中 文 摘 要
本研究旨在探討夫妻依附風格、衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度之間的關係。以台灣北部地區（新竹以北）十所小學的學生家長共299對夫妻為研究對象。本研究採問卷調查法進行資料收集，所使用的工具包括「親密關係體驗量表」、「婚姻因應量表」與「婚姻滿意量表」。調查所得的資料分別以列聯相關、單因子多變項變異數分析、單因子變異數分析、典型相關分析等統計方法進行處理。本研究主要發現如下：
一、夫妻依附風格現況與配對情形
國內夫妻依附風格以安全依附型較多，約佔32.3%，其次為焦慮依附型，佔29.4%。丈夫依附風格與妻子依附風格之間有列聯相關存在，亦即安全依附型傾向與安全依附型配對，焦慮依附型也傾向與焦慮依附型配對，害怕依附型與放棄依附型亦傾向與不安全依附型配對。而夫妻依附風格配對情形，以雙方皆是安全依附型的配對較多，佔17.4%。
二、夫妻在衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度的差異情形
在衝突因應策略方面，丈夫與妻子在衝突因應策略上有顯著差異。其中差異主要來自「爭執」、「自我責備」、「正向回應」、「自我興趣」與「尋求社會支持」，亦即丈夫比妻子更常採取「正向回應」與「自我興趣」因應婚姻衝突，而妻子則比丈夫更常採取「爭執」、「自我責備」與「尋求社會支持」策略。
在婚姻滿意度方面，丈夫與妻子在婚姻滿意度上有顯著差異。其中差異主要來自「心理面滿意」，亦即丈夫在「心理面」的婚姻滿意度高於妻子。
三、不同依附風格夫妻在衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度的差異情形
在衝突因應策略方面，不同依附風格丈夫與妻子在衝突因應策略上均有顯著差異。其中差異主要均來自「爭執」、「自我責備」、「正向回應」、「逃避」，而不同依附風格丈夫在「自我興趣」、「尋求社會支持」亦有顯著差異。
在婚姻滿意度方面，不同依附風格丈夫與妻子在婚姻滿意度均有顯著差異。其中差異主要均來自「生理面滿意」、「經濟面滿意」、「心理面滿意」、「社會面滿意」與「哲學面滿意」。
四、不同依附風格配對夫妻在衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度的差異情形
在衝突因應策略方面，不同依附風格配對之丈夫與妻子在衝突因應策略上均有顯著差異。其中差異主要均來自「爭執」、「自我責備」、「正向回應」與「逃避」。
在婚姻滿意度方面，不同依附風格配對之丈夫與妻子在婚姻滿意度上均有顯著差異。其中差異主要均來自「生理面滿意」、「經濟面滿意」、「心理面滿意」、「社會面滿意」與「哲學面滿意」。
五、夫妻衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度的關係
(一) 丈夫衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度兩組變項之間有三組顯著的關係組型。三組關係組型分別為：
1.愈少採取「爭執」、「自我責備」、「逃避」策略越多，「正向回應」
策略，其「生理面」、「經濟面」、「社會面」、「心理面」與「哲學
面」婚姻滿意度會愈低。
2.愈常採取「爭執」、「自我責備」、「正向回應」、「尋求社會支持」
策略，其「社會面」婚姻滿意度會愈低。
3.愈常採取「爭執」、「尋求社會支持」策略，愈少採取「逃避」策略，
其「生理面婚姻滿意度會愈低。
(二)妻子衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度兩組變項之間有兩組顯著的關係組型。兩組關係組型分別為：
1.愈常採取「爭執」、「自我責備」、「逃避」策略，愈少採取「正向回
應」策略，其「生理面」、「經濟面」、「社會面」、「心理面」與
「哲學面」婚姻滿意度會愈低。
2.愈常採取「爭執」、「自我責備」、「正向回應」策略，其「經濟
面」、「社會面」婚姻滿意度會愈低。
最後，研究者依據本研究結果加以討論，並提出具體建議，以應用在婚姻諮商與兩性教育方面，並作為未來研究之參考。

Attachment Styles, Conflict-Coping Strategies and Marital
Satisfaction in Married Couples
Chia-Ling Lin
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among spouses' attachment styles, conflict-coping strategies, and marital satisfaction. The sample was composed of 299 married couples living in the northern parts of Taiwan and having primary school-age children. Instruments used in this study were ”Experiences in Close Relationship Inventory”, “The Marital Coping Inventory”, and “Marital Satisfaction Inventory”. Data obtained were analyzed by contingency coefficient, One-way MANOVA, ANOVA and Canonical correlation. The major findings were as follows:
1. The relationship between spouse’s attachment styles
The result of contingency coefficient analysis revealed that husbands’ attachment style was significantly associated with wives’ attachment style. Secure participants tended to pair with secure partners and vice versa . The same was applicable to the preoccupied, fearful, as well as dismissing attachments. Among all types of pairing, the pairs of secure husbands and secure wives were most common, claiming a leading percentage of 17.4%.
2. Differences between husbands and wives regarding their
conflict-coping strategy and marital satisfaction
Data analysis indicated significant sex differences for conflict-coping strategy. The differences were evident in forms of conflict, introspective self-blame, positive approach, self-interest and seeking social support. Simply put, husbands reported greater use of positive approach and self-interest than did wives. Moreover, wives reported greater use of conflict, introspective self-blame, and seeking social support than did husbands.
As for marital satisfaction, husbands tended to be more satisfied than their wives for psychological aspects of marriage.
3. Difference among attachment styles regarding the conflict-
coping strategies and marital satisfaction
Results of the one-way MANOVA revealed that husbands and wives with different attachment styles were significantly different on conflict-coping strategies. Major differences lied in conflict, introspective self-blame, positive approach and avoidance. And there were differences on self-interest and seeking social support by husband with different attachment styles.
Results of the one-way MANOVA revealed that husbands and wives with different attachment styles were significantly different on marital satisfaction. Primary variations were of physical, economic, psychological, social, and philosophical aspects of marriage.
4. Differences among attachment styles pairing couples on the
conflict-coping strategies and marital satisfaction
Results of the one-way MANOVA revealed that husbands and wives paired with different attachment styles were significantly different on conflict-coping strategies. Major differences range from conflict, introspective self-blame, positive approach and avoidance.
Results of the one-way MANOVA revealed that husbands and wives paired with different attachment styles were significantly different on marital satisfaction. Primary variations were of physical, economic, psychological, social, and philosophical aspects of marriage.
5. The Relationships between conflict-coping strategy and
marital satisfaction
There are three canonical roots for husbands:
a. Husbands using more conflict, introspective self-blame and
avoidance, less positive approach, enjoy less satisfaction
in their physical, economic, social, psychological, and
philosophical aspects of marriage.
b. Husbands using more conflict, introspective self-blame,
positive approach, and seeking social support enjoy less
satisfaction in their social aspects of marriage.
c. Husbands involving themselves more in conflicts and social
supports and less in avoidance tend to get less physical satisfaction with their spouses.
There are two canonical roots for wives:
a. Wives using more conflict, introspective self-blame and
avoidance, less positive approach, enjoy less satisfaction
in their physical, economic, social, psychological,and
philosophical aspects of marriage.
b. Wives using methods like conflict, introspective self-blame,
and positive approach enjoy less satisfaction in both
economic and social aspects of the marriages.
Lastly, based on the above results, relevant implications were discussed and suggestions for the counseling services as well as future research were presented.

中文部份
王以燕（民80）；我國台灣地區社會環境與家庭結構變遷之探討：自
光復至今。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
王行（民86）:台灣地區已婚男性對夫妻性別角色觀念之研究。東吳社
會工作學報，3期，47-78頁。
王慶福（民84)；大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究。國立彰化師範
大學輔導研究所博士論文。
內政統計通報（民89）：台閩地區八十八年離婚對數與粗離婚率。網
址：http://www.moi.gov.tw/W3/stat。
伊慶村（民80）:台北地區婚姻調適的一些初步研究發現。國家科學委
員會研究彙刊：人文與社會一卷，二期，151-173頁。
行政院主計處（民86）:中華民國八十六年台灣地去國民生活狀況調查。
吳嘉瑜（民85)：衝突原因、處理方式對愛情關係的影響-以焦慮依附
型大學生為例。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
李良哲（民84）:衝突因應行為決定因素歷程模式之驗證研究。行政院
國家委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC 84-2413-H-004-010）
李瑞玲、黃慧貞、林淑梨和王若蘭譯（民88）：脆弱的關係：從玫瑰
戰爭到親密永久的婚姻。台北：張老師出版社。
李銀河（民85）：北京市婚姻質量的調查與分析。現代化專刊，6卷，
25-31頁。
利翠珊（民84）:夫妻互動歷程之探討：以台北地區年輕夫妻為例的一
項初探性研究。本土心理學研究，4期，260-321頁。
林生傳（民79）: 教育社會學。高雄：復文書局。
林秀娟（民88）：南區大學生依附類型與其性知識、性態度、性行為
之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
林松齡（民86）: 台灣中部地區已婚婦女之婚姻品質的決定因素：一
個社會學理論的解釋。台大社會學刊，25期，179-220頁。
邱秀貞（民76）：夫妻溝通與婚姻滿足之研究。私立東海大學社會工
作研究所碩士論文。
邱碧慧（民83)：不同依附類型的成人在人際互動中的歸因差異。私立
中原大學心理研究所碩士論文。
張青惠（民85）：八位離婚女性離婚歷程之分析研究-由依賴婚姻走向
獨立生活。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
曹中瑋（民73）：自我狀態、夫妻溝通型態與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。
國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
莊訓當（民85）:國中已婚教師婚姻滿意度相關因素及其調適之研究。
國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
劉惠琴（民85）:女性主義觀點看夫妻衝突與影響歷程。「健康的婚姻
觀」研討會，17-53頁。
陳明君（民80）:家庭決策、夫妻溝通之自我開放程度與婚姻滿意度之
相關研究。私立文化大學家政研究所碩士論文。
陳明穗（民74）：家庭型態、夫妻知覺一致性與婚姻滿足之關係研究。
國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
陳志賢（民87）：婚姻信念、婚姻溝通與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。國
立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
單小琳（民79）:教師的社會支持及其相關因素之探討。台北市立師範
學院學報，21期，123-154頁。
曾文志（民85）：成年早期婚姻親密量表之編製及影響婚姻親密之因
素探討。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
黃于娟（民83)：性別、依附風格與自我坦露、幽默、撒嬌之關係。國
立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
黃鈴喬（民87）：不同依附風格夫妻之關係期望、婚姻溝通與婚姻調
適之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
黃慧鶯譯（民84）: 攜手造就愛情。台北：遠流出版社。
楊雅惠（民84)：婚姻衝突現象與因應歷程之研究。國立台灣師範大學
教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
劉瓊瑛、黃漢耀、魯宓和馬英譯（民89）:回家：結構派大師說家族治
療的故事。台北：張老師出版社。
樊雪梅譯（民88）：親密陌生人：婚姻治療。台北：五南出版社。
鄭居安（民84）：成人依附量表之編制。私立高雄醫學院行為科學研
究所碩士論文。
謝秀芬（民86）:現代婦女的家庭價值觀與家庭期待之研究。東吳社會
工作學報，3期，1-46頁。
謝銀沙（民81）: 已婚婦女個人特質、婚姻溝通與婚姻調適相關研究。
國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡秀玲（民86）:大學男女學生依附關係、個體化與適應之相關研究。
國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
蘇建文（民82）：幼兒與母親間依附關係與其學校社會能力表現之研
究。花師幼兒教育學報，2期，263-292頁。
蘇建文、丁心平、許錦雲(民79)：陌生情境中嬰兒行為及其依附類型
研究初探。師大教育心理學報，23期，49-70頁。
龔美娟（民83）：母親的依附經驗與其教養方式及子女安全依附之研
究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
英文部份
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachment beyond infancy,
American Psychologist, 44(4), 709-716.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall,S.
(1978).Patterns of attachment. A psychological study of the
Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum.
Bahr, S. J. (1989). Family interactuon. New York：Macmillan
publishing. Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy：
An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships, 7, 147-178.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles
among young adults: A test of four-category model. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
Bartholomew, K., & Shaver, R. S. (1998). Methods of assessing
adult attachment: Do they converge? In J. A. Simpson & W.
S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationship.
New York: Guildford.
Berman, W. H., Marcus L., & Berman E. R. (1994). Attachment in
marital relations. In M. B. Sperling & W. H. Berman(Eds.),
Attachment in Adults(pp. 204-231). New York: Guilford.
Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In H. H. kelley, E. Berscheid,
A.Christensen, J. Harvey, T. Huston, G. Levinger, E.
McClintock, L. A. Pelau & D. Peterson (Eds.), Close
Relationships(pp. 110-168). San Francisco: Freeman.
Billings, Andrew, G., & Moos, R. H. (1981). The role of coping
responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of
life events. Journal of behavioral Medicine, 4, 139-157.
Blake, R. L., & Vandiver, T. A. (1988). The association of
healrh with stressful life change, social supports, and
coping. Family Practice Research Journal, 7(4), 205-217.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss：Vol. 1. Attachment. New
York：Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss：Vol. 2. Seperation:
Anxiety and anger. New York：Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and Breaking of Affectional
Bonds. London: Tavistock.
Bowman, M. L. (1990). Coping efforts and marital satisfaction:
Measuring marital coping and its correlates. Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 52, 463-474.
Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. O. (1990). Attributions in
marriage：review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 3-
33.
Brennan, K. A., Clark C. L. & Shaver, P. R.(1998). Self-report
measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview.
In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes(Eds.), Attachment theory
and close relationship. New York: Guildford.
Brennan, K. A., & Shaver P. R. (1990). Dimensions of adult
attachment and the dynamics of romatic relationships. State
University of New York, Buffalo, New York.
Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and
prospect. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 50, 3-35.
Bretherton, I. , & Waters, E. (1985). Growing points of
Attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society
for Research in Child Development, 50, 1-2.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. & Weintraub, J. K. (1989).
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based
approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,
267-283.
Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social
structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital
conflict. Journal of personality and Social Psychology,
59,1,73-81.
Christensen, A., & Pasch, L. (1993). The sequence of marital
conflict：An analysis of seven phases of marital conflict
in distressed and nondistressed couples. Clinical
Psychology Review, 13(1), 3-14.
Christensen, A., & Shemk, J. L. (1991). Communication,
conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed,
clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Counsulting and
Clinical Psychology, 59, 3, 458-463.
Cohen, C. E. (1981). Person categories and social perception:
Testing some boundaries of the processing effects of prior
knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
40, 441-452.
Cohn, D. A., Sliver, D. H., Cowan, C. P., Cowman, P. A., &
Pearson, J. (1992). Working models of childhood attachment
and couple relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 432-
449.
Coleman, J. C. (1988). Intimate relationships, marriage, and
family(2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan publishing.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working
models, and relationship quality in dating couples.
Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representation
of adult attachment：The structure and function of working
model. In K. Batholomew & D. Perlman(Eds.), Attachment
processes in adulthood(pp. 53-59). London：Jessica
Kingsley.
Creath, M. K. (1994). The relationship of attachment styles to
working models and behaviors in marriage. The University
North Texas. Deutsch, H. (1973). Conflicts：productive and
destructive. In Jandt, F. E. (Eds.), Conflict resolution
through communication. New York：Harper & Row, Publishers.
Egeland, B. & Farber, E. (1984). Infant-mother attachment :
Factors related to its development and change over time.
Child Development, 55, 753-771.
Ender, N. S. & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional
assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844-854.
Ewing, K. J.(1994). The Role of Adult Rimantic Attachment in
Marital Communication. Wilfrid Laurier University,
Dissertation Abstracts, AAC MM 95839.
Feeney, J. A. (1994). Attachment styles, communication
patterns, and satisfaction across the life cycle of
marriage. Personal Relationships, 2,143-159.
Feeney, J, A. (1999). Adult romatic attachment and couple
relationships, In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver(Eds.), Handbook
of attachment(pp. 355-377). New York: Guilford.
Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment styles as a
predictor of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 58, 281-291.
Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Callan, V. J. (1994). Attachment
style, communication and satisfaction in the early years of
marriage. In K. Batholomew & D. Perlman(Eds.), Attachment
processes in adulthood(pp. 269-308). London：Jessica
Kingsley.
Finkel, J. S., & Hansen, F. J. (1992). Correlates of
restrospective marital satisfaction in long-lived marriage:
A social constructivist perspectives. Family Therapy, 19, 1-
16.
Fiske, S. T. & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus
piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-
triggered affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins
(Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations
of Social Behavior(pp. 167-203). New York: Guilford Press.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be
a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages
of college examination. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 48(1). 150-170.
Fowers, B. J. (1991). His and her marriage: A multivariate
study of gender and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 24,
209-221.
Gelles, R. J. (1995). Contemporary families: a sociological
view. London:Stage Publications.
George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). The Berkeley Adult
Attachment Interview. Unpublished protocol, University of
California, Berkeley.
Glick, B. & Gross, S. (1975). Marital Interaction and Marital
conflict: A critical evaluation of current research
strategies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37, 505-512.
Gick, B. & Gross, S. (1975). Marital interaction and marital
conflict: A critical evaluation of current research
strategies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37, 505-512.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory
and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Glenn, N. D. (1990). Quantitative research on marital quality
in the 1980s: A critical review. Journal of Marriage and
the Family, 52, 832-843.
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1988). The social
psychophysiology of Marriage. In P. Noller & M. A.
Fitzpatrick(Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction(pp.
182-202). Clevedon, Avon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of
measurement: The case of adult attachment. In K.
Bartholomew & D. Perlman(Eds.), Attachment processes in
adulthood. (pp. 17-52). London：Jessica Kingsley.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized
as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 52, 511-524.
Hinchliffe, M. (1991). Working with couples in crisis. In D.
Hoper & W. Dryden(Eds.), Couple therapy：A handbook . Open
University Press. Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot,W. W. (1991).
Interpersonal conflict (3rd ed.). Wm.C.Brown Punblishers.
Holmes, J. (1993). John Bowlby and Attachment Theory. New York/
London：Guilford press.
Jacobson, N. S. (1983). Beyond empiricism: The politivs of
marital therapy. American Journal of Family therapy, 11, 11-
24.
Jacobson, N. S. (1989). The politics of intimacy. Behavior
Therapist, 12, 29-32.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, F. P. (1987). Joining together.
Prentice Hall, Inc.
Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Wullivan, K.
T. (1994). The role of negative affectivity in the
association between attributions and marital satisfaction.
Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 66, 413-424.
Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N. Fincham, F. D., & Sullivan, K.
T. (1994). The Role of negative affectivity in the
association between attributions and Marital satisfaction.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 413-424.
Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures
and processes. Hillsdale, New York: Erlbaum.
Killmann, R., & Thomas, K. (1975). Interpersonal conflict：
Handing behavior as reflections of Jungian personality
dinensions. Psychological Reports, 37, 971-980.
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style,
gender, and relationship stability: A logitudinal analysis.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 502-512.
Kobak, R. R., & Duemmler, S. (1994). Attachment and
conversation : Toward a discourse analysis of adolrscent
and adult security. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman(Eds.),
Attachment processes in adulthood. (pp. 121-149). London：
Jessica Kingsley.
Kobak, R. R., & Hazan, C. (1991). Attachment in marriage：
Effects of security and accuracy of working models. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 861-869.
Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late
adolescent : working models, affect regulation, and
representation of self and others. Child Development, 59,
135-146.
Komarovsky, M. (1976). Dilemmas of masculinity. New York:
Norton. Kotler, T. & Omodei, M. (1988). Attachment and
emotional health: a life Span approach. Human Relations,
41, 619-640.
Koren, P., & Carlton, K. (1980). Marital conflict：relations
among behaviors outcomes, and distress. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical psychology, 48(4), 460-468.
Kurduk, L. A. (1995). Predicting changes in martial
satisfaction from husbands’ and wives’ conflict
resolution styles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57,
153-164.
Latty-Mann H., & Davis K. E. (1996). Attachment theoy and
partner choice: Preference and actuality. Journal of Social
and Personal Relationships, 13(1), 5-23.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and
coping. New York: Springer.
Lee, L. J. (1995). Age and sex differences in marital coping
behavior. The Journal of National Chengchi University, 70,
117-134.
Levy, M. B., & Davis, K. E. (1988). Love styles and attachment
styles compares：Their relations to each other and to
various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and
Personal Relationships, 5, 439-471.
Lloyd, S. (1990). Conflict types and strategies in violent
marriages. Journal of Family Violence, 5(4), 269-284.
Lussier, Y., & Sabourin S., & Turgeon C. (1997). Coping
strategies as Moderators of the relationship between
attachment and marital adjustment. Journal of Social
Personal Relationship, 14(6), 777-791.
Mack, R. M., & Snyder, R. C. (1973). The analysis of social
conflict toward an overview and and synthesis. In F.E. Jandt
(Eds.), Conflict Resolution through Communication. New
York：Harper & Row, Publishers.
Main, M. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive
monitoring, and singular(coherent) vs. multiple(incoherent)
model of attachment. In C. M. Paker, J. Stevenson-Hinde &
P. Marris(Eds.), Attachment Across the Life Cycle(pp. 127-
159). London: Tavisrock/ Routledge.
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in
infancy, childhood, and adulthood：A move to the level of
representation. In I. Brtherton & E. Waters(Eds.), Growing
points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the
Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66-106.
Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information
about self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
35, 63-78.
Marcus, L. (1997). The relationship of adult attachment style,
communication, and relationship satisfaction. Fordham
University. DAO No. AAC 9730100.
Margolin, G., & Wampold, B. E. (1981). Seguential analysis of
conflict and accord in ditressed and nondistressed marital
partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
49, 554-567.
McCrae, R. R. (1982). Age differences in the use of coping
mechanisms. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 454-460.
Menagham, E. (1982). Measuring coping effectiveness: A Panel
analysis of marital problems and copping efforts. Journal
of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 220-234.
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Tolmacz, R. (1990). Attachment
styles and fear of personal death: A case study of affect
regulation. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 58
(2), 273-280.
Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1995). Apprasial of and coping
with a real-life stressful situation: The contribution of
attachment style, Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 21, 406-414.
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., Weller, A. (1993). Attachment
style, coping strategies, and posttraumatic psychological
distress: The impact of the Gulf War in Israel, Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 817-826.
Nording, W. J. (1992). The relationship of attachment styles to
conflict resolution, quality of communication, and
satisfaction in intimate dyadic relationships. The
University of Maryland College. DAO No. AAC 9315707.
Notarius, C. L., & Johnson, J. S. (1982). Emotional expression
in husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family,
44, 483-489.
Notarius, C. L., & Pellearini, D. S. (1987). Differences
between Husbands and Wives：Implications for understanding
marital discord. In K. Hahlweg & M.J. Goldstein(Eds.),
Understanding major mental disorder：The contribution of
Family interaction research.
Norton, R. (1983). The family life cycle: empirical or
conceptual tool? Journal of marriage and the Family, 41, 15-
26.
Ognibene, T. C. & Collins, N. C. (1998). Adult attchment
styles, perceived social support and coping strategies.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(3), 323-
345.
Olson, D. H., & McCubbin, H. I. (1983). Families. California:
Sage Publications. Inc.
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping.
Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21.
Pervin, L. A. (1993). Personality theory and research. New
York: John Wiley & Sons.
Peterson, D. R. (1979). Assessing interspersonal relationships
by means of interaction records. Behaviorial Assessment, 1,
221-236.
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Carnelley, K. B. (1994). Gender and
working models of attachment：Consequences for perception
of self and romantic relationships. Personality
Relationships, 1, 3-26.
Pistole, M. C. (1989). Attachment in adult romantic
relationship: Style of conflict resolution and
satisfaction. Journal of Social and personal relationships,
6, 505-510.
Pollina, L. K. & Snell, W. E., Jr. (1999). Coping in untimate
relationships: Development of the multidimensional intimate
coping questionnaire. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships, 16(1), 133-144.
Powell, T. (1995). Dysfunctional marital beliefs and marital
satisfaction: A multicultural analysis. Ball state
University.
Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling
interpersonal conflict. Academy of Measurement Journal, 26
(2), 44-53.
Rands, M., Levinger, G., & Mellinger, G. (1981). Patterns of
conflict Resolution and marital satisfaction. Journal of
Family Issues, 2(3), 297-321.
Raush, H. L., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., & Swain, M. E.
(1974). Communication, conflict and marriage. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rhyne, D. (1981). Bases of marital satisfaction among men and
women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 73, 941-955.
Roach, A. J., Frazier, L. P., & Bowden, S. R. (1981). The
marital satisfaction scale: develpoment of a measure for
intervention research. Journal of Marriage and the Family,
43, 537-546.
Rubin, L. B. (1983). Intimate stranger: Men and Women together.
New York: Harper & Row.
Russell, M. R. (1996). Specific and generalized expectacies,
individual, and marital satisfaction:An initial
investigation. The University of Tulsa. DAO No. AAC 9702122.
Schaap, C., Bunnk, B., & Kerkstra, A. (1988). Marital conflict
resolution. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick(Eds.),
Perspectives on marital interaction. Clevedon, Avon,
England: Multilingual Matters.
Scharfe, E. & Bartholomew, K. (1995). Accommodation and
attachment representations in young couples. Journal of
Social Personality Relationships, 12(3), 389-401.
Scroufe, L. A. & Waters, E. (1977). Attachment as an
organizational perspective. Child Development, 48, 1184-
1199.
Senchak, M. & Leonard, K. E. (1992). Attachment styles and
marital adjustment among newlyed couples. Journal of Social
and Personal Relationships, 9, 51-64.
Shaver, P. R. (1986). Being lonely falling in love：
Perspectives from attachment theory. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 272835).
Shek, D. T., & Tsang, S. K. (1993). The Chinese version of
Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: Some psychometric and
normative data. Social Behavior and Personality, 21, 205-
214.
Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on
romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 59, 971-980.
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (1994). Stress and secure base
relationships. In adultthood. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman
(Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 181-204).
London：Jessica Kingsley.
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S. & Nelligan, J. S. (1992). Support
seeking and support giving within couples in anxiety-
provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434-446.
Simpson, J. A., Rholes,W. S. & Philips D. (1996). Conflict in
close relationships：An attachment perspectives. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899-914.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales
for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
Sroufe, L. A., & Waters, E. (1977). Attachment as an
organizational construct. Child Development, 48, 1184-1199.
Srull, T. K. & Wyer, R. S. Jr. (1989). Person memory and
judgement. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
Stinnett, N., Walters, J., & Stinnett, N. (1991). Relationships
in marriage and the family(3rd.). New York：Macmillan
Publishing.
Stone, A. A., & Neale, J. M. (1984). New measure of daily
coping: Development and preliminary results. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 892-906.
Terry, D. J. (1991). Coping resources and situational apprasial
as predictors of coping behavior. Personality and
individual differences, 12(10), 1031-1047.
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann R. H. (1974). Comparison of four
instruments measuring conflict behavior. Psychological
Reports, 42, 1128-1142.
Thomson, E., & Colella, U. (1992). Cohabitation and marital
stability: Quality or commitment. Journal of Marriage and
the Family, 54, 259-267.
Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L.
Berkowitz(Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
(pp. 289-338) New York: Academic Press.
Vaughn, B., Egeland, B., Sroufe, L. A. & Waters, E. (1979).
Individual differences in infant-mother attachment at
twelve and eighteen months: Stability and change in
families under stress. Child Development, 50, 971-975.
Verderber, R. F., & Vederber, K. S. (1989). Inter-act using
interpersonal communication skills(5th Ed.), California :
Wadsworth Publishing.
Whiffen, V. E. & Gotlib, I. H. (1989). Stress and coping in
maritally distressed and nondistressed couples. Journal of
Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 327-344.
White, S., & Hatcher, C. (1984). Couple complementarityand
similarity: A review of the literature. The American
Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 15-25.
White, M. B., Stahamann, R. F., & Furrow, J. L. (1994). Shoter
may be better: A comparison of the Kansas Marital
Satisfaction Scale and the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment
Test. Family Psespective, 28(1), 53-66.