簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林彥伶
Yen-Ling Lin
論文名稱: 國中學生知覺體育專家與生手教師回饋對學習成就相關性之研究
A study of Relationship of Student’s Perception of Expert and Novice Teacher Feedback to Students’ Achievement in Junior High School Physical Education
指導教授: 闕月清
Keh, Nyit-Chin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 120
中文關鍵詞: 學生知覺教師回饋行為學習成就專家教師生手教師
英文關鍵詞: student's perception, teacher feedback behavior, learning achievement, expert teacher, novice teacher
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:218下載:42
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究目的在探討國中學生知覺體育專家與生手教師回饋對學習成就的相關性。研究對象包括一位國中體育專家教師與一位體育生手教師,及任教八年級學生,共68名(專家教師33名、生手教師35名)。教學內容為排球發球與低手傳球兩個單元,共八節課。教學過程全程錄音錄影,採用Fishman 與 Tobey 教師回饋觀察系統工具來蒐集與分析教師回饋行為,以學生知覺教師回饋量表的調查,瞭解學生知覺教師回饋的差異。以相依樣本t檢定比較學生學習成就之差異,以皮爾遜積差相關,分析教師回饋與學習成就之相關,輔以學生知覺訪談,分析學生知覺的教師回饋行為是否有一致。研究結果顯示:(一)體育專家與生手教師在回饋對象與目的的行為類目有不同的表現;(二)體育專家教師以八節共提供510次的回饋總數與每分鐘1.41次的回饋頻率,高於體育生手教師的459次與1.28次;(三)學生學習成就方面,體育專家與生手教師的學生都有進步的表現,且部分回饋類目與學習成就達顯著相關;(四)學生知覺方面,體育生手教師學生知覺教師回饋情形高於體育專家教師學生(生手學生M=3.26、專家學生M=2.31);(五)練習試作成功率方面,體育專家教師學生表現高於體育生手教師學生(專家教師M=.61、生手教師M=.55)。本研究發現可提供師資培育機構、學校體育教師與相關研究人員,在體育課程設計、教學與學術研究之參考。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of student’s perception of expert and novice teacher feedback to students’ achievement in junior high school physical education class. One junior high school physical education expert and a novice teacher, with 68 eighth grade students in their physical education classes (expert-33 students, novice-35 students) served as the participants of this study. Instruction took place during eight classes of volleyball serve and setting unit. Data were collected by videotaping and audiotaping. The systematic observation instrument used was Fishman and Tobey Teacher Feedback Observation System. A modified “Student Perception of Teacher’s Feedback” Scale was used to investigate the difference of student’s perception in teacher feedback. Dependent t-test was used to determine difference in students’ achievement. Pearson product moment correlation was used to analyze correlation of the teacher feedback and the learning achievement. Individual student’s perception interview was administrated to further understand the consistency of student perceived teacher feedback. Results indicated that: (1) The expert and novice teacher were different in intent and direction feedback categories. (2) The expert teacher provided 510 feedbacks in eight lessons at the rate of 1.41 per minute, which was higher than the novice teacher with a total of 459 times at 1.28 per minute. (3) In student’s achievement, the expert and novice teacher’s students showed improvement in performance, and some feedback categories were significantly correlated with student achievement. (4) In student’s perception, students of the novice teacher scored higher in perceived teacher feedback than the expert teacher’s (the novice teacher’s students M=3.26, the expert teacher’s students M=2.31). (5) In successful rate of practice trial, the expert teacher’s students showed higher performance than novice teacher’s (the expert teacher’s students M=.61, the novice teacher’s student M=.55). These findings have implications for teacher education and physical education teachers, as well as provide insights for researchers.

    中文摘要……………………………………………………………i 英文摘要……………………………………………………………ii 謝誌…………………………………………………………………iii 目次…………………………………………………………………iv 表次…………………………………………………………………vii 圖次…………………………………………………………………ix 第壹章 緒論 第一節 研究背景………………………………………………01 第二節 研究目的與問題………………………………………03 第三節 研究假設………………………………………………03 第四節 研究範圍與限制………………………………………04 第五節 名詞釋義………………………………………………06 第六節 研究重要性……………………………………………08 第貳章 文獻探討 第一節 體育專家教師與生手教師回饋之比較研究…………09 第二節 教師回饋與學生學習成就之相關研究………………15 第三節 學生知覺與教師回饋…………………………………18 第四節 學生知覺與學生學習成就……………………………20 第参章 方法與步驟 第一節 研究架構………………………………………………24 第二節 研究對象………………………………………………25 第三節 研究方法與工具………………………………………27 第四節 實施過程………………………………………………28 第五節 資料處理………………………………………………33 第肆章 結果與討論 第一節 體育專家與生手教師回饋內容的差異情形…………35 第二節 體育專家與生手教師回饋對學習成就的影響………58 第三節 學生知覺體育專家與生手教師回饋行為的差異……65 第四節 學生知覺體育專家與生手教師回饋對學習成就 的影響…………………………………………………74 第伍章 結論與建議 第一節 結論……………………………………………………79 第二節 建議……………………………………………………82 引用文獻…………………………………………………………84 附 錄 附錄一:教師回饋觀察紀錄表 …………………………………92 附錄二:教師回饋觀察類目說明表 ……………………………93 附錄三:學生知覺教師回饋量表 ………………………………94 附錄四:動作技能測驗主觀評分計分表 ………………………96 附錄五:練習試作成功率紀錄表 ………………………………98 附錄六:教師訪談大綱 …………………………………………99 附錄七:學生訪談大綱 …………………………………………100 附錄八:研究參與教師同意書 …………………………………101 附錄九:研究參與學生同意書 …………………………………102 附錄十:研究參與學生監護人同意書 …………………………103 附錄十一:體育專家教師教學計畫簡案 ………………………104 附錄十二:體育生手教師教學計畫簡案 ………………………106 附錄十三:研究者觀察體育專家教師反省札記 ………………108 附錄十四:研究者觀察體育生手教師反省札記 ………………113 附錄十五:量表問卷使用同意書 ………………………………118 表 次 表1 排球教學進度表………………………………………………05 表2 教師回饋與學生學習成就之相關研究表……………………18 表3 研究參與教師基本資料表……………………………………26 表4 訪談日程表……………………………………………………32 表5 體育專家教師回饋類目統計表………………………………41 表6 體育生手教師回饋類目統計表………………………………47 表7 體育專家與生手教師回饋類目比較表………………………48 表8 體育專家與生手教師每節接收回饋人數比較表……………55 表9 體育專家與生手教回饋次數與頻率比較表…………………57 表10 學生動作技能前-後測之量的客觀成績比較表……………59 表11 學生動作技能前-後測之質的主觀成績比較………………60 表12 教師回饋與學習成就之量的客觀成績相關分析摘要表 …63 表13 教師回饋與學習成就之質的主觀成績相關分析摘要表 …64 表14 學生知覺教師回饋行為量表分析 …………………………65 表15 學生知覺正面一般性回饋構面分析 ………………………67 表16 學生知覺正面形式回饋構面分析 …………………………68 表17 學生知覺負面形式回饋構面分析 …………………………69 表18 學生知覺中立形式回饋構面分析 …………………………70 表19 學生知覺正面目的特殊性回饋構面分析 …………………71 表20 學生知覺負面目的特殊性回饋構面分析 …………………72 表21 學生知覺時間回饋構面分析 ………………………………73 表22 體育專家與生手教師學生每節試作成功率比較表 ………75 表23 高、低技能學生試作成功率比較表…………………………76 表24 高、低技能學生試作成功率與教師回饋相關摘要表………78 圖 次 圖1 研究架構圖……………………………………………………24 圖2 研究流程圖……………………………………………………29 圖3 體育專家與生手教師在回饋形式之情形……………………49 圖4 體育專家與生手教師在回饋對象之情形……………………50 圖5 體育專家與生手教師在回饋時間之情形……………………50 圖6 體育專家與生手教師在回饋目的之情形……………………51 圖7 體育專家與生手教師在回饋一般性之情形…………………52 圖8 體育專家與生手教師在回饋特殊性之情形…………………53 圖9 體育專家與生手教師在回饋特質之情形……………………54 圖10 體育專家與生手教師在回饋後續行為之情形 ……………54

    中文部份
    李佩芬(2003)。台灣地區大學院校舞蹈系學生思考風格及其影響因素之研
    究─以台灣藝術大學為例。未出版碩士論文,中國文化大學,臺北市。

    林逸松(2002)。體育專家教師回饋之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師
    範大學,臺北市。

    林逸松、闕月清(2001)。小學體育教學中學生思考初探。國際高等教育體
    育學術研討會論文集(頁181-184)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。

    林進財(1999)。教學研究與發展。臺北市:五南。

    林俊賢(2007)。教師回饋知覺、目標導向與國中生體育課參與動機之關連。
    未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

    吳淑靜(2004)。國小體育教師師生互動行為及教學決定因素之研究。未出
    版碩士論文,國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。

    吳德城(2001)。國小體育專家教師教學行為分析。未出版碩士論文,國立
    臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

    施登堯(1998)。自動口語提示對動作技能學習效果之研究。未出版碩士論
    文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

    黃秋芳、闕月清(2001)。體育教師回饋與學習成就。中華民國大專院校九
    十一年度體育學術研討會專刊,77-85。

    黃淑芬(2002)。幼兒對身體活動教學知覺之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺
    灣師範大學,臺北市。

    黃秋芳(2003)。體育專家教師與生手教師回饋行為與教學思考之比較研
    究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

    黃泰源(2005)。國小體育專教師與生手教師教學行為及教學反省之比較研
    究。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院,桃園縣。

    孫志麟(1992)。生手如何成為專家呢?教師專業表現之探討。師友月刊,
    3,21-25。

    夏淑琴(1999)。體育專家教師與生手教師之比較研究-以教師回饋為例。
    未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

    游恆山(1990)。心理學。臺北市:五南。

    路君約等(1987)。心理學。臺北市:中國行為科學社。

    張春秀(2000)。體育教學情境中的學生思考研究。臺北市:師大書苑。

    張春興(1987)。心理學。臺北市:東華。

    張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。

    張春興(1994)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。

    張春興(1995)。教育心理學-認知取向。臺北市:遠流。

    張景媛(1997)。如何讓新手老師成為專家教師。輔導與測驗,145,
    3008-3010。

    蔡易峻(1998)。專家與生手體育教師教學行為之比較。未出版碩士論文,
    國立體育學院,桃園縣。

    翰林出版事業股份有限公司(2007)。國民中學健康與體育課本。臺南市:
    作者。

    簡紅珠(1992)。教學研究的主要派典及其啟示之探析。高雄:復文。

    闕月清(2000)。教師回饋與體育教學。運動心理學研究委員會89學年年
    度專書(頁103-112)。臺北市:中華民國體育學會。

    闕月清(2000)。刺激回憶訪談法。體育教學研究方法(頁221-236)。臺北
    市:國立台灣師範大學體育研究與發展中心。

    鐘敏華(1995)。國中體育教師回饋與學生學習成就之相關研究。未出版碩
    士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

    外文部分
    Berliner, D. C. (1988). The development of expertise in
    pedagogy. Washington, D. C.: American Association of
    College for Teacher Education. (Originally presented as
    the Charles W. Hunt Memorial lecture at the meetings of
    the American Association of College for Teacher
    Education, New Orleans, LA., February 17, 1988).

    Bilodeau, E. A., & Bilodeau, I. M. (1961). Variation of
    temporal intervals among critical events in five
    studies of knowledge of result. Journal of Experimental
    Psychology, 55, 603-612.

    Brandt, R. S. (1986). On the expert teacher: A conversation
    with David Berliner. Educational Leadership, 44(2), 4-
    9.

    Chen, D. D. (2001). Trends in Augmented Feedback Research
    and Tips for the Practitioner. Journal of Physical
    Education, Recreation, & Dance, 72(1), 32-36.

    De Knop, P. (1986). Relationship of Specified instructional
    teacher behavior to student gain on tennis. Journal of
    teaching in physical education, 5, 71-78.

    Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher
    effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 5, 163-
    198.

    Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. (1974). The study of teaching.
    New York: Holt, Reinhart & Wintson.

    Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students
    through their individual learning styles-practical
    approaches for grades 3-6. Boston, MA : Simon &
    Schuster.

    Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1994). Teaching young children
    through their individual learning styles-practical
    approaches for grades K-2. Boston, MA : Simon &
    Schuster.

    Engan, T. (1983). The interaction of knowledge of results
    as a response outcome and goal information in motor
    skill acquisition. Unpublished master’s thesis,
    Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

    Eghan, T. (1988). The relation of teacher feedback to
    student achievement in learning selected tennis skills.
    Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State
    University, Baton Rouge, LA.

    Fishman, S., & Tobey, C. (1978). Augmented feedback. In
    W.G. Anderson & G. Barrette (Eds.). What’s going on in
    gym: Descriptive studies of physical education class.
    Motor Skill: Theory into practice. (Monograph 1)

    Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition
    with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3-23.

    Godbout, P., Brunelle, J., & Tousignant, M. (1987). Who
    benefits from passing through the program? In G. T.
    Barrette R. S. Feingold, C. R. Rees, & M. Pieron
    (Eds.). Myths models and methods in sport pedagogy,
    (pp. 183-197). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Graham, K. C. (1987). A description of academic work and
    student performance during a middle school
    volleyball unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical
    Education, 7, 22-37.

    Griffey, D. C., & Housner, L. D. (1991). Differences
    between experienced and inexperienced teachers
    planning decisions, interactions, student
    engagement and instructional climate. Research
    Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62 (2), 196-204.

    Gushart, J. L., & Kelly, L. W. (1993). Teachers’
    instructional variables in volleyball and students’
    improvement in motor skill. Perceptual and Motor
    Skills, 76, 1015-1024.

    Gushart, J. L., Kelly, I. M., & Rink, J. E. (1997). The
    validity of the qualitative measure of teacher
    performance scale as measure of teacher effectiveness.
    Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 196-210.

    Hartman, M. D. (1990). The effect of an observational
    training program on feedback behaviors of persevere
    physical educators in clinical adapted physical
    education setting. Unpublished dissertation, Oklahoma
    State University.

    Hebert, E., & Landin, D. K. (1994). Effects of a learning
    model and augmented feedback on tennis skill
    acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
    Sport, 65, (3), 250-257.

    Keh, N. C., Lee, A. M., & Magill, R. A. (1989, August).
    Differential characteristics of teacher feedback for
    low-and high-skilled students in the acquisition of
    badminton skill. In C. K. Giam, K. K. Chook, & K. C.
    Teh (Eds.), Proceeding of the 7th World Congress in
    Sport Psychology pp. 101-102). Singapore Sports Council.

    Keh, N. C. (1992). Students’ use of teacher feedback
    during badminton instruction. Unpublished dissertation,
    Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

    Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2005). The effect perceived teacher
    feedback on intrinsic motivation in physical
    education. International Journal of Sport Psychology,
    36, 91-106.

    Lee, A. M. (1997). Contributions of research on student
    thinking in physical education. Journal of Teaching in
    Physical Education, 16, 262-277.

    Lee, M. A., Keh, N. C., & Magill, R. A. (1993).
    Instructional effects of teacher feedback in physical
    education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,
    12, 228-243.

    Magill, R. A. (1986). Knowledge of Results and Skill
    Acquisition. Dubuque, Iowa: W.C. Brown.

    Magill, R. A. (1993). Augmented feedback in skill
    acquisition. In R. N. Signer, M. Murphey, & L. K.
    Tennant (Eds.), Handbook on research in sport
    Psychology (pp.193-212). New York: Macmillan.

    Mars, H., Darst, P. W., Vogler, E. W., & Cusimano, B.
    (1995). Novice expert physical education teachers:
    maybe they think and decide different.... but do they
    behave differently? Journal of Teaching in Physical
    Education, 14, 340-347.

    Martinek, T. J. (1988). Confirmation of a teacher
    expectancy model: Student perception and causal
    attributions of teaching behaviors. Research Quarterly
    for Exercise and Sport, 59, 118-126.

    Metzler, M. (1986). Using systematic analysis to promote
    teaching skills in physical education, Journal of
    Teacher Education, 37, 29-33.

    Paese, P. C. (1987). Specific teacher feedback’s effect on
    academic learning time and on a novel motor skill. In
    G. T. Barrette R. S. Feingold, C. R. Rees, & M. Pieron
    (Eds.). Myths models and methods in sport pedagogy,
    (pp. 207-213). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Pellett, T. L., Henschel-Pellett, H. A., & Harrison, J.
    M. (1994). Feedback effects: Field-based findings.
    Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 75-77.

    Pellett, T. L., & Harrison, J. M. (1995). The influence of
    a teacher’s specific, congruent, and corrective
    feedback on female junior high school students’
    immediate volleyball practice success. Journal of
    Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 53-63.

    Place, J. H., & Locke, L. F. (1986). Research on teaching
    physical education: New knowledge and caution optimism.
    Journal of Teaching Education, 37, 24-28.

    Pieron, M. (1982). Effectiveness of teaching a psychomotor
    task: Study in a micro-teaching setting. In M. Pieron,
    & J. Cheffers (Eds.). Studying the Teaching in Physical
    Education (pp.61-68). Liege, Belgium: AIESEP

    Rikard, G. L. (1991). The short term relationship of
    feedback and student practice. Journal of Teaching in
    Physical Education, 10, 175-185.

    Rikard, G. L. (1992). The relationship of teacher’s task
    refinement and feedback to students’ practice success.
    Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 349-357.

    Rink, J. E. (1985). Teaching physical education for
    learning. St. Louis: Time Mirror/Mosby.

    Salter, W. B., & Graham, G. (1985). The effects of three
    disparate instructional approaches on skill attempts
    and student learning in an experimental teaching unit.
    Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 212-218.

    Samoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. W. (1984).
    Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and
    critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 225-
    260.

    Santina, B., Solmon, M. A., Cothran, D. J., Loftus, S. J.,
    & Davidson, K. S. (1998). Patriarchal consciousness:
    Middle school students’ and teachers’perspectives of
    motivational practices. Sport, Education & Society, 3,
    181-200.

    Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor
    skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.

    Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A
    Behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human
    Kinetics.

    Sharpe, T. & Hawkins, A. (1992). Study Ⅲ expert and novice
    elementary specialists: a comparative analysis.
    Journal of teaching in physical education, 12, 55-75.

    Siedentop, D. (1982). Teaching research: The
    interventionist view. Journal of Teaching in Physical
    Education, 1, 3-14.

    Siedentop, D. (1983). Developing teaching skills in
    physical education (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Sidentop, D. (1991). Developing teaching skill in physical
    education (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Silverman, S. (1991). Research on teaching in physical
    education. Research on Quarterly for Exercise and
    Sport, 62, 352-364.

    Silverman, S., Tyason, L. A., & Krampitz, J. (1992).
    Teacher feedback and achievement in physical education:
    Interaction with student practice. Teaching and Teacher
    Education, 8, 333-344.

    Silverman, S., & Skonie, R. (1997). Research on teaching in
    physical education: An analysis of published research.
    Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 300-311.

    Solmon, M. A., & Carter, J. O. (1995). Kindergarten and
    first-grade students’perceptions of physical education
    in one teachers’ classes. The Elementary School
    Journal, 95, 354-365.

    Solmon, M. A., & Lee, A. M. (1991). A contrast of planning
    behaviors between expert and novice adapted physical
    education teachers. Adapted Physical Activity
    Quarterly, 8, 115-127.

    Solmon, M. A., & Lee, A. M. (1996). Entry characteristics,
    practice variables, and cognition: Student mediation of
    instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,
    15, 136-150.

    Tan, S. K. S. (1996). Differences between experienced
    inexperienced physical education teachers’ augmented
    feedback and interactive teaching decision. Journal of
    Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 151-170.

    Tjeerdsma, B. L. (1997). A Comparison of teacher and
    student perspectives of tasks and feedback. Journal of
    Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 388-400.

    Weinstein, C. E., & Middlestat, S. E. (1979). Student
    perceptions of teacher interactions with male high and
    low achievers. Journal of Teaching in Physical
    Education, 71, 421-461.

    Wittrock, M. C.(1986). Students’ thought processes.
    Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed.). New York:
    Macmillan.

    Xiang, P., & Lee, A. M. (1998). The development of self-
    perceptions of ability and achievement goals and their
    relation in physical education. Research Quarterly for
    Exercise and Sport, 69, 231-241.

    Yerg, B. J. (1981). The impact of selected presage and
    process behaviors on the refinement of a motor skill.
    Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1(1),38-46.

    Yerg, B. J., & Twardy, B. (1982). Relationship of a
    specified instructional teacher behaviors to pupil gain
    on a motor skill task. In M. Pieron, & J. Cheffers
    (Eds.). Studying the Teaching in Physical Education
    (pp.61-68). Liege, Belgium: AIESEP

    QR CODE