研究指出MOOCs的創新教學模式下，其課程完成率低於傳統線上教育，僅有少於10%的學生完成課程，因此本研究欲探討MOOCs的課程平台是否能吸引臺灣學習者使用，以及探討學習者使用MOOCs的意願。
本研究依循解構式計畫行為理論為基礎，探討學習者使用MOOCs課程網站意願因素，使得課程網站更加完善，增加使用意願。本研究針對國立台灣大學於Coursera開設的通識課程「東坡詞」與「毒道之處看不見的危機」學生為研究對象，最終有效問卷207份。資料分析方法以部分結構方程式模式（Partial Least Square）驗證研究模型，PLS的分析工具則採SmartPLS 2.0程式進行模型的路徑係數分析。
研究結果顯示，若學習者知覺到MOOCs課程網站的有用性、易用性與相容性越高，則學習者的行為態度就越正向。若學習者身邊的重要關係人越是支持，則學習者使用MOOCs課程網站的主觀規範越高，同儕影響、上級影響對主觀規範影響是正向的。學習者自我效能與科技資源對學習者使用MOOCs輔助狀態越高，則知覺行為控制越高，自我效能與科技輔助狀態對知覺行為控制影響皆為正向。學習者行為態度對使用MOOCs課程網站有越正向的評價，有助於學習者使用MOOCs課程網站的行為意圖增加，而主觀規範及知覺行為控制影響學習者使用MOOCs課程網站的行為意圖並無顯著關係。

Some studies have pointed out that MOOCs innovative teaching model has a lower course completion rate than traditional online education, only less than 10% of students complete the course. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore whether MOOCs platform can attract Taiwanese learners and explore learners' wishes.
Primarily based on the decomposed theory of planned behavior, this study explores the willingness of learners to use MOOCs website, and increases the willingness to use. Students study in the Coursera classes of National Taiwan University were choosed as subjects, 207 questionnaires were collected for this study. The data analysis method validates the research model with Partial Least Square, and uses the SmartPLS 2.0 program as the PLS analysis tool.
The results show that if the learner perceives the usefulness, ease of use and compatibility of the MOOCs course website, the learner's behavioral attitude will be more positive. If the important person around learners support more, the higher the subjective norm of using the MOOCs course site will be. The peer and superior influence have positive effects on the subjective norm. The higher the state of learners' self-efficacy and scientific resources are, the higher the perceived behavior control is. The more positive learners' behavioral attitude on the use of MOOCs website is, the intention for learners to use MOOCs website increases. However, subjective norms and perception of behavioral control have no significant effects on the intention of using MOOCs website.

一、中文文獻
MOOCs學院。（2013年11月21日）。MOOCs 中文用戶大摸底。取自 http://mooc.guokr.com/post/610667/
古雅薇、張佳蕙（2013）。教育雲端平台─MOOC 發展動態。MIC研究報告。取自http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/reports/reportdetail_register.asp?docid=3026&rtype=freereport
行政院人事行政總處地方行政研習中心（2015）。新興數位培訓模式-大規模開放式線上課程及翻轉教室運用之探討。104年度各國人事制度編譯報告，1-2。
李威儀（2013）。數位教育的下一站–MOOCs 研討會。 2013 年 10 月 7 日，台南市：成功大學。取自： http://apps.acad.ncku.edu.tw/lecture/main/login.php?m=M&t=17&f=201309240024
邱顯烺（2010）。以解構計畫行為理論探討購物網站選擇行為（未出版之碩士論文）。北台灣科學技術學院電子商務研究所，台北市。
郭欣宗（2016）。以計畫行為理論探討學生對MOOCs課程的使用意向（未出版之碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學資管學系，雲林縣。
陳東園（2013）。以網路特質經營數位學習(e-learning)平台策略的研究-以 網路媒體互動性功能為例。空大人文學報，22，1-28。
教育部磨課師分項計畫辦公室（2013）。高等教育新紀元磨課師數位學習研討會。2013年 10 月 11 日，台中市：逢甲大學。取自：http://taiwanmooc.org/archives/7768
教育部（2013）教育部電子報。 取自http://epaper.edu.tw/old/vocabulary.aspx?vocabulary_sn=565
彭耀政（2001）。網際網路中多媒體技術應用於海洋環境教育基本架構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系，高雄市。
張韶筠（2011）。以計劃行為理論實證消費者對有機餐廳之消費意圖與願付價格（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄應用科技大學觀光與餐旅管理所，高雄市。
曾怡婷（2012）。以計劃行為理論探討數位原生世代對沙發客旅遊之行為意向（未出版之碩士論文）。南華大學旅遊管理所，嘉義縣。
黃雲龍、葉允棋、歐展嘉（2012）。Web2.0 新興教學科技的使用行為研究與滿意度之研究。休閒研究，4（2），45-68。
黃日鉦、林承賢（2013）。以計畫行為理論探討縮短數位落差之持續使用行為。商略學報，5（1），57-78。
張添香、楊惠理、曾伊舲、呂珈蕙、黃敏涵（2013）。探討消費者使用網路團購網站之因素—以信任傾向為干擾變數。資訊科技國際研討會。取自http://www.inf.cyut.edu.tw/AIT2013/session.htm
黃敬婷（2015）。以解構式計畫行為理論探討大學生使用Web2.0平台於網路學習行為之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學成人與繼續教育研究所，南投縣。
鄭如伶、陳贊仰（2015）。磨課師（MOOCs）的數位學習模式之教學對電腦繪圖設計課程學習成效之研究。紡織綜合研究期刊，26（3），34-42。
劉怡甫（2013）。與全球十萬人作同學：談 MOOC 現況及其發展。評鑑雙月刊，42。 取自：http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2013/03/01/5945.aspx
魏建華（2014）。以解構計畫行為理論探討Facebook成癮之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學資訊管理學系，台北市。

二、英文文獻
Abelson, H. (2008). The Creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(2), 164-174.
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 183-189.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.). Action-control: From cognition to behavior, 11- 39. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer.
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Stanford University.
Coursera Blog. (2015). Coursera Celebrates 1 Million Learners in China with Alipay Integration. Retrieved from http://blog.coursera.org/post/123957682612/coursera-celebrates-1-million-learners-in-china
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B, Bennett, A., Woods. D & Emanuel. E. J. (2013). The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964
Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, C. (2007). Giving knowledge for free : the emergence of open educational resources. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/38654317.pdf
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064.
Dhawal Shah. (2015). Less Experimentation, More Iteration: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2015. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2015/
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1-20. http://jime.open.ac.uk/article/2012-18/
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly: 319-340.
DeBoer, J., Ho, A. D., Stump, G. S., & Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “Course”: Reconceptualizing Educational Variables for Massive Open Online Courses. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 74–84.
Fiona M Hollands & Devayani Tirthali(2014). MOOCs: Expectations and RealityFull Report. Centerfor Benefit-Cost Studies of Education,Teachers College, Columbia University, NY.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.(1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Journal of Leisure research, 27(1), 61-84.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.
Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses. HarvardX and MITx Working Paper (Vol. 1). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2381263
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58.
Jordan, K.（2013）. Emerging and potential learning analytics from MOOCs. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/3264990/Emerging_and_potential_learning_analytics_from_MOOCs
Liaw, S. S.(2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfication, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, 864-873.
Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Kashin, K., Han, Q., Reich, J., Waldo, J., Chuang I., & Ho, A. D. (2015c). World Map of Age Composition (HarvardX Insights). Retrieved from http://harvardx.harvard.edu/harvardx-insights/world- map-age-composition
Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Kashin, K., Han, Q., Reich, J., Waldo, J., Chuang I., & Ho, A. D. (2015d). World Map of Education Composition (HarvardX Insights). Retrieved from http://harvardx.harvard.edu/harvardx-insights/world- map-education-composition
Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Kashin, K., Han, Q., Reich, J., Waldo, J., Chuang I., & Ho, A. D. (2015f). World Map of Gender Composition (HarvardX Insights). Retrieved from http://harvardx.harvard.edu/world-map-gender- composition
Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Kashin, K., Han, Q., Reich, J., Waldo, J., Chuang I., & Ho, A. D. (2015e). World Map of Enrollment (HarvardX Insights). Retrieved from http://harvardx.harvard.edu/harvardx-insights/world-map- enrollment
Ndubisi, N. O. (2004). Factors influencing e-learning adoption intention: Examining the determinant structure of the decomposed theory of planned behaviour constructs. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of HERDSA.
Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=2&article=516
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Sadaf, A., T. J. Newby, et al. (2012). "Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior." Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171-196.
Taylor, S. and P. A. Todd (1995). "Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models." Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
Tovar, E., Dimovska, A., Piedra, N., & Chicaiza, J. (2013). OCW-S: Enablers for building sustainable open education evolving OCW and MOOC. Paper presented at the Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE, Berlin.
University UK（2013）. Massive open online courses: higher education's digital moment? Retrieved from http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Pages/massive-open-online-courses.aspx
Wiley, D., & Green, C. (2012). Chapter6. Why Openness in Education? In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Game Changers, EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/chapter-6-why-openness-education
Waldrop, M. M. (2013). Massive Open Online Courses, aka MOOCs, Transform Higher Education and Science. Nature, 495, 160–163.
Yuan, L. & Powell, S.（2013）. MOOCs and Open Education：Implications for Higher Education. CETIS Centre for Educational Technology, Interoperability and Standards. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667