簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳翠霞
Tsui-Hsai Wu
論文名稱: 「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」對高中生學習表現之影響
The Effects of Teaching Program Mainly on Teaching Strategies for Adjusting Epistemological Beliefs and Class Mamagement for Senior High School Students on Learning Perfomance
指導教授: 張景媛
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 189
中文關鍵詞: 知識信念以調整知識信念為主的教學策略班級經營策略學習表現
英文關鍵詞: epistemological beliefs, Teaching program mainly on taaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs, class management strategies, learning performance
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:321下載:53
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究主要目的有四:一是設計適合高中生的「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」。二是分析實施「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」後,學生知識信念與數學學習表現的情形。三是了解高中生實施「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」後,學生知識信念改變的歷程。四是探究教師實施「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」後個人在教學上的省思。
針對上述研究目的,本研究以知識信念改變的相關理論為基礎,結合建構認知心理學觀點,設計「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」並進行教學實驗。本研究採用單因子準實驗設計,研究對象為臺北市一所高中兩個班級共83位高一學生,實驗組學生41位(男19,女22),控制組學生42位(男18,女24)。本研究先藉由知識信念量表、學期中的定期評量(兩次期中考及一次期末考)為測量工具,分析教學實驗效果;再透過蒐集實驗組學生課堂的學習資料,深入了解學生知識信念的轉變情形;最後針對高、低知識信念學生及參與教學實驗老師進行訪談,探討個別學生及老師知識信念的改變歷程及省思。
研究結果發現:
一、本研究實施「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」有助於調整學生的知識信念。
二、本研究實施「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」有助於提升高中學生之學習表現。
三、學生在學習過程中會受到知識信念的影響,會因知識信念發展程度不同而有不同之學習意願、行動及對教學活動體會亦不同。
四、本研究「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」之實施,有助於提升導師之班級經營效能。
整體而言,本研究設計的「以調整知識信念為主的教學及班級經營策略」實驗課程有助於學生調整知識信念及提升學業成績表現,在整個實施之過程對老師班級經營、教學及學生學習過程產生了一些影響。最後研究者歸納並討論研究結果,針對教學及未來研究提出幾項建議,作為知識信念調整教學、班級經營與未來後續研究之參考。

The purposes of this study were: 1) to design teaching program mainly on taaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs and class management which were suitable for senior high school students in the mathematical classes and class management. 2) to design teaching program mainly on teaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs and class management,and then examine the effects of teaching program for senior high school students on the epistemological beliefs and mathematical learning performance 3) To understand how students’ epistemological beliefs changed whilst teaching program mainly on teaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs and class management. 4) To discuss the changes of teachers’ opinions when applying teaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs in mathematical classes and class management.
The basis of this research was adjusting epistemological beliefs and its relative theories together with constructive cognitive psychology view. The teaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs had been designed as a quasi-experiment and applied to 83 first-year senior high school students in one senior high school in Taipei City. Single factor methodology was used in the research and the students were divided into two groups: one was experimental group which had 41 students (19 male and 22 female) and the other was controlled group which had 42 students (18 male and 24 female). Epistemological belief inventory and regular examination results were used to evaluate and analyse the effects of this method. In addition, learning documents in the experimental group were collected to fully understand how the students’ epistemological beliefs changed. And finally, the interviews to the students with higher or lower epistemological beliefs were introduced to discover the effective on individual students and teacher.
The result of study were presented as follow:
1)Teaching program mainly on taaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs and class management had benefits on adjusting students’ epistemological beliefs.
2)Teaching program mainly on taaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs and class management had improved the students’ learning performance.
3)The students in learning period were affected by epistemological belief and the students with different epistemological belief developments had different learning attitudes, actions, and feelings.
4)Teaching program mainly on taaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs and class management also enhanced performance of teachers’ class management.
Generally speaking, this research “Teaching program mainly on taaching strategies for adjusting epistemological beliefs and class management ” programme helped students to adjust epistemological beliefs and also improved their learning performance. The experiment affect teachers’ attitude on class management and teaching. The researcher also provided some recommendations for instructional assistance and future studies.

第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題與假設 5 第三節 名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 知識信念的意義、內涵及研究發展 9 第二節 知識信念與學習的關係 17 第三節 知識信念的改變歷程 27 第四節 班級經營策略與效能 39 第三章 研究方法 50 第一節 研究架構 50 第二節 研究對象 51 第三節 實驗設計 52 第四節 研究工具 53 第五節 實施程序 64 第六節 資料處理 66 第四章 研究結果與討論 68 第一節 「調整知識信念教學及班級經營策略」方案分析 68 第二節 「調整知識信念教學與班級經營策略」對學習表現之影響 82 第三節 實施「調整知識信念教學與班級經營策略」後學生知識信念改變的歷程分析 91 第四節 教師實施「調整知識信念教學與班級經營策略」後個人在教學上的省思分析 104 第五節 綜合討論 110 第五章 結論與建議 126 第一節 結論 126 第二節 建議 128 附錄 134 附錄一 知識信念量表 134 附錄二 量表的項目分析與因素分析結果 137 附錄三 單元活動設計 140 附錄四 各類學習單 162

一、 中文部分
李咏吟 (民83)。合作學習的技術層面。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,35,頁151-168。
李咏吟(1998)。認知教學理論與策略。台北:心理出版社。
何宗翰(1998)。主修領域背景對大學生知識信念與學習策略的影響,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華。
林清山(1995)。多變項分析統計法。台北:東華。
林清山譯(1990)。教育心理學-認知取向。台北:遠流。
林清文(民92)。高中高職學生基礎學科自我調整課業學習策略研究。中華輔導學報,13期,頁1-44。
林邦傑(民83)。中小學讀書與學習策略量表之編製。學生輔導通訊,31,116-21
林邦傑(民84)。我國國小、國中、高中學生學習及讀書策略之比較分析。測驗年刊,42,349-370。
林紀慧(2001a)。國小學童知識信念的發展以及學業成績之相關研究。台中師院學報,15期,191-206頁。
林紀慧(2001b)。知識學習信念與不同電腦繪圖型態的國小電腦數學學習成效研究。新竹師院學報,14期,69-85頁。
周文欽等(民84)。心理與教育測驗。台北:心理。
邱錦堂(2001)。國中導師信念、班級經營策略對班級經營效能之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所。
陳木金(1999)。班級經營。台北:揚智。
陳萩卿(2005)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證暨調整知識信念的教學策略對國中生學習歷程影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育與心理輔導研究所博士論文。
陳明照、曾勘仁(1995)。高中學生學習策略調查及團體輔導效果之研究。彰化市:欣欣文化出版社。
程炳林(1995)。自我調整學習模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
程炳林(1991)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整模式建構及驗證。師大學報教育類,46(1),頁67-92。
郭明德(2001)。班級經營理論實務策略與研究。台北:五南。
張春興(1994)。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華。
張春興(1994)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
張景媛(1992)。自我調整、動機信念、選題策略與作業表現關係的研究暨自我調整訓練課程效果之評估。教育心理學報,25,頁201-244
張景媛(1994)。國中生數學學習歷程統整模式之驗證及應用:學生建構數學概念的分析及數學文字題教學策略之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育與心理輔導研究所博士論文。
張新仁(2003)。學習與教學新趨勢。台北:心理出版社。
張子超(1995)。研究生的科學知識信念的研究。師大學報,40,頁601-618。
單文經譯(2004)班級經營的理論與實務。台北:學富文化事業有限公司。
溫明麗(2002)。皮亞傑與批判性思考教學。台北:洪葉文化。
許雅真(2002)。教師團隊的對話、反思與行動歷程。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
潘丗尊(1997)。Rogers人本教育理論與建構主義整合教學模式在國小一年級數學科教學應用個案研究。國立台中師院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
藍雅慧(2002)。知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程模式之建構。國立台
灣師範大學教育與心理輔導研究所碩士論文。
簡妙娟 (1999)。合作學習對高二學生學習公民「政治」單元之影響。台灣省教育,5,頁227-239。
簡妙娟 (2000)。高中公民科合作學習教學實驗之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
唐淑華(2000)。以讀書治療挑戰低成就學生之知識信念的實驗研究。中華輔導學報,8期,21-50頁。
馮施鈺珩、陳壟譯(2003)。學習與知識。香港:香港公開大學出版社。
黃盛蘭(1999)。高中學生行為困擾問題與求助態度之研究。國立台灣師大教育研究所碩士論文。
教育部(2002)。台灣地區中等以下各級學校學生學習及生活概況調查摘要報告。
91年8月27日取自http://www2.edu.tw/statisstics/index.htm。
楊百川(2001)。高中生心理需求困擾之評量與調查研究。國力成功大學大學教育研究所碩士論文。

二、 英文部分
Baxter Mogolda,M.B.(1992). Knowing and reasoning in collage:Gender-releated patterns in students intellectual development,San Francisco:Jossey -Bass。
Baxter Mogolda,M.B.(2004).Evolution of a conatructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection.Educational psychologist,39(1),31-42.
Bendixen,L.D.(2002).A process model of epistemic belief change.in B.K.Hofer& P.R.Pintrich(Eds),Pesonal epistemology.The Psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp.191-208).Mahwah,N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum..
Bendixen,L.D.,& Rule ,D.C.(2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology:A guiding model .Educational Psychologist,39(1),69-80.
Boyes,M.,& Chandler ,M.J.(1992).Cognitive delopment ,Epistemic doubt ,and identity formation in adolescence .Journal of Youth and Adolescence,21(3),227-304.
Bryson,M.(1993).School-based epistemologies :Exploring conceptions of how ,what,and why student know .Learing Disability Quarterly,16,299-313.
Buerk,D.(1985).The voice of women making meaning in mathematics..Journal of Education,167(8),59-70.
Chinn,CA.,& Brewer,W. F.(1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquistion:A theoretical framework and implications for science education . Review of educational research,63(1),1-49.
Corno,L.(1986).The metacognitive control components of self-regulated learning comtemporary educational . Psychology,11,333-346.
Dweck,C.S.,& Leggett,E. L.(1988).A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review ,95(2),256-273.
Dweck,C.& Bempechat,J.(1983).Children,s theories of intelligence:Implications for learning.In S. Paris.G. Olson ,H..Steven(Eds),Learning and motivation in the classroom(pp.239-256).Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum..
Flavell,J.H.,& Wellman,H.M.(1977).Metamemory.In K.Hogan,Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition.Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Hofer,B.K.(2004a).Introduction :Paradigmatic approachs to Personal epistemology. Educational Psychologist ,39(1),1-3.
Hofer,B.K.(2004b).Epistemological understanding as a meta-cognitive process :Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist ,39(1),43-55.
Hofer,B.K.(2004c).Exploring the dimentions of Personal epistemology in differing classroom context:Student interpretations during the firswt year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology 29(2),129-163.
Hofer,B.K.,& Pintrich P.R.(1997).The development of epistemological theories:Belief about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning . Review of Educational Research,67(1),88-140.
Jehng,J.J.,Johnson,S.D.and Anderson ,R.C.(1993).Schooling and students epistemological beliefs about learning .Contemporary Educational Psychology.18,23-35.
Johnson.D.W.& Johnson.R.T.(1989).Toward a cooperative effort:A response to Slavin.Educational leadership,46(7),80-81.
Kardash,C.M.,& Scholes ,R.J.(1996).Effects of preexisting beliefs,and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology,88(2),260-271.
King,P.M.,& Kitchener.K.S.(1994). Developing reflective judgement:Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical think in adolescents and adult.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
King,P.M.,& Kitchener.K.S.(2002). The reflective judgement model:Twenty years of research on epistemic cognition. In B.K Hofer& P.R Pintrich (Eds),Personal epistemology:The Psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp.37-61).Mahwah,Nj:Lawrence Erlbaum..
Kitchener,K.S.,&King, P.M.(1981). Reflective judgement:Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psycology,2,89-116.
Kitchener,K.S.(1983).Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition:A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222-232.
Kuhn,D.(1991).The skill for argument .Cambridge ,England:Cambridge university Press.
Kuhn,D.,Cheney,R.,& Weinstock,M.(2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development,15,309-328.
Lampert,M.(1990).When the problem is not the question and solution is not the answer :Mathematical knowing and teaching. .American Educational Research Journal,27(1),29-63.
Paulsen,M.B.,&Wells,C.(1998).Domain difference in the epistemological belief of college students.Research in Higher education ,39(4),365-384.
Perry,W.G.Jr.(1970).Forms intellectual and ethical development in the college years:A scheme.Holt ,New York:Rienhart &Winston.
Piaget,J.(1970).Genetic Epistemology. New York:Columbia University.
Ryan,M.P.(1984).Monitoring text comprehension:individual differences in epistemological stqandards.Journal of Educational Psychology ,76(2),248-258.
Schoenfeld,A.h.(1983)Beyond the purely cognitive :Beliefs systems, social cognitions,and mrtacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance.Cognitive Science,7,329-363.
Schoenfeld,A.h.(1985).Mathematical problem solving. New York:Academic Press.
Schommer,M.(1990).Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehensive . Journal of Educational Psychology,82(3),498-504.
Schommer,M.(1993a).Comparison of beliefs about the nature of knowledge and learning among postsecondary students.Research in Higher Education,34(3),355-369.
Schommer,M.(1993b). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology,85(3),406-411.
Schommer,M.&Dunnell,P.A.(1997). Epistemological beliefs of gifted high school students.Roeper Review,19(3),153-156.
Schommer-Aikins,M.(2004).Explaining the epistemological belief system.:Intraducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach . Educational Psychologist,39(1),19-29.
Schraw,C.,Bendixen,L.d.,Dunkle,M.E.(2002).Development and Validation of the epistemic belief inventory (EBI). In B.K Hofer& P.R Pintrich (Eds),Personal epistemology:The Psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp.261-275).Mahwah,Nj:Lawrence Erlbaum..
Slavin,R.E.(1990).Cooperative learning :Theory and research and practice .N.J.:Prentice –Hall.
Slavin,R.E.(1995). Cooperative learning :Theory and research and practice (2 nd ed).N.J.:Prentice –Hall.
Slavin,R.E.(1996). Research on cooperative learning and achivement:What we know,what we need to know .Comtenporary Educational Psychology,21,43-69.
Wood,P.,& Lynch,C.(1998).Using guided essays to assess and courage reflective thinking .Assessment Update,10,14-15.
Von Glasserfeld Ernst(1995). A constructivist approach to teaching inHussen,T&Postlewaite,N.(eds.)approachtoteachinginHussen,T&Postlewaite,N.(eds.)Constuctivism in education,pp.3-16.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.
Von Glasserfeld Ernst(1995).Radical constructivism :A way of knowing and learning.Washington,D.C.:The farmer press.
Weinstein,C.E.,& Underwood V.L(1985).Learning stratgies:The how of learning.

QR CODE