電腦科學教育學者認為運算思維（computational thinking）是每個人都應具備的基本能力，電腦課程應能培養學生此方面之能力。本研究透過大慧調查法逐步取得學者專家的共識，界定中小學各學習年段學生應具備之運算思維能力。研究首先由文獻探討歸納運算思維之內涵，並據以發展大慧調查問卷初稿；接著針對13位專家小組進行的三次問卷及一次座談會議，逐步舉得學生應具備能力之共識。專家小組成員包含大專資訊科系教授、中小學資訊科技教師、及資訊相關產業研究員。專家小組提出擬出之運算思維能力包括九個向度，分別為：問題解決、拆解問題、演算法、資料表示、資料分析、模組化及模擬、抽象化、自動化、與其他領域之關係。各學習年段必要具備之運算思維能力共49項，包含國小階段13項，國中階段9項及高中階段27項；另有選備能力8項，分別於國中階段1項及高中階段7項。本研究結果可作為未來12年國民教育資訊科技課程擬定之參考。

The objective of this study is to design a computational thinking curriculum standard for K-12 education. The Delphi technique was employed to collect different views and derive consensus from a panel of thirteen experts, including computer scientists, computer science educators, K-12 computer teachers, and industry experts.
The first draft of Delphi survey questionnaire consists of nine themes (problem solving, problem decomposition, algorithms, data representation, data analysis, modeling and simulation, abstraction, automation and others) and 60 competence indicators, was developed based on our investigation of the nature of computational thinking. After three-rounds of survey and a final round-table discussion, the expert panel derived 49 essential competence indicators (13 for grades K to 6, nine of grades 7 to 9 and 27 of grades 10 to 12) and eight optional competence indicators (one for grades 7 to 9 and seven for grade 10 to 12). The results serve as useful references for developing Taiwan’s new K-12 computing curriculum.

方信淵（2005）。台灣地區大專院校運動觀光課程發展研究。體育學報，38（3），23-36。
吳美宜、黃松元（2007）。大學通識生死學課程規劃、目標與內容之研究。學校衛生，50，59-86。
吳瓊洳（2008）。多元文化課程評鑑指標之建構－以新台灣之子學校課程為例。花蓮教育大學學報，27，85-106。
林香河、陳國彥（2013）。國中性別平等教育課程評鑑指標建構之研究。教育學誌，29，1-20。
姚文隆、谷家恆、楊俊彬、黃明賢、傅兆章、林栢村、郭文豐（2008）。科技大學精密模具設計分析專業學程課程發展之研究。高雄師大學報，24，81-94。
莊謙本（1997）。Delphi，DACUM，V-TECS在資訊技術分析與課程設計效能之比較研究。台北：文景出版社。
教育部（2008a）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題－資訊教育。2013年8月13日，取自：http://www.tpde.edu.tw/97_sid17/3資訊教育議題1000720-ok.doc
教育部（2008b）。普通高級中學必修科目「資訊科技概論」課程綱要。2013年8月13日，取自：http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/普通高級中學必修科目「資訊科技概論」課程綱要(1).pdf
教育部（2013）。提升國民素養專案計劃報告書。2013年12月17日，取自http://literacytw.naer.edu.tw/data/cht/20131104/20131104juhon7.pdf
教育部（2014）。提升國民素養實施方案 102年結案報告－數位素養研究計畫。2014年07月01日，取自 http://literacytw.naer.edu.tw/data/cht/20140430/20140430v0x2d6.pdf
國家教育研究院（2013）。十二年國民基本教育科技領域綱要內容之前導研究。國家教育研究院專題研究成果報告（編號：NAER-102-06-A-1-02-09-1-18），未出版。
黃佳媛（2010）。小學奈米科技核心概念之研究。國立臺中教育大學科學應用與推廣系碩士論文。
黃佳媛、許良榮、陳欣琦（2011）。小學奈米科技核心概念之研究。臺中教育大學學報，25(1)，1-22。
葉重新（2005）。教育研究法（第二版）。台北：心理出版社。
廖錦龍（2009）。國民小學友善校園指標建構之研究。中臺科技大學文教事業經營研究所碩士論文。
潘義祥（2011）。高中學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標之建構。體育學報，44（4），571-592。
Aho, A. V. (2012). Computation and computational thinking. The Computer Journal, 55(7), 832-835.
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.
Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843-855.
CSTA (Computer Science Teachers Association). (2011a). CSTA K–12 computer science standards. The ACM K-12 Education Task Force. Retrieved from http://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/CSTA_K-12_CSS.pdf
CSTA (Computer Science Teachers Association). (2011b). Computational thinking teacher resources, second edition. Retrieved from http://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/472.11CTTeacherResources_2ed-SP-vF.pdf
Cuhls K. (2000). Delphi method. Retrieved from http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/import/16959_DelphiMethod.pdf
Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J. M. (2010). Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer scientists. Unpublished manuscript in progress, reference in http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science, 9(3), 458-467.
Dalkey, N. C., Brown, B. B., & Cochran, S. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion (Vol. 3). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
DOE (Department for Education). (2013, September 11). National curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study
Gill, F. J., Leslie, G. D., Grech, C., & Latour, J. M. (2013). Using a web-based survey tool to undertake a Delphi study: Application for nurse education research. Nurse education today, 33(11), 1322-1328.
Google. (2010). Exploring Computational Thinking [Web message]. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/edu/computational-thinking/
Grigal, M., Hart, D., & Weir, C. (2011). Framing the future: A standards-based conceptual framework for research and practice in inclusive higher education. Think College Insight Brief, Issue No, 10.
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). National educational technology standards for students. Retrieved from http://www.iste.
org/standards/standards-for-students/nets-student-standards-2007
Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., … Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 32-37.
Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. SIGCSE Bull., 41(1), 260-264. doi: 10.1145/1539024.1508959
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison Wesly.
National Research Council (NRC). (2010). Report of a Workshop on the Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking. National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2010). Computational Thinking for Youth. Retrieved from http://itestlrc.edc.org/sites/itestlrc.edc.org/files/Computational_
Thinking_paper.pdf
O'Neill, S., Scott, M., & Conboy, K. (2011). A Delphi study on collaborative learning in distance education: The faculty perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 939-949.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills(P21). (2009). P21 Framework Definitions. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
Royal Society. (2012). Shut down or restart: The way forward for computing in UK schools. Retrieved from http://royalsociety.org/education/policy/computing-in-schools/report/
Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
Wing, J. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions on the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725.
Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking— What and why? The Link Magazine, Spring. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-
what-and-why
Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2013). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge‐practical (TPACK‐practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology.