簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉秀英
Shiuying Liu
論文名稱: 透過Moodle線上閱讀與讀寫活動學習字彙的研究
EFL Vocabulary Learning: Online Reading and Reading-Writing Activities through Moodle
指導教授: 陳浩然
Chen, Hao-Jan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 148
中文關鍵詞: 課程管理系統線上閱讀線上讀寫字彙學習
英文關鍵詞: CMS, Online Reading, Online Reading-Writing, Vocabulary Learning, Moodle
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:212下載:51
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要

    目前台灣的國中生極需大量的英語字彙與個別化的英語字彙學習機會,以便銜接高中英語以及適應常態班級學習。前人的研究指出,閱讀與讀寫活動有助字彙學習,而近年興起的科技融入教學更是被寄予厚望。吾人期待,利用課程管理系統進行線上閱讀與線上讀寫活動能有效增進字彙學習,並營造適合不同語言程度學生的學習機會。
    因此,本研究旨在確認,相較於在教室接受教導,透過Moodle進行線上閱讀與讀寫活動學習字彙的成效如何。
    研究對象為34名九年級生,實驗組17人,控制組17人。兩組學生依其英語程度又分為低、中、高三組,以便進一步探討本實驗課程對不同程度學生的影響。實驗組學生在線上閱讀活動中,藉著線上字典的輔助完成線上閱讀、線上作業與線上閱讀測驗;而控制組則在一般教室接受教師講解文章與單字字義,並以口語問答完成閱讀理解測驗。在線上讀寫活動中,實驗組學生勾選線上問卷、完成線上閱讀、線上作業,並根據所讀內容在討論區發表評論,必要時藉著線上字典的輔助完成上述活動;控制組學生則接受教師講解文章與單字,並以口頭討論方式發表評論。所有實驗課程設計目的在於鼓勵學生透過線上活動,獨立自主學習字彙。
    本研究透過描述統計、二因子變異數分析、獨立樣本t檢定與差數大小對學生字彙測驗成績進行量性分析,且以問卷探討學生對於透過Moodle進行線上閱讀與讀寫活動學習字彙的觀感。研究結果顯示,透過Moodle線上閱讀活動學習字彙的成效雖與一般字彙教學成效無異,卻有助於中、高程度學生長期字彙記憶,尤其是高程度學生。透過Moodle的線上讀寫活動,單字翻譯測驗顯示,中等程度學生表現明顯優於控制組; 而克漏字測驗顯示,中、高程度學生的字彙學習優於控制組,尤其是高程度學生。因此推測,透過Moodle的線上讀寫活動,格外加強高程度學生推測單字意義的能力。然而,兩種活動均未能使低語言程度學生特別獲益。根據問卷調查與晤談結果顯示,學生對此線上課程多抱持肯定態度。

    Abstract
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of learning vocabulary through online reading and reading-writing activities in Moodle (Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment).
    The participants were 34 ninth graders selected from two classes. 17 participants forming the experimental group engaged in online reading and reading-writing activities in the lab. 17 participants forming the control group received the traditional EFL instructions in classroom. Participants in each group were further categorized into high, intermediate and low groups to explore the impact of the proposed course on learners at different language proficiency levels. Descriptive statistics were employed to compare the effect of different treatments, and independent samples t-test was used to determine statistical significance. Besides, two-way ANOVA was used to detect group-by-level interactions. To reinforce the validity of the study, a questionnaire and interviews were given to probe to the participants’ perceptions of the proposed online course.
    Results of the study showed (1) the high achievers and intermediate achievers who learned through online reading in Moodle performed better in vocabulary retention, (2) the intermediate achievers who learned through online reading-writing performed better in vocabulary learning, (3) the high achievers’ inferring skills seemed to be improved through online reading-writing, (4) the low achievers did not benefit from the online course in Moodle, and (5) a questionnaire and interviews revealed that the participants’ attitude toward learning vocabulary through online reading and reading-writing activities in Moodle was positive.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 中文摘要 i Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii List of Tables ix List of Figures xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose of the Study 5 1.3 Organization of the Thesis 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 Computer-Aided Vocabulary Learning 7 2.1.1 Vocabulary Learning Strategies 8 2.1.2 Empirical Studies on Computer-aided Vocabulary Learning 10 2.2 Online Reading and Vocabulary Learning 15 2.2.1 Reading-based Vocabulary Learning 16 Encounter and Vocabulary Learning 17 Noticing and Vocabulary Learning 18 Depth of Processing and Vocabulary Learning 18 2.2.2 Empirical Studies on Online Reading and Vocabulary Learning 19 2.2.3 Use of Online Dictionary 22 2.3 Online Reading-Writing and Vocabulary Learning 27 2.4 Summary 30 2.5 Research Questions 30 Chapter 3 Methodology 31 3.1 Participants 31 3.2 The Procedure of the Study 32 3.2.1 Online Reading Activity 39 Reading Materials 39 Vocabulary Selection 40 Online Reading & Assignments 40 Online Reading Comprehension Test 41 The Immediate Vocabulary Tests 42 The Delayed Vocabulary Test 42 3.2.2 Online Reading-Writing Activity 43 Reading Materials 43 Vocabulary Selection 44 Online Survey 45 Online Reading & Assignments 46 Online Writing 47 Posttests for Online Reading-Writing Activity 48 3.3 A Questionnaire and Interviews 48 3.4 Data Collection and Data Analysis 48 Chapter 4 Results 51 4.1 Results from the Immediate Vocabulary Tests and the Delayed Vocabulary Test: The Comparisons between the Experimental Group and the Control Group 51 4.2 Results from the Immediate Vocabulary Tests and the Delayed Vocabulary Test: the Comparisons of Participants at Different Language Proficiency Levels 53 4.2.1 The Comparisons of the Overall Mean Scores on Immediate Vocabulary Tests 53 4.2.2 The Comparisons of the Mean Scores on the Delayed Vocabulary Test 54 4.3 Results from the Word Level Translation Test and the Cloze Test: the Comparisons between the Experimental Group and the Control Group 56 4.4 Results from the Word Level Translation Test and the Cloze Test: the Comparisons of Participants at Different Language Proficiency Levels 57 4.4.1 The Comparisons of the Mean Scores on Word Level Translation Tests 57 4.4.2 The Comparisons of the Mean Scores on the Cloze Tests 58 4.5 The Participants’ Responses to the Questionnaire 60 4.5.1. The Access to the Learning Web 60 4.5.2 The Online Dictionaries 61 4.5.3 The Reading Materials 61 The Reading Materials Used in Online Reading Activity (the News Stories Retrieved from CBBC Newsround) 62 The Reading Materials Used in Online Reading-Writing Activity (the Online Comments Retrieved from CBBC Newsround) 62 4.5.4 The Favored Task (or Tasks) in Online Reading and Reading-Writing Activities 63 4.5.5 The Effectiveness of Each Task in Online Reading and Reading-Writing Activities 64 4.5.6 The Participants’ Preference 65 4.5.7 The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Online Course 65 4.6 Summary of the Results 66 4.6.1 Quantitative Results 66 4.6.2 Qualitative Results 67 Chapter 5 Discussion 68 5.1 Discussions about Research Findings 68 5.1.1 Research Question One: Do online reading activities in Moodle enhance vocabulary learning? 68 5.1.2 Research Question Two: Do online reading activities in Moodle help students at different language proficiency levels learn vocabulary? 72 5.1.3 Research Question Three: Do online reading-writing activities in Moodle enhance vocabulary learning? 74 5.1.4 Research Question Four: Do online reading-writing activities in Moodle help students at different language proficiency levels learn vocabulary? 76 5.1.5 Research Question Five: What are learners’ perceptions of vocabulary learning through online reading and reading-writing activities in Moodle? 77 5.2 Summary of Findings 79 5.3 Pedagogical Implications 80 5.4 Limitations of the Study and Recommendations for Future Research 82 References 84 Appendices 93 Appendix 1 Screening Test (1): 1000 LEVELS TEST A 93 Appendix 2 Screening Test (2): A GEPT Test on Reading Comprehension 101 Appendix 3 Screening Test (3): A Grammar Test 108 Appendix 4 Reading Materials Used in Online Reading Activity —News Stories Retrieved from CBBC Newsround 111 Appendix 5 Reading Materials Used in Online Reading-Writing Activity —Online Comments Retrieved from CBBC Newsround 116 Appendix 6 Vocabulary Selection (1)—Making a Word List 120 Appendix 7 Vocabulary Selection (2)--A Translation Work 125 Appendix 8 A Sample of the Delayed Vocabulary Test 130 Appendix 9 Posttests for Online Reading-Writing Activity (1)—A Word Level Translation Test (1) 131 Appendix 10 Posttests for Online Reading-Writing Activity (2)—A Cloze Test 132 Appendix 11 The Questionnaire 133 Appendix 12 Raw Scores on Immediate and Delayed Vocabulary Tests 135 Appendix 13 Converted Scores on Immediate and Delayed Vocabulary Tests 136

    References
    Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5 (1), 202-232.
    Al-Seghayer, K. (2003). Technological and pedagogical considerations for a more effective electronic glossary. The Reading Matrix, 3 (1), 1-15.
    Arnaud, P. J. L., & Béjoint, H. (1992). Vocabulary and applied linguistics. London: Macmillan.
    Aust, R., Kelley, M. J., & Roby, W. (1993). The use of hyper-reference and conventional dictionaries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41 (4), 63-73.
    Brandl, K. (2002). Integrating Internet-based reading materials into the foreign language curriculum: from teacher- to student-centered approaches. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 87-107.
    Brandl, K. (2005). Are you ready to “MOODLE”? Language Learning & Technology, 9 (2), 16-23.
    Carpenter, T. G., Brown, W. L., & Hickman, R.C. (2004). Influences of online delivery on developmental writing outcomes. Journal of Developmental Education, 28 (1), 14-35.
    Cho, H. (2002). The effect of vocabulary exercise types on L2 vocabulary retention. [On-line] Retrieved from http://plaza.snu.ac.kr/~dell/korean/working_papers/ on March 21, 2006.
    Chun, D. M. (2006). CALL technologies for L2 reading. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: from theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (pp.69-98). Texas: CALICO.
    Comeaux, P., & McKenna-Byington, E. (2003). Computer-mediated communication in online and conventional classrooms: some implications for instructional design and professional development programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40 (4), 348-355.
    De La Fuente, M. J. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (1), 47-81.
    Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31, 349-365.
    Felix, K. (2006). New software and electronic media titles for K-12. MultiMedia & Internet@School, 15464636, 13 (6). [On-line] Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com on January 1, 2007.
    Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. NY: McGRAW-HILL.
    Ghadirian, S. (2002). Providing controlled exposure to target vocabulary through the screening and arranging of texts. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (1), 147-164.
    Goodfellow, R. (1994). Design principles for computer-aided vocabulary learning. Computer Education, 23 (1/2), 53-62.
    Grace, C. A. (1998). Retention of word meanings inferred form context and sentence-level translations: implications for the design of beginning-level CALL software. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 533-544.
    Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2003). Blended learning environments: a review of the research literature. [On-line] Retrieved from http://msed.byu.edu/ipt/graham/vita/ble on January 1, 2006.
    Graves, M. F. (1987). The roles of instruction in fostering vocabulary development. In M. C. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition (pp.165-184). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Groot, P. J. M. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 60-81.
    Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: person, task, context and strategies. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (TESL-EJ), 7 (2). [On-line] Retrieved from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ on April 12, 2006.
    Hayati, M., & Fattahzadeh, A. (2006). The effect of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries on vocabulary recall and retention of EFL learners. The Reading Matrix, 6 (2), 125-134.
    Hémard, D. (2003). Language learning online: designing towards user acceptability. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language learning online: towards best practice (pp. 21-40). Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
    Hermann, F. (2003). Different effects of reading and memorization of paired associates on vocabulary acquisition in adult learners of English as a second language. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (TESL-EJ), 7 (1). [On-line] Retrieved from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/tesl-ej/ej25/al.htm on April 12, 2006.
    Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Nicolae, I. (2005). Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive on-line database. Language Learning & Technology, 9 (2), 90-110.
    Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a Clockwork Orange: acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a foreign language, 11(2). [On-line] Retrieved from http://www.er.uqam.ca/nobel/r21270/cv/Caster bridge.html/ on March 21, 2006.
    Horst, M., & Meara, P. (1999). Test of a model for predicting second language lexical growth through reading. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56 (2). [On-line] Retrieved from http://www.utpjournals.com/ on April 12, 2006.
    Huang, Y. (2001). Easing into e-news: an EAP course for advanced readers. In Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 414-423). Taipei: Crane.
    Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in Foreign Language, 17 (1). [On-line] Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/ on July 11, 2005.
    Johnson, A., & Heffernan, N. (2006). The short readings project: a CALL reading activity utilizing vocabulary recycling. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19 (1), 63-77.
    Jones, L. (2004). Testing L2 vocabulary recognition and recall using pictorial and written testing items. Language Learning & Technology, 8 (3), 122-143.
    Joshi, R. M. (2005). Vocabulary: a critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 209-219.
    Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: the effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (3), 285-299.
    Koyama, T., & Takeuchi, O. (2003). Printed dictionaries vs. electronic dictionaries: A pilot study on how Japanese EFL learners differ in using dictionaries. Language Education & Technology, 40, 61-79.
    Koyama, T., & Takeuchi, O. (2004). How has the difference affected the retention? Two empirical studies on electronic dictionaries. [On-line] Retrieved from http://fleat5.byu.edu/_files/75Koyama.pdf on March 29, 2005.
    Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: additional evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73 (4), 441-464.
    Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
    Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics (pp. 113-126). London: Macmillan.
    Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16 (3), 307-322.
    Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59 (4), 1-14.
    Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning & Technology, 3 (2), 58-76.
    Lee, S. H. (2003). ESL learners’ vocabulary use in writing and the effects of explicit vocabulary instruction. System, 31, 537-561.
    Leloup, J. W., & Ponterio, R. (2005). Vocabulary support for independent online reading. Language Learning & Technology, 9 (2), 3-7.
    Lin, C., & Hsu, H. (2001). EFL students’ perceptions of Web-based reading-writing activities. In selected Papers from the tenth International Symposium on English Teaching (525-533). Taipei: Crane.
    Liou, H. C. (1997). The impact of WWW texts on EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10 (5), 455-478.
    Liou, H. C. (1999). Incorporating computers into English classroom: curriculum design issues. In selected Papers from the tenth International Symposium on English Teaching. (120-131). Taipei: Crane.
    Loucky, J. P. (2005). Combining the benefits of electronic and online dictionaries with CALL Web sites to produce effective and enjoyable vocabulary and language learning lessons. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 389-416.
    Ma, Q., & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 15-45.
    McKeown, M. G., & Curtis, M. E. (1987). The nature of vocabulary acquisition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Meara, P. (1997). Towards a new approach to modeling vocabulary acquisition. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp.109-120). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Moon, R. (1992). Textual aspects of fixed expressions in learners’ dictionaries. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics (pp. 13-27). London: Macmillan.
    Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of teaching English as a second language trainees. System, 32, 75-87.
    Muncie, J. (2002). Process writing and vocabulary development: comparing lexical frequency profiles across drafts. System, 30, 225-235.
    Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. C. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 19-36). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 6-19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
    Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge: Implications for Acquisition and Instruction. In M. G. McKeown (Ed.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition (pp.19-35). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    O, C., & Shally. (2005). Moodle. Taipei: Wenquey.
    O, C., & Shally. (2006). Moodle. Taipei: Wenquey.
    Ojalia, M. (2000). Online reading as a nonlinear activity. EContent, 23 (5). [On-line] Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/ehost/ on March 29, 2005.
    Schouten, M. C., & Parreren, C. S. (1992). Individual differences in vocabulary acquisition: a qualitative experiment in the first phase of secondary education. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics (pp. 94-101). London: Macmillan.
    Pino-Silva, J. (2006). Extensive reading through the Internet: Is it worth the while? The Reading Matrix, 6 (1). [On-line] Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/ on March 29, 2005.
    Reinhardt, J., & Isbell, K. (2002). Building web literacy skills. The Reading Matrix, 2 (2). [On-line] Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/ on March 29, 2005.
    Robb, T. N. (2004). Moodle: a virtual learning environment for the rest of us. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (TESL-EJ), 8 (2). [On-line] Retrieved from http://writing.berkeley.edu/TESL_EJ on January 17, 2006.
    Sakar, A., & Ercetin, G. (2004). Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 28-38.
    Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCARTHY (Eds.), Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp.199-227). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. NY: Cambridge University.
    Schmitt, N., & McCARTHY, M. (1997). Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Scurfield, S. (2003). Give vocabulary learning a chance. [On-line] Retrieved from http://www.tesol-spain.org/newsletter/ on March 29, 2005.
    Segler, T., Pain, H., & Sorace, A. (2002). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition and Learning Strategies in ICALL Environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15 (4), 409-422.
    Sökmen, A. J. (1997). Current Trends in Teaching Second Language Vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 237-257). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Stakhnevich, J. (2002). Reading on the Web: implications for ESL professionals. The Reading Matrix, 2 (2). [On-line] Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/ on March 29, 2005.
    St-Jacques, C., & Barrière, C. (2005). Search by fuzzy inference in a children’s dictionary. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 (3), 193-215.
    Streiter, O., Knapp, J., Voltmer, L., & Zielinski, D. (2004). Bridging the gap between intentional and incidental vocabulary acquisition. [On-line] Retrieved from http://dev.eurac.edu:8080/autoren/publs/gym/ on April 12, 2006.
    Sun, Y. C. (2003). Extensive reading online: an overview and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 438-446.
    Taguchi E., Takayasu-Maass, M., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004). Developing reading fluency in EFL: how assisted reading and extensive reading affect fluency development. Reading in Foreign Language, 16 (2). [On-line] Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/ on July 11, 2005.
    Taiwan Elementary and Secondary Education Community. (2003). The basic 1000 vocabulary for elementary and junior high school students. Retrieved June, 3, 2005, from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/declare/content.php?ID=136.
    Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning. London: Kogan Page.
    Tozcu, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful Learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(5), 473-495.
    Tsai, J. (2006). Connecting reading and writing in college EFL course. [On-line] Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/ on December 22, 2006.
    Waring, R. (2000). Extensive reading in second languages: a critique of the research. [On-line] Retrieved from http://www1.harenet.ne.jp/~waring/papers/ on April 12, 2006.
    Waring, R., & Nation, P. (2004). Second language reading and incidental vocabulary learning. Angles on the English-Speaking World, 4, 11-23.
    Winter, C. (1992). Bilingual dictionaries: between language and speech. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics (pp.41-51). London: Macmillan.
    Wolter, B. (2002). Assessing proficiency through word associations: is there still hope? System, 30, 315-329.
    Wood, J. (2001). Can software support children’s vocabulary development? Language Learning & Technology, 5 (1), 166-201.
    Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: effects of frequency and contextual richness. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 (4), 541-572.

    QR CODE