本研究的主要目的，首先在於探討反省實踐的相關意涵與理論，其次是探究校長運用反省實踐的方法、類型、模式與步驟，並進一步瞭解反省實踐理念在校長專業培訓方案的應用實例，最後根據研究結論提出建議，以供相關單位及人員之參考。經由相關文獻之分析與訪談之實施，本研究歸納出以下結論：
一、反省實踐是一種慎思的歷程，其強調經驗與持續成長的重要性。該理念歷經萌芽、發展與應用等三階段，目前已應用到師資培育與教育行政領域。
二、反省實踐具有提升個人專業成長與激勵組織變革等正面功能。若校長疏於從事反省實踐，則會產生不利校長專業成長、降低組織績效等負面的影響。
三、行動理論、成人學習理論以及建構主義理論與反省實踐有密切相關，並肯定藉由反省實踐可調整個人的行動理論、激發學習動力以及建構知識。
四、促進反省實踐的方法相當多樣，可分為寫作、觀察、模擬、語意分析等四大類，並各有其具體的作法。目前受訪校長較常使用的是對話與關注他人的聲音。
五、反省實踐的類型可分為技術性、詮釋性、對話性、批判性以及多元互動性五種。受訪校長較常運用的為技術性、對話性及批判性三種。
六、反省實踐的模式可分為行動前反省、行動中反省及行動後反省三種。受訪校長多採用行動後反省模式，且在遭遇到特殊的人、事、物時，更能激發反省實踐。
七、反省實踐的步驟可分為三階段八步驟，並應為一種循環的歷程。受訪校長實際上並未完全運用所有的步驟。
八、反省實踐理念可運用在校長專業培訓中，受訪校長亦肯定此種作法的重要性。
九、國外校長專業培訓方案運用反省實踐著重於解決實際問題的學習，並協助校長同儕建立夥伴關係。我國運用反省實踐在校長專業培訓方案的情形則尚未普遍。
根據上述結論，本研究提出下列建議：
一、對校長的建議
（一）應加強運用札記、行政檔案等不同方法以激勵反省實踐，進而提升個人的專業成長。
（二）宜增進行動前與行動中的反省，以強化反省實踐的運用。
（三）應增進專業對話的機會，藉由與他人互動以激發反省實踐的能力。
二、對校長專業培訓方案設計者的建議
（一）以反省實踐理念融入方案核心，改變以傳統學科本位為主的設計。
（二）提供主動參與的多元活動，以有效提升校長反省實踐的能力。
三、對師資培育機關及人員的建議
（一）將反省實踐理念納入行政課程或專業培訓方案的規劃，以利於理論與實踐之結合。
（二）宜提供校長專業成長的管道，並以催化者的角色促進校長從事反省實踐。
四、對主管教育行政機關的建議
（一）提供在職校長培養反省實踐能力的機會，並規劃相關的制度加以配合。
（二）以反省實踐理念設計校長儲訓課程，培養具反省實踐能力的校長。
五、對進一步研究的建議
（一）採用個案研究的方式進行更深入與長時間之研究。
（二）以行動研究進行實驗性的研究。
（三）以不同的反省實踐方法進行實驗性之研究。
（四）以反省實踐理念建構校長專業培訓方案，並加以實驗。
（五）以其他的行政人員或教師做為研究對象。

The aim of the study is to explore the meaning and theory related to reflective practice, to investigate the ways, types, models and steps in which a principal exercises reflective practice and to further examine the application of the concept involving reflective practice to a principal-professional-training program. At length, based on the conclusion of the study I offer some suggestions, which can be referred to by the authorities concerned. By means of the analysis of the literature and interview, the following conclusions are reached:
1.Reflective practice is a process of deliberation, emphasizing the importance of experience and incessant development. The concept of reflective practice undergoes three stages─germination, development and application. For the time being, it has been applied to a teacher training and the field of educational administration.
2.Reflective practice has a positive function of uplifting personal professional development and of encouraging a revolution of an organization. Provided that a principal ignores to engage himself in reflective practice, some negative effects will occur, that is, those detrimental to a principal’s professional development will be generated and the efficiency of an organization will be decreased.
3.Action theory, adult learning theory and constructivism theory, closely related to reflective practice, support the fact that the application of reflective practice can adapt personal action theory, invoke learning motivation and construct knowledge.
4.The ways to facilitate reflective practice are diversified, including writing, observation, simulation, and semantic analysis, each with a concrete strategy. At present, a principal often uses dialogue and pay heed to others’ opinions.
5.The types of reflective practice can be classified into technical, interpretive, dialogic, critical and multiple-interaction reflective practice. The most common ones used by a principal are technical, dialogic and critical reflective practice.
6.The models of reflective practice contain reflection for action, reflection in action and reflection on action. Those interviewed principals, more often than not, adopt reflection on action, in particular a special person, thing and object can further stir principals’ reflective practice.
7.The steps of reflective practice, a process of circulation, include three stages and eight steps. All of the interviewed principals, in essence, do not completely employ all of the steps.
8.The concept of reflective practice can be applied to a principal-professional training, of which the interviewed principals also affirm the importance.
9.Foreign principal-professional-training programs, which make use of reflective practice, focus on learning to solve a practical problem and on helping principal peers build a partner relationship. Nevertheless, the situation of applying reflective practice to a professional training is still uncommon in our country.
On the basis of the conclusions given above, I offer the following suggestions:
1.Suggestions for principals:
(i) To utilize different ways, such as to keep a journal or to collect administrative portfolios to promote reflective practice and further enhance individual professional development.
(ii) To increase reflection for action and reflection in action, consolidating the application of the reflective practice.
(iii) To promote an opportunity of a professional dialogue, in which the ability for reflective practice can be aroused by means of interaction with others.
2.Suggestions for designers of a principal-professional-training program:
(i) To put the concept of reflective practice into the core of the program, changing a traditional subject-oriented design.
(ii) To offer diverse activities, which can evoke active participation, effectively elevating a principal’s ability for reflective practice.
3.Suggestions for the staff of the teacher education institution:
(i) To incorporate the concept of reflective practice into an administrative curriculum or a professional-training program, which can facilitate the combination of theory and practice.
(ii) To provide a channel for the professional development of a principal and to promote the reflective practice by playing a catalysis role.
4.Suggestions for the chief of the educational administration institution:
(i) To provide the opportunity by which a principal can develop the ability for reflective practice and plan some related systems.
(ii) To design a principal-training curriculum in terms of the concept of the reflective practice and educate a principal with the ability of reflective practice.
5.Suggestions for Further Study:
(i) To adopt a case study for longitudinal and further research.
(ii) To undertake an experimental research in light of action study.
(iii) To undertake an experimental study by means of different ways of reflective practice.
(iv) To construct a principal-professional-training program in terms of the concept of reflective practice and do some further experiments.
(v) To have other administrative staff or teachers as the subjects of the study.

一、中文部分
王如哲（1998）：教育行政學。台北：五南。
王麗雲（2000）：自傳／傳記／生命史在教育研究上的應用。載於中正
大學教育學研究所主編之質的研究方法。台北：麗文。
行政院教育改革審議委員會（1996）：教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：
行政院教育改革審議委員會。
王秋絨（1997）：成人教育的思想與實務─現代、後現代的論辯。台北：
心理。
台北市教師研習中心（2001）：八十九學年度市立國民小學候用校長儲
訓班會前會資料。未出版。
李永吟（1998）：認知教學─理論與策略。台北：心理。
吳幸宜譯（1994）：學習理論與教學應用。台北：心理。
林天祐、吳清山（1998）：學校行政領導人才的培育。國立暨南國際大
學教育政策與行政研究所。[WWW page] URL
http://www.epa.ncnu.edu.tw/y/wu.html
林明地（1998a）：從自我更新取向的專業成長與發展看學校領導者的培
育。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所。[WWW page] URL
http://www.epa.ncnu.edu.tw/y/linmd.html
林明地譯（1998b）：學校領導─平衡邏輯與藝術。台北：五南。
林明地（2000a）：學校行政的「技藝」性質及其對學校行政理論與實際
的啟示。學校行政，5，45-62。
林明地（2000b）：校長專業發展課程設計理念與教學方法之探討。發表
於現代教育論壇：校長證照制度與校長專業發展。台北：國立台北
師範學院國民教育研究所。
林明地（2000c）：助長學校組織學習的關鍵：校長轉型領導。學校行
政，8，4-11。
洪志成、王麗雲（1999）：個案教學與師資培育。載於中華民國師範教育
學會主編之師資培育與教學科技（pp.111-136）。台北：臺灣書店。
姜文閩譯（1992）：我們如何思維。台北：五南。
胡瑋珊譯（1999）：知識管理。台北：中國生產力中心。
胡夢鯨（1998）：成人教育學理論與模型。台北：師大書苑。
秦夢群（1999）：校長職前教育之分析與檢討。教育資料與研究，29，
11-16。
夏林清譯（2000）：行動科學。台北：遠流。
張世忠（2000）：建構教學─理論與應用。台北：五南。
張民杰（2000）：案例教學法之研究及其試用─以教育行政課程試用為
例。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
張明輝（2000）：英國中小學校長的專業成長計畫及其啟示。載於第六
次教育行政論壇論文集（pp.43-67）。台北：國立政治大學教育學
系。
張春興（1989）：張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張景媛（1998）：新學習時代的來臨─建構學習的理論與實務。教育研
究資訊，6(1)，52-65。
張靜嚳（1995）：何謂建構主義。建構與教學，3，1-2。
陳金生、林明地（2001）：我國校長職前儲訓方案之現況與成效意見反
應之研究。載於第七次教育行政論壇「中小學校長培育、證照、甄
選、評鑑與專業發展國際學術研討會」論文集（pp.73-86）。台北：
國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
陳美玉（1997）：教師專業實踐理論與應用。台北：師大書苑。
陳美玉（1999）：教師專業學習與發展。台北：師大書苑。
陳惠萍（1999）：教學檔案在教師專業發展上之應用。載於中華民國師
範教育學會主編之師資培育與教學科技（pp.183-212）。台北：臺灣
書店。
陳惠萍（2000）：檔案在教育實習課程之運用。載於「2000行動研究─
展望本土教育改革學術研討會論文集」（pp.649-691）。台東：國立
台東師範學院教育研究所。
陳聖謨（1998）：國民小學教師教學反省之研究。國立高雄師範大學教
育研究所博士論文，未出版。
陳麗華（1995）：反省性教學的概念架構與實施方法：以國小社會科為
例。發表於國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心主辦「師資培育的理論與
實際」。
郭進隆譯（1994）：第五項修練─學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北：天
下文化。
湯維玲（1996）：反省取向的師資培育學程研究。國立臺灣師範大學教
育研究所博士論文，未出版。
黃乃熒（2000）：後現代教育行政哲學。台北：師大書苑。
黃淑玲（1997）：英國實習輔導教師之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研
究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃富順（1989）：成人心理與學習。台北：師大書苑。
楊深坑、王秋絨（1997）：「反省性教學」運用於師資培育課程的可行性
研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
葉淑儀譯（1999）：教育領導─建構論的觀點。台北：桂冠。
蔡克容（1998）：建構主義對教育改革的啟示。課程與教學，1(3)，47- 60。
蔡秀媛（2000）：初任校長導入輔導制度設計理念。發表於現代教育論
壇：校長證照制度與校長專業發展。台北：國立台北師範學院國民
教育研究所。
鄧運林（1995）：成人教學與自我導向學習。台北：五南。
劉錫麒（1993）：數學思考教學研究。台北：師大書苑。
謝文全（1999）：中小學校長培育、任用、評鑑制度。教育資料與研究，
28，1-5。
戴文年譯（1995）：組織意象。台北：五南。
二、英文部分
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice:
Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Ashbaugh, C. R., & Kasten, K. (1993). Educating the reflective
school leader. Journal of School Leadership, 3(2), 152-164.
Barnett, B. G. (1987). Peer-Assisted leadership: Peer
observation and Feedback as catalysts for professional
growth. In Murphy, J. & Hallinger, P. (1987) (Ed.).
Approaches to administrative training in education. Albany:
State University of New York Press.
Barth, R. S. (1990). Principal centered professional
development. Theory into practice, 25(3), 156-160.
Barnett, B. (1989). Reflection: The cornerstone of learning
from experience.In Pohland, P. A. (Ed.). New Mexico case
records in school administration. ERIC, Document
Reproduction Service No, ED305722.
Barnett, B. G. (1990). Peer-Assisted leadership: Expanding
principals’ Knowledge through reflective practice. Journal
of Educational Administration, 28(3), 67-76.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning
experience into learning. New York: Nichols Publishing
Company.
Bredeson, P. (2001). Paradoxes in professional development :
Implications for principal learning, work, and licensing. 載
於第七次教育行政論壇「中小學校長培育、證號、甄選、評鑑與專業
發展國際學術研討會」論文集（pp.339-334）。台北：國立台北師範
學院國民教育研究所。
Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (1998). Facilitating reflective
learning in higher eduction. Buckingham: SRHE & Open
University Press.
Brown, G. & Irby, B. J. (1995). Administrative portfolios: A
contemporary construct for evaluation. ERIC, Document
Reproduction Service No, ED400247.
Brubacher, J. W., Case, C. W., & Reagan, T. G. (1994). Becoming
a reflective educator: How to building a culture of inquiry
in the schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc.
Carter, K. (1990). Meaning and metaphor: Case knowledge in
teaching. Theory into Practice, 29(2), 109-115.
Chambers, G. F. (1997). Learning from the trenches: A principal
reflects on the effects of reflective practice in changing
and transforming a school culture. Unpublished Ph.D.
Thesis, University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Dana, N. F., & Pitts, J. H., Jr. (1993). The use of metaphor
and reflective coaching in the exploration of principal
thinking: A case study of principal change. Educational
Administration Quarterly, 29(3), 323-338.
Daresh, J. C. (2001). US school administrator development:
Issues and a plan for improvement. 載於第七次教育行政論壇
「中小學校長培育、證號、甄選、評鑑與專業發展國際學術研討會」
論文集（pp.189-202）。台北：國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
Davies, B., & Ellison, L. (1997). School leadership for the
21st Century.New York: Routledge.
Dell’Olio, J. M. (1993). Schön’s cycle of reflection-in-
action in the work of staff developers. Unpublished Ed. D.
Thesis, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation
of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston:
D.C. Heath and Company.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier
Books.
Dezutti, S. K. (1996) . Reflective practice: A staff
development strategy for principals’ professional
development.Unpublished Ed.D. Thesis, University of
California.
Edwards, W. L. (2001). The crucial factor for successful
schools. 載於第七次教育行政論壇「中小學校長培育、證號、甄
選、評鑑與專業發展國際學術研討會」論文集（pp.109-122）。台
北：國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
Fosnot, C. T. (ed.). (1996). Constructivism: Theory,
perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College
Press.
Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring student teachers:
The growth of professional knowledge. London: Routledge.
Ghaye, A., & Ghaye, K. (1998). Teaching and learning through
critical reflective practice. London: David Fulton
Publishers.
Griffiths, M., & Tann, S. (1992). Using reflective practice to
link personal and public theories. Journal of Education for
Teaching, 18(1), 69-84.
Grimmett, P. P., & Erickson, G. L. (1988). Reflection in
teacher education. New York: Teacher college Press.
Hager, P. (1996). Professional practice in education: Research
and issue. Australian Journal of Education, 40(3), 235-247.
Handerson, J. G. (1996). Reflective teaching: The study of your
constructivist practices. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hanny, L. M. (1994). Strategies for facilitating reflective
practice: The role of staff developers. Journal of Staff
Development, 15(3), 22-26.
Hart, A. W. (1990). Effective administration through reflective
practice. Education and Urban Society, 22(2), 153-169.
Hart, A. W. (1993). A design studio for reflective practice. In
Hallinger, P.,Leithwood, K., & Murphy, J. (Eds.).
Cognitive perspectives on educational leadership. New York:
Teachers College.
Hatton, N., & Smith D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education:
Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher
Education, 11(1), 33-49.
Hult, C. A. T. (1992) . The reflective practices of school
principals.Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oregon.
Imel, S. (1992). Reflective practice in adult education. ERIC,
Document Reproduction Service No, ED346319.
Jay, J. K. (1999). Untying the knots: Examining the
complexities of reflective practice. ERIC, Document
Reproduction Service No, ED431732.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining together.
(4nd). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Juniewicz, T. (1996) . Principals’ use of reflective
practices. Unpublished Ed.D. Thesis, University of Maine.
Kennedy, R. L,. & Wyrick, A. M. (1995). Teaching as reflective
practice. ERIC, Document Reproduction Service No, ED393850
Killion, J. P., & Todnem, G. R. (1991). A process for personal
theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 14-16.
King, P. M., & Karen, S. K. (1994). Developing reflective
judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth
and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San
Frarrcisco: Jossey-Bass.
Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education:
Andragogy versus pedagogy. New York: Association Press.
Knowles, M. S. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species.
Houston: Gulf.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action. Lodon: McGraw-Hill.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the
source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-
Hall, Inc.
Kottkamp, R. B. (1990). Means for facilitating reflection.
Education and Urban Society, 22(2), 182-203.
Krol, C. A. (1997). Reflective practice. English Journal, 86
(5), 96-97.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D. P., Cooper, J. E.,
Lambert, M. D., Gardner, M. E., Ford Slack P. J. (1995).
The constructivist leader. New York: Teachers College Press.
Langer, G. M., & Colton, A. B. (1994). Reflective decision
making: The cornerstone of school reform. Journal of staff
development, 15(1), 2-7.
Law, S. & Glover, D. (2000). Educational leadership and
learning: Practice, policy and research. Buckingham: Open
University Press.
Lipton, L.(1993). Transforming information into knowledge:
Structured reflection in administrative practice. ERIC,
Document Reproduction Service No, ED361903.
Lyons, N. (1998). Reflection in teaching can it be development?
A portfolio perspective. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25
(1), 115-128.
Marshall, H. H. (1988). Work or learning: Implication of
classroom metaphors. Educational Researcher, 17, 9-16.
Marshall, H. H. (1990). Beyond the workplace metaphor: The
classroom as a learning setting. Theory Into Practice, 29
(2), 94-101.
Mezirow, J. A. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed
learning. In Brookfield, S.(Ed.). Self-directed
learning:Theory and practice. (pp.17-30). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Montie, J., York-Barr, J., Kronberg, R., Stevenson, J.,
Vallejo, B., & Lunders, C. (1998). Reflective practice:
Creating capacities for school improvement. University of
Minnesota Press.
Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1990). Metaphor in the study of
teachers’professional knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 29
(2), 116-121.
Murphy, J. & Hallinger, P. (1987). New directions in the
professional development of school administrations: A
synthesis and suggestions for improvement. In Murphy, J. &
Hallinger, P. (1987) (Ed.). Approaches to administrative
training in education. Albany: State University of New
York Press.
Nai-Ying Whang. (2001). The construction of professional of
principals’leadership through epistemology of reflective
practice. 載於第七次教育行政論壇「中小學校長培育、證號、甄
選、評鑑與專業發展國際學術研討會」論文集（pp.189-202）。台
北：國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
Neufeld, B. (1997). Responding to the expressed needs of urban
middle school principals. Urban Education, 31(5), 490-509.
Newman, S. (1999). Philosophy and teacher education: A
reinterpretation of Donald A. Schön’s epistemology of
reflective practice. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Osterman, K. F. (1990). Reflective practice: A new agenda for
education. Education and Urban Society, 22(2), 133-152.
Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B.(1993). Reflective practice
for educators: Improving schooling through professional
development. Newbury Park: Corwin Press, Inc.
Osterman, K. F. (1998). Using constructivism and reflective
practice to bridge the theory/practice gap. ERIC, Document
Reproduction Service No, ED425518.
Pearce, H. A., & Arredondo, D. E. (1996). Reforming schools
through changed supervisory practices: One superintendent
and one principal at a time. ERIC, Document Reproduction
Service No, ED401642.
Pohland, P. A. (Ed.). New Mexico case records in school
administration. ERIC, Document Reproduction Service No,
ED305722.
Razik, T. A., & Swanson, A. D. (2001). Fundamental concepts of
educational Leadership (2nd). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-
Hall, Inc.
Richardson, V. (1990). The evolution of reflective teaching and
teacher education. In Clift, R. T. et. al. (Eds.).
Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis
of issues and programs. New York: Teacher College Press.
Ross, D. D. (1989). First steps in developing reflective
approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 22-30.
Ross, E. W., & Hanny, L. M. (1986). Towards a critical theory
of reflective inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4),
9-15.
Saban, J. M., Killion, J. P., & Green, C. G. (1994). The
centric reflection model: Kaleidoscope for staff
developers. Journal of Staff Development, 15(3), 16-20.
Sarason, S. (1971). The culture of the school and the problem
of change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Schall, E. (1995). Learning to love the swamp: Reshaping
education for public service. Journal of Policy Analysis
and Management, 14(2), 202-220.
Schmuck, R. A. (1997). Practical action research for change.
Arlington Heights: SkyLight Professional Development.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How
professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Schuttloffel, M. J. (1999). Character and the contemplative
principal. ERIC, Document Reproduction Service No, ED438599.
Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1983). Supervision: Human
perspectives. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the
heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Sergiovanni,T. J., Burlingame, M., Coombs, F. S.,& Thurston, P.
W. (1992). Educational governance and administration.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective
practice perspective (3nd). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective
practice perspective. (4nd). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Smyth, J. (1989). Developing and sustaining critical reflection
in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2),
2-9.
Trautwein, A. K. (1994). Reflective practice: Some perceptions
of Missouri public high school principals. Unpublished
Ph.D. Thesis, Saint Louis University.
Tomlinson, H. (2001). International conference on school leader
preparation, licensure/certification, selection, evaluation
and professional development. 載於第七次教育行政論壇「中小學
校長培育、證號、甄選、評鑑與專業發展國際學術研討會」論文集
（pp.1-22）。台北：國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
Valli, L. (1992). Reflective teacher education: Case and
critiques. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Vanderbilt University (2001). [WWW page] URL
http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/depts/del/general/.
Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of
being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205-228.
Weade, R., & Ernst, G. (1990). Pictures of life in classroom,
and the search for metaphors to frame them. Theory Into
Practice, 29(2), 133-140.
Witmer, J. T. (1995). Moving up! : A guidebook for women in
educational administration. Lancaster: Technomic Pubishing
Company, Inc.
Zigler, T. A. (1994). A case study evaluation of reflective
process in a preparation program for educational
administrators. ERIC, Document Reproduction Service No,
ED385005.