研究生: |
黃鱗棋 Kenny, Lin-Chi Huang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
注意焦點取向在間斷動作學習策略中的角色 THE ROLE OF ATTENTIONAL FOCUS DIRECTION IN MOTOR LEARNING STRATEGY OF DISCRETE MOVEMENT |
指導教授: |
卓俊伶
Jwo, Jun-Ling |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
畢業學年度: | 87 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 72 |
中文關鍵詞: | 動作學習 、表現變項 、學習變項 、注意焦點取向 |
英文關鍵詞: | motor learning, performance variables, learning variables, direction of attentional focus |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:438 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討「不同注意焦點取向」的運用,對於初學者在準確性拋球動作之技能學習的影響。採新奇性工作的原則,要求實驗參加者以坐姿方式,採用非慣用手從事準確性拋球間斷動作學習。30名先前沒有本實驗工作經驗的大學男女生為本實驗參加者,隨機分成:(1)外在注意焦點取向組;(2)內在注意焦點取向組;或(3)混合注意焦點取向組等三組。實驗期間共計練習試做160次,包括:前測均質性考驗的10次練習試做、獲得期120次練習試做,以及十分鐘後立即保留與隔天所進行的隔天保留測驗各15次練習試做。本實驗除以動作表現的半徑誤差(RE)、變異誤差(VE)、以及動作表現錯誤比率(MPER)為依變項之外,進一步以問卷填寫的方式來獲知實驗參加者在正個實驗中,對於實驗操弄處置的配合程度,以及動作執行時的方式與感覺。於實驗中所測得的資料,經處理轉換成為依變相的分數之後,再分別以二因子混合設計變異數分析、杜凱氏HSD法事後比較法,進行統計顯著考驗。結果發現:(一)在本研究一全新間斷動作技能學習過程中,運用「外在注意焦點取向」的學習方式,會優於「內在注意焦點取向」的學習方式,尤其是在參加者的動作表現準確性、以及動作表現錯比率(MPER)方面較有助益。(二)在本研究一全新間斷動作技能學習中,「混合注意焦點取向」的學習方式會優於「內在注意焦點取向」的學習方式,尤其是在參加者的動作表現錯比率方面較有助益。(三)以半徑誤差(RE)來看,「不同注意焦點取向」可被視為一學習變項(learning variables),而非表現變項;以動作表現錯誤比率(MPER)來看,「不同注意焦點取向」可被視為一學習變項,亦可被視為一表現變項(performance variables)。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of direction within attentional focus on learning a motor task of ball throwing accuracy. By novelty principle, participants had to sit on a chair and throw balls with their non-dominant hand. Thirty university students who had no previous experience of the task were randomly assigned to one of the following three groups: (1) external direction of attentional focus group; (2) internal direction of attentional focus group; and (3) mixed direction of attentional focus group. Experimental trials included 10 trials for pretest to test the homogeneity of participants, 120 trials for acquisition, 15 trials for both 10-minute immediate retention test and one-day delay retention test. Other than radial error (RE), variable error (VE) and motor performance error rate (MPER) as dependent variables, questionnaires were administered to insight about participants’ perception during experiment. The experimental data were transformed into scores of proportion of dependent variables. Mixed Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD method were used for statistical analysis. Findings were as follows: (1) within the whole new discrete motor skill acquisition, the strategy of external direction of attentional focus was better than strategy of internal direction of attentional focus, especially for accuracy of task performance and motor performance error rate; (2) the strategy of mixed direction of attentional focus was better than strategy of internal direction of attentional focus, especially for motor performance error rate; and (3) based on the radial error, different direction of attentional focus was thought to be a learning variables, whereas based on the motor performance error rate, various direction of attentional focus was thought to be a performance variables.
中文部分:
林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華。
卓俊伶、簡曜輝、張智惠、楊梓楣、黃鱗棋(民國87年)身體活動心理學與動作行為的發展概況與規劃,台灣師大體育研究,第5期,117─130。
黃鱗棋與卓俊伶(1998)。關節自由度對間斷動作表現的影響。體育學報,25,229-237。
英文部分:
Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610-620.
Baumeister, R. F., & Steinhilber, A. (1984). Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: The home field disadvantage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 85-93.
Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1987). The measurement of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 6, 175-183.
Christina, R. W. (1973). Influence of enforced motor and sensory sets on reaction latency and movement speed. Research Quarterly, 44, 483-487.
Cox, J. W. (1933). Some experiments on formal training in the acquisition of skill. British Journal of Psychology, 24, 67-87.
Feldenkrais, M. (1972). Awareness through movement. New York: Harper & Row.
Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Gallwey, W. T. (1982). The inner game of tennis. New York: Bantam Books.
Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3-23.
Goult, C., Bard, C., & Fleury, M. (1989). Expertise deficiencies in preparing to return a tennis serve: A visual information 8processing approach. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 382-398.
Green, T. D., & Flowers, J. H. (1991). Implicit versus explicit learning processes in a probabilistic, continuous fine-motor catching task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 293-300.
Hardy, L., Jones, G., & Gould, D. (1996). Understanding psychological 0preparation for sport. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Henry, F. M. (1960). Influence of motor and sensory sets on reaction latency and speed of discrete movements. Research Quarterly, 31, 459-468.
Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased respond latency and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
Logan, G. D.(1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 4, 492-527.
Magill, R. A. (1993). Motor learning: Concepts and applications.(4th ed.). Wisconsin: Wm. C. Brown.
Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp.341-361). Amsterdam: Martins Nijhoff.
Nideffer, R. M. (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 394-404.
Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1969). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391-408.
Poulton, E. C. (1957). On prediction in skilled movements. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 467-478.
Reber, A. S. (1976). Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 88-94.
Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor Control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Motor learning and performance: From principle into practice. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schneider, W., & Fisk, A. D. (1983). Attention theory and mechanisms for skilled performance. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp.119-143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Singer, R. N. (1980). Motor learning and human performance: An application to motor skills and movement behaviors. New York: Macmillian.
Singer, R. N., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1984). The learning of athletic skills and the use of strategies. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 15, 271-282.
Singer, R. N., Cauraugh, J. H., Murphey, M., Chen. D., & Lidor, R. (1991). Attentional control, distractors, and motor performance. Human Performance, 4, 55-69.
Singer, R. N., Lidor, R., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1994). To be aware or not aware: What to think about while learning and performing a motor skill. The Sport Psychologist, 7, 19-30.
Singer, R. N., Lidor, R., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1994). Focus of attention during motor skill performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 12, 335-340.
Welford, A. T. (1952). The psychological refractory period and the timing of high-speed performance─A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
Wulf, G., HoB, M. & Prinz, W. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 169-179.
Wulf, G., & Weigelt, C. (1997). Instructions about physical principles in learning a complex motor skill: To tell or not to tell……. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 326-367.