本研究旨在探討國小五年級學童的認知風格、情緒智力與學習動機之間的關係，主要目的有三項：（一）發展與考驗一套具有整合性的「國小學童認知風格量表」，以協助教師針對國小學童認知風格之特色而加以因材施教。（二）探討國小學童認知風格、情緒智力與學習動機的關係。（三）探討不同認知風格類型國小學童在情緒智力和學習動機上的差異性。
本研究採「問卷調查法」，以893名分佈於台北市、台北縣、新竹市、台中市等地區的國小五年級學生為研究對象，並使用「國小學童認知風格量表」、「國小學童情緒智力量表」、「國小學童學習動機量表」等調查工具。所得資料以典型相關分析、獨立樣本t檢定等統計方法來進行資料處理，綜合整個研究結果，本研究的結果分項概述如下：：
一、編製國小學生適用之「多向度認知風格量表」，結果顯示信度與效度均佳，且建立五年級學童之百分等級常模。
二、當國小學生之認知風格越傾向「場地獨立型」、「分化型」、「沈思型」和「聚斂型」，其情緒智力之「認識自己的情緒」「表達自己的情緒」「管理自己的情緒」「自我激勵」「認識他人的情緒」「回應他人的情緒」「人際關係的處理」，以及學習動機之「追求成功」與「目標導向」的傾向也越強。
三、以認知風格而言，認知風格為「分析型」的學童，其情緒智力優於「整體型」的學童。
四、以認知風格而言，認知風格為「分析型」的學童，其學習動機優於「整體型」的學童。
　本研究結果可提供教學上、輔導工作上與未來研究上參考。

This study investigates the relationships of the Cognitive Style, Emotional Intelligence and Learning Motivation of the Elementary 5th Grade Students, focusing on: 1. developing and testing an integrative scale of “The Cognitive Style of Elementary Students”, which is for the use of teacher’s teaching assistance, 2. investigating the relationships of the cognitive style, emotional intelligence and learning motivation of the elementary students, and 3. investigating the differences of emotional intelligence and learning motivation between different cognitive style of elementary students.
In this study, we survey 893 elementary 5th grade students from Taipei City and County, HsinChu City and TaiChung City with “Elementary Students Cognitive Style Scale”, “Elementary Students Emotional Intelligence Scale”, and ” Elementary Students Learning Motivation Scale”. All results were analyzed by statistical methods such as canonical correlation analysis and independent sample t-test, and the research results can be concluded as follows:
1. With the construction of “Multi-dimensional Cognitive Style Scale” for elementary students and the percentage rating norms of elementary 5th students, the result shows good reliability and validity.
2. When the elementary student tends to be more “field-independency”, “disunite”, “contemplative”, and “convergent” Cognitive Style, the tendency of “knowing self’s emotion”, “expressing self’s emotion”, “managing self’s emotion”, “self-motivated”, “knowing other’s emotion”, “responding other’s emotion”, “deal with interpersonal relation” of emotional intelligence and “success pursuing”, “goal orientation” of learning motivation would be stronger.
3. In terms of Cognitive Style, the emotional intelligence of the “analytic” cognitive style students performed better than the “wholist” cognitive style students.
4. In light of Cognitive Style, the learning motivation of the “analytic” cognitive style students performed better than the “wholist” cognitive style students.

We found that the results of this study could be provided as a reference for teaching, counseling and future research.

一、中文部分

王保進 (民88)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市：心理出版社。
李瑞玲、張美惠、黃慧真 譯（民87）。EQⅡ：工作EQ。台北，時報。D. Goleman（1999）.Emotional
吳明清(民76)。一週教育論壇。台北市 : 教育廣播電台。
吳明隆（民89）。SPSS統計應用實務。台北：松崗。
吳明隆（民92）。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。台北：知城。
吳知賢（民78）。國小高年級兒童之人格特質、媒體、偏好、科目興趣與其認知型態的關係。台南師院學報，22，29-53。
吳淑敏(民81)。創造性問題解決之心像教學方案對國小資優班學生問題解決能力、創造力、自我概念及認知風格之影響。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
吳裕益（民76）。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。高雄師範學院教育學刊，7 ，51-98。
吳毓瑩等（1999）。教育測驗與評量：教室學習觀點。台北：五南出版社。
林生傳(民74)。教育社會學。高雄: 復文出版社。
林生傳（1980）。認知式態測驗編製報告與指導手冊。國立高雄師範大學。
林佳宏(民88)。不同認知型態的國中學生在虛擬實境學習教室中學習歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學/工業科技教育學系碩士論文。
江文慈(民86)。情緒智力(EQ)意涵的再解析。諮商與輔導，136期，3-8頁。
江文慈(民88)。情緒調整的發展軌跡與模式建構之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
林珊如(民71)。國中資賦優異學生智力、認知發展、創造力與學業成就之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林清山 (民81)。心理與教育統計學。台北市：東華書局。
周文欽等（1995）。心理與教育測驗。台北：心理出版社。
張志全（民91）。動機策略與電腦焦慮對國小六年級學生社會科網路學習動機的影響。國立屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文。
張美惠 譯（民86）。EQ。台北：時報。D. Goleman（1995）.Emotional
張春興 (民78)。張氏心理學辭典。台北市：東華書局。
張春興 (民80)。現代心理學。台北市：東華書局。
張春興（民86）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐（修訂版）。台北市：東華書局。

張春興、林清山（民62）。教育心理學。台北市：文景出版社。
邱皓政（民91）。量化研究與統計分析。台北：五南。
陳李綢（民88）。認知發展與輔導。台北：心理出版社。
陳密桃（民84）：我國台灣地區國中學生批判思考的關因素及其教學效之分析研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究。
陳明終（1988）：我國心理與教育彙測驗彙編。高雄：復文書局。
郭生玉（民85）。心理與教育測驗。台北：精華。
教育部（民90）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市：教育部。
許麗玲（民89）。認知風格在虛擬實境遠距學習遷移之影響。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。
賈馥茗、鍾紅柱、陳如山、林月琴、梁志宏、黃恆、吳翠珍、簡仁育、侯志欽等編著 (民 80)。教育心理學。台北縣：國立空中大學。
楊坤原（民85）。高一學生認知風格、認知策略、遺傳學知識與遺傳學解題之研究。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文。
葛樹人（民85）。心理測驗學。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
鄭昭明（1993）。認知心理學。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
劉金花（民88）。兒童發展心理學。台北：五南出版社。
劉信雄（民81）。國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能、與學業成就關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
蔡秀玲、楊智馨（民88）。情緒管理。台北：揚智文化。
蔡桂芳(民83) 。國中資優生認知類型及其在資優教學模式上之應用分析。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
賴怡君（民90）。國小學童情緒智力發展、依附關係與生活適應之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
羅芝芸（民88）。兒童認知風格、情緒智力與問題解決能力之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
羅品欣（民92）。國小學童的家庭結構、親子互動關係、情緒智力與同儕互動關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部分

Allinson, J., & Hayes, C. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 119-135.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Bandura(1982)，Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bieri, J. (1966). Cognitive complexity and personality development. In O. J.
Harvey (Ed), Experience, Structure and Adaptability (pp. 13-37). New York: Springer.
Colangelo, Nicholas, Dettmann, & David F.（1983）A Review of Research on Parents and Families of Gifted Children. Exceptional Children,.50,20-27.
Curry, L.（1983）. An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Eric Document 235 185.
Cohen, R. A. (1967). Primary group structure, conceptual styles and school
achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, UK.
Davis, J. (1967). Technical report 32: Concept identification as a function of cognitive style, complexity, and training procedure. Madison, WI: Center for Cogitive Learning.
Doyle, W. (1990). Classroom knowledge as a foundation for teaching. Teachers College Record, 91, 347-360.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1995). Students’conceptions and constructivist teaching approaches. In B. J. Fraser, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving Science Education (pp. 46-49). Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1989). Learning Styles Inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol.4: Socialization, personality,and social development. New York: Wiley.
Goleman, D.(1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York： Bantam Books.
Grigorenko, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Style of thinking, abilities, and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 63, 295-312.
Halford, G. (1993). Children's Understanding: Development of Mental Models. New

Jersey: LEA.
Hansen, J. W. (1995). Student Cognitive Styles in Postsecondary Technology Programs. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 1-12.
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986). Using Your Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction. Hillsdale. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing And Prescribing Programs (pp. 1-17).Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Keefe, J. W. (1982).Student learning styles and brain behavior (pp. 43-63). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing And Prescribing Programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk-Taking: A study in Cognition and Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Kuhlen, R. (1968). Developmental changes in mohvation during the adult years. In B. L. Neugarten (Ed.) , Middle age and aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuchinskas, G. (1979). Whose cognitive style makes the difference?. Educational Leadership, 36, 269-271.
Lian-Hwang Chiu（1985）. The Relation of Cognitive Style and Manifest Anxiety to Academic Performance Among Chinese Children. Journal of Social Psychology, 125 ,5, 667-670.
Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miller, A. (1991). Personality types, learning styles and educational goals.Educational Psychology , 11, 217-238.
Wardell, D. M., & Royce, J. R. (1978). Toward a multifactor theory of styles and their relationship in cognition and affect. Journal of Personality, 46, 474-505.
Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Witkin, H. A .（1977）.Cognitive Styles in the Educational Setting. New York University Education Quarterly, 8(3), 14-20.
Witkin, H. A .（1977）.Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
Watkin, C. (2000). Developing emotional intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessmen, 8, 89-92.

Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 6. Motivation - enhancing environments (pp.117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Rayner ＆ Riding.（1998）. Cognitive Styles and Learning Syles: understanding Stylr Difference in Learning and Behavior .London：Fulton Publishers.
Riding, Richard; Craig, Olivia.（1998）. Cognitive style and problem behaviour in boys referred to residential special schools. Educational Studies, 24, 205-223.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strstegies, Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Rollins＆Genser(1997).Role of Cognitive Style in a Cognitive Task: A Case Favoring the Impulsive Approach to Problem Solving Rollins. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), 281-287.
Tennant, M. (1988). Psychology and Adult Learning. London: Routledge.
Salovey, P. ＆ Mayer, J. D.（1990）. Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185-211.
Shaffer, D. R. (2000). Social & Personality Development. (4th Ed.). CA: Wadsworth.