值此電子化時代，利用網站獲取資訊，已經是現代人經常從事的行為，圖書館網站更是提供多元資訊、資源服務的管道，如何讓使用者能方便、有效率地從圖書館網站中取用所需之資訊，使圖書館網站收藏的資訊發揮應有價值，是網站設計者必須深思的問題。而一個網站中，標籤系統是網站與使用者溝通的重要橋樑，標籤設計之良窳，將會影響使用者是否能有效且準確的獲得資訊。因此本研究希望利用索引典中顯現各相關詞彙、促進標引一致性與協助檢索目標內容之特性，建立更符合使用者需求的圖書館網站標籤系統。
本研究可分為五個階段：透過1.網站內容分析與2.標籤討論將臺師大圖書館網站標籤歸納命名，再利用索引典特性3.建立網站標籤索引典，並將產生的原始網站標籤（A標籤組）、使用者命名替換之標籤（B標籤組）與符合索引典特性之標籤進行（C標籤組）4.卡片分類，以建構三種不同網站架構，最後進行5.尋獲度測試，比較三者之差異。
研究結果顯示，結合索引典特性之標籤系統可透過各種關係詞彙的輔助，加深使用者對圖書館網站標籤的理解，同時也能提升使用者進行卡片分類時的信心，將卡片分類至受試者認為最適合的位置；另外，結合索引典特性之標籤而建立的網站架構，在網站尋獲度上確實優於原圖書館標籤或使用者替換過之標籤所建立的網站架構。因此，本研究結合索引典特性之標籤而建構出的網站架構，較符合使用者在瀏覽圖書館網站上的需求，可以讓使用者更有效率地取得所需資訊。

In the digital age, people use websites to access information frequently. How to make users access the required information from the websites conveniently and efficiently to bring the values of them, website designers must seriously take the problem into consideration. Labeling systems are the important channels to converse with the users in a website. The design of labels will affect whether users can require the accurate information efficiently. This study proposes to construct a better library website labeling system based on the concept of thesaurus.
This study has five main steps. First, analyzing the contents of library website and picking out the labels. In second step, the participants will discuss the website labels selected from first step and rename the labels if the labels are not easy to understand. Then the researcher will collect all these original library labels (A labels group) and the renamed labels (B labels group) together to construct a library label thesaurus in the third step. After working out the library label thesaurus, there will have the third kind of labels which is generated by combining the original library labels and the characteristic of thesaurus (C labels group). Card sorting test is applied in the fourth step, using three different labels group to construct three new website structures. Finally, we use the evaluation of findability of website to compare the differences of three websites structures to verify their effectiveness. The study shown that the labels with the characteristic of thesaurus (C labels group) show the relationship terms of the original website labels, which can help the users get more understanding to the labels and have more confidence when they conducted card sorting tests. The evaluation of findability also verified that the website structure built after the card sorting test with the labels which have the characteristic of thesaurus is better than other two website structures. That is, the website structure built after the card sorting test with the labels which have the characteristic of thesaurus is more accord with the users’ requirements.

英文部分
Ahlstrom, V., & Allendoerfer, K. (2004). Information organization for a portal using a card-sorting technique. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://hf.tc.faa.gov/technotes/dot-faa-ct-tn04-31.pdf
American National Standards Institute. (2005). Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.niso.org/kst/reports/standards/kfile_download?id:ustring:iso-8859-1=Z39-19-2005.pdf&pt=RkGKiXzW643YeUaYUqZ1BFwDhIG4-24RJbcZBWg8uE4vWdpZsJDs4RjLz0t90_d5_ymGsj_IKVaGZww13HuDlYn5U74YdfA-3TffjxYQ25QrtR8PONuJLqxvo-l0NIr5
Boulton, M. (2007). Card sorting. Part 1. In Spencer, D., & Garrett, J. J. (Eds.). Card sorting: designing usable categories. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld.
Brooke, J. (1996). Sus: A quick and dirty usability scale. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://hell.meiert.org/core/pdf/sus.pdf
Campbell, N. (2001). Usability assessment of library-related web sites methods and case study. Chicago, IL: LITA
Courage, C., & Baxter, K. (2004). Understanding your users: A practical guide to user requirements methods, tools, and techniques. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Deaton, M. (2002). Sorting techniques for user-centered information design. Retrieved January 10, 2011, from http://www.mmdeaton.com/SortingTechniquesforInformationDesign.pdf
Dickstein, R., & Mills, V. (2000). Usability testing at the university of arizona library: How to let users in on the design. Information technology and libraries, 19(3), 144-150.
Dixon, K., & Lowcay, B (2007). Creating a great website. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.phcris.org.au/phplib/filedownload.php?file=/elib/lib/downloaded_files/publications/pdfs/phcris_pub_1214.pdf
Falks, A., & Hyland, N. (2000). Gaining user Insight: A case study illustrating the
- 58 -
card sort technique. College & Research Libraries, 61(4), 349-357.
Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2005). Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems, 22(3), 89-93.
Fox, R. (2008). Weaving the digital library web. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(1), 8-17.
Genius, S. K. (2004). Web site usability testing: a critical tool for libraries. Feliciter, 50(4), 161-164.
Hahsler, M., & Simon, B. (2001). User-centered navigation re-design for web-based information systems. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/usr/wi/bsimon/publikationen/navigation_re-design_amcis.pdf
Hawley, M. (2008). Extending card-sorting techniques to inform the design of web site hierarchies. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000332.php
Hinkle, V. (2008). Card-sorting: What you need to know about analyzing and interpreting card sorting results. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/102/cardsort.asp.
Kalbach, J. (2007). Designing Web Navigation. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly
Kaufman, J. (2006). Card sorting: An inexpensive and practical usability technique. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.stc.org/intercom/PDFs/2006/200611_17-19.pdf
Leise, F. (2007). Content Analysis Heuristics. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-analysis
Maurer, D., & Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: A definitive guide. Boxes and Arrows, April. http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide.php
Martin, S., & Kidwell, D. K. (2001). A case study in cluster analysis for intranet organization. 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Management for Applied Technology, 57-64.
Mcgaw, J. (2009). Search Engine Optimization. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/k5x797x36222m808/fulltext.pdf
McGills, L., & Toms, E. G. (2001). Usability of the academic library web site:
- 59 -
Implications for design. College & Research Libraries, 62, 355-367.
Mi, J., & Weng, C. (2008). Revitalizing the library OPAC: Interface, searching, and display challenge. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(1), 5-22.
Morville, P. (2005). Ambient findability: Libraries at the crossroads of ubiquitous computing and the internet. Online, 29(6), 16-21.
Motive. (2004). The Motive Web Design Glossary. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.motive.co.nz/glossary/label.php
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, MA: Academic.
Nielsen, J. (2004). Card sorting: how many users to test. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040719.html
Nielsen, J. (2009). Card Sorting: Pushing Users Beyond Terminology Matches. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/word-matching.html
Nielsen, J., & Sano, D. (1994). 1994 design of SunWeb - Sun Microsystems' intranet. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.useit.com/papers/sunweb
Paul, C. L. (2007). A modified delphi approach to a new card sorting methodology. Baltimore, MD: University of Baltimore.
Robertson, J. (2002). Information design using card sorting. Retrieved January 16, 2011,from http://www.intranetjournal.com/articles/200202/pkm_02_05_02a.html
Rosenfeld. L., & Morville. P. (2007). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design and conduct effective tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Shackel, B. (1991). Usability: context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In B. Shackel & S. Richardson (Eds.), Human factors for informatics usability, (pp. 21-37). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Spencer, D., & Garrett J. J. (2009). Card sorting: Designing usable categories. Brooklyn, N.Y. : Rosenfeld Media.
Spencer, D. (2007). Card sort analysis spreadsheet. Retrieved January 17, 2011, from http://www.rosenfeldmedia.com/books/cardsorting/blog/card_sort_analysis_spre
- 60 -
adsheet/
Spencer, D., & Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: a definitive guide. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide
Toub, S. (2000). Evaluating information architecture. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://argus-acia.com/white_papers/evaluating_ia.pdf
Tullis, T., & Wood, L. (2004). How many users are enough for a card-sorting study? . Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/UPA2004CardSorting.pdf
Upchurch, L., Rugg, G., & Kitchenham, B. (2001). Using card sorts to elicit web page quality attributes. IEEE Software, 18(4), 84-89.
Usability. gov. (2010). Information Architecture. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.usability.gov/methods/design_site/define.html#DefiningYourCategoriesLabels
Walbridge, S. (2000). Usability testing and libraries: The WSU experience. The Washington Library Association Journal, 16(3), 23-24.
Zimmerman, D. E., & Akerelrea, C. (2002). A group card sorting methodology for developing informational web sites. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01049127
中文部分
卜小蝶（2007）。使用者導向之網路資源組織與檢索。臺北市：文華。
李連揮（1977）。索引典與索引方法。圖書館學與資訊科學，3，192-202。
林信成、歐陽慧、歐陽崇榮（2004）。以主題地圖建構索引典之語意網路模型。圖書資訊學刊，48，35-56。
洪范文（2010）。以網站日誌探勘建立網站架構。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
許嫚婷（2000）。一個新課題 — 圖書館網頁之設計。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館通訊，53，2-7。
蔡維君（2006）。大學圖書館網站好用性評估 — 以臺灣大學圖書館網站為例。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。(Rubin, 1994)
戴玉美、劉元芳（2005）。我國IA（信息構建）研究綜述。情報資料工作，143，
- 61 -
13-16。
謝寶煖、周秉貞（2003）。以顧客導向觀點評估政府網站之資訊架構。圖書與資訊學刊，46，175-198。
謝建成、丁依玲、陳慧倫（2011）。大學圖書館網站資訊尋獲度之研究。資訊管理學報，18（3），25-49。
謝建成、吳怡青（2010）。改進修正型德菲式卡片分類法探討大學圖書館網站尋獲度之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，47（3），245-281。
謝建成、劉至逢（2009）。大學圖書館網站使用性評估之探討。教育資料與圖書館學，47（2），163-198。
魏澤群（2005）。使用者最大：從優使性（Usability）出發的網站設計原則。臺北市：網奕資訊科技。