簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蕭景祥
josh shiau
論文名稱: 營造業勞工防墜行為及其相關因素之研究
指導教授: 黃乾全
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 健康促進與衛生教育學系
Department of Health Promotion and Health Education
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
中文關鍵詞: 營造業墜落勞工職業災害安全教育
英文關鍵詞: construction industry, falling accidents, labor, occupational accidents, safety education
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:382下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來台灣地區營造業職業災害發生率居高不下,尤其是墜落事故已造成國內營造業職業災害的重大傷亡,其嚴重性不容忽視。因此本研究之目的在於診斷工地防墜安全衛生管理、評估工地防墜設施及調查勞工防墜行為及其相關因素,以作為推動工地墜落預防安全衛生管理及勞工安全衛生教育之重要參考。
    本研究立意選取20處工地,由研究者親至工地現場,評估工地防墜安全衛生管理現況及施工環境中的防墜相關設施;並由受訪之工地中,面對面訪問調查現場作業勞工,共計回收294份有效問卷,據此評估勞工之防墜行為與其相關因素。
    研究結果發現,在防墜安全衛生管理方面:以工地主任兼辦安全衛生業務者最為常見,設有專任工地安全衛生管理人員,且該人員已取得專業證照者並不多見。對於現場作業人員之健康管理,有70﹪的受訪工地覺得實施上有困難。95﹪的工地已實施工地安全衛生教育,實施方式則以利用工地會議時,採統一講解方式最為普遍。對於工地安全衛生守則實施方式,則以購置制式商品公告在工地入口處最為常見。此外,工地對於墜落預防自動檢查及協議組織之推動,則較感困難。
    在施工環境防墜相關設施方面:65﹪的受訪工地對其跌倒、採傷之防止設施並不理想。有50﹪受訪工地坦承對「缺口封閉」之墜落之預防措施落實不易。工地中除「警告標示」設置情況較佳外,其餘「工地臨時照明」、「安全母索」、「防墜安全網架設」情況則不理想。
    在勞工防墜行為及其相關因素方面:整體而言,受試者對墜落危害認知的程度不強、大多贊同工地中安全衛生管理的作法。不同年齡層勞工間在墜落危害認知之差異達統計顯著水準(p<0.05),以年齡層50歲以上的作業勞工對墜落危害認知程度較低;不同工種間在墜落危害認知之差異達統計顯著水準(p<0.01),以「雜工」對墜落危害認知的程度最低。無職業災害經驗者,較傾向於覺得自己的安全知識是足夠的; 有職業災害經驗者,反而較傾向於覺得自己的安全知識是不足的。受訪者的防墜行為在「個人防護具」使用方面需加強。各相關因素中以「上司督導管理」、「工作情緒」兩變項對於防墜行為的預測力較佳,因此,如何落實工地安全衛生管理與做好作業者負向情緒(工作緊張、擔心安全問題)的管理工作,是預防工地墜落發生的首要工作。

    In recent years, Taiwan has experienced high rates of occupational accidents, among which construction site falling accidents have been a leading cause of deaths and serious injuries and are not to be neglected. The purpose of this research is to examine the factors that help ward off falling accidents at construction sites, including the safety and health management, the facilities that prevent falling accidents, and workers' safety knowledge and precautionary behavior. Therefore the result of the survey will serve as an important reference for those concerned to implement the safety and health management and worker's safety and health education in order to prevent falling accidents at construction sites.
    This study assessed the safety and health management and safety facilities in the working environment at twenty Taiwan construction sites. In addition, individual, on-site interviews were conducted with 294 construction workers, using a structured questionnaire, the Occupational Safety Knowledge Assessment Form (reliability: Cronbach's a = 0.91) to evaluate their precautionary behavior.
    Results showed that very few construction sites employed licensed safety and hygiene management officers. Instead, site directors themselves were often in charge of safety and health management, in addition to directing the affairs of the entire construction site. 60% of site directors admitted difficulty in undertaking safety inspections, and 70% experienced difficulty in overseeing the health of personnel. 95% of sites had held on-site safety education, usually in the form of short speeches given at planning meetings of all site subcontractors. The commonest way to put the safety and health education into practice is to put up notices and signs at the entrance of the construction site. Also, it is difficult to implement precautionary self-inspections and to promote negotiation organization.
    As for the facilities to ward off falling accidents, 65% of the construction sites interviewed didn't have appropriate safety facilities to prevent injuries from falling and trampling. 50% of site directors admitted that it was not easy to create a work environment that would prevent falling accidents. Site directors found it particularly difficult to ensure the safety of temporary elevator shaft cavities and their cover fittings, due to multiple teams and subcontractors working separately on the shafts. While the setting up of warning signs in construction sites is generally in good shape, the temporary lighting systems, safety cable, and safety nets still need improvement.
    On the whole, the workers interviewed didn't have extensive safety knowledge and mostly regarded the safety and health management at the construction site as acceptable and considered the facilities to prevent falling accidents sufficient. With one-way analysis of variance, a significant discrepancy in workers' occupational safety knowledge was found among different age groups. Construction workers aged 50~59 had the poorest understanding of occupational safety concepts. A discrepancy also exists among different levels of workers, among which the temporary workers have the poorest safety knowledge. Those who had no experience of occupational accidents tended to consider their own safety knowledge sufficient, while those who had experienced occupational accidents considered theirs insufficient. Those who were interviewed seemed to need more practice in using individual safety equipment. Among all factors, supervision from superiors and working moods had more direct influences on the prevention of falling accidents. Therefore to implement safety and health management at construction sites and to deal with workers' negative moods(nervousness from work, safety concerns) are the priorities in preventing falling accidents at construction sites.

    目錄 第一章 緒論………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究動機與重要性………………………………………. 1 第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………. 2 第三節 待答問題…………………………………………………. 4 第四節 研究假設…………………………………………………. 6 第五節 研究架構…………………………………………………. 7 第六節 名詞定義…………………………………………………. 8 第七節 研究範圍與限制…………………………………………. 12 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………… 13 第一節 營造業職業災害統計……………………………………. 13 第二節 營造業施工環境與作業特性分析………………………. 19 第三節 墜落職業災害原因相關文獻分析………………………. 22 第四節 營造業安全衛生管理相關文獻分析……………………. 26 第三章 研究方法…………………………………… 29 第一節 研究對象…………………………………………………. 29 第二節 研究工具…………………………………………………. 32 第三節 資料收集…………………………………………………. 39 第四節 資料處理與統計…………………………………………. 41 第四章 結果與討論…………………………………………… 45 第一節 受訪對象基本資料………………………………………. 45 第二節 工地防墜安全衛生管理現況……………………………. 49 第三節 施工環境防墜設施現況…………………………………. 54 第四節 勞工墜落危害認知………………………………………. 57 第五節 勞工對防墜安全衛生管理之態度………………………. 61 第六節 勞工對防墜設施之態度…………………………………. 64 第七節 勞工之作業安全態度……………………………………. 66 第八節 勞工防墜行為及其相關因素……………………………. 70 第五章 結論與建議………………………………………….. 81 第一節 結論………………………………………………………. 81 第二節 建議………………………………………………………. 85 參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 88 附錄一 勞工防墜行為及其相關因素調查問卷。 附錄二 工地防墜安全衛生管理檢核表。 附錄三 環境防墜診斷表。 附錄四 專家效度名單與意見 附錄五 問卷內容之項目分析 附錄六 問卷內容的信、效度考驗 附錄七 施工環境實況記錄 圖表目錄 圖1-1 「營造業勞工防墜行為及其相關因素之研究」研究架構………………………………………………………………. 7 表2-1 營造業歷年來重大職業災害件數統計表……………………. 13 表2-2 營造業歷年來墜落、滾落災害件數統計……………………. 14 表2-3 營造業勞工職業災害千人率…………………………………. 15 表3-1 完訪工地名冊一覽表…………………………………………. 30 表4-1 受訪工地基本資料……………………………………………. 46 表4-2 受訪者基本資料………………………………………………. 47 表4-3 受訪者年齡與工作年資………………………………………. 48 表4-4 受訪者工種別…………………………………………………. 48 表4-5 勞工墜落危害認知之平均值與標準差………………………. 59 表4-6 不同年齡層勞工在墜落危害認知上的比較…………………. 60 表4-7 受訪者在防墜安全衛生管理各題之平均值與標準差………. 62 表4-8 不同職災經驗者在「安全教育」上的比較…………………. 63 表4-9 受訪者在防墜設施各題之平均值與標準差…………………. 65 表4-10 受訪者在作業安全態度各題之平均值與標準差……………. 68 表4-11 性別在「作業方式與條件」的t考驗………………………. 69 表4-12 受訪者在防墜行為各題之平均值與標準差…………………. 71 表4-13 不同性別、職災經驗者在防墜行為上的比較………………. 73 表4-14 不同年齡層在防墜行為上的比較……………………………. 73 表4-15 受訪者在工作情緒各題之平均值與標準差…………………. 75 表4-16 不同年齡層在工作情緒上的比較……………………………. 76 表4-17 勞工作業安全態度、防墜行為與職災經驗、工作情緒、防墜設施管理、上司督導、安全教育、墜落危害認知間之相關分析………………………………………………………… 77 表4-18 預測「作業方式與條件」之逐步複迴歸分析……………… 78 表4-19 預測「個人防護具」之逐步複迴歸分析…………………… 79 表4-20 預測「防墜行為」之逐步複迴歸分析………………………. 80

    參考文獻
    [1] 行政院勞工委員會,1999;"八十七年度暨歷年重大職業災害資料統計分析報告", 勞工檢查技術叢書,02-34-04。
    [2]郭其珍,1993; "台灣地區營建作業安全設施調查研究",勞工安全衛生研究季刊,第1卷,第3期:9-20。
    [3]行政院勞工委員會,1998, 台北;"中華民國台灣地區勞動統計月報":15。
    [4]行政院勞工委員會,1998, 台北;"中華民國台灣地區勞動統計月報":56。
    [5]行政院勞工委員會,1998, 台北;"勞動檢查年報"。
    [6]行政院勞工委員會,1998, 台北;"中華民國台灣地區勞動統計年鑑"。
    [7]吳世雄、曹常成,1997;"營造業墜落安全問題之分析研究", 行政院勞工委員會,ISOH85-S327。
    [8]Suruda, A .,Fosbroke ,D., and Braddee,R.,1995;"Fatal work-related falls from roofs.", Journal of Safety Research,26(1):1-8.
    [9]行政院勞工委員會勞動檢查處,1998, 台北;"台北縣營造工地輔導訪查結案報告"。
    [10]行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局,1994, 台北;"中華民國職業分類典"。
    [11]行政院勞工委員會,1999;"中華民國台灣地區勞動統計月報", 院勞工委員會編印,第73期,126-127頁。
    [12]呂家清、徐學陶、洪榮昭,1994;"營造業勞工危險意識調查研究",工業教育學報,第七期,119-143頁。
    [13]蘇銘勳,1997;"台灣地區墜落死亡職災的情境",國立台灣工業技術學院管理技術研究所碩士論文。
    [14]Susan EB.,Leonard JP.,1987;"Fatal Injuries in the Construction Industry in Washington State," American Journal of Industrial Medicine 11:453-460.
    [15]Jacqueline A. ,Anthony JS.,1993;"Age and Fatal Work-Related Falls,"Human Factors,35(4),731-736.
    [16]Gary SS.,Emily OS.& Marcia G., 1993; "Fatal Occupational Injuries in the New Jersey Construction Industry,1983 to 1989," JOM.Volume 35,917-921.
    [17]Mcvittie,D.,Banikin ,H. ,and Brocklebank, W.,1997;" The effects of firm size on injury frequency in construction." ,Safety Science,27(1):19-23.
    [18]Julia AF.,James JB.& Elizabeth M.,1997;"Injury Severity Associated with Nonfatal Construction Falls," American Journal of Industrial Medicine 32:647-655.
    [19]Gwendolyn HC.,Aaron S.,Ronald S.,Scott H. & Judith G.,1996;"Nonfatal Occupational Fall Injuries in the West Virginia Construction Industry,"Accid.Anal.and Prev.,Vol.28,No.5,655-663.
    [20]Timothy,O.,1998;"Women in the U.S.Construction Industry:An Analysis of Fatal Occupational Injury Experience,1980 to 1992,"American Journal of Industry Medicine 33:256-262.
    [21]林慈銘,1991;"台灣地區營造業員工異動分析",中國文化大學勞工研究所碩 士論文。
    [22]葛文斌,1991;"我國營造業勞工安全衛生制度之研究",國立台灣工業技術學院工程技術研究所碩士論文。
    [23]吳世雄、杜偉民,1994;"國內營造安全設施現況調查分析", 行政院勞工委員會,ISOH83-S326。
    [24]Nabil AK. and Rami GB.,1998;"Fatalities and Injuries in the KUWAITI Construcion Industry ," Accid.Anal.and Prev.,Vol.30,No.6,805-814.
    [25]J.Sun Meng,E.Shibata,N.Hisanaga,M.Kamijima & G.Ichihara,1997;"A Cohort Mortality Study of Construction Workers," American Journal of Industrial Medicine 32:35-41.
    [26]H.W. Henrich "Industrial Accident Prevention " USA Mc Graw-Hill Book Co.3rd 1983.
    [27]呂盤﹑林燊生、廖信榮,1994;"台北市房屋建築業勞工安全知識﹑態度﹑習慣及相關因子調查研究",衛生教育論文集刊,第7期:59-77。
    [28]Torbjorn,R.,1992;" Risk perception and safety on offshore petroleum platforms-Part II:Perceived risk ,job stress and accidents ," Safety Science ,15:53-68.
    [29]Torbjorn,R.,1997;" Associations between risk perception and safety ," Safety Science ,24(3):197-209.
    [30]Beth,S.A.1987;"The Modification of Occupational Safety Behavior," Journal of Occupational Accidents,9:177-197.
    [31]David MD.(1996) Theoretical models of health behavior and workplace self-protective behavior Journal of Safety Research Vol.27,No2,pp61-72.
    [32]Holcom,ML.,Lehman,WEK.&Simpson,DD.,1993;" Employee accidents :Influences of personal characteristics ,job characteristics ,and substance use in jobs differing in accident potential," Journal of Safety Research,24:205~221.
    [33]Debobes,L.,1986;" The psycological factors in accident prevention ,"Personnel journal,64(1):34-38.
    [34]Hansen ,CP.,1988;" Personality characteristics test scores with the probable risk of a fatal fall," Safety Science ",18 :95-112.
    [35]Steffy ,BD. ,Jones,JW.,Wurphy,LR., and Kunz,L.,1986;" A demonstration of the impact of stress abatement programs on reducing employee's accidents and their costs," American Journal of Health Promotion ,1(2):25-32.
    [36]Gun ,RT, and Ryan ,CF.,1994;" A case control study of possible risk factors in the causation of ocupational injury ," Safety Science ,18:1-13.
    [37]Nagata,H.,1993;" Proposed method to match physical of the accident involved employee ,"Journal of Business and Psycology,2(4):346-365。
    [38]Chia-Fen Chi ,Meng-Lin Wu,1997;"Fatal Occupational Injuries in Taiwan - Relationship Between Fatality Rate And Age, "Safety Science,27:1-27。
    [39]林志賢,1991;"我國營造業勞工安全衛生現況及因應策略之研究",國立台灣工業技術學院工程技術研究所碩士論文。
    [40]黃惠玲,1996;"如何落實中小企業勞工安全衛生自動檢查之研究",中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
    [41]蔣代政,1995;"我國營造業勞工安全衛生教育訓練現況及需求之研究",中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
    [42]Richard ,DH.,1998;"Who is responsible for construction site safety ?"Professional Safety:26-28.
    [43]Heikki, L. ,Ismo ,R.,1996;" The effects of feedback and goal setting on safety performance at two construction sites," Safety Science ,24(1):61-73.
    [44]葉嘉泯,1991;"我國營造業職業災害之現況即防止對策之探討",中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
    [45]行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所,1997;"營造安全研究相關技術資料彙編", 行政院勞工委員會,ISOH86-S-205。
    [46]行政院勞工委員會,1998, 台北;"營造業勞動檢查相關法規彙編-勞工安全衛生組織管理及自動檢查辦法":299-346。
    [47]行政院勞工委員會,1998, 台北;"營造業勞動檢查相關法規彙編-營造安全衛生設施標準":237-298。
    [48]李金泉、黃清賢、張竣凱、陳連輝;1994;"勞工工作安全認知量表的建構",嘉南學報,第20期:70-85。
    [49]陳繼盛、林大鈞、周朝宗,1994;"營造業承攬關係安全衛生法制之研究 ", 行政院勞工委員會,ISOH83-S121。
    [50]行政院勞工委員會,1996;"工作環境安全衛生狀況調查報告-受雇者認知調查 ", 行政院勞工委員會,ISOH84-H302。

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE