本研究旨在以才能發展的典範取向，探討一位語文能力優異學生成長背景、才能發展的現況、影響其才能發展的因素，以及才能發展的歷程，研究者以個案研究法蒐集相關資料，分析其才能發展的各個階段，期望能夠提供教育工作者在資優教育中的參考。研究結果顯示：
一、以Gagné的DMGT模式理論為視框來闡釋個案的才能發展，可以發現家庭支持和學校教育在其才能啟動和開展中扮演了關鍵角色，尤其是母親的持續支持和教師的專業指導。在學校課程設計和教學內容的引導下，個案的語文才能得到了充分的發揮和進一步的發展。
二、研究者以標準化測驗工具，搭配自行整理的語文資優才能發展評量指標評估個案語文才能發展的現況，標準化測驗成果顯示了個案語文上的天賦潛能，而評量指標的結果則顯示個案在語文能力、作品中的高層次思考及個人內在特質的表現上，大多落在「能力試探與識別」及「專業素養的培育」二個層次內。
三、以Subotnik等人所整理的才能發展進程，可看出個案才能發展的歷程有朝向更高層次階段發展的趨勢，但在小學階段僅能觀察個案從潛能天賦的識別發展到素養的階段。
四、在才能發展過程中，個案受到了家庭、學校及個人內在特質的多方面支持，其中學校的主題式課程提供了其早期接觸語文發展的舞臺，並且提供機會讓他將能力進一步的整合應用。
本研究呈現了語文資優生在才能發展過程中的具體經歷，期能為教育工作者提供實踐參考，有意識地支持學生才能發展。

This study aims to explore the growth background, current status of talent development, influencing factors, and developmental trajectory of a linguistically gifted student from the perspective of the talent development paradigm. The researcher collected relevant data through a case study method and analyzed the various stages of the student's talent development. The research results indicate the following:
1. The case's talent development process aligns with Gagné's DMGT theory. Family support and school education played critical roles in initiating and developing the student's talents, particularly the continuous support from the mother and the professional guidance from teachers.
2. The researcher utilized standardized testing tools along with a assessment rubric for evaluating the talented development of the case. The standardized test results demonstrated the individual's inherent linguistic potential, while the assessment rubric indicated that the individual's performance in language abilities, higher-order thinking in their works, and personal intrinsic characteristics predominantly fell within the "ability exploration and identification" and "cultivation of professional competence" levels.
3. The developmental trajectory of the student's talent shows a trend toward higher levels, but at the elementary stage, it is only possible to observe the progression from potential and gifted identification to the competence stage.
4. Throughout the talent development process, the case received multifaceted support from family, school, and personal intrinsic characteristics. The school's thematic curriculum provided an early platform for engaging with language development and offered opportunities for further integration and application of the individual's abilities.
This study presents the specific experiences of a linguistically gifted student in the talent development process, aiming to provide practical references for educators to consciously support students' talent development.

王文科、王智弘（2010）：質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報，17，29-50。
王雅奇（2014）：表達性藝術暨才能發展課程對自閉症繪畫能力優異青年社會互動與焦慮行為之影響﹝未出版之博士論文﹞。國立臺灣師範大學。
任恩儀（2005）：參與「學前資優幼兒多元智能與問題解決方案」幼兒語文特質之研究﹝未出版之碩士論文﹞。國立灣師範大學。
何佩蓉（2020）：追夢的勇氣─不一樣又如何聽覺障礙者之生涯歷程與才能發展及其成功經驗﹝未出版之碩士論文﹞。國立臺灣師範大學。
何金針（2004）：教育研究的效度問題探討。社會科學學報，12，47-82。
吳巧雯、顏瓊雯、潘裕豐（2021）：國中語文資優生對雙語教育接受度與教學關係之研究。中等教育，72(1)，82-99.
呂金燮、侯貞伊、陳偉仁（2016）：資優教育的在地轉化：一個課外方案的實踐與省思。資優教育論壇，14，1-26。
呂金燮、張琇儀、劉亞汶（2022）：未有資優生以前：地方模式偏鄉校本資優方案之行動研究。特殊教育研究學刊，47（2），65-94。
李家兆（2022）：社經地位不利優秀學生才能發展軌跡之研究﹝未出版之博士論文﹞。國立臺灣師範大學。
周慶祥、方怡文（ 2007）：新聞採訪寫作（增訂版）。風雲論壇。
施雅碧（2021）：幸福感－區分性才能發展模式之另一個催化因子。資優教育論壇，19（1），79-92。
洪詠善、林佳慧、楊惠娥（2019）：十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊，15，20-28。
胡幼慧（1996）：焦點團體法。載於胡幼慧（主編），質性研究—理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（223-238 頁）。巨流。
胡幼慧、姚美華（1996）：一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何收集資料、登錄與分析？載於胡幼慧（主編），質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（頁141-15）。巨流。
特殊教育學生及幼兒鑑定辦法（2024年4月29日）修正。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080065
教育部（2014）：十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。教育部。
郭靜姿（2014）：開發社會資本：輕度自閉症青年的才能發展與支持系統建立。資優教育季刊，132，1-11。
郭靜姿、陳彥瑋、王曼娜、陳心怡（2023）：國小身心障礙及社經文化地位不利資優學生鑑定評量項目調整之研究：WISC-V 調整性指數之運用。特殊教育研究學刊，48(2)，37-76。
陳思妤（2021）：以成功智能的觀點探究聽覺障礙人士之才能發展歷程﹝未出版之碩士論文﹞。國立臺北教育大學。
陳昭蓉（2015）：傑出合唱團團員音樂才能發展歷程及相關因素之個案研究﹝未出版之碩士論文﹞。國立臺灣師範大學。
陳聖明、王心怡、黃靜雯（2013）：從文化資本及能力取向探討社經文化殊異資優生之教育機會均等議題。資優教育季刊，126，33-40。
曾琦芬（2014）：語文資優之高中英文課程設計。中等教育，67(1)，56-73。
曾煥淦（2020）：臺灣實驗學校校長轉化型課程領導之個案研究﹝未出版博士論文﹞。國立清華大學。
鈕文英（2020）：質性研究方法與論文寫作（第3版）。雙葉書廊。
黃楷茹（2018a）：學校本位才能發展方案之建構與實踐﹝未出版之博士論文﹞。國立臺灣師範大學。
黃楷茹（2018b）：才能發展取向的學生才能檔案建構。資優教育季刊，146，13-24。
蔡崇建（1989）：您的孩子資優嗎？時報。
戴耘（2015）：二十一世紀英才教育的十大趨勢：兼談亞洲的機遇與挑戰。資優教育論壇，13，1-16。
Bailey, J. M. (1996). Literacy development in verbally talented children. In J. D. Van Tassel-Baska, D. T. Johnson, & L. N. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talent: Ideas and strategies for teachers of elementary and middle school students (pp. 97-114). Allyn & Bacon.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Open Court.
Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Sage.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. Ballantine.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Callahan, C., Cooper, C., & Glascock, R. (2003). Preparing teachers to develop and enhance talent: The position of national education organizations. (ERIC Document Services No. ED477882.
Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted : developing the potential of children at home and at school. McMillan
Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted.（4rd ed.). Macmillan.
Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and at home (8th ed.). Pearson.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), pp. 93–94.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins Publishers.
Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. Teachers College Press.
Dai, D. Y. (2011). Hopeless anarchy or saving pluralism? Reflections on our field in response to Ambrose, VanTassel-Baska, Coleman, and Cross. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 705-730.
Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 151-168.https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the talented and talented (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K. & Treffinger, D.(1991). Bringing out the giftedness in your children. John Wiley& Sons.
Ericsson, A. K., Roring, R. W., & Nandagopal, K. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: an account based on the expert performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130701350593
Fox, L. H., & Durden, W. G. (1982). Education verbally gifted youth . Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103-112.
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory1 . High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682
Gagné, F. (2005). From noncompetence to exceptional talent: Exploring the range of academic achievement within and between grade levels. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 139-153.https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900204
Gagné, F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane, & T. Stambaugh, (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp.61-80). Prufrock Press.
Gagné, F. (2011). Academic talent development and the equity issue in gifted education. Talent Development and Excellence, 3, 3-22.
Gallagher, J. J., & Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences, The theory into practice. Basic Books.
Glaser, B. G. (2016). Open coding escriptions. Grounded Theory Review, 15, 108-110.　　https://reurl.cc/ymdxKO
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
Jackson, N. E. (1988). Precocious reading ability: What does it mean? Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 200-204.
Karolyi, C.V., Ramos-ford, V.,& Gardner,H. (2002). Multiple intelligence: A perspective on education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education ( 3rd ed.)( pp. 100-112 ). Allyn and Bacon.
Lewis, G. (1995). Bringing up your gifted child. Angus & Robertson.
Leyden, S. (2002). Supporting the child of exceptional ability. ( 3rd ed.). David Fulton Publishers.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137-150.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
Nikolova, O., & Taylor, G. (2003). The impact of a language learning task on instructional outcomes in two student populations” high-ability and average-ability. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(4), 205-217.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. P., & Thomson, D. T. (2015). Talent development as a framework for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 38(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514556531
Passow, A. H. (1996). Talent identification and development in the language arts. In J. Van Tassel-Baska, D.T. Johnson, & L. N. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talent. Allyn & Bbacon.
Pendarvis, E.D., Howley, A.A, & Howley, C.B. (1990). The abilities of gifted children. Prentice Hall.
Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults:Their development and education( 2rd ed.). Macmillan.
Plomin, R. (2018). Blueprint: How DNA makes us who we are. Penguin Random House.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10144
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184, 261.
Rossman, G.B., & Wilson, B.L. (1994). Numbers and words revisited: Being "shamelessly eclectic." Quality and Quantity, 28, 315-327.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Schroth, S. T., Collins, C. L., & Treffinger, D. J. (2011). Talent development: From theoretical conceptions to practical applications. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.), Handbook of counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 39-52). Prufrock Press Inc.
Smith, L. (1978). An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies. In L. Shulman (Ed.), Review of researching education (pp. 316377). F. E. Peacock.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14, 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163807
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.（1997）。質性研究概論（徐宗國譯）。 巨流。（原著出版於1990）
Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond Expertise: Conceptions of Giftedness as Great Performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 343–357). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.020
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R.J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52). Cambridge University Press.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45–59). Allyn & Bacon.
Terman, L. M. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium--II. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0064940
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. University of Chicago Press.
Treffinger, D. (1988). Components of Creativity: Another Look. Creative Learning, 2, 1-4.
Tseng, C. C. (2008). Establishment of principles for English talented curriculum development and their transformation into criteria for English talented program evaluation in senior high school in Taiwan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Taiwan Normal University.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). Excellence in educating gifted & talented learners. Love publishing Company.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2022). Introduction to the talent development handbook. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Talent development in gifted education: theory, research, and practice (pp. 3-25). Routledge.
VanTassel-Baska, J.(1996). Creating a new language arts curriculum for high-ability learners. In J. VanTassel-Baska D. T. Johnson, & L. N. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talent: Ideas and strategies for teachers of elementary and middle school students(pp. 193-217). Allyn and Bacon.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Feldhusen, J.(1994). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Allyn and Bacon.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Williams, M. (2003). The importance of metacognition in the literacy development of young gifted and talented children. Gifted Education International, 17, 249-258.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (Rev. ed.). Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.