研究生: |
張恪銘 Chang, Ke-Ming |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
大學圖書館學科館員對數位移轉觀點之研究 Subject Librarians' Perspectives on Digital Sift in Academic Library |
指導教授: |
邱銘心
Chiu, Ming-Hsin |
口試委員: |
邱銘心
Chiu, Ming-Hsin 柯皓仁 Ke, Hao-Ren 蔡天怡 Tsai, Tien-I |
口試日期: | 2025/01/15 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2025 |
畢業學年度: | 113 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 85 |
中文關鍵詞: | 大學圖書館 、學科館員 、數位移轉 、人工智慧 、創新擴散理論 |
英文關鍵詞: | Academic Libraries, Subject Librarians, Digital Shift, Artificial Intelligence, Diffusion of Innovations Theory |
研究方法: | 半結構式訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202500344 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:57 下載:4 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
大學與研究型圖書館協會(Association of College & Research Libraries, ACRL)回顧了近四年大學圖書館的趨勢,點出新型冠狀病毒(Covid-19)所造成的大流行以及生成式AI等人工智慧(AI)技術對於大學圖書館的影響最為顯著。英國研究型圖書館聯盟(Research Libraries UK,RLUK聯盟)歷經國內首次的大流行後,意識研究型圖書館(Research Libraries)推動「數位移轉」(Digital Shift)之必要,後續提出「數位移轉宣言」(A manifesto for the digital shift)並著重在館員技能(Skills)、空間(Spaces)、學術與館藏(Scholarship and collection)與利害關係人(Stakeholders)這四個面向進行創新,以形塑圖書館科技創新、永續發展以及與學術界密切合作的角色。
在大學圖書館中,學科服務是大學圖書館與各系所間保持經常性聯繫的管道,透過學科館員提供的客製化服務,支持大學各系所間師生研究與教學的需求。本研究透過半結構式訪談法向國內七所大學圖書館共十二名學科館員與其中階主管,探討我國大學圖書館推動數位移轉的現況、影響數位移轉的因素,並採用創新擴散理論分析人工智慧技術於大學圖書館創新之態度。
研究結果顯示,我國大學圖書館在「數位移轉宣言」裡的四個面向皆有創新。至於影響圖書館數位移轉之因素,則發現經費、館員、使用者需求、組織文化與圖書館管理階層等五個因素。而人工智慧技術在圖書館的應用包含館員的個人工作上使用、提供使用者AI素養的服務、圖書館後端系統以及引文資料庫的AI檢索功能。儘管AI技術於大學圖書館中已展現出可提升服務品質與效率的潛力,但是在推動創新時仍面臨著挑戰,像是部份AI技術於圖書館領域的成熟度不足、館員缺乏AI素養以及AI工具衍伸倫理與隱私議題。
基於研究結果,本研究建議我國圖書資訊學教育應調整課程,以培育新一代圖書館之人才;大學圖書館則應強化學科館員的職能培訓、改善人力配置,並推動AI素養發展;學科館員則強化數位技能與專業領域知識、加強與教學單位及研究單位之間的聯繫。
The Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) has reviewed trends in academic libraries over the past four years, highlighting the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of generative AI and other artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on academic libraries. The Research Libraries UK (RLUK), after experiencing the first wave of the pandemic domestically, recognized the necessity of promoting a "Digital Shift" in research libraries. Subsequently, RLUK introduced the "A Manifesto for the Digital Shift," focusing on four key areas: skills, spaces, scholarship & collections, and stakeholders. This initiative aims to shape the role of research libraries in technological innovation, sustainable development, and close collaboration with academia.
In academic libraries, subject services serve as a crucial channel for maintaining regular communication between libraries and academic departments. Through customized services provided by subject librarians, these services support the research and teaching needs of faculty and students across various disciplines. This study employs semi-structured interviews with twelve subject librarians and mid-level managers from seven university libraries in Taiwan to explore the current state of digital shift in academic libraries, the factors influencing this shift, and the attitudes toward AI technology in library innovation using the diffusion of innovations theory.
The research findings indicate that university libraries in Taiwan have introduced innovations across the four areas outlined in the "A Manifesto for the Digital Shift." The study identifies five key factors influencing the digital shift of libraries: funding, librarians, user needs, organizational culture, and library management. The applications of AI technology in libraries include personal work assistance for librarians, AI literacy services for users, AI integration in backend library systems, and AI-powered search functions in citation databases. While AI technology has demonstrated its potential to enhance service quality and efficiency in academic libraries, several challenges persist in its implementation. These include the immaturity of some AI technologies in the library field, a lack of AI literacy among librarians, and ethical and privacy concerns associated with AI tools.
This study suggests that library and information science (LIS) education in Taiwan should revise its curriculum to cultivate the next generation of library professionals. University libraries should enhance training programs for subject librarians, improve workforce allocation, and promote AI literacy development. Subject librarians should also strengthen their digital skills, deepen their expertise in specialized fields, and enhance collaboration with teaching and research units.
Lombardi, P(2024)。人工智慧與圖書館:學術資源管理的新時代。CONCERT 2024國際學術研討會〔研討會演講〕。台北市,台灣。
中央流行疫情指揮中心 (2021年5月18日)。COVID-19疫情警戒標準及因應事項。https://covid19.mohw.gov.tw/ch/cp-4822-61184-205.html
王梅玲(2021)。轉變與擴疆:臺灣圖書資訊學教育白皮書2021-2030。中華圖書資訊學教育學會
朱永新、楊帆(2023)。ChatGPT/生成式人工智慧與教育創新:機遇、挑戰以及未來。華東師範大學學報(教育科學版),41(7)。
余顯強(2006)。圖書館應用無線射頻識別技術之實務性研究。教育資料與圖書館學,44(1),3-13。https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.200609_44(1).155.RS.AM
吳泰毅、鄧玉羚(2023)。初探台灣民眾對人工智慧產品與服務之採用經驗與信任感。資訊社會研究,44,97-127。https://doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.202301_(44).0004
吳朝裕(2018)。SLIM雲端圖書館自動化系統問答集(2)為什麼圖書館要換系統?。http://tul.blog.ntu.edu.tw/archives/21051。
周澍來(2005)。大學圖書館館藏安全之探討-以圖書安全系統使用評估為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.01160
林文君(2022)。圖書館服務的轉型-淺談研究資料服務。JLIS-圖書資訊學刊的沙龍。https://vocus.cc/article/62329b70fd897800018cc430
林巧敏(2006)。數位時代圖書館功能及角色的變遷。圖書與資訊學刊,59,40-56。https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2006.59.04
林巧敏(2008)。國家圖書館電子資源館藏發展之研究〔博士論文〕。國立臺灣大學。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.01566
林明宏(2001)。廿一世紀資訊中心 : 數位圖書館。書苑,47,34-44。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、嚴嘉楓(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊,3(2),122-136。
林泰宏(2008)。Library2.0!?。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,17,頁25-52。
林素甘、張莉慧(2022)。臺灣學術圖書館參考館員對嵌入式館員服務的認知與看法。圖書資訊學研究,16(2),39-69。https://doi.org/10.30177%2fJLISR.202206_16(2).0002
邱子恒(2021)。我國大學圖書館管理相關研究之回顧與展望。在吳美美(主編)。圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0。台北市:元華文創。
邱銘心(2011)。大學圖書館學科服務之經營與管理研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,37(2),頁 73-93。
政治大學達賢圖書館(2024)。創客空間。檢自 https://makerspace.lib.nccu.edu.tw/
柯皓仁(2021)。大學圖書館學科服務趨勢分析。在吳美美(主編)。圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0。台北市:元華文創。
柯皓仁(2021)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館2020年年報。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館。
柯皓仁(2021)。新世代大學圖書館空間設計理念與空間改造經驗談。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,30,4-6.
柯皓仁(2022)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館2021年年報。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館。
洪世昌、謝順宏(2009)。臺灣師範大學圖書館 SMILE 多元學習區與 My Library 個人化讀者服務建置經驗分享。https://www.lib.scu.edu.tw/activity/meeting/ntnu.pdf
洪敦明(2024)。AI智慧館員:探索國立公共資訊圖書館「智慧服務」的演進之旅。臺北市立圖書館館訊,37(3),43-53。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10112081-N202406180008-00005
高青(2009)。面向用戶的高校圖書館學科化信息服務體系構建。圖書館管理與資源建設,29(5),80-84。
國家圖書館(2016)。我國大學圖書館館員專業知能指標研訂芻議。http://www.ncl.edu.tw
國家圖書館(2020)。圖書館創客空間建置與服務指引。臺北市:國家圖書館。
張莉慧(2015)。探討國內大學圖書館員對學術傳播的認知與態度。﹝碩士論文。國立中興大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w9gu63。
莊馥瑄(2019)。學術圖書館創新模式之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201900774
許琇媛(2020)。新冠肺炎(COVID-19)疫情成為圖書館數位移轉的催化劑。國家圖書館館訊,(166),27-32。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10267220-202011-202011230007-202011230007-27-32
連心瑜、羅美芳、高碧霞(2014)。創新擴散理論之發展與護理應用。長庚護理,25(4),404-412。https://doi.org/10.3966/102673012014122504003
陳巧倫(2014)。國立臺灣大學研究生對圖書館學科服務使用情形初探。大學圖書館,18(2),166-179。https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.18-2.08
陳光華(2019)。學術圖書館的創新服務。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,(28),1-13。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10293809-201911-201911200007-201911200007-1-13
陳光華(2019)。學術圖書館的創新服務。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,(28),1-13。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10293809-201911-201911200007-201911200007-1-13
陳育賢(2023)。化解ChatGPT帶來抄襲作弊疑慮 清華大學首推AI素養培養指引。國立清華大學。https://www.nthu.edu.tw/mediaReport/content/1604
陳亞寧(2015)。館藏發展的未來趨勢分析。臺北市立圖書館館訊,32(4),21-38。
陳冠名(2023)。以ChatGPT協助學術論文寫作之初探。實踐博雅學報,34,85-99。
陳靜宜、張琇婷(2020)。國立政治大學Alma 圖書館服務平台導入實務之經驗分享。圖資與檔案學刊,12(1),171-194。https://jila.lib.nccu.edu.tw/2020volume-12/121-no-96-june-2020/5636/
彭于萍(2016)。大學圖書館館員之領導者-成員交換關係、創意自我效能與館員創新行為之關係模式探析。教育資料與圖書館學,53(1),27-61。https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2016.531/0044.RS.AM
彭于萍(2021)。圖書館館員職能研究。在吳美美(主編)。圖書資訊學研究回顧與前瞻2.0。台北市:元華文創。
黃沛、王梅玲(2023)。大學圖書館創客空間學習者參與經驗與滿意度之研究:以達賢圖書館為例。圖資與檔案學刊,15(1),(102),73-108。https://doi.org/10.6575/JILA.202306_(102).0003
黃郁庭(2024)。大學圖書館創客空間的使用行為研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/tku202400443
楊千霆、謝宗昊、林知穎、劉宇瑄(2015)。國立臺灣大學圖書館網站好用性測試研究:以非圖書資訊學系學生觀點為例。大學圖書館,19(1),91-114。https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.19-1.05
楊美華(2009)。大學圖書館學習共享空間的理念與建置。圖書與資訊學刊,69,1-17。doi:10.6575/JoLIS.2009.69.01
群輝商務科技(2024)。為何圖書館需要 RFID?不能不知道的三個管理好處。https://chci.com.tw/rfid-in-library/
詹麗萍 (1985)。「大學圖書館」名詞查詢。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/df3dde79d9b9556ff30a4e2f6c26b067/?startswith=zh&seq=1。
實踐大學圖書暨資訊處(無日期)。Smart RFID圖書管理系統。https://lis.usc.edu.tw/p/405-1004-822,c249.php?Lang=zh-tw
臺灣大學圖書館(2021)。[公告] 圖書館閉館相關服務調整說明。擷取自臺灣大學圖書館: https://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/。
臺灣學術倫理教育資源中心(2023)。運用 ChatGPT 撰寫作業的風險。https://ethics.moe.edu.tw/files/resource/knowledge/knowledge_06.pdf
劉昌澔(2017)。臺灣大學圖書館與淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館推動學科服務之比較〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00277
蔡妍芳(2011)。大學圖書館對學科服務的認知態度研究。﹝碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gw265z。
鄭瑋、黃寶霈(2023)。認識「開放科學」三維度,讓科研成果發揮更大的效益。科學月刊。檢索自:https://www.scimonth.com.tw/archives/7725
賴雅柔(2013)。臺灣地區大學圖書館特色館藏發展之研究﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6g3nb2。
蘇日古嘎、郝振君(2023)。ChatGPT生成式人工智慧與大學轉型:機遇、挑戰與未來。臺灣教育評論月刊,12(9),19-23。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20130114001-N202309040016-00004
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2018). Standards for Libraries in Higher Education. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/standardslibraries.
Adebayo, O., Iwu-James, J., Olawoyin, O., Fagbohun, M., Esse, U., Yusuf, F., ...Owolabi, S. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: implication and strategies for academic library support. Proceedings of INTED2019 Conference, Valencia, Spain. 7210-7217. http://eprints.lmu.edu.ng/2487/1/BLENDEDLEARNINGINHIGHEREDUCATION. pdf.
Aghassibake, N., Joqu, J., and Sisk, M. L.(2020). Supporting Data Visualization Services in Academic Libraries. The Journal of Interactive Technology & Pedagogy, 18. https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/supporting-data-visualization-services-in-academic-libraries/.
Ali, M.Y. and Gatiti, P. (2020). The COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic: reflections on the roles of librarians and information professionals. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 37(2), 158-162.
Allen, K. (2010). Survey reveals attitudes towards social media in European libraries. Retrieved from https://www.infotoday.eu/Articles/Editorial/Featured-Articles/ Survey-reveals-attitudes-towards-social-media-in-European-libraries-72075.aspx
American Library Association. (2008). Standards for proficiencies for instruction librarians and coordinators. https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/acrl/content/standards/profstandards.pdf
Amos, Z. (2024). 5 Ways Artificial Intelligence Is (Quietly) Changing Libraries.https://hackernoon.com/5-ways-artificial-intelligence-is-quietly-changing-libraries.
Zemskov, A. I., Telitsyna, A. (2024). Demonstrating ChatGPT possibilities for the libraries. Scientific and Technical Libraries, 4, 131-145,doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2024-4-131-145
Ashiq, M., Jabeen, F., & Mahmood, K. (2022). Transformation of libraries during Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,48, 1-10.
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Environment scan 2015.Retrieved from https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/EnvironmentalScan15.pdf
Ball, R. (2010). The end of all niches: the future position of the academic librarian in a modern service industry. In: Kocójowa, Maria, (ed.) ePublications of Information and Library Science Institute of the JU. Libraries, Information, Books: Interdisciplinary Research and Practice in 21st Century, Series III, 7. , pp. 72-79.
Baxter, G., Beard, L., Beattie, G., Blake, M., Greenhall, M., Lingstadt, K., … Reimer, T. (2021). Covid-19 and the Future of the Digital Shift amongst Research Libraries: An RLUK Perspective in Context. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 27(3), 322–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1976232
Borgman, C. L. (2000). Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication. Journal of Documentation, 56 (4), 412-430.
Brewerton, A. (2012). Re-skilling for research: Investigating the needs of researchers and how library staff can best support them. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18, 96–110.
Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
Chanetsa, B., & Ngulube, P. (2017). Qualifications and Skills of Subject Librarians in Selected African Countries. The International Information & Library Review, 49(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1278195
Charles, B. L. (2010). Year 2 of the ‘Great Recession’: Surviving the Present by Building the Future. Journal of Library Administration,51(1): 37–53.
Cox, A. M., & Mazumdar, S. (2024). Defining artificial intelligence for librarians. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(2), 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221142029
Crossley, C.A. (1974). The subject specialist librarian in an academic library: his role and place. Aslib Proceedings, 26(6), pp. 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb050458
Dempsey, L., Malpas, C., & Lavoie, B. (2014). Collection Directions: The Evolution of Library Collections and Collecting. portal: Libraries and the Academy 14(3), 393-423.
Falcone, A. & McCartin L. F. (2022). Strategies for Retaining and Sustaining the Academic Librarian Workforce in Times of Crises. Journal of Library Administration,62(4),557–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2057132.
Feather, J. & Paul, S. (2003). International encyclopedia of information and library science(2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Freeman, G. (2005). The Library as Place: Changes in Learning Patterns, Collections, Technology, and Use. Council on Library and Information Resources. https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub129/freeman/
Gaston, R. (2001). The changing role of the subject librarian, with a particular focus on UK developments, examined through a review of the literature. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 7(1),19-36
Green, A.(2023). Academic Library Employees and Their Work Modality Options and Preferences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,49(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102764.
Greenhall, M. (2020). Covid-19 and the digital shift in action. RLUK Report. https:// www.rluk.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Covid19- and-the-digital-shift-in-action-report-FINAL.pdf
Greenhall, M. (2020). The initial responses of RLUK member libraries to the Covid-19 crisis. RLUK Report. https://www.rluk.ac.uk/report-the-initial-responses-of-rluk-member-libraries-to-the-covid-19-crisis/
Grote, M., & Lysholm Faber , H. C. ., & Gasparini, A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in PhD education: New perspectives for research libraries . LIBER Quarterly,34(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.18137
Gulati, A., & Raina, R. L. (2000). Professional competencies among librarians and information professionals in the knowledge era. World Libraries, 10(1&2), 11–18.
Hamad, F., Al-Fadel, M., & Fakhouri, H. (2022). The role of academic libraries and information specialists during times of health crises in Jordan: the COVID-19 pandemic case. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(4), 476-492. DOI: 10.1108/DLP-02-2021-0009. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125934719&doi=10.1108%2fDLP-02-2021-0009&partnerID=40&md5=e935c2d00fe28f6069a6e4b5511f0f20
Harper, R. & Corrall, S. (2011). Effects of the Economic Downturn on Academic Libraries in the UK: Positions and Projections in Mid-2009. New Review of Academic Librarianship,17(1): 96–128.
Hay, F. J. (1990). The Subject Specialist in the Academic Library: A Review Article. Journal of Academic Librarianship,16,p11-17.
Hervieux, S., Wheatley, A. (2024). Building an AI Literacy Framework: Perspectives from Instruction Librarians and Current Information Literacy Tools.
Ifijeh, G., & Yusuf, F. (2020). Covid – 19 pandemic and the future of Nigeria's university system: The quest for libraries' relevance. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(6), 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102226/
IFLA. (2004). IFLA Digital Reference Guidelines. https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/reference-and-information-services/publications/ifla-digital-reference-guidelines-en.pdf
IFLA. (2020). COVID-19 and the Global Library Field. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. https://www.ifla.org/covid-19-and-the-global-library-field/.
IFLA. (2023). Developing a library strategic response to Artificial Intelligence. https://www.ifla.org/?s=chatgpt&_sfm_type%5B%5D=0&_sfm_type%5B%5D=1&_sfm_type%5B%5D=2&_sfm_type%5B%5D=3
Jaguszewski, J. M., & Williams, K. (2013). New roles for new times: Transforming liaison roles in research libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/publications-resources/
Kim, J. (2021). Determining Research Data Services Maturity: The Role of Library Leadership and Stakeholder Involvement. Library & Information Science Research, 43, no. 2: 101092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101092.
Lee, H.-L. (2000). What is a collection? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(12), 1106-1103.
Litsey, R., & Mauldin, W. (2018). Knowing what the patron wants: Using predictive analytics to transform library decision making. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(1): 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.004.
Lowendahl, J.-M., & Calhoun Williams, K. (2018). 5 best practices for artificial intelligence in higher education. Gartner Group.
Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The emerging third dimension of open science and open data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153-171.
MacEachern, M., Samuel, S. (2023). Research Reproducibility Activities in Health Sciences Libraries. Journal of eScience Librarianship,12(2): e650. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.650.
Peet, L. (2021). Big Ten Academic Alliance Plans BIG Collection. Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/?detailStory=big-ten-academic-alliance-plans-big-collection-across-15-libraries.
Peršić, A., & Straza, T. (2023). Open Science for All: Implementing the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science for an Equitable and Just Transition to Open Science. College & Research Libraries News, 84(10), 381. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.10.377.
Research Planning and Review Committee, 2. (2022). Top trends in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues. College & Research Libraries News, 83(6), 243. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.83.6.243
Research Planning and Review Committee, A. (2024). 2024 Top Trends in Academic Libraries: A Review of the Trends and Issues. College & Research Libraries News, 85(6), 231. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.85.6.231
RLUK. (2020). A manifesto for the digital shift in research libraries. https://www.rluk.ac.uk/digital-shift-manifesto/.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., Quinlan, M. (2019). Diffusion of Innovations. 10.4324/9780203710753-35.
Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.
Rudin, P. (2008). No fixed address: The evolution of outreach library services on university campuses. The Reference Librarian, 49(1), 55-75.doi:10.1080/02763870802103761
RUSA. (2017). Guidelines for Implementing and Maintaining Virtual Reference Services. https://www.ala.org/rusa/sites/ala.org.rusa/files/content/resources/guidelines/GuidelinesVirtualReference_2017.pdf
Sewell, A. (2024). Game Jams for Academic Libraries: Lessons Learned from a Collaboration with the Makerspace. College & Research Libraries News, 85(1). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.85.1.23.
Wilkins, L., & DeLooper, J. (2021). If you build it, will they come? Reflections on creating a community college library makerspace. Public Services Quarterly, 17(4), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2021.1887049
Wilson, D. (2024). Constant Change or Constantly the Same? A Historical Literature Review of the Subject Librarian Position. College & Research Libraries, 85(7), 1035. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.7.1035