簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳韋伶
Chen, Wei-Ling
論文名稱: 以中文為母語之兒童中文示證性標記之理解與使用
The Comprehension and Production of Evidential Markers in Chinese by Mandarin-speaking Children
指導教授: 陳純音
Chen, Chun-Yin
口試委員: 張妙霞
Chang, Miao-Hsia
陳淑惠
Chen, Shu-hui
陳純音
Chen, Chun-yin Doris
口試日期: 2021/01/28
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 116
中文關鍵詞: 中文第一語言習得示證性題型效應年齡效應
英文關鍵詞: Mandarin Chinese, first language acquisition, evidentiality, task effect, age effect
研究方法: 實驗設計法紮根理論法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101326
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:129下載:57
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討以中文為母語的兒童對中文示證性標記之習得,主要探討的議題包括:訊息來源類型、習得順序、題型效應以及年齡效應。本研究包含兩項測驗:圖片敘述測驗與選擇題測驗,分別測試兒童的表達能力以及理解能力。研究對象包含實驗組的四十位孩童,依年齡三歲及五歲分成兩組,每組二十人;另外有對照組的二十位以中文為母語的成人。研究結果顯示,直接訊息來源的標記比起間接訊息來源的標記更早習得。其中,視覺和非視覺訊息的標記對兒童來說同樣容易;比起轉述訊息的標記,兒童對推論訊息的標記有較多誤用。在題型效應方面,兒童在選擇題測驗的表現顯著優於他們在圖片敘述測驗的表現,顯示兒童辨識中文示證性用語的能力比起使用相關標記表達訊息來源的能力來得更好。最後,本研究發現年齡是習得中文示證性標記的關鍵因素。三歲兒童已經可以掌握直接訊息來源的標記,但仍難以理解間接訊息來源的標記;五歲兒童處理間接訊息來源標記的能力比起三歲兒童已有顯著增強,但仍未達到成人能力的階段。總言之,以中文為母語的兒童對中文示證性標記習得的能力隨著年齡增長而提升。

    The present study examined the acquisition of evidential markers in Chinese with Mandarin-speaking children under various issues, including evidential types, the order of acquisition, task effect and age effect. One production task (i.e., picture-description task) and one comprehension task (i.e., multiple-choice task) were conducted. Forty Mandarin-speaking children participated in the study, and they were further divided into two age groups: the 3-year-olds and the 5-year-olds. In addition, twenty adult native speakers of Mandarin were recruited as controls. The results showed that direct evidential markers were acquired prior to indirect evidential markers. With regard to the order of acquisition, the children found visual markers and non-visual markers equally easy, while they understood reported markers better than inferring markers. Concerning the task effect, the participants performed significantly better on the comprehension task than on the production task, suggesting that it is relatively easier for them to recognize evidential meanings than to produce evidentially encoded utterances. Finally, age was identified as a crucial factor contributing to the children's acquisition of Chinese evidential markers. The 3-year-olds had some success with direct evidential markers, but they still had difficulties with indirect evidential markers. The 5-year-olds significantly outperformed the 3-year-olds in indirect contexts; however, they did not reach an adult-like level. Taken together, Mandarin-speaking children's abilities of handling evidential markers in Chinese improved with the growth of age.

    Acknowledgements i 摘要 iii Abstract iv Table of Contents v List of Tables viii List of Figures ix Chapter One Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Research Questions 6 1.3 Significance of the Study 7 1.4 Organization of the Thesis 8 Chapter Two Literature Review 9 2.1 Defining Evidentiality 9 2.2 Types of Evidence 12 2.3 Evidential Hierarchy 15 2.4 Empirical Studies on Evidentiality 17 2.4.1 Papafragou et al. (2007) 18 2.4.2 Winans et al. (2014) 22 2.4.3 Koring & de Mulder (2015) 25 2.4.4 Ozturk & Papafragou (2016) 29 2.4.5 Summary of the empirical studies 33 2.5 A New Classification of Chinese Evidential markers 35 2.6 Summary of Chapter Two 43 Chapter Three Research Design 44 3.1 Participants 44 3.2 Material and Methods 46 3.2.1 Picture-description Task 48 3.2.2 Multiple-choice Task 51 3.3 Procedures 52 3.3.1 Pilot Study 53 3.3.2 Formal Study 54 3.3.3 Scoring 56 3.4 Summary of Chapter Three 56 Chapter Four Results and Discussion 58 4.1 Acquisition of Direct and Indirect Evidential Markers 58 4.1.1 Overall Comparison between the Two Evidential Types 59 4.1.2 General Discussion 61 4.2 Acquisition Order of the Subtypes 65 4.2.1 Overall Comparison between the Subtypes 65 4.2.2 General Discussion 68 4.3 Task Effect 73 4.3.1 Overall Comparison between the Two Task Conditions 73 4.3.2 Comparison of Evidential Types in Two Task Conditions 75 4.3.3 Comparison of the Subtypes in Two Task Conditions 80 4.3.4 General Discussion 83 4.4 Age Effect 88 4.5 Summary of Chapter Four 90 Chapter Five Conclusion 91 5.1 Summary of the Major Findings 91 5.2 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Further Research 92 References 94 Appendix A Test Items Used in the Picture-description Task 102 Appendix B Test Items Used in the Multiple-choice Task 113 Appendix C Consent Form 116

    Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon, 1-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Aksu-Koç, Ayhan. 1988. The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Aksu‐Koç, Ayhan, Hale Ögel‐Balaban, and I. Ercan Alp. 2009. Evidentials and source knowledge in Turkish. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125:13 28.
    Ambridge, Ben, and Caroline F. Rowland. 2013. Experimental methods in studying child language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4.2:149-168.
    Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 273-312. Norwood: Ablex.
    Asudeh, Ash, and Ida Toivonen. 2012. Copy raising and perception. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30.2:321-380.
    Barnes, Janet. 1984. Evidentials in the Tuyuca Verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 50.3:255-271.
    Bates, Elizabeth, Inge Bretherton, and Lynn Sebestyen Snyder. 1988. From First Words to Grammar: Individual Differences and Dissociable Mechanisms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Berman, Ruth A., and Dan Isaac Slobin (eds.) 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Blume, María, and Barbara C. Lust. 2017. Research Methods in Language Acquisition: Principles, Procedures, and Practices. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    Boas, Franz. 1947. Kwakiutl grammar, with a glossary of the suffixes. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 37.3:201-377.
    Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 261-272. Norwood: Ablex.
    Chafe, Wallace, and Johanna Nichols (eds.) 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex.
    Choi, Soonja. 1995. The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Joan Bybee and Suzanne Fleischman, 165-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Clark, Eve E. 1993. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Cornillie, Bert. 2008. Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Spanish (Semi-)Auxiliaries: A Cognitive-Functional Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    Davis, Christopher, Christopher Potts, and Margaret Speas. 2007. The pragmatic values of evidential sentences. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 17:71-88.
    de Haan, Ferdinand. 1998. The category of evidentiality. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Mexico.
    de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18.1: 83-101.
    de Villiers, Jill, Jay Garfield, Harper Gernet-Girard, Tom Roeper, and Margaret Speas. 2009. Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics, and cognitive development. New directions for child and adolescent development 125:29-47.
    DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16.3:529-564.
    Dendale, Patrick, and Liliane Tasmowski. 2001. Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33.3:339-348.
    Diewald, Gabriele, and Elena Smirnova. 2010. Evidentiality in German: Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Eisenbeiss, Sonja. 2010. Production methods in language acquisition research. Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research, ed. by Elma Blom and Sharon Unsworth, 11-34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Faller, Martina Theresia. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
    Fox, Barbara A. 2001. Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11.2:167-192.
    Garrett, Edward John. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
    Givón, Thomas. 1982. Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language 6.1:23-49.
    Goodglass, Harold, Edith Kaplan, and Sandra Weintraub. 2001. BDAE: The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    Hamayan, Else, Joel Saegert, and Paul Larudee. 1977. Elicited imitation in second language learners. Language and Speech 20.1: 86-97.
    Hsiao, Pei-Yi Katherine. 2015. Issues on Evidentiality and Attitudes in Chinese Languages. Doctoral dissertation, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
    Hsieh, Chia-Ling. 2006. Hanyu qingtaici de yuyi jieding: yuliaoku wei ben de yanjiu [The semantic categorization of Chinese modal expressions: a corpus-based analysis]. Zhongguo yuwen yanjiu [Studies in Chinese Linguistics] 21:45-63.
    Hsieh, Chia-Ling. 2008. Evidentiality in Chinese newspaper reports: Subjectivity/objectivity as a factor. Discourse Studies 10.2:205-229.
    Hulstijn, Jan H. 2010. Measuring second language proficiency. Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research, ed. by Elma Blom and Sharon Unsworth, 185-200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Jacobsen, William H., Jr. 1986. The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 3-28. Norwood: Ablex.
    Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. Cambridge: Harvard University.
    Koring, Loes, and Hannah de Mulder. 2015. Understanding different sources of information: The acquisition of evidentiality. Journal of Child Language 42.5:947-968.
    Larsen-Freeman, Diane, and Michael H. Long. 1991. An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Longman.
    Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33.3:359-367.
    Lee, Thomas Hun-tak, and Ann Law. 2001. Epistemic modality and the acquisition of Cantonese final particles. Issues in East Asian Language Acquisition, ed. by Mineharu Nakayama, 67-128. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
    Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Lindsay, D. Stephen, Marcia K. Johnson, and Paul Kwon. 1991. Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 52.3:297-318.
    MacWhinney, Brian , and Catherine Snow. 1985. The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language 12.2:271-295.
    Marín Arrese, Juana I., Gerda Haßler, and Marta Carretero. 2017. Introduction. Evidentiality Revisited, ed. by Juana I. Marín Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero, 1-9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Matsui, Tomoko, and Stanka A. Fitneva. 2009. Knowing how we know: Evidentiality and cognitive development. New directions for child and adolescent development 125:1-11.
    Matsui, Tomoko, Taeko Yamamoto, and Peter McCagg. 2006. On the role of language in children’s early understanding of others as epistemic beings. Cognitive Development 21.2:158-173.
    Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, Where are You? New York: Dial Book for Young Readers.
    McNamara, Tim. 1996. Measuring Second Language Performance. London: Longman.
    Mithun, Marianne. 1986. Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian. The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 89-112. Norwood: Ablex.
    Murray, Sarah E. 2010. Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
    Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    O’Neill, Daniela K., and Alison Gopnik. 1991. Young children’s ability to identify the sources of their beliefs. Developmental Psychology 27.3:390-397.
    O’Neill, Daniela K., and Selena C. F. Chong. 2001. Preschool children’s difficulty understanding the types of information obtained through the five senses. Child Development 72.3:803-815.
    Oswalt, Robert L. 1986. The evidential system of Kashaya. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 29-45. Norwood: Ablex.
    Ozturk, Ozge, and Anna Papafragou. 2016. The acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring. Language Learning and Development 12.2:199-230.
    Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Papafragou, Anna, Peggy Li, Youngon Choi, and Chung-hye Han. 2007. Evidentiality in language and cognition. Cognition 103.2:253-299.
    Pillow, Bradford H. 1989. Early understanding of perception as a source of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 47.1:116-129.
    Pillow, Bradford H., Valerie Hill, April Boyce, and Catherine Stein. 2000. Understanding inference as a source of knowledge: Children’s ability to evaluate the certainty of deduction, perception, and guessing. Developmental Psychology 36.2:169-179.
    Pratt, Chris, and Peter Bryant. 1990. Young children understand that looking leads to knowing (so long as they are looking into a single barrel). Child Development 61.4:973-982.
    Rett, Jessica, and Nina Hyams. 2014. The acquisition of syntactically encoded
    Evidentiality. Language Acquisition 21:2:173-198.
    Robinson, E. J., G. V. Thomas, A. Parton, and R. Nye. 1997. Children’s overestimation of the knowledge to be gained from seeing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 15.3:257-273.
    Sodian, Beate, and Heinz Wimmer. 1987. Children’s understanding of inference as a source of knowledge. Child Development 58.2:424-433.
    Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114.3:255-276.
    Squartini, Mario. 2008. Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics 46.5:917-947.
    Su, Lily I-wen. Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30.1:19-40.
    Ünal, Ercenur, and Anna Papafragou. 2016. Production-comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language 89:179-199.
    Ünal, Ercenur, and Anna Papafragou. 2020. Relations between language and cognition: Evidentiality and sources of knowledge. Topics in Cognitive Science 12.1:115-135.
    van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2.1:79-124.
    Viberg, Åke. 1983. The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21:123-162.
    Wang, Yu-Fang, Aya Katz, and Chih-Hua Chen. 2003. Thinking as saying: shuo (‘say’) in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and BBS talk. Language Sciences 25.5:457-488.
    Wiemer, Björn. 2010. Hearsay in European languages: Toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical Marking. Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 59-130. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12.1:51-97.
    Wimmer, Heinz, G.-Jürgen Hogrefe, and Josef Perner. 1988. Children’s understanding of informational access as source of knowledge. Child Development 59.2:386-396.
    Winans, Lauren, Nina Hyams, Jessica Rett, and Laura Kalin. 2014. Children’s comprehension of syntactically encoded evidentiality. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Cambridge, MA.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE