研究生: |
楊吉銘 Yang Ji-Ming |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
企業實施團隊教導之研究 The Research of Team Coaching Applied in Business |
指導教授: |
余鑑
Yu, Chien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 89 |
中文關鍵詞: | 團隊 、教導 、團隊教導 |
英文關鍵詞: | team, coaching, team coaching |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:148 下載:22 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在研究企業實施團隊教導之現況及其影響因素。本研究採質化研究中的多重個案研究法,以訪談的方式收集資料。經過訪談資料及文件資料的分析後,得到下列結論:
一、 企業實施團隊教導之現況,包括團隊教導的行為、團隊教導的方式、團隊教導的時機、團隊教導的態度、團隊教導的特性五個面向。
(一) 團隊教導的行為包括建立團隊規則、激發熱忱、師徒相傳、觀察成員行為、協助成員面對及預防問題、引導學習、建立正向的團隊氣氛等。
(二) 團隊教導的方式包括正式型態及非正式型態。
(三) 團隊教導的時機包括成員所面對狀況超出授權範圍、工作結果與目標發生差距、成員工作量不平衡、成員工作過程受到阻礙等。
(四) 團隊教導的態度包括尊重成員、從旁引導成員而非主導。
(五) 團隊教導的特性包括即時性的、觀念培養重於技能訓練。
二、 團隊教導的影響因素包括內部影響因素及外部影響因素。
(一) 內部因素包括團隊成員因素、團隊因素、領導者因素、產業別及團隊性質等。
(二) 外部因素包括外部環境變遷、公司制度。
The purposes of this research were to search the team coaching current conditions applied in business and the factors influencing the performances of team coaching. The research method be used in this research was the multiple-cases of qualitative research, and collecting information by interview. After analyzed the interview content and file information, this research concluded following conclusions:
1. The five dimensions of team-coaching current conditions applied in business as follow: the team coaching behaviors of team leader, the team coaching methods, the timing of team coaching, the attitudes of team coaching and the traits of team coaching.
(1) The team coaching behaviors of team leader included setting up team rules, motivating the team and team members, mentoring, observing the behaviors of team members, assisting team members in facing and solving the problems, guiding team members learning and establishing the great atmosphere of the team.
(2) The team coaching methods included the formal method and the informal method.
(3) The timing of team coaching included the situation is out of member’s authority, the gap between objective and result occurs, the working load was unbalance between members and the member’s work was obstructed.
(4) The attitude of team-coaching included considering member’s mind, assisting member’s work but not ordering.
(5) The traits of team coaching included immediately and emphasizing conception but not skill.
2. The factors influencing the performances of team coaching included the inside influence factor and external influence factor.
(1) The inside factor included the team, members, leaders and the different from the kids of team.
(2) The external factor included the change of external condition and the regulation of the company.
一、中文部分
王文科(2002)。教育研究法。台北:五南。
王青(2004)。團隊就是力量(理論篇)。台北:霍克文化。
文林(譯)(1993)。R. B. Maddux著。建立團隊:合作就是力量。台北:麥田。
古永嘉(1996)。企業研究方法。台北:華泰。
伍大佑(2003)。團隊品質與玩興氣氛對團隊創新之影響。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,未出版,高雄。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬(譯)(2001)。S. P. Robbins著。組織行為學。台北:華泰。
李濟慧(2001)。線上家教網:國中生數學學習社群。國立台灣師範大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
尚榮安(譯)(2001)。P. K. Yin著。個案研究。台北:弘智文化。
胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法與本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
高薰芳、林盈助、王向葵(譯)(2001)。J. A. Maxwell著。質化研究設計─一種互動取向的方法。台北:心理。
陳瑞麟、趙美齡(譯)(2004)。S. L. McShane & M. A. V. Glinow著。組織行為。台北:美商麥格羅‧希爾。
黃敏蕙(2004)。連鎖業店長教導能力(coaching)之研究-以咖啡業為例。台灣師範大學工業科技教育系碩士論文,未出版。
葛迺駿(譯)(2003)。P. L. James著。我懂了!專案管理。台北市:經濟新潮社。
楊紹強(2003)。團隊10項修煉。台北:原動力國際開發。
榮泰生(1998)。組織行為學。台北:五南
潘慧玲(2004)教育研究方法論:觀點與方法。台北:心理。
黎導(譯)(1996)。M. West著。成功的團隊工作。台北:唐山。
齊若蘭(譯)(1995)。D. H. Mackin著。團隊出擊。台北:天下文化。
劉楚慧(2003)。主管新能力-部屬教導能力。就業情報,329,100-101。
二、英文部分
Borkowski, M. (2001). Management Coaching and Mentoring. Canadian Electronics, 16(6), 6.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publication.
Daniel A. F. (2001). The Manager’s Pocket Guide to Workplace coaching. Massachusetts: HRD Press.
Dennis, C. K. (1999). Coaching for commitment: Participant workbook. NY : Jossey-Bass
Evered, R. D., & Selman, J.C. (1989). Coaching and the art of management. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 16-32.
Eden, D. (1985). Team development: A true field experiment at three levels of rigor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 94-100.
Fournies, F. F. (1978). Coaching for improved work performance. NY : Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Frederic, M. H. (1999). The hand book of coaching: A comprehensive resource guide for managers, executives, consultants, and human resource professionals. NY : Jossey-Bass.
Geber, B. (1992). From manager into coach. Training, February, 25-31.
Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30, 269-287.
Haserot, P. W. (2002). Coaching your coaches to boost business development results. Of Counsel, 21(12), 11-13.
John, W. (1996). Coaching for performance. London:Nicholas Brealey.
Komaki, J. L. (1986). Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work. Journal of Applied Psychology. 71, 270-279.
Kinlaw, D. (2000). Encourage superior performance from people and teams through coaching. Women in Business, 52(1), 38-41.
Katzenbach, J. G. & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Ceating the high-performance organization. NY: Happer Collins.
Lucas, R. W. (1994). Coaching skills: A guide for supervisors. NY : McGraw-Hill.
Mears, P., & Voehl, F. (1994). Team bilding: A structured learning approach. Delray Beach: St. Lucie Press.
Parsloe, E., (1995). Coaching, Mentoring, and Assessing, Revised Edition. London, Kogan Page.
Richards, B. (2003). Intelligent coaching: Unleashing human potential. Journal for Quality & Participation, 26(1), 13-16.
Shonk, J. H. (1982). Working in Teams: A practical manual for improving work. NY : AMACOM.
Schein, E. H. (1988). Process consultation, vol. 1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 11-12.
Schwarz, R. (1994). Team facilitation. Englewood cliffs. NJ : Prentice-Hall.
Woodman, R. W., & Sherwood, J. J. (1980). The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review.
Zeus, P., & Skiffington, S. (2003). The coaching at work toolkit: A complete guide to techniques and practices. NY :McGraw-Hill.