簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林怡均
Lin, Yi-Jyun
論文名稱: 臺灣及琉球山月桃複合群的分類研究
Taxonomic study of Alpinia intermedia complex (Zingiberaceae) in Taiwan and the Ryukyus
指導教授: 王震哲
Wang, Jenn-Che
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 生命科學系
Department of Life Science
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 114
中文關鍵詞: 山月桃種複合群形質分析分類
英文關鍵詞: Alpinia intermedia, species complex, morphometrics, taxonomy
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.SLS.006.2018.D01
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:117下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 山月桃 (Alpinia intermedia Gagn.) 及其相關類群 (A. chinensis Roscoe、A. kelungensis Hayata、A. oblongifolia Hayata及A. suishaensis Hayata) 分布在日本琉球群島、臺灣及中國大陸,為中低海拔常見中型草本植物。此一複合群由於類群間的特徵差異小,以致不同學者對於此複合群的分群迄無共識,有待更深入的研究。本研究針對台灣 (包括蘭嶼) 及琉球分布的山月桃複合群,透過詳盡的文獻考證、野外觀察、變異數分析、Tukey事後比較分析以及主成分分析等形質分析方法,探討此一複合群的分類問題。研究結果顯示,營養器官特徵在此類群中無法提供有效的分群結果,應以生殖構造作為重要判斷特徵。而在生殖構造中,則以雌雄蕊長度、唇瓣的大小以及唇瓣基部是否具短柄等為最重要的鑑別特徵。綜合統計分析及主成分分析的結果皆支持將日本琉球、臺灣與蘭嶼之本複合群植物分為「琉球+蘭嶼」以及「臺灣」兩群,而透過原始文獻及模式標本的考證,確認「琉球+蘭嶼」的物種學名為A. intermedia,「臺灣」的物種學名則應使用A. oblongifolia。

    Alpinia intermedia Gagn. and its related species (including A. chinensis Roscoe, A. kelungensis Hayata, A. oblongifolia Hayata and A. suishaensis Hayata) are distributed in Japan, Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan and mainland China. It is a common herb frequently found in forest and forest edge at low and middle elevation. The taxonomic treatments of A. intermedia complex has been controversial due to minor morphological differences delimiting subgroups with the complex, implying a great necessity to study this complex in detail. In this study, I used the methods of morphometric analysis such as one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference Test and principal component analysis (PCA), combining with field observation and literature review to untangle the problem of Alpinia intermedia complex in the Ryukyus and Taiwan. The results obtained from one-way ANOVA and Tukey compare analysis show that the reproductive characters, especially the length of stamens / pistil, the size of labellum, and the shape labellum being shortly unguiculate or sessile, instead of vegetative characters, are important characters to separate taxa within this complex. The statistical analysis and principal component analysis both support to separate this complex of Japan, Taiwan and Orchid Island into "The Ryukyus + Orchid Island" and "Taiwan" two groups. We concluded the names for "The Ryukyus+ Orchid island” speciesould be A. intermedia Gagnep, while for "Taiwan" species should be A. oblongifolia.

    目次 目次...............................I 附表目次...........................II 附圖目次...........................III 中文摘要...........................IV 英文摘要............................V 壹、前言............................1 貳、研究材料及方法...................8 參、研究結果........................26 肆、討論............................58 伍、引用文獻........................94 陸、附錄............................98

    何春蓀。2003。臺灣地質概論。中央地質調查所。臺北市。
    吴德邻。1981。山姜屬。中國植物志16(2): 76-78。
    楊正仲。1993。臺灣產月桃屬之分類研究。國立臺灣師範大學生命科學系碩士論文。臺北市。
    劉淑娟。2009。臺灣產月桃屬植物天然雜交及島田氏月桃複合群親緣地理之研究。國立臺灣師範大學生命科學系博士論文。臺北市。
    蘇向豪。2013。利用單子葉簡單重複序列與簡單重複序列區間分子標誌分析月桃親緣關係。國立中興大學農藝學系碩士論文。臺中市。
    André T, Specht C, Salzman S, Palma-Silva C & Wendt T. 2015 Evolution of species diversity in the genus Chamaecostus (Costaceae): molecular phylogenetics and morphometric approaches. Phytotaxa 204(4): 265-276
    Bentham G. 1861. Flora Hongkongensis; a Description of the Flowering Plants and Ferns of the Island of Hongkong. P349.
    Egan AN. 2015. Species delimitation and recognition in the Pediomelum megalanthum complex (Fabaceae) via multivariate morphometrics. PhytoKeys 44: 65-87
    Fosberg F. 1942. Subspecies and Variety. Rhodora: 153-157.
    Gagnepain MF. 1901. Le Mémoire suivant est communiqué à l’assemblée: zingibéracées nouvelles ou mal connues de l’herbier du muséum. Bulletin de la Sociéte botanuque de France 48:LXXIII-LXXXIV.
    Hayata B. 1915. Icones Plantarum Formosanarum. Vol. 5. pp. 215-228. Bureau of Forestry. Taihoku (Taipei), Taiwan.
    Hayata B. 1916. General index to the flora of Formosa. Bureau of forestry. Taihoku (Taipei) p.82.
    Hayata B. 1920. Icones Plantarum Formosanarum. Vol. 9. pp. 118-124. Bureau of Forestry. Taihoku (Taipei), Taiwan.
    Henderson A. 2006. Traditional morphometrics in plant systematics and its role in plam systematics. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151: 103-111
    Henry A. 1896. A list of plants from Formosa with some preliminary remarks on the flora and economic botany of the island. Transaction of Asiatic Society of Japan 24: 98-99.
    Jensen R. 2003. The conundrum of morphometrics. Taxon 52: 663-671.
    König FG. 1783. Observations Botanicae sex Fasciculis Comprehensae.Vol. 3 pp. 65-67.
    Masamune G. 1936. Short flora of Formosa. The editorial department of Kudoa. pp.279-280.
    Matsumura G & Hayata B. 1906. Enumeratio Plantarum Formosanarum. Journal of college of Science imperial university of Tokyo. 22: 423
    Mckinnon G, Vaillancourt R, Steane D & Potts B. 2008. An AFLP marker approach to lower-level systematics in Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae). American Journal of Botany 95(3): 368-380.
    Moo CT. 1978. Zingiberaceae. In HL. Li et al. (eds.) Flora of Taiwan. Vol. 5 .pp. 831-853. Epoch Publishing Co. Taipei, Taiwan.
    Nielsen L, Cowan R, Siegismund H, Adsersen H, Philipp M & Fay M. 2003. Morphometric, AFLP and plastid microsatellite variation in populations of Scalesia divisa and S. incise (Asteraceae) from the Galapagos Islands. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 143: 243-254.
    Ohwi T. 1965. Flora of Japan. p. 317. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.
    Pace MC & Cameron KM. 2017. The systematics of the Spiranthes cernua species complex (Orchidacese): Untangling the Gordian Knot. Systematic Botany 42(4): 640-669
    Pedersen H. 2010. Species delimitation and recognition in the Brachycorythis helferi complex (Orchidaceae) resolved by multivariate morphometric analysis. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 162: 64-76.
    Pedersen H, Srimuang K & Watthana S. 2016. Strengthening the taxonomic backbone of Thai orchid conservation: genetic fingerprinting and morphometry applied to a species complex in Geodorum. Annals of Botany 118: 125-133
    Piedra-Malagón E, Albarran-Lara AL, Rull J, Pinero D & Sosa V. 2016. Using multiple sources of characters to delimit species in the genus Crataegus (Rosaceae): the case of the Crataegus resei complex. Systematics and Biodiversity 14(2): 244-260
    Retzius AG. 1791. Observations Botanicae sex Fasciculis Comprehensae. Vol. 6 pp. 17-18.
    Roscoe W. 1807. A new arrangement of the plants of the monandrian class usually called Scitamineae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London. 8: 346
    Sasaki S. 1924. The nomenclature change in genus Alpinia. Transactions of the natural history society of Formosa 74: 84-86.
    Sasaki S. 1928 List of plants of Formosa. Natural history society of Formosa pp. 116-118
    Schumann K. 1904. Alpinia. In Engler (ed) Das Pflanzenreich 20: 308-318
    Smith RM. 1990. Aplinia (Zingiberaceae): A proposed new infrageneric classification. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 47: 1-75.
    Turchetto C, Fagundes N & Segatto A. 2014. Diversification in the south American pampas: the genetic and morphological variation of the widespread Petunia axillaris complex (Solanaceae). Molecular Ecology 23: 374-389.
    Walker EH. 1976. Flora of Okinawa and the Southern Ryukyu Islands. p. 327 Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.
    Willdenow CL. 1797. Species Plantarum. Vol. 1 p. 5.
    Yang JJ & Wang JC. 2000. Alpinia. In Huang TC et al. (eds) Flora of Taiwan 2nd . Vol. 5. pp.707-717. Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan. Taipei,Taiwan.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE