摘 要
本研究的主旨在闡釋Sternberg的智能理論及其相關理論，進而申述其在教學上的涵義與啟示，藉供從事教育工作者的參考。
根據上述的研究動機，所擬定的研究目的有下列三項：(一)探究Sternberg智能理論產生的背景及其內涵。(二)闡明Sternberg智能理論在教學上的應用。(三)分析Sternberg智能相關的理論內涵及其在教學上的涵義。
根據文獻分析，本研究主要發現下列幾項重要結論撮述如下：
壹、Sternberg智能理論產生的背景及內涵
一、Sternberg智能理論產生的背景：緣於他小時候的一段經歷
二、智能三元論的內涵
(一)Sternberg認為分析性智能不僅是解決學業上，也包括日常生活上的問題，並倡導要透過分析性智能來發現解決問題的方法
(二)Sternberg認為每一個心智正常的人有不同程度的創造力，並倡導要透過創造性智能來找對問題
(三)Sternberg認為「實用性智能」是不容小覷的，其中「默會知識」的概念是發展人生「智慧」重要的核心概念
(四)Sternberg整合分析性、創造性、實用性這三種智能提出「成功的智能理論」
三、Sternberg智能相關理論的內涵
(一)重視非智能因素(如動機、情緒智能、思考方式等)對人成就的影響
(二)重新發現智慧的價值，提出平衡的智慧理論
(三)直觀思維是人們在學習一個新科目或解決不熟悉的問題常用的方法，需要與分析性思考相互平衡及驗證，擴大學習的視野
(四)從動態評量的架構提出「能力即發展中的專門知識和技術的形式」之概念
貳、Sternberg智能理論在教學上的應用
一、在教學目標及教學內容的應用方面
(一)強調教學目標以培養三元智能為本的能力
(二)將分析性、創造性、實用性三種思維能力適當融入各階段的學校教學內容(材料)當中
(三)教育目標重視以人人都能成功為理念
二、在教學觀和評量觀的應用方面
(一)教師可以指導學生了解「後設成分」作為監控自我認知的作用，提昇學生分析性思維能力
(二)教師善用培養創造性思維的策略，提昇學生創造力
(三)教師善用培養實用性思維的策略，提昇學生實用性思維能力
(四)許多專業實務知識的學習是默會的
(五)以培養三元智能的能力作為全面性評量學生的依據
參、Sternberg智能相關理論在教學上的涵義
一、要有因材施教的教學觀
二、採用多元的教學觀以協助不同思考方式的學生
三、教導平衡的智慧理論
四、強調透過對話和辯證式的教學方法促進學生智慧的發展
五、就發展「智慧」而言，「統整的課程」是有其需要的
六、教學上應重視學生直觀思維的重要性，指導學生須配合分析性思維的反思
七、強調認知能力的可塑性，結合教學與評量
關鍵字：智能三元論、成功的智能、智慧

A study on Sternberg’s intelligence theory
and its implications for teaching
Abstract
The main purposes of the study are to explore a triarchic theory of human intelligence, and then stating its value is applied to teaching . Particularly, The study of this paper expects to provide Sternberg’s ideas to native education.
Firstly, the author elaborated the background of Sternberg’s intelligence theory. Secondly, the author stated the application for teaching of Sternberg’s intelligence theory. Finally, the author analyzed the relevant theory of Sternberg intelligence and its implications for teaching.
According to the literature review. In brief, the findings as follows :
First of all , The background and intension that Sternberg’s intelligence theory produced.
First, The background that Sternberg’s intelligence theory produced : Because of a section of experiences as he is a child .
Second, the intension of a triarchic theory of human intelligence:
(1) Sternberg thinks analytical intelligence to solve not only on the academic task, include the daily question in life too, and advocates finding the method to solve problem through analytical intelligence.
(2) Sternberg thinks that every person with normal intelligence has creativity in various degree, and advocates to look for the question correctly through creative intelligence
(3) Sternberg thinks practical intelligence is important , the tacit knowledge concept among them is to develop the key concept of wisdom in life.
(4) Sternberg combined analytical, creative and practical intelligence and then proposed the successful intelligence theory .
Third, intension of the relevant theory of Sternberg intelligence.
(1) Nonintelligence factors influence on human achievement. (such as motive , EQ , thinking style ),
(2) Sternberg’s theory recover the value of wisdom, proposing the balance theory of wisdom.
(3) The intuitive mind needed analytical thinking are balanced each other , expanding the vision of learning.
(4) Sternberg’s dynamic test theory proposes abilities as form of developing expertise.
Secondly, the application for teaching of Sternberg’s intelligence theory.
First, It implicates for the objectives of teaching as follows :
(1) Sternberg’s intelligence theory emphasizes the objectives of teaching in order to cultivate the ability based on a triarchic theory of human intelligence.
(2) There are analytical, creative and practical intelligence to be incorporated with the school content of each stages properly.
(3)The educational objectives pay attention to everyone can be successful
Second, It implicates for teaching and measuring as follows :
(1)Teacher can promote student's analytical thinking ability.
(2)Teacher can promote student's creative thinking ability.
(3)Teacher can promote student's practical thinking ability.
(4) A lot of professional knowledge is tacit learning.
(5) Measuring students is based on a triarchic theory of human intelligence.
Thirdly, It implicates for teaching the relevant theory of Sternberg intelligence.
First, Educators should have view of teaching in accordance with their student’s aptitude.
Second, Educators should adopt multiple view of teaching differently to help different student of thinking style.
Third, Educators should teach the balance theory of wisdom.
Fourth, Sternberg’s theory emphasize that the development of wisdom by dialogue and dialectical method of teaching .
Fifth, In respect of developing wisdom , Curriculum intergration is essential.
Sixth, Educators should pay attention to the importance of student's intuitive mind, teaching students how to cooperate with reflection of analytical thinking.
Seventh, Sternberg’s theory emphasizes that the modifiability of cognitive ability , and combining teaching with test.
Keywords: A triarchic theory of human intelligence,
successful intelligence, wisdom,

參 考 文 獻
一、 中文部分
Dai, D.(2000)。多元智能理論：背景、意義、問題。文教新潮，5，38- 43。
王振德(1997)。創造力三面模式評介---兼論創造力的本質與研究取向。資優教育季刊，64，1-5。
北：遠流。
石中英(2001)。波蘭尼的知識理論及其教育意義。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)，20(2)，36-44。
古明峰(1998)。動態評量在加、減法文字題學習與遷移歷程之應用研究。新竹師範學院初等教育學報，6，1-32。。
白學軍(1996)。智力心理的進展。浙江：人民出版社。
皮連生(1994)。智育概論--- 一種新的智育理論的探索。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)，4，41-49。。
皮連生(1997)。論智力的知識觀。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)，3，52-58。
李子建、黃顯華(1996)。課程：範式、取向和設計。台北：五南。
李丹(1989)。兒童發展。台北：五南。
李平譯(1997)。T. Armstrong(1994)著。經營多元智慧(Multiple Intelligence in the Classroom)。台北：遠流。
李弘善(譯)(2000)。R.J. Sternberg & L. Spear-Swerling著。思考教學(Teaching for thinking)。台北：遠流。
李其維(1995)。皮亞傑心理邏輯學。台北：楊智。
李咏吟(1996)。課程與教學。載於歐陽教(主編)，教育概論(頁229-254)。台北：師大書苑。
吳武典(1997)。Gardner與Sternberg智能建構模式的整合及人事之探討。資優教育季刊，65，1-7。
吳武典(1999)。透過人事智能達到成功人生。資優教育教師專業知能研討會集刊。台北：中華資優教育學會出版。
吳武典、簡茂發(2001)。以人事智能為核心的多元智能課程對國小學生個人成長與因應行為的影響。資優教育研究，１(1)，1-28頁。
吳國宏(譯)(2003)。R.J. Sternberg著。教授成功智力---增進學生的學習和成就水平(Teaching for successful intelligence: To increase student learning and achievement)。台北：五南。
吳國宏、李其維(1999)。再次超越IQ----斯騰伯格「成功智力」理論述評。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)，２，53-61。
吳靜吉(2003)。活用智能導讀。2003年7月10日。取自
http://www.ylib.com/search/int-show.asp Book No=A3214
杜麗燕(1995)。皮亞傑。台北：東大。
取自：http://www.tw.org./newwave/53/1-10.htm
周天賜(1998)。動態評量：發展與改進兒童學習潛能的媒介式學習。台北：心理。
周甘逢、劉冠麟(合譯) (2002)。R.J. Sternberg & W.M.Williams合著。教育心理學。台北：華騰文化。
周怜利(譯)(2000)。E. H. Erikson, J. M. Erikson , & H.Q. Kivnick著。Erikson老年研究報告：人生八大階段(Votal involvement in old age)。台北：張老師文化事業有限公司。
姜文閔(譯) (1992)。J. Dewey著。我們如何思維(How we think)。台北：五南。
洪蘭(譯)(1999a)。R.J. Sternberg著。活用智能---超越IQ的心智訓練(Intelligence
applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills)。台北：遠流。
洪蘭(譯) (1999b)。R.J. Sternberg著。不同凡想---在一窩蜂文化中開拓創造力(Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity)。台
胡中鋒、劉學蘭(2002)。現代智力觀及其對教育課程改革的啟示。課程、教材、教法。5，22-26。人民教育出版社。
唐淑華、崔光宙等(2003)。影響情緒發展的各項因素(二)學校。2003年7月15日，取自：http://edu.ndhu.edu.tw/tang/course/course16.htm
桂慶中、劉炳輝(2002)。皮亞傑認知發展論探討自我調整學習歷程之建構與應用。中等教育，53(5)，112-122。
翁懿涵(2002)。皮亞傑發生認識論及對台灣教育蘊義之省思。國立台灣師大教育系碩士論文，未出版，台北。
張世慧(2003)。創造力─理論、技術 / 技法與培育。台北市：台北市立師範學院特殊教育學系。
張玉成(1998a)。思考方式與教學效能。國民教育，38(3)，36-41。
張玉成(1998b)。成功性智能與沉寂性智能。國民教育，39(1)，57-62。
張玉成(1999)。教師發問技巧之外─論鼓勵學生發問暨教師回答技巧之重要性。國民教育，39(3)，47-53。
張春興(1993)。現代心理學，初版8刷。台北：東華。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學─三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
張玲(2003)。加德納多元智能理論對教育的意義到底何在？華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)， 21(1)，44-52。。
張新仁、邱上真(1992)。國中地理學習之後設認知研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。計劃編號：NSC 81-0301-H-017-02-L1。高雄：高雄師範大學。
張衛東(1997)。認知神經科學：認知行為腦機制多學科研究。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版) ，(3)，67-72。
張衛東(2002)。智慧的多元─平衡─整合論。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版) ，20(4)，61-67。
梁平(2000)。論問題解決的教學設計。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)，18(2)，50-57。
莊麗娟(1999)。系統化多元評量模式之發展研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄。
莊麗娟、邱上真(1996)。動態評量在教學上的應用。高雄教育簡訊，13，12-13。
郭玉霞(1997)。教師的實務知識。高雄：復文。
郭亨杰(2003)。思維的擴展。新竹：凡異文化。
郭俊賢、陳淑惠(譯) (2003)。R. J. Sternber & W. M. Williams著。如何培育學生的創造力(How to develop student creativity)。台北：心理。
陳李綢(1991)。多重智能理論模式的驗証與智能的促進。國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。
陳英和(1996)。認知發展心理學。浙江：人民出版社。
陳旻萃(譯) (1997)。R.J. Sternberg著。成功的智商(Successful intelligence)。台北：平安文化。
陳淑芳(2003)。閱讀「創造力」：探尋創造的源頭與秘因。2003年7月15日。取自：http://www.nttp.edu.tw/shufang.
陳琦、張建佛(1998)。建構主義學習觀要義評析。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版) ，(1)，61-68。。
陳越(2003)。建構主義與建構主義學習理論綜述。2003年7月15日。取自：http://www.being.org.cn/sikao/constructivism. htm
陳億貞(譯) (2002)。R.J. Sternberg著。普通心理學(Educational psychology)。台北：雙葉書廊。
創造力教育白皮書(2003)。2003年7月15日。取自：http://www.nknush.kh.edu.tw/creativity/academy/teach1.doc
單文經(2001)。教學引論。台北：學富。
斯騰伯格(2000)。超越IQ：人類智能的三元理論。上海：華東師範大學出版社。
斯騰伯格、霍瓦斯(1997)。R.J. Sternberg & J. A. Horvath著。專家型教師教學的原型觀(A prototype view of expert teaching)。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)：特約稿，1，27-37。
黃幸美(1994)。兒童的類比推理思考與發展。教育與心理研究。17，477-506。
楊國恩、李洪玉、李幼穗合著(1996)。非智力因素及其培養。浙江：浙江人民出版社。
葉郁菁主編(2002)。心理學。高雄：麗文。
趙志裕、康螢儀、鄭思雅、賀蓓 合著(1998)。多元才能：IQ以外的能力。台北：心理。
劉世南、郭誌光(2001a)。創造力與智慧的關係。資優教育季刊，80，16-21。
劉世南、郭誌光(2001b)。創造力的概念與定義。資優教育季刊，81，1-7。
劉世南、郭誌光(2002)。創造力理論的發展：一個心理構念演進的省思。資優教育季刊，85，20-30。
劉覲龍、韓湘文(1996)。大腦與思維。福建：教育出版社。
蔡崇建(1991)。智力的評量與分析。台北：心理。
鄭友超、王百民、陳明鈺(2003)。應用問題解決教學策略於高中學生生活科技課程學習成效之研究：以「能源與運輸」領域為例。教育研究資訊，11(5) ，113-62。
鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學：理論與實踐。台北：桂冠。
薛絢(譯) (1999)。R.J. Sternberg著。活用你的思考方式(Thinking styles)。台北：天下遠見出版公司。
簡紅珠(1998)。多元智能理論對課程與教學的啟示。教師天地，93，23-27。
謝展文(2000)。直覺法則對於數學及科學的影響—以國小四、五、六學生為對象。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
魏美惠(1996)。智力新探。台北：心理。
譚和平、李其維(1998)。略論思維的可訓練性。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版) ，4，46-57。
二、 英文部分
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasin, P. W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C.(2003).(Eds.)A taxonomy for learning, teaching , and assessing—A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. NewYork:Longman.
Baltes, P.B., & Staudinger, U.M.(1993).The search for psychology of wisdom. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 2(4), 347-365.
Baltes, P. B., & Ursula, M. S. (1996). Interactive mind: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berg, C. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). A triarchic theory of intellectual development during adulthood. Developmental Review, 5, 334-370.
Billing, M., Condors, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radly, A.(1988). Ideplogical dilemma: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage .
Bruner, J.S.(1960). The process of education. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J.S.(1971). The relevance of education. New York : Norton.
Calvin, S. H.(1996).How brains think. New York: Basic Books.
Clayton, V.(1975).Erickson’s theory of human development as it applies to the aged: Wisdom as contradictory cognition.Human Development, 18, 119-128.
Clayton, V.(1982). Wisdom and intelligence: The nature and function of knowledge in the later years. International Journal of Aging and Development, 15, 315-321.
Clayton, V.,& Birren, J. E.(1980). The development of wisdom across the life-span: A reexamination of an ancient topic. In P.B. Baltes & O.G. Brim(Eds.) Life-span development and behavior. ( pp. 103-135). New York: Academic press.
Deary, D.F.(2000). Simple information process and intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg(Ed.)Handbook of intelligence. (pp. 267- 284). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. Originally published: Lexington, MA : D.C. Heath, 1910.
Eisner, E.W. & Vallance, E.(Eds.).(1985). Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. Berkeley, California: McCutchan .
Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence . ( pp. 157?188). Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fromberg, D.P.(1995). The full-day kindergarten: Planning and practicing a dynamic themes curriculum(2nd Ed.).New York : Teachers College Press.
Gardner, H. (1973).The arts and human development: A psychological study of the artist process. New York: Wiley.
Gardner, H.(1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basics Books.
Gardner, H.(1991).The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basics Books.
Gregory C.R.(1999).Book reviews.Thinking styles. Educational Psychology. 19 (1), 103.
Goldhor, H. (1999). Shorter notices.The Library Quarterly. 19 (3), 103.
Goleman, D. (1995).Emotional intellignce. New York: Bantam Books.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2001).Book review. Practical intelligence in everyday life. Intelligence, 29, 363-365.
Henderson, J.G. (2000).Informing curriculum and teaching transformation through postmodern studies. In J. Glanz & L. H. Behar.(Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspective(pp. 52-168). London : Bergin & Garvey.
Hernstein, R. J., & Murray, C.(1994). The bell curve: Intelligence aand class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
History of influences in the development of intelligence theory & testing.Retrieved March 27, 2003, from http://www.indiana.edu/-intell/map.htm.
Jacobsen, M.(2003).Article review: A prototype view of expert teaching.
Retrieved March 25, 2003, from http://Ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/course/679-95/jacobsen/artreview.html.
Lohman, D. F. (2000). Complex information processing and intelligence. Handbook of intelligence. (pp. 285- 340). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Myers, I. B. (1980). Gifts differing. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Myers, R.E. (2000).Intelligence and education. In R.J. Sternberg(Ed.)Handbook of intelligence. (pp. 519-533). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, D.N. (1990).Wisdom through the ages. In R.J. Sternberg(Ed.) Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development(pp. 13-24). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Staudinger, U. M . (1996) . Wisdom and the social-interactive foundation of the mind. In P.B. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger(Eds.), Interactive minds(pp. 276-315). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R.J. (1985a).Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1985b).Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-627.
Sternberg, R.J. (1986a). Intelligence applied: Understand and increasing your intellectual skills. San Diego : Harcourt Brace.
Sternberg, R.J. (1986b).Practical intelligence : Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.) .(1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1998 a). Intelligence, instruction, and assessment theory into practice. Mahway, N J : Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R.J. (1998 b). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347-365.
Sternberg, R.J. (1990a).Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1990b).Understanding wisdom. In R.J. Sternberg(Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origin, and development.(pp.3-9). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1990c).Wisdom: Its nature, origin, and development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1994a).Answering questions and questioning answers: Phi Delta Kappan, 76( 2), 136-138.
Sternberg, R.J. (1994b). Thinking and problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1997a). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1997b).Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
Sternberg, R.J. (1997c). Pathways to psychology. San Diego : Harcourt Brace.
Sternberg, R.J. (1999a).The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.) (1999b). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (2000a). Intelligence and wisdom.In R.J. Sternberg(Ed.) Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 629- 647). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.) (2000b).Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (2001a).Psychology: In search of human mind (3rd ed). San Diego : Harcourt Brace.
Sternberg, R.J. (2001b).Reply to the book review on practical intelligence in everyday life. Intelligence, 30, 117-118.
Sternberg, R.J. (2001c).Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in education settings.Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227-245.
Sternberg, R.J. (2003a). Biography. Retrieved May 27, 2003, from http://www.scrippscol.edu/-dept/psych/www/girard2002/Sternberg_bio.htm.
Sternberg, R.J. (2003b). Sternberg .Retrieved May 25, 2003, from http://www.indiana.edu/-intell/ Sternberg. html
Sternberg, R.J., & Caruso, R. (1985). Practical modes of knowing. In E. Eisner(Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing(pp.133-158). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sternberg, R.J., & Davidson, J. E.( Eds.)(1986).Conception of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J., & Davidson, J. E.( Eds.)(1995).The nature of insight. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Sternberg, R.J.& Detterman, D. K.(1986).What is intelligence？Norwood, N J :Ablex.
Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund. J., Horvath, J., Snook, S., Williams, W. M., Wagner, R. K., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J., & Gardner, M.K.(1983).Unities in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 80-116.
Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000).Teaching for successful intelligence: To increase student learning and achievement. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9-17.
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1995/1999). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
Sternberg, R.J. & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Children Development, 51, 27-38.
Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, C., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001).The relationship between academic and practical intelligence:a case study in Kenya. Intelligence , 29, 401-418.
Sternberg, R.J., & Rifkin, B. (1979). The developmentof analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 226-234.
Sternberg, R.J., & Spear-Swerling,L. (1996). Teaching for thinking. American Psychological Association.
Sternberg, R.J., & Waner, R.K.(1986). Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the every day world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Sternberg, R.J., & Williams,W. M. (2002).Educational psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Taub, G. E.(1998). Predicting success: A critical analysis of R.J. Sternberg and R.K. Wagner’s theory of practical intelligence: Is this an ability beyond g？unpublished doctoral disseration, State University of Florida.
Torff, B. , & Sternberg, R.J. (Eds.) (2001).Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wagner, R.K.（2000）Practical intelligence.In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.)Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, R.K. , & Sternberg, R.J. (1986). Tacit knowledge and intelligence in the everyday world. In R. J. Sternberg & K.K. Wagner(Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the every day world.(pp.51-83). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yang, S., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997a). Conceptions of intelligence in ancient Chinese philosophy. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 17, 101-119.
Yang, S.,& Sternberg, R.J. (1997b).Taiwanese Chinese people’s conceptions of intelligence. Intelligence, 25(1), 21-36.
Yang, S.Y.(2001). Conceptions of wisdom among Taiwanese Chinese. Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 30(6). 23-35.
Zhang, L. F. (1999). Futher crosss-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. Educational Psychology,133, 165-181.
Zhang,L.F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles Related？A Study in two Chinese populations. Journal of Psychology, 134( 5) , 469.
Zhang,L.F. (2001). Approaches and thinking styles in teaching. Journal of Psychology, 135( 5) , 547.
Zhang, L. F. (2002).Thinking styles and big five personality traits. Educational Psychology, 22( 1), 15-17.