bearly Limited.
    Shkliarevsky, G. (2017). Understanding the process of creation: A new approach. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 22, 1–13.
    Sedaghat, M., Abedin, A., Hejazi, E., & Hassanabadi, H. (2011). Motivation, cognitive engagement, and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2406-2410.
    Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1988a). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–32
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. Free Press.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688.
    Starkweather, E. K. (1971). Creativity Research Instruments Designed for Use with Preschool Children. Journal of Creativity Behavior, 5(4), 245-255.
    Thibodeaux, J. (2014). Three versions of constructionism and their reli- ance on social conditions in social problems research. Sociology, 48, 829–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513511560
    Tay-Lim, J. & Lim, S. (2013). Privileging younger children’s voices in research: Use of drawings and a co-construction process. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 65-83.
    Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 236–252.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x
    Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding Creative Talent. Prentice-Hall.
    Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Personal Press.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42, 7–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210
    Walia, C. (2019). A Dynamic Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641787
    Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Developm ent of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.). Wiley.
    Wallas, G.(1926). The art of thought. Harcour Brace and World.
    Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Song, L. J., & Wu, J. (2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000166

    下載圖示
    QR CODE